Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 6.01 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 6.01 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 6.01

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION
Chapter 6
ADMISSION INTO UNION; CONCESSIONS; STATE BOUNDARIES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 6.01
6.01 Assent to terms of admission into the union.The State of Florida assents as by the statute approved July 25, 1845, to the terms of admission of this state into the Confederacy and Union of the United States, and to the provisions of the Acts of Congress respecting the public lands of the United States in this state.
History.s. 1, ch. 14, 1845; RS 6; GS 4; RGS 4; CGL 4.

F.S. 6.01 on Google Scholar

F.S. 6.01 on Casetext

Amendments to 6.01


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 6.01
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 6.01.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

MOODY, v. UNITED STATES,, 931 F.3d 1136 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . This approach is also consistent with the Restatement (Third) of Agency § 6.01 (Am. . . .

GOLAN v. FREEEATS. COM, INC. AIC LLC, R., 930 F.3d 950 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Restatement (Third) Of Agency §§ 1.01, 6.01. Thus, to the extent Dr. . . .

UNITED STATES v. PAULING, a k a JJ,, 924 F.3d 649 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Sand et al., Modern Federal Jury Instructions § 6.01 (2011) ("The process of drawing inferences from . . . Martinez , 54 F.3d 1040, 1043 (2d Cir. 1995) ; see also Sand et al., supra , § 6.01 ("[W]hether based . . .

IN RE BOON GLOBAL LIMITED v. a, 923 F.3d 643 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Restatement (Third) of Agency § 6.01, rep. n.2 (Am. Law Inst. 2003); Forsythe v. . . .

TINGZI WANG, v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, 375 F. Supp. 3d 22 (D.D.C. 2019)

. . . Upon the event of a sale under Section 6.01, the "book value" of the shares sold is calculated "30 days . . . Because Sections 6.01 and 6.11 of the Agreement provided Wang "the option to withdraw and/or sell back . . . Unlike "the facts under Matter of Izzumi ," on which USCIS relied, Wang argued that Section 6.01 was . . . explained to Wang in the RFE, it determined that Wang's investment was not "at risk" because Section 6.01 . . . And because Section 6.01 only permits him to sell his shares at their "book value"-which would fluctuate . . .

CVS PHARMACY, INC. Rx, LLC, v. PRESS AMERICA, INC., 377 F. Supp. 3d 359 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Business Associate Agreement § 6.01. This language refers to the reimbursement of attorneys' fees. . . .

WALGREEN CO. v. JOHNSON JOHNSON,, 375 F. Supp. 3d 616 (E.D. Pa. 2019)

. . . New Jersey law, applying the Restatement (Third) of Agency § 6.01, has held that a "principal will be . . . Restat 3d of Agency, § 6.01 Cmt b (3rd 2006). . . .

IN RE ENERGY FUTURE HOLDINGS CORP., 593 B.R. 217 (Bankr. Del. 2018)

. . . (See, e.g., PAB-X439, Tax Matters Agreement, dated Aug. 16, 2016, at § 6.01(b); 9/2/2018 Husnick Written . . .

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION, v. ANGLOGOLD ASHANTI LIMITED, USA M., 344 F. Supp. 3d 724 (S.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . . ¶¶ 3, 67, 69; SPA § 6.01(b). . . .

CITY OF NEW YORK, v. TAVERN ON THE GREEN INTERNATIONAL LLC,, 351 F. Supp. 3d 680 (S.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . (See, e.g. , Use Agreement § 6.01.) . . .

DEFINITIVE MARINE SURVEYS INC. v. TRAN, A. T. a A. T. a, 339 F. Supp. 3d 1292 (M.D. Fla. 2018)

. . . . § 636(b) and Local Rule 6.01(b) for a report and recommendation on a resolution. Doc. 19. I. . . .

SEATTLE TIMES COMPANY, v. LEATHERCARE, INC. v. SLU LLC TB TS RELP LLC,, 337 F. Supp. 3d 999 (W.D. Wash. 2018)

. . . per ton for PCE-contaminated material sent by rail to the Roosevelt or Arlington facilities; (ii) $6.01 . . . With regard to the CTI markups for trucking PCE-contaminated soil to Wenatchee ($6.01/ton) and for transporting . . .

