Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 6.03 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 6.03 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 6.03

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION
Chapter 6
ADMISSION INTO UNION; CONCESSIONS; STATE BOUNDARIES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 6.03
6.03 Condemnation of land when price not agreed upon.If the officer or other agent employed by the United States to make such purchase and the owner of the land contemplated to be purchased, as aforesaid, cannot agree for the sale and purchase thereof, the same may be acquired by the United States by condemnation in the same manner as is hereinafter provided for condemnation of lands for other public purposes, and any officer or agent authorized by the United States may institute and conduct such proceedings in their behalf.
History.s. 2, ch. 25, 1845; RS 8; GS 6; RGS 6; CGL 6.

F.S. 6.03 on Google Scholar

F.S. 6.03 on Casetext

Amendments to 6.03


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 6.03
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 6.03.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

ALLEN, v. LILLY EXTENDED DISABILITY PLAN,, 379 F. Supp. 3d 743 (S.D. Ind. 2019)

. . . Section 6.03(a) of the Plan says that the Benefits Committee "shall have the discretion to construe the . . . The Plan continues in § 6.03(b): The Employee Benefits Committee shall have the discretion to make any . . . Section 6.03 states "[t]he Employee Benefits Committee may review its prior determination from time to . . .

AESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE BREAST CENTER, LLC, v. UNITED HEALTHCARE GROUP, INC., 367 F. Supp. 3d 1 (D. Conn. 2019)

. . . . § 6.03[9] (2018). . . .

WORLD FUEL SERVICES, INC. v. NAMBE PUEBLO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,, 362 F. Supp. 3d 1021 (D.N.M. 2019)

. . . No numbered section headings appear on page 5, but page 6 begins with § 6.03. . . .

OLIVER, v. JOHANSON DB LLC,, 357 F. Supp. 3d 758 (W.D. Ark. 2018)

. . . Nimmer on Copyright § 6.03. . . . Mo. 1991) (quoting Nimmer on Copyright § 6.03). . . .

BENMAN, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,, 350 F. Supp. 3d 252 (W.D.N.Y. 2018)

. . . The ALJ particularly considered the criteria of Listings 6.03, 9.00, 1.00, 2.00, 4.00-6.00, 8.00, 11.00 . . .

MEJIA, v. DAVIS,, 906 F.3d 307 (5th Cir. 2018)

. . . . § 6.03(c); see also, e.g., Alonzo v. State , 353 S.W.3d 778, 782 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011). . . .

UNITED STATES v. MARTIN,, 334 F. Supp. 3d 860 (W.D. Ky. 2018)

. . . . § 6.03. . . .

CENTURY SURETY COMPANY, v. M. SEIDEL,, 893 F.3d 328 (5th Cir. 2018)

. . . . § 6.03(d) (defining criminal negligence). . . .

WAL- MART STORES, INC. LLC, s v. TEXAS ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE COMMISSION, Jr. M., 313 F. Supp. 3d 751 (W.D. Tex. 2018)

. . . See WM Ex-16 (H.B. 1445), § 6.03(k); Tr. June 7 (Vol. I), at 197:18-24. . . .

IN RE C. CHASE M. C. M. v., 578 B.R. 43 (Bankr. D. Mass. 2017)

. . . Debtor is in arrears according to the terms of the proposed plan totaling $ 11,268.00, which is equal to 6.03 . . .

IN RE HALBERT, v. T., 576 B.R. 586 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2017)

. . . Sommer & Margaret Dee McGarity, Collier Family Law and the Bankruptcy Code ¶ 6.03[4][b], at 27 (2017) . . .

MEJIA, TDCJ v. STEPHENS,, 289 F. Supp. 3d 799 (S.D. Tex. 2017)

. . . Penal Code § 6.03(a), and "knowingly" as acting with "aware[ness] that his conduct is reasonably certain . . . Penal Code § 6.03(b). See Tex. Penal Code § 19.02(c) (murder is first degree felony); Tex. . . . Penal Code § 6.03(c). . . . Penal Code § 6.03(d). . . . Penal Code § 6.03(c) ("A person is "reckless" when he is "aware of but consciously disregards a substantial . . .

S. GODFREY v. UNITED STATES, 255 F. Supp. 3d 247 (D. Mass. 2017)

. . . See e.g., Trial Exhibit. 6.03 (email from Godfrey to Fischer enclosing a script stating: “Great news, . . .

SALVATI, LLC, LLC, LLC, LLC, AB LLC, v. AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY,, 855 F.3d 40 (1st Cir. 2017)

. . . Coverage Disputes, § 6.03[b] (16th Ed. 2013) (noting that “the insured, having purchased both primary . . .

COOPER TIRE RUBBER COMPANY, Co. Co. v. UNITED STATES, AFL- CIO, CLC,, 217 F. Supp. 3d 1373 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2017)

. . . This would result in a cash deposit rate of 6.03% for Cooper, calculated by subtracting 11.13% and 8.68% . . .

L. KINZEL, L. A. A. v. BANK OF AMERICA, U. S. A., 850 F.3d 275 (6th Cir. 2017)

. . . exercised his stock options on' April 15, 2008, he purchased 640,000 shares of FUN at the option price of $6.03 . . .

IN RE XTREME POWER INC. Jr. v. H. III SAIL LLC,, 563 B.R. 614 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. 2016)

. . . See Second Amended Plan ¶¶ 1.29, 6.01, 6.03 (case no. 14-10096, dkt# 897). . . .

UPSTATE CITIZENS FOR EQUALITY, INC. T. v. UNITED STATES M. R. U. S. L. U. S. J., 839 F.3d 556 (2d Cir. 2016)

. . . Id. at 280 (quoting Cohen, Handbook § 6.03[l][a]). . . . See Cohen, Handbook § 6.03[1][b]; see also Moe v. . . .

UPSTATE CITIZENS FOR EQUALITY, INC. T. v. UNITED STATES M. R. U. S. L. U. S. J., 841 F.3d 556 (2d Cir. 2016)

. . . Id. at 280 (quoting Cohen, Handbook § 6.03[l][a]). . . . See Cohen, Handbook § 6.03[1][b]; see also Moe v. . . .

RACING OPTICS, INC. v. AEVOE CORP., 195 F. Supp. 3d 1140 (D. Nev. 2016)

. . . Chisum, Chisurn on Patents § 6.03[2], at 6-315 to 6-316 (2015) (footnotes omitted). . . .

UNITED STATES v. GRANDERSON,, 651 F. App'x 373 (6th Cir. 2016)

. . . R. 204-1, Model Jury Instruction 6.03, PID 1430. . . .

CRUZ, v. ABBOTT, In C. In In In In P. In In, 177 F. Supp. 3d 992 (W.D. Tex. 2016)

. . . Section 6.03(b) of the Texas Penal Code states that “[a] person acts knowingly, or with knowledge, with . . . Penal Code § 6.03(b). . . .

BECKER v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N. A. J. P., 172 F. Supp. 3d 777 (E.D. Pa. 2016)

. . . Loan Agreement §§ 6.2, 6.3, 6.4; Indenture, recitals at 2-3, §§ 6.02, 6.03, 6.07, 7.01; Assignment at . . .

INHALATION PLASTICS, INC. v. MEDEX CARDIO- PULMONARY, INC., 638 F. App'x 489 (6th Cir. 2016)

. . . R. 311-3 (Agreement and Plan of Merger at 1, 12, § 6.03) (Page ID # 9786, 9795, 9820). . . .

UNITED STATES v. C. VERNON,, 814 F.3d 1091 (10th Cir. 2016)

. . . Kleinberger, Limited Liability Companies: Tax and Business Law, ¶ 6.03 Limits of the Shield: Piercing . . .

IN RE KING, v., 541 B.R. 404 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2015)

. . . See Company Agreement ¶ 6.03 (providing that the LLC may transact business with any member provided the . . .

CITIZENS AGAINST CASINO GAMBLING IN ERIE COUNTY, Co- D. G. J. D. F. C. E. C. A. H. Sr. v. CHAUDHURI,, 802 F.3d 267 (2d Cir. 2015)

. . . Cohen’s Handbook § 6.03[1] [a]. . . . Cohen’s Handbook § 6.03[1] [a], “Because of plenary federal authority in Indian affairs, there is no . . .