PARADA v. ANOKA COUNTY, 332 F. Supp. 3d 1229 (D. Minn. 2018)

. . . Parada was driving without a license, (2) the arrest violated Minnesota Rule of Criminal Procedure 6.01 . . . Rule 6.01 requires officers, in misdemeanor cases, to issue a citation and release the defendant unless . . . P. 6.01(a). Taking Parada's allegations as true, Oman violated Rule 6.01. . . . Court's only concern is whether Oman had probable cause to arrest Parada; whether Oman violated Rule 6.01 . . . And while Parada cannot use Rule 6.01 to establish a Fourth Amendment violation, the Rule is evidence . . .

AGILITY LOGISTICS SERVICES COMPANY KSC, v. N. MATTIS, T., 887 F.3d 1143 (Fed. Cir. 2018)

. . . Restatement (Third) of Agency § 6.01 cmt. b (Am. Law Inst. 2006). . . .

IN RE OAKHURST LODGE, INC., 582 B.R. 784 (Bankr. E.D. Cal. 2018)

. . . creditors are referenced in the Debtor’s Combined Disclosure Statement and Plan of Reorganization §§ 6.01 . . .

FIXED INCOME SHARES SERIES M, v. CITIBANK N. A., 314 F. Supp. 3d 552 (S.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . (See Indenture § 6.01(b)(i) ("Trustee undertakes to perform such duties and only such duties as are specifically . . . (Indenture § 6.01(a) ). (Federal law imposes a similar duty. . . . (Id. § 6.01(i) ). . . .

IN RE FRONTIER INSURANCE GROUP, INC. LLC, v. LLC,, 585 B.R. 685 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . 7 (definition of "Assets" and "Estate") and 11 (definition of "Trust Assets") and Article IV and §§ 6.01 . . . identifies -and the Disclosure Statement's description of the Plan is consistent with Article IV, §§ 6.01 . . . IV and §§ 6.01(h) and 11.01, Liquidator Tr. Ex. 29. Liquidator Trial Ex. 1. Liquidator Trial Ex. 2. . . . Id. § 6.01(h). Id. at 11; Art. IV. Id. at 11. Disclosure Statement at 19, IV.E.1, Liquidator's Tr. . . .

IN RE N. PETERSON,, 581 B.R. 789 (Bankr. D. Md. 2018)

. . . Declaration, § 6.01 (emphasis added). . . . The Declaration provides that ''[t]he lien on each Unit Ownership provided for in Section 6.01 for assessments . . .

ARCTIC CAT INC. v. BOMBARDIER RECREATIONAL PRODUCTS INC. BRP U. S., 876 F.3d 1350 (Fed. Cir. 2017)

. . . J.A. 7833 § 6.01. . . .

IN RE OI BRASIL HOLDINGS CO PERATIEF U. A. a In Oi Co U. A. a In Oi S. A. a, 578 B.R. 169 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2017)

. . . TX 15 § 6.01(9) (emphasis added). . . . TX 15 § 6.01(9) (emphasis added). . . . See TX 17 § 6.01(8) (“any event ... under the laws of Brazil or any political subdivision thereof [that . . .

In MATTER OF MPM SILICONES, L. L. C. LLC, Ad v. BOKF, NA, N. A. U. S. v. FSB, Ad LLC,, 874 F.3d 787 (2d Cir. 2017)

. . . Pursuant to Section 6.01(g), one such event is MPM’s filing of a voluntary bankruptcy petition. . . . Section 6.02 provides: "If an Event of Default specified in Section 6.01(f) or (g) with respect to MPM . . .

In MATTER OF MPM SILICONES, L. L. C. LLC, Ad v. BOKF, NA, N. A. U. S. v. FSB, Ad LLC,, 874 F.3d 787 (2d Cir. 2017)

. . . Pursuant to Section 6.01(g), one such event is MPM’s filing of a voluntary bankruptcy petition. . . . Section 6,02 provides; "If an Event of Default specified in Section 6.01(f) or (g) with respect to MPM . . .