CITIZENS AGAINST CASINO GAMBLING IN ERIE COUNTY, Co- D. G. J. D. F. C. E. C. A. H. Sr. v. CHAUDHURI,, 802 F.3d 267 (2d Cir. 2015)

. . . Cohen’s Handbook § 6.03[1] [a]. . . . Cohen’s Handbook § 6.03[1] [a]. . . .

GARCIA- DORANTES, v. WARREN,, 801 F.3d 584 (6th Cir. 2015)

. . . He found an absolute disparity of 6.03% and a comparative disparity of 73.1% fewer African-American members . . . Stephenson (6.03%), the magistrate judge noted that three recent cases have found an absolute disparity . . .

LLOYD, v. BIRKMAN, A., 127 F. Supp. 3d 725 (W.D. Tex. 2015)

. . . Schwartz, Section 1983 Litigation: Claims and Defenses § 6.03 (2015). . . . .

J. KORESKO, v. UNITED STATES, 123 F. Supp. 3d 654 (E.D. Pa. 2015)

. . . Verified Complaint; Ex. 1 to the United States’ motion), at Ex, B (Health and Welfare Plan Document § 6.03 . . .

SHAULIS, v. NORDSTROM INC. d b a, 120 F. Supp. 3d 40 (D. Mass. 2015)

. . . Code Regs. 6.03(2). . . .

SMITH, v. WILLIAMS,, 181 F. Supp. 3d 563 (N.D. Ill. 2015)

. . . Smith argued on direct appeal that the trial court erred in giving Illinois Pattern Jury Instruction 6.03 . . .

MILBY, v. LIBERTY LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF BOSTON,, 102 F. Supp. 3d 922 (W.D. Ky. 2015)

. . . VI, § 6.03.) . . . VI, § 6.03.) . . . VI, §§ 6.01(A), 6.03.) . . .

LUITPOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. ED. GEISTLICH S HNE A. G. F R CHEMISCHE INDUSTRIE,, 784 F.3d 78 (2d Cir. 2015)

. . . . ¶ 6.03. . . . Luitpold points in particular to paragraph 6.03 of the respective License Agreements, which provides . . . goodwill relating thereto and all registrations granted thereon. 1994 and 1998 License Agreements ¶ 6.03 . . . Particularly in light of the carve-out expressed in paragraph 6.03, the agreements here were at the very . . .

ROBL CONSTRUCTION, INC. a v. G. HOMOLY,, 781 F.3d 1029 (8th Cir. 2015)

. . . the buy-sell agreement were not met; (4) the loan was invalid because Robl Construction violated § 6.03 . . . Robl Construction did not show Homoly actually authorized the loan as is required by § 6.03(D) and (I . . . This interpretation effectively reads § 6.03(1) out of the operating agreement. . . . Further, as a matter of law, § 8 should not be interpreted as fulfilling § 6.03(1). . . . Instead, it shows how a written personal guaranty can satisfy both § 8 and § 6.03(1). . . . Rather than ignore the conditions precedent in § 6.03(D) and (I), Robl Construction, challenging the . . . The same is true for § 6.03(1). . . . Despite claiming Robl Construction “essentially ignore[d]” § 6.03(1), the dissent later explains Robl . . . Construction did not ignore § 6.03(1) at all but instead “argue[d] § 8 of the buy-sell agreement acts . . . as Homoly’s written consent,” which satisfies § 6.03(1). . . .

IN RE M. OKREPKA,, 533 B.R. 327 (Bankr. D. Kan. 2015)

. . . Sommer & Margaret Dee McGarity, Collier Family Law and the Bankruptcy Code ¶ 6.03[1], at 6-13-6-17 (2014 . . .

E. PEREZ, v. J. KORESKO, V,, 86 F. Supp. 3d 293 (E.D. Pa. 2015)

. . . The plan documents further state in Section 6.03 that the administrator shall assume all duties of the . . .

VISTEON CORPORATION, v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA,, 777 F.3d 415 (7th Cir. 2015)

. . . Both these points are explained at length in Eugene Anderson et al., Insurance Coverage Litigation § 6.03 . . .

IN RE WALLER, v., 525 B.R. 473 (Bankr. D. Kan. 2014)

. . . Sommer & Margaret Dee McGarity, Collier Family Law and the Bankruptcy Code ¶ 6.03[1], at 6-13 to 6-17 . . .

PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, v. CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. LLC,, 771 F.3d 391 (7th Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 6.03[D], The differences between general liability insurance and title insurance led the Supreme . . .

LAKE, v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 54 F. Supp. 3d 331 (D.N.J. 2014)

. . . See Lawrence Taylor and Steven Oberman, Drunk Driving Defense (7th ed.2014) § 6.03. . . .

In W. PACKER, XXX- XX- XXXX, L. L. C. v. W., 520 B.R. 520 (Bankr. E.D. Tex. 2014)

. . . Kleinberger, Limited Liability Companies: Tax and Business Law ¶ 6.03 at *3 (Thomson Reuters Tax and . . .

SORENSON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, 765 F.3d 37 (D.C. Cir. 2014)

. . . for minutes in the three tiers respectively; the Administrator’s proposal for 2010-2011 was $5.78, $6.03 . . .

HERRERA, T. H. a v. SANTA FE PUBLIC SCHOOLS, Fe J. Fe J. Fe Fe a ASI LLC,, 41 F. Supp. 3d 1188 (D.N.M. 2014)

. . . link between the municipal action and the deprivation of federal rights”); see also Schwartz, at § 6.03 . . .

UNITED STATES v. JACKSON, 22 F. Supp. 3d 636 (E.D. La. 2014)

. . . on th(e) ground” that it was “induced by pretrial publicity”) (citing 8 Moore’s Federal Practice P. 6.03 . . .

MARINO, v. USHER,, 22 F. Supp. 3d 437 (E.D. Pa. 2014)

. . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 6.03; see also 17 U.S.C. § 101 (defining a “joint work”) . . .

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF BAY AREA ROOFERS HEALTH WELFARE TRUST FUND, v. WESTECH ROOFING,, 42 F. Supp. 3d 1220 (N.D. Cal. 2014)

. . . At 10% simple interest per annum, the daily rate on that amount is $6.03/per day, giving rise to interest . . .

Dr. A. GUTTENBERG, v. Dr. W. EMERY,, 41 F. Supp. 3d 61 (D.C. Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 6.03 (agent’s liability in undisclosed principal situation) id. § 6.04 (agent’s liability in nonexistent . . .

HARRIS, v. CITY OF BALCH SPRINGS, Z. B. E., 9 F. Supp. 3d 690 (N.D. Tex. 2014)

. . . Id. 6.03 Defendants have violated that right by terminating Plaintiff without affording her due process . . .

BROWNSTEIN, v. LINDSAY, 742 F.3d 55 (3d Cir. 2014)

. . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 6.03 [hereinafter Nimmer on Copyright]; see 17 U.S.C. § . . . equal for them to have an equal stake in the work as a whole. 17 U.S.C. § 101; 1 Nimmer on Copyright § 6.03 . . .

MONTEL AETNASTAK, INC. v. MIESSEN a k a N., 998 F. Supp. 2d 694 (N.D. Ill. 2014)

. . . Restatement (Third) of Agency § 6.03 cmt. b (2006). . . . Petroleum Co., 521 F.3d 750 (7th Cir.2008), citing with approval to the Restatement (Third) of Agency § 6.03 . . . Restatement (Third) of Agency § 6.03. . . .

In RIVIERA DRILLING EXPLORATION COMPANY, T E. E. E. LLC, v., 502 B.R. 863 (B.A.P. 10th Cir. 2013)

. . . Id. at 8, ¶ 6.03(b), in App. at 557. . Id. at 11-13, ¶ 8.02, in App. at 560-62. . . . .