THOMAS D. PHILIPSBORN IRREVOCABLE INSURANCE TRUST, v. AVON CAPITAL, LLC,, 699 F. App'x 550 (7th Cir. 2017)

. . . (The current provisions on this subject are Restatement (Third) of Agency §§ 6.01 and 7.01 (2006).) . . .

CUMMINGS, Jr. v. CITY OF NEW YORK s E., 302 F. Supp. 3d 511 (S.D.N.Y. 2017)

. . . II, § 6.01(A) ("ACS may obtain an insurance package from the New York City Centralized Insurance Program . . . Id. § 6.01(C). . . . II, §§ 5.03(B), 6.01. . . .

E. DOWLING, v. PENSION PLAN FOR SALARIED EMPLOYEES OF UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION AND AFFILIATES A. Co, 871 F.3d 239 (3d Cir. 2017)

. . . Compare Plan § 4.02(a), App. 155 (laying out the “General Rule” for “Credited Service”), and Plan § 6.01 . . .

DAVENPORT CHESTER, LLC, v. ABRAMS PROPERTIES, INC, 870 F.3d 852 (8th Cir. 2017)

. . . on proper interpretation of the following provisions in the forty-five-page lease agreement: Section 6.01 . . .

CITY OF EL CENIZO, v. STATE, 264 F. Supp. 3d 744 (W.D. Tex. 2017)

. . . These challenges are directed against language in Sections 1.01, 2.01, 5.02, and 6.01 of SB 4, Tex. . . . Defendants also argue that the immigration inquiry provision. of SB 4, Section 6.01, does not violate . . . , “inquiring into the immigration status of a person under a lawful detention or arrest[,]” Section 6.01 . . . First, Section 6.01 provides that such questioning is permitted only when “the officer determines that . . . Sections 1.01 and 6.01, Tex. Gov’t Code § 752.053(b) and Tex. Crim. Proc. Code Art. 2.13). . . . .

IN RE WTE- S S AG ENTERPRISES, LLC, WTE- S S Ag LLC, v. GHD, n k a DVO,, 575 B.R. 397 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2017)

. . . Section 6.01(A) states “[t]he standard of care for Design Professional Services performed or furnished . . .

HENSEL PHELPS CONSTRUCTION CO. v. COOPER CARRY INC., 861 F.3d 267 (D.C. Cir. 2017)

. . . Agreement Art. 6.01, J.A. 27. . . . initial Agreement, the terms “claim, judgment, lawsuit, damage, liability, and costs and expenses,” Art. 6.01 . . .

WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, a AEGCO AEGCO AEGCO I M I M I M v. AEP GENERATING COMPANY,, 859 F.3d 365 (6th Cir. 2017)

. . . First, Section 6.01(j) of the Participation Agreement broadly prohibits AEP from “tak[ing] any action . . . purposes: (1) breach of the Facility Lease by imposing an impermissible Lien; (2) breach of Section 6.01 . . . Its reasoning in doing so served as the foundation for dismissing the Section 6.01(j) claim. . . . Second, the owners sought partial summary judgment below on their Section 6.01(j) claim, requesting the . . . (as the district court did) on whether Section 7’s Permitted Lien provision conflicts with Section 6.01 . . .

KERPEN, v. METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON AIRPORTS AUTHORITY,, 260 F. Supp. 3d 567 (E.D. Va. 2017)

. . . Exh. 5 [Dkt. 93-5] § 6.01. . . .

S. HENDERSON, v. BUNTING,, 698 F. App'x 244 (6th Cir. 2017)

. . . R. 6.01(A)(1). . . .

IN RE A. GRAL, A. LLC, v., 572 B.R. 709 (Bankr. E.D. Wis. 2017)

. . . See Restatement (Third) of Agency § 6.01 (Am. Law Inst. 2006). . . .

LAKE, v. FLAGG, 319 F.R.D. 252 (S.D. Ill. 2017)

. . . The Court also noted that the Seventh Circuit Pattern Instruction, at the time labeled 6.01 and 6.02 . . . See Committee Comments to Seventh Circuit Pattern Civil Jury Instruction 6.01 and 6.02. . . .