LLC, W. H. A v., 141 T.C. 477 (T.C. 2013)

. . . section 12.02(c)(i), then the balance shall be distributed to the members in accordance with section 6.03 . . . Section 6.03 of the Holdings Agreement is entitled “Distributions in Liquidation.” . . . Section 6.03 provides that upon the dissolution of Crescent Holdings “the proceeds of sale and other . . . Section 6.02(a) states “[e]xcept as provided in Section 6.03 and subject to * * * the provisions of section . . .

GARCIA- DORANTES, v. WARREN,, 978 F. Supp. 2d 815 (E.D. Mich. 2013)

. . . Stephenson concluded that “there is a 6.03 percent difference between the percentage of eligible Black . . . Stephenson’s absolute disparity figures, i.e., 3.45% or 6.03%, Garcia-Dorantes has shown a percentage . . . Stephenson concluded that the absolute disparity test “result indicates that there is a 6.03 percent . . . Stephenson concluded that the absolute disparity test “result indicates that there is a 6.03 percent . . . Stephenson, the relevant absolute disparity was 6.03% and the comparative disparity was 73.1%. . . .

UNITED STATES v. ESPINOZA,, 733 F.3d 568 (5th Cir. 2013)

. . . Penal Code § 6.03. . . .

GREENLIGHT REINSURANCE, LTD. v. APPALACHIAN UNDERWRITERS, INC., 958 F. Supp. 2d 507 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)

. . . In turn, § 6.03 of the Reinsurance Agreements requires AUI to remit to Greenlight these ceded premiums . . . A-C, §§ 6.03.) . . .

In EFRON, s, 495 B.R. 166 (Bankr. D.P.R. 2013)

. . . Mar. 12, 2013); 1-6 Collier Family Law and the Bankruptcy Code ¶ 6.03[1] and [2] (“... the legislative . . . ; In re Werthen, 329 F.3d 269, 273 (1st Cir.2003); 1-6 Collier Family Law and the Bankruptcy Code ¶ 6.03 . . . Mar. 12, 2013) (quoting 1-6 Collier Family Law and the Bankruptcy Code ¶ 6.03[2]) (quotations omitted . . .

TARRANT REGIONAL WATER DISTRICT, v. HERRMANN, 569 U.S. 614 (U.S. 2013)

. . . Section 6.03(b), which covers subbasin 3 of Reach III, similarly provides that "Texas and Louisiana within . . . Thus, § 5.03 (b) and § 6.03(b) mimic § 5.05(b)(1) in allocating water rights within a subbasin, but differ . . .

SCHNEIDER, v. CITY OF GRAND JUNCTION POLICE DEPARTMENT, D. A., 717 F.3d 760 (10th Cir. 2013)

. . . See Schwartz, at § 6.03[A][1], But whether the plaintiff has presented sufficient evidence of causation . . . link between the municipal action and the deprivation of federal rights”); see also Schwartz, at § 6.03 . . .

J. MALMSTEEN, v. UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP, INC. UMG, 940 F. Supp. 2d 123 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)

. . . . § 6.03. . . . See Agreement § 6.03; 1989 Amendment § 8(c). . . .

MISSOURI, v. G. McNEELY., 569 U.S. 141 (U.S. 2013)

. . . Oberman, Drunk Driving Defense § 6.03 (7th ed.2010) (describing ways to undermine such evidence before . . .

BROWN, v. LYNCH, Sr., 524 F. App'x 69 (5th Cir. 2013)

. . . Davis, 1 Federal Standards of Review § 6.03 (4th ed. 2010) (”[C]ourts have developed the general rule . . .

M. WALLIS, D. V. M. L. a v. CENTENNIAL INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. a Co. a, 927 F. Supp. 2d 909 (E.D. Cal. 2013)

. . . . § 6.03(1)-(2). . . . Id. § 6.03(3). . . .

LIBERTY MEDIA CORPORATION, LMC LLC, LLC, LMC USA VI, LMC USA VII, LMC USA VIII, LMC USA X, HSN LLC v. VIVENDI UNIVERSAL, S. A., 923 F. Supp. 2d 511 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)

. . . That is, under a literal application of Section 6.03 to the chronology of Liberty’s closing, by closing . . . See id. at 30 (citing Merger Agreement § 6.03(b)-(c)). . . . Merger Agreement § 6.03(c). . Id. §§ 5.01(e), 6.03(b). . See Viv. Mem. at 33. . . . Merger Agreement at § 6.03 (emphasis added). . Id. at § 6.03(c). . . . . See Merger Agreement §§ 5.01(e), 6.03(b). . See Viv. Mem. at 31-33. . See id.; Viv. . . .

ASSURED GUARANTY MUNICIPAL CORP. f k a v. FLAGSTAR BANK, FSB ABS, LLC,, 920 F. Supp. 2d 475 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)

. . . Section 6.03 of the I & Is provides that payments made to Assured pursuant to the I & I “shall bear interest . . . Ex. 90 § 6.03. The Late Payment Rate amounts to the prime rate plus two percent. PL Ex. 90 App. . . .

ADAMS, v. RAINTREE VACATION EXCHANGE, LLC,, 702 F.3d 436 (7th Cir. 2012)

. . . Restatement (Third) of Agency §§ 6.03 and comment, b, 6.11(4) (2006); Clarendon National Ins. . . .

BRISCOE, v. JEFFERSON COUNTY Bo, 500 F. App'x 274 (5th Cir. 2012)

. . . Davis, 1 Federal Standards of Review § 6.03 (4th ed.2010) C'[C]ourts have developed the general rule . . .

NEW YORK, v. SHINNECOCK INDIAN NATION, A. C., 701 F.3d 101 (2d Cir. 2012)

. . . See Cohen’s Handbook of Federal Indian Law § 6.03[l][a] (Nell Jessup Newton et al. eds., 2005) (“A state . . .

BERGE HELENE LTD. v. GE OIL GAS, INC., 896 F. Supp. 2d 582 (S.D. Tex. 2012)

. . . . ¶ 6.03. . See, e.g., DX 3. . Id. at 14-15 ¶ 7.06; PX 131, at 57 ¶46.5. . PX 131, at 57 ¶ 46.5. . . . .

TRUSTEES OF EIGHTH DISTRICT ELECTRICAL PENSION FUND, v. GIETZEN ELECTRIC, INC., 898 F. Supp. 2d 1193 (D. Idaho 2012)

. . . B at §§ 6.02, 6.03, 7.03, 8.03, 9.01, 10.01 to Rodney James Decl. . . . C at §§ 6.02, 6.03, 6.04, 7.03, 8.03 to Gill Decl. (Docket No. 22, Att. 5). . . .

D. KENDALL, v. TWIN CITIES IRON WORKERS PENSION PLAN,, 893 F. Supp. 2d 988 (D. Minn. 2012)

. . . required in any case and the application and interpretation” of plan terms. (793 Plan § 10.06; TCIW Plan § 6.03 . . .

In U. S. FIDELIS, INC., 481 B.R. 503 (Bankr. E.D. Mo. 2012)

. . . Section 6.03 Allocation. . . .

In PENN CENTRAL TRANSPORTATION CO., 944 F. Supp. 2d 363 (E.D. Pa. 2012)

. . . Consummation Order, “Discharge and Release of Claims,” provided: Subject to the provisions of Section 6.03 . . . addressed the “Ongoing Operation of the Reorganized Company” in § 6 of the Consummation Order, and § 6.03 . . . Consummation Order §§ 6.03(i), (j). . . .

L. SOLIS, v. J. KORESKO, V,, 884 F. Supp. 2d 261 (E.D. Pa. 2012)

. . . Plan Document §§ 5.05, 5.06, 6.01, 6.03 (GX 14). B. . . . Section 6.03 of the Plan Document does permit the “Committee” to “make any amendments to the Plan (except . . . Plan Document § 6.03(h) (GX 14) (emphasis added). . . . Id. § 6.03. . . . Plan Document §§ 5.04, 5.06(b), 6.03 (GX 14). . . .

UNITED STATES, v. SANFORD LTD., 878 F. Supp. 2d 137 (D.D.C. 2012)

. . . Model Penal Code § 6.03(5) (1981); see also H.R. Rep. . . . the pecuniary gain derived from the offense by the offender. 3 Model Penal Code and Commentaries § 6.03 . . .