UNITED STATES v. HILLIARD,, 851 F.3d 768 (7th Cir. 2017)

. . . Elements of Entrapment (Pattern Instruction 6.01) “Entrapment is a defense to criminal liability when . . .

BURTON, v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SYSTEM,, 851 F.3d 690 (7th Cir. 2017)

. . . Code UWS § 6.01, asking for a formal letter of reprimand. . . .

STEWART, v. SBE ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, LLC, d b a LV LLC,, 239 F. Supp. 3d 1235 (D. Nev. 2017)

. . . ECF No. 39-14 (citing a violation of Article 6, Section 6.01(b) of the CBA). . ECF No. 39-34. . . . .

IN RE CITY HOMES III LLC, LLC, LLC, LLC, LLC, LLC, II LLC, LLC, LLC,, 564 B.R. 827 (Bankr. D. Md. 2017)

. . . pointed out that CHI has a duty to indemnify certain persons (directors, officers, employees) per Section 6.01 . . . Beyond that, Article 6.01 of CHI’s By-laws cannot withstand the vast weight of the Plan Proponent’s failure . . .

IN RE XTREME POWER INC. Jr. v. H. III SAIL LLC,, 563 B.R. 614 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. 2016)

. . . See Second Amended Plan ¶¶ 6.01-6.07 (case no. 14-10096, dkt# 897). . . . See Second Amended Plan ¶¶ 1.29, 6.01, 6.03 (case no. 14-10096, dkt# 897). . . .

UNITED STATES v. CLARKE,, 842 F.3d 288 (4th Cir. 2016)

. . . court considered the Virginia Department of State Police’s inventory search policy, General Order OPR 6.01 . . .

IN RE ENERGY FUTURE HOLDINGS CORP. a k a TXU a k a TXU a k a f k a CSC v. LLC EFIH Ad EFIH In a k a TXU a k a TXU a k a NA v. LLC EFIH, 842 F.3d 247 (3d Cir. 2016)

. . . . §' 6.01 (defining bankruptcy as an event of default)., Any duty to pay the make-whole comes from § . . .

IN RE ENERGY FUTURE HOLDINGS CORP. a k a TXU a k a TXU a k a f k a CSC v. LLC EFIH Ad EFIH In a k a TXU a k a TXU a k a NA v. LLC EFIH, 842 F.3d 247 (3d Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 6.01 (defining bankruptcy as an event of default). . . .

HENSEL PHELPS CONSTRUCTION CO. v. COOPER CARRY, INC., 210 F. Supp. 3d 192 (D.D.C. 2016)

. . . Ex. 1, § 6.01. . . .

MAPP v. UMG RECORDINGS, INC., 208 F. Supp. 3d 776 (M.D. La. 2016)

. . . Taylor, 945 F.2d 500, 505 (2d Cir.1991) (citing 1 Nimmer on Copyright § 6.01 (1991)). . . .

IN RE L. MELO, a LLC M Z LLC, v. L., 558 B.R. 521 (Bankr. D. Mass. 2016)

. . . Section 6.01 of the Memoza Operating Agreement, entitled “Management of the LLC” provided that, except . . .

GILMORE, v. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS, 837 F.3d 827 (8th Cir. 2016)

. . . Whether the officers’ continued detention of Gilmore pursuant to Minnesota Rule of Criminal Procedure 6.01 . . . Rule 6.01 requires that an arresting officer in misdemeanor cases, proceeding without a warrant, “must . . . P. 6.01. . . . In contrast to the officers’ obligations under Rule 6.01, section 629.36 provides: “When a bystander . . . The combination of this statute and Rule 6.01 creates potentially odd results: identical misdemeanor . . .

IN RE SANCHEZ, K. v. A., 557 B.R. 264 (Bankr. D.R.I. 2016)

. . . Collier on Bankruptcy P 6.01 (Alan N. Resnick & Henry J. Sommers eds., 16th ed.) . . . efficiency and integrity of the bankruptcy system .... ” Id. at 323; See also Collier on Bankruptcy P 6.01 . . .

UNITED STATES v. A. WALDMAN,, 835 F.3d 751 (7th Cir. 2016)

. . . See Pattern Criminal Jury Instructions of the Seventh Circuit 6.01 at 85 (2012). . . .