In MAGNA ENTERTAINMENT CORP., 475 B.R. 411 (Bankr. D. Del. 2012)

. . . . a delay will occur in the achievement of Substantial Project Completion, then, subject to Section 6.03 . . . Management Company LTD.’s] good faith estimate, if ascertainable, of the resulting delay-” (X 7 at § 6.03 . . . (Id. § 6.03(b); SF 34.) . . .

AMBROSE, v. D. BOOKER, v. v., 684 F.3d 638 (6th Cir. 2012)

. . . He found an absolute disparity of 6.03% and a comparative disparity of 73.1% fewer African-American members . . .

NEW YORK, v. SHINNECOCK INDIAN NATION, A. C., 686 F.3d 133 (2d Cir. 2012)

. . . See Cohen’s Handbook of Federal Indian Law § 6.03[1][a] (Nell Jessup Newton et al. eds., 2005) (“A state . . .

SEIU HEALTH CARE MICHIGAN, v. SNYDER,, 875 F. Supp. 2d 710 (E.D. Mich. 2012)

. . . (Interlocal Agreement § 6.03.) (emphasis added). . . .

SOUTHERN UNION CO. v. UNITED STATES, 567 U.S. 343 (U.S. 2012)

. . . Model Penal Code § 6.03(5), 10A U. L. A. 259 (2001). . . .

CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS v. P. BECKER, J. L. F. R. Jr. R. W. Jr. R. M. Jr. Jr. J. Jr. Jr. J. III, L. A. Jr. C. Jr. L. Jr. A. Sr., 863 F. Supp. 2d 1190 (N.D. Ga. 2012)

. . . Nimmer and David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 6.03 (Matthew Bender, Rev. Ed.). . . .

In LOWER BUCKS HOSPITAL,, 471 B.R. 419 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 2012)

. . . . §§ 6.03. 6.07); • assigned the Authority’s rights under the Loan Agreement to the Indenture Trustee . . . pgs. 2-3; see also id. § 6.02); • created certain reserve accounts by the Indenture Trustee, (id. §§ 6.03 . . .

H. JONES v. LOWNDES COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI C. B., 678 F.3d 344 (5th Cir. 2012)

. . . Court Prac. 6.03. . . .

MIG INVESTMENTS LLC, v. AETREX WORLDWIDE, INC. v. v. d b a ABC,, 852 F. Supp. 2d 493 (D. Del. 2012)

. . . Pursuant to § 6.03(e) of the Merger Agreement: [I]f the Equity Holders have not formed Newco and established . . . (Id. at § 6.03(e)) In order to obtain the exclusive license, Fitracks’s stockholders formed a Newco called . . . Specifically, under § 6.03(a) of the Merger Agreement: Prior to the Closing Date, all or some of the . . . Subject to Section 2.11(c) and Section 6.03(h) of this Agreement, Newco shall be granted a worldwide . . . C at § 6.03(a)) . Aetrex II refers to MIG Investments LLC v. Aetrex Worldwide, Inc., C.A. . . .

BROWN, v. G. SUDDUTH, Ex-, 675 F.3d 472 (5th Cir. 2012)

. . . R. 6.03. On Tuesday, a Pontotoc municipal judge issued warrants for Brown’s arrest. . . . erred by excluding evidence on the substantive demands of Mississippi Uniform Circuit and County Rule 6.03 . . .

S. FLAHERTY, v. BRYSON,, 850 F. Supp. 2d 38 (D.D.C. 2012)

. . . on our initial review of the proposed subject project and the criteria provided in Sections 5.04 and 6.03 . . .

B. CAILLET H. v. REGIONS FINANCIAL CORPORATION, 282 F.R.D. 406 (W.D. La. 2012)

. . . terminated director effective December 31, 2004 for the purposes of the BNR Agreement; and 5) Section 6.03 . . . With regard to plaintiffs’ assertion that defendant is in breach of section 6.03 of the contract (permitting . . . Accordingly, should plaintiffs wish to pursue a claim for breach of section 6.03 of the contract, again . . .

In NATIONAL CENTURY FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES, INC., 846 F. Supp. 2d 828 (S.D. Ohio 2012)

. . . at specified percentage levels of the net value of purchased receivables, see id. at §§ 6.01, 6.02, 6.03 . . .

NAZARIO- LUGO, v. CARIBEVISI N HOLDINGS, INC. a k a C. V. a k a LLC,, 670 F.3d 109 (1st Cir. 2012)

. . . Article 6.03 provides in part: "This Agreement supercedes any and all other agreements, either oral or . . .

KRECHT, v. UNITED STATES, 846 F. Supp. 2d 1268 (S.D. Fla. 2012)

. . . the offense level by two levels. 1 Practice Under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines §§ 2.05[D][2], 6.03 . . .

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION,, 842 F. Supp. 2d 1216 (C.D. Cal. 2012)

. . . CFC, Current Report (Form 8-K) (Aug. 16, 2007), Ex. 99.1, § 6.03, Art. 7(d) (Ex. 9 at 310-313). . . .

REMY ASSOCIATES, L. L. C. v. WHOLE FOODS MARKETS, INC., 460 F. App'x 494 (6th Cir. 2012)

. . . Remy claims that Whole Foods breached section 6.03 of the lease by failing to pay a $200 daily charge . . . The second, section 6.03, is entitled “Conduct of Business by Tenant.” . . . Remy claims that section 6.03 applies to permanent store closures because the language of section 6.03 . . . Nothing in section 6.03 suggests that the “days and hours designated” requirement is intended to apply . . . Remy also argues that section 6.03’s “days and hours designated” requirement must apply to permanent . . .

PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE CO. v. SSR HOSPITALITY, INC., 459 F. App'x 308 (5th Cir. 2012)

. . . The note specifies an interest rate of 6.03% per annum and monthly payments of $27,547.81 for 10 years . . .

ELLINGTON CREDIT FUND, LTD. v. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC., 837 F. Supp. 2d 162 (S.D.N.Y. 2011)

. . . , and shall enforce the obligations and rights of the other parties to this Agreement .... ” (id. § 6.03 . . . (See id. § 6.03(b) (“[N]othing in this Section shall require any action by the Trustee unless the Trustee . . . do not allege to have provided indemnity to the Trustee, rendering unavailing any claim based on § 6.03 . . . For instance, while § 6.03 provides that the Trustee “will hold the Trust Estate in trust for the benefit . . . (See § 6.03(b) (“[N]othing in this Section shall require any action by the Trustee unless the Trustee . . .

In SUFFOLK REGIONAL OFFTRACK BETTING CORP. d b a OTB,, 462 B.R. 397 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 2011)

. . . If Churchill Downs was an undisclosed principal of TrackNet, as Suffolk OTB alleges, § 6.03 of the Restatement . . . Restatement (Third) of Agency § 6.03. . . . Restatement (Third) of Agency § 6.03 cmt. d. . . . more persons may as coprincipals appoint an agent to act for them in the same transaction or matter”), 6.03 . . . Churchill Downs and Magna, Restatement (Third) of Agency § 6.05(2) is inapplicable, and §§ 3.16 and 6.03 . . .

BERGE HELENE LTD. v. GE OIL GAS, INC., 830 F. Supp. 2d 235 (S.D. Tex. 2011)

. . . MSJ Implied at 9 n. 2 (citing GE Ex. 4, Aibel-Berge Operations Agreement, Art. 6.03 at BER139575) (providing . . .

U. S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION N. A. N. A. v. CB SETTLE INN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a CB a, 827 F. Supp. 2d 993 (S.D. Iowa 2011)

. . . Mortgage, Notice Removal Ex. 3 § 6.03, ECF No. 1-6; ALR, Notice Removal Ex. 4 § 4.3, ECF 1-8. . . .

SORENSON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION T- USA,, 659 F.3d 1035 (10th Cir. 2011)

. . . $6.24 per minute in Tier 3.Under NECA’s proposal, providers would receive $5.78 per minute in Tier 1, $6.03 . . .