IN RE D. HAWK, D. v. S., 556 B.R. 788 (S.D. Tex. 2016)

. . . Kelley, Ginsberg & Martin on Bankruptcy § 6.01 (Substantive Exemption Rights)(Aspen Publishers 2016)( . . .

IN RE ADKINS SUPPLY, INC. v. L. T. Jr., 556 B.R. 285 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2016)

. . . . ¶ 6.01. • Part of the scheme was to invest fractional interests in Adkins’s wells and to not record . . .

WITT M. v. NATION- WIDE HORSE TRANSPORTATION, INC., 197 F. Supp. 3d 1146 (S.D. Iowa 2016)

. . . Restatement (Third) of Agency § 6.01(a) (emphasis added). . . .

UNITED STATES v. CARPENTER, 190 F. Supp. 3d 260 (D. Conn. 2016)

. . . In that interval, a new sentence was added to Section 6.01 of the COT Declaration1 of Trust, which deals . . .

IN RE ENERGY FUTURE HOLDINGS CORP. v. N. A., 551 B.R. 550 (Bankr. D. Del. 2016)

. . . Under section 6.02, “in the case of an Event of Default arising under clause (6) or (7) of Section 6.01 . . . Here, EFIH’s filing for bankruptcy was an Event of Default arising under clause (6) of Section 6.01(a . . .

BURTON, v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SYSTEM,, 171 F. Supp. 3d 830 (W.D. Wis. 2016)

. . . Code UWS § 6.01. . . . causal connection between her charge and later lawsuit and dean Throop’s letter of direction and § 6.01 . . . Throop attached some of the pertinent correspondence to the § 6.01 complaint, and. she also referred . . . Code UWS§ 6.01. . Burton does not explicitly forgo the indirect method. . . .

KEOKUK GLYCERIN, LLC v. MIDWEST LABORATORIES, INC., 241 F. Supp. 3d 887 (S.D. Iowa 2016)

. . . Restatement (Third) Of Agency § 6.01 (2006). Mr. . . .

BLACKROCK CORE BOND PORTFOLIO, v. U. S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,, 165 F. Supp. 3d 80 (S.D.N.Y. 2016)

. . . (Ick_ § 6.01(e)(iv).) . . . For instance, the Bayview 2005-A Indenture contains the following provision: Section 6.01. . . . B § 6.01.) At least 20 other Indentures include substantially identical language. (Am. Compl. . . . T § 6.01, at 37.) . . . O § 6.01(a). . . .

DAVIS, v. VALSAMIS, INC., 181 F. Supp. 3d 420 (S.D. Tex. 2016)

. . . . ¶¶ 6.01-6.16. . . .

NARANJO, v. THOMPSON GEO, 809 F.3d 793 (5th Cir. 2015)

. . . Profl Conduct 6.01. . . . Prof'l Conduct 6.01; see also La. R. Prof’l Conduct 6.2; Miss. R. Prof'l Conduct 6.2. . Cf. U.S. . . .

IN RE KING, v., 541 B.R. 404 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2015)

. . . Pl.’s Ex. 2, ¶¶ 1.01, 3.01, 6.01, and Ex. A to the Company Agreement. . . . responsibilities in accordance with the parties’ respective Percentage Interests (as called for by ¶ 6.01 . . . Management (under ¶ 6.01© of the Company Agreement) is allowed to determine distributions of cash to . . .

IN RE ENERGY FUTURE HOLDINGS CORP., 540 B.R. 96 (Bankr. D. Del. 2015)

. . . [I]n the case of an Event of Default arising under clause (6) or (7) of Section 6.01(a) hereof, all principal . . . Section 6.01(a) of the PIK Indenture defines “Event of Default” and includes at subsections (6) and ( . . . language is bolded): [I]n the case of an Event of Default arising under clause (6) or (7) of Section 6.01 . . . language in the Momentive’s indenture was as follows: “ ‘If an Event of Default specified in Section 6.01 . . . PIK Indenture § 6.01(a)(6)(i). . PIK Indenture § 6.02 (emphasis added). . PIK Indenture § 3.03. . . . .

IN RE ENERGY FUTURE HOLDINGS CORP. N. A. v. LLC EFIH, 539 B.R. 723 (Bankr. D. Del. 2015)

. . . language is bold-ed): [I]n the case of an Event of Default arising under clause (6) or (7) of Section 6.01 . . . language in the Momentive’s indenture was as follows: “ ‘If an Event of Default specified in Section 6.01 . . .

CROWE, v. EXAMWORKS, INC., 136 F. Supp. 3d 16 (D. Mass. 2015)

. . . Code Regs. 6.01 et seq., which are the primary regulations governing utilization review. . . .

OMEGAGENESIS CORPORATION, v. MAYO FOUNDATION FOR MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH,, 132 F. Supp. 3d 1119 (D. Minn. 2015)

. . . . §§ 1.09, 1.12, 5.01, 6.01. . . . A. § 6.01. . . .

FIXED INCOME SHARES SERIES M, v. CITIBANK N. A., 130 F. Supp. 3d 842 (S.D.N.Y. 2015)

. . . (Sample PSA § 8.01; see also Sample Indenture § 6.01). . . .

SHAULIS, v. NORDSTROM INC. d b a, 120 F. Supp. 3d 40 (D. Mass. 2015)

. . . Code Regs. 6.01, an advertisement is defined as including a “representation-1.. printed on or contained . . . Code Regs. 6.01. . . .

IN RE ENERGY FUTURE HOLDINGS CORP. v. LLC, 533 B.R. 106 (Bankr. D. Del. 2015)

. . . ) waive each and every Default that would otherwise constitute a Default pursuant to either section 6.01 . . . (a)(6) or section 6.01(a)(7) of the Indenture (each such Default, individually, a ‘Bankruptcy Default . . .

ROYAL PARK INVESTMENTS SA NV, v. HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, FI v. HSBC USA, SF v. HSBC USA,, 109 F. Supp. 3d 587 (S.D.N.Y. 2015)

. . . .:. ” Section 6.01(a) of the same Indenture then states that “[i]f an Event of Default has occurred and . . .

In MPM SILICONES, LLC, U. S. v. FSB, USA I LLC, II LLC, III LLC, IV LLC, MPM LLC, SPV In MPM LLC, BOKF, NA, MPM LLC MPM v. USA. I LLC, II LLC, III LLC, IV LLC, MPM LLC, SPV, 531 B.R. 321 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2015)

. . . Cl, §§ 6.01(f), 6.02). . . . Cl, §§ 6.01(f), 6.02). . . . Section 6.01(f) of the 2012 Indentures provides that the commencement of a Chapter 11 proceeding is an . . . See 2012 Indentures § 6.01(f) (“An ‘Event of Default’ occurs if ... the Company or any Significant Subsidiary . . . If an Event of Default specified in Section 6.01(f) ... occurs, the principal of, premium, if any, and . . .

MILBY, v. LIBERTY LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF BOSTON,, 102 F. Supp. 3d 922 (W.D. Ky. 2015)

. . . VI, §§ 6.01(A), 6.03.) . . .

F. SANFORD, U. v. TIAA- CREF INDIVIDUAL INSTITUTIONAL SERVICES, LLC,, 612 F. App'x 17 (2d Cir. 2015)

. . . See Restatement (Third) of Agency § 6.01 cmt. b (2006) (“An agent has power to make contracts on behalf . . .

LUITPOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. ED. GEISTLICH S HNE A. G. F R CHEMISCHE INDUSTRIE,, 784 F.3d 78 (2d Cir. 2015)

. . . . ¶ 6.01. . . . The court focused on paragraphs 6.01 to 6.04 of the respective agreements, and concluded that “[t]here . . . Paragraph 6.01 provides that “the entire right, title and interest in and to [the] TRADEMARKS shah remain . . . the property of LICENSOR during the term hereof.” 1994 and 1998 License Agreements ¶ 6.01. . . .

IN RE ENERGY FUTURE HOLDINGS CORP. v. LLC EFIH, 527 B.R. 178 (Bankr. D. Del. 2015)

. . . default for the commencement of “proceeding to be adjudicated bankrupt or insolvent” under section 6.01 . . . Section 6.01 defines the various Events of Default and, relevant here, sections 6.01(a)(6) and (a)(7) . . . (Id. § 6.01(a)(6)(i).) 20. . . . Here, EFIH’s filing for bankruptcy was an Event of Default arising under clause (6) of Section 6.01(a . . . (Indenture § 6.01(a)(1) (emphasis added).) • “The due and punctual payment of the principal, premium, . . .

In SKYPORT GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. v. v., 528 B.R. 297 (S.D. Tex. 2015)

. . . Schermerhorn Parties rely is merely the Court’s observation that “the Uniform Commercial Code, Article 5069-6.01 . . .

ZEYER, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION,, 98 F. Supp. 3d 425 (D. Conn. 2015)

. . . interest in continued employment in the 0.45 FTE position, which arises from a provision in Section 6.01 . . . understood the 2007 Agreement to create a separate 0.45 FTE salaried position protected by Section 6.01 . . . of the CBA and whether the term “discharge” in Section 6.01 encompasses a scenario in which an employee . . . FTE position, the 2007 Agreement effectively provided Zeyer with a contractual right under Section 6.01 . . . alleged the existence of any express provision of a contract with the defendants, other than Section 6.01 . . .

ROUNDTREE, v. BUSH ROSS, P. A., 304 F.R.D. 644 (M.D. Fla. 2015)

. . . R. 6.01. . . . .

AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY, a v. WEAVER AGGREGATE TRANSPORT, INC., 84 F. Supp. 3d 1314 (M.D. Fla. 2015)

. . . Local Rule 6.01(c)(19), M.D. . . .

KIRBY, v. HEALTH CARE SERVICE CORP., 88 F. Supp. 3d 717 (W.D. Tex. 2015)

. . . . ¶ 6.01. . . .

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE WORKERS, AFL- CIO, LOCAL LODGE NO. v. VERSO PAPER CORP., 80 F. Supp. 3d 247 (D. Me. 2015)

. . . (citing MIPA §§ 8.01, 6.01(e)). . . .

GEDEK, v. M. PEREZ, W. v. M. v. M. v. M. J. a v. v. E. v., 66 F. Supp. 3d 368 (W.D.N.Y. 2014)

. . . B, § 6.01. . . .

GILMAN, v. L. WALTERS, 61 F. Supp. 3d 794 (S.D. Ind. 2014)

. . . This conclusion is consistent with Section 6.01 of the Restatement (Third) of Agency, which provides: . . .

TOTO, INC. v. SONY MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT,, 60 F. Supp. 3d 407 (S.D.N.Y. 2014)

. . . . ¶¶ 6.01-6.04., 9.01-9.07.) . . .

A. GOODREAU, v. E. KEPLER,, 518 B.R. 522 (W.D. Wis. 2014)

. . . Martin, Ginsberg & Martin on Bankruptcy § 6.01[A] (6th ed. 2012) (exemptions liberally construed to protect . . .

NIEBAUER, v. CRANE CO. INC. Co., 44 F. Supp. 3d 147 (D. Mass. 2014)

. . . (Id. at 8, § 6.01.) . . . (Plan 8, § 6.01 (“It shall be the duty of the Plan Administrator, on the basis of information supplied . . .

In CORRLINE INTERNATIONAL, LLC,, 516 B.R. 106 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 2014)

. . . Section 6.01(a) of the JV Agreement provides that “the powers of the [CorrL-ine] shall be exercised by . . . Section 6.01 of the JV Agreement instills CorrLine managers with the power to make business decisions . . .

IN RE ENERGY FUTURE HOLDINGS CORP. CSC v. LLC EFIH, 513 B.R. 651 (Bankr. D. Del. 2014)

. . . The EFIH Debtors first cite to § 6.01(a) of the contract, in which the term “Event of Default” is defined . . .

IN RE LIGHTSQUARED INC. LP, TMI GP ATC LLC, LLC, v. SP LLC, DISH W., 511 B.R. 253 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2014)

. . . (Id. at HARBAP00004110, § 6.01(3).) . . .

Dr. A. GUTTENBERG, v. Dr. W. EMERY,, 41 F. Supp. 3d 61 (D.C. Cir. 2014)

. . . See, e.g., Restatement (Third) of Agency § 6.01 (2006) (agent making contract on behalf of disclosed . . .

In BORGES, B. J M R. J M AG FCS, ACA, AG FCS, FLCA, AG FCS, PCA, v. a a a a LLC, a CWBC, a In B. J M R. J M v. AG FCS, PCA, AG FCS, FLCA, AG FCS, ACA, In B. J M R. J M v. AG FCS, ACA, AG FCS, PCA, AG FCS, FLCA,, 510 B.R. 306 (B.A.P. 10th Cir. 2014)

. . . , AGNM informed Maria that it was raising the interest rate on the Cow Note from 3.55% per annum to 6.01% . . .

WHR GROUP, INC. d b a LLC, v. UNITED STATES LLC, TRC, 115 Fed. Cl. 386 (Fed. Cl. 2014)

. . . . § 3301; 48 C.F.R. 6.01, 8.405-6. . . .

HARRIS, v. CITY OF BALCH SPRINGS, Z. B. E., 9 F. Supp. 3d 690 (N.D. Tex. 2014)

. . . This claim is set forth as follows in Plaintiffs Complaint: 6.01 Plaintiff incorporates the foregoing . . . Compl. ¶¶ 6.01-6.07. . . .

DAVIS, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 11 F. Supp. 3d 1154 (M.D. Fla. 2014)

. . . See also Local Rule 6.01(c)(21). . . . .

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF IBT LOCAL PENSION FUND, v. C S WHOLESALE GROCERS INC. WOODBRIDGE LOGISTICS LLC,, 5 F. Supp. 3d 707 (D.N.J. 2014)

. . . VI, Sec. 6.01, ECF No. 35-3). . . .

TJGEM LLC, v. REPUBLIC OF GHANA,, 26 F. Supp. 3d 1 (D.D.C. 2013)

. . . Jacob, 840 F.Supp.2d 287, 291 (D.D.C.2012); see also Restatement (Third) of Agency § 6.01, cmt. b. . . .

LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS, INC. v. GATEWAY FUNDING DIVERSIFIED MORTGAGE SERVICES, L. P., 989 F. Supp. 2d 411 (E.D. Pa. 2013)

. . . Pl.’s Ex. 6 at § 6.01(a). Pasceri asked for this provision and Arlington complied with it. . . . Pl.’s Ex. 6 at § 6.01(a). . . .

MANUFACTURERS AND TRADERS TRUST COMPANY, v. MINUTEMAN SPILL RESPONSE, INC. L. P. BPK LLC, LLC, BPK B, 999 F. Supp. 2d 805 (W.D. Pa. 2013)

. . . Ex. 3 at § 6.01(n); Pl. Ex. 2B at ¶ 3.5; Pl. Ex. 2H at § 3(d); Pl. . . .

STUEVE BROS. FARMS, LLC, v. UNITED STATES,, 737 F.3d 750 (Fed. Cir. 2013)

. . . Sackman, Nichols on Eminent Domain § 6.01[15] (3d ed.2013); City of Buffalo v. J.W. . . .

STUEVE BROS. FARMS, LLC, v. UNITED STATES,, 737 F.3d 750 (Fed. Cir. 2013)

. . . Saekman, Nichols on Eminent Domain § 6.01[15] (3d ed.2013); City of Buffalo v. J.W. . . .

FOX, Jr. v. MCCORMICK,, 20 F. Supp. 3d 133 (D.D.C. 2013)

. . . See Trustees’ Mot. to Dismiss, Ex. 2 (Plan of Benefits) [Dkt. 7-3] § 6.01 (showing eleven adjustments . . .

VERSATILE HELICOPTERS, INC. v. CITY OF COLUMBUS, OHIO,, 548 F. App'x 337 (6th Cir. 2013)

. . . (citing 2 Restatement (Third) of Agenoy, §§ 6.01 and 6.02). . . . subject the principal to liability on a contract made by an agent. 2 Restatement (Third) of Agenoy § 6.01 . . .