The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION

Chapter 6
ADMISSION INTO UNION; CONCESSIONS; STATE BOUNDARIES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 6.04

6.04 Jurisdiction over such lands; how ceded to the United States.—Whenever the United States shall contract for, purchase, or acquire any land within the limits of this state for the purposes aforesaid, in either of the modes above mentioned and provided, or shall hold for such purposes lands heretofore lawfully acquired or reserved therefor, and shall desire to acquire constitutional jurisdiction over such lands for said purposes, the Governor of this state may, upon application made to him or her in writing on behalf of the United States for that purpose, accompanied by the proper evidence of said reservation, purchase, contract, or acquisition of record, describing the land sought to be ceded by convenient metes and bounds, thereupon, in the name and on behalf of this state, cede to the United States exclusive jurisdiction over the land so reserved, purchased, or acquired and sought to be ceded; the United States to hold, use, occupy, own, possess, and exercise said jurisdiction over the same for the purposes aforesaid, and none other whatsoever; provided, always, that the consent aforesaid is hereby given and the cession aforesaid is to be granted and made as aforesaid, upon the express condition that this state shall retain a concurrent jurisdiction with the United States in and over the land or lands so to be ceded, and every portion thereof, so far that all process, civil or criminal, issuing under authority of this state, or of any of the courts or judicial officers thereof may be executed by the proper officers thereof, upon any person amenable to the same, within the limits and extent of lands so ceded, in like manner and to like effect as if this law had never been passed; saving, however, to the United States security to their property within said limits and extent, and exemption of the same, and of said lands from any taxation under the authority of this state while the same shall continue to be owned, held, used, and occupied by the United States for the purposes above expressed and intended, and not otherwise.

History.—s. 3, ch. 25, 1845; RS 9; GS 7; RGS 7; CGL 7; s. 2, ch. 95-147.

F.S. 6.04 on Google Scholar

F.S. 6.04 on Casetext

Amendments to 6.04

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 6.04

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 6.04.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

MCGIRT, v. OKLAHOMA, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Victories, at 18 (describing "nationwide jurisdictional confusion" as a result of the MCA); Cohen § 6.04 . . .

GUIZHOU TYRE CO. LTD. Co. Co. Co. v. UNITED STATES,, 389 F. Supp. 3d 1315 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2019)

. . . percent of consumption; 10.50% increase from 2014 to 2015 in the import percent of production; and a 6.04% . . .

OCEAN TOMO, LLC, v. PATENTRATINGS, LLC, 375 F. Supp. 3d 915 (N.D. Ill. 2019)

. . . See R. 398-5 at 16 (§ 6.04) ("Each member shall have the right ... to inspect and copy... the books and . . .

DEMOCRATIC EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF FLORIDA, US v. M. LEE, In, 915 F.3d 1312 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Gas Pipe Line Co., LLC v. 6.04 Acres, More or Less, Over Parcel(s) of Land of Approximately 1.21 Acres . . .

CHASE, v. NODINE S SMOKEHOUSE, INC. J., 360 F. Supp. 3d 98 (D. Conn. 2019)

. . . Claims & Defenses, § 6.04 Rule Against Respondeat Superior Liability. In Rizzo v. . . .

TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC, v. ACRES, MORE OR LESS, OVER PARCEL S OF LAND OF APPROXIMATELY ACRES, MORE OR LESS, SITUATED IN LAND LOT LLC, v. LLC, v. s LLC, LLC, v. s H. LLC, v. s J. LLC, v. s M. LLC, v. A LLC, v. s LLC, v. s JJBK LLLP, LLC, v. s s Co, S. LLC, v. s LLC, LLC, v. s LLC. v. s LLC, v. s LLC, LLC. v. W. F. LLC, v. s W. LLC, v. s f. k. a. M. LLC, v. A. LLC, v. LLC, v. G. K. LLC, v. D. S. LLC, v. s L. P., 910 F.3d 1130 (11th Cir. 2018)

. . . TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 6.04 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, OVER PARCEL . . .

IN RE PURSUIT CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, LLC, LLC, LLC, v. LLC, LLC, LLC, I, L. P. I, L. P. I, I, 595 B.R. 631 (Bankr. Del. 2018)

. . . to a management fee of one and a half percent (1.5%) of assets under management pursuant to Section 6.04 . . .

A. D ADDARIO, F. D D A. D T. D F. D T. D v. D ADDARIO, D S. LLC, LLC,, 901 F.3d 80 (2nd Cir. 2018)

. . . Reed, Civil RICO , ¶ 6.04[5][a] (Matthew Bender 2017). . . .

NAVAJO NATION v. J. DALLEY,, 896 F.3d 1196 (10th Cir. 2018)

. . . COHEN'S HANDBOOK , supra , § 6.04[3][d][iii], at 569. . . . Nash , 972 F.Supp.2d 1254, 1266 (D.N.M. 2013) ; see Cohen's Handbook , supra , § 6.04[3][d][iii], at . . .

UTE INDIAN TRIBE OF UINTAH v. G. LAWRENCE, D., 312 F. Supp. 3d 1219 (D. Utah 2018)

. . . See Cohen's Handbook of Federal Indian Law § 6.04[3][a], p. 538 (2012 ed.). . . .

JAUCH, v. CHOCTAW COUNTY, 886 F.3d 534 (5th Cir. 2018)

. . . R. 6.03, And A Later Preliminary hearing to examine probable cause and reconsider bail, Rule 6.04. . . . P. 6.04. . . .

UTE INDIAN TRIBE OF UINTAH AND OURAY RESERVATION, v. G. LAWRENCE, D., 289 F. Supp. 3d 1242 (D. Utah 2018)

. . . ."); Cohen's Handbook of Federal Indian Law (Cohen) § 6.04[3][a], at 537-38 n.47 (Nell Jessup Newton . . .

WILLIAMSON, v. TRAVELPORT, LP U. S., 289 F. Supp. 3d 1305 (N.D. Ga. 2018)

. . . Section 4.01 is modified by Section 6.04 of the Plan, which states: Any benefits payable under this Plan . . . Plan are also used to determine such Participant's accrued benefit under the [UAL] [ ] Plan. ( [4.1] § 6.04 . . . Plaintiff does not once refer to Section 6.04 in her Amended Complaint, and it appears that she asks . . .

IN RE C. CHASE M. C. M. v., 578 B.R. 43 (Bankr. D. Mass. 2017)

. . . Debtors failed to cure the arrears, and are currently in arrears in the amount of $11,268.00 which equals 6.04 . . .

UTE INDIAN TRIBE a a a LLC, v. G. LAWRENCE, D., 875 F.3d 539 (10th Cir. 2017)

. . . .”); Cohen’s Handbook of Federal Indian Law (Cohen) § 6.04[3][a], at 537-38 n.47 (Nell Jessup Newton . . .

IN RE WELLS FARGO COMPANY SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION, 282 F. Supp. 3d 1074 (N.D. Cal. 2017)

. . . 2012 5.98 Stumpf, Sloan 2Q 2012 10-Q August 7, 2012 6.00 Stumpf, Sloan 3Q 2012 10-Q November 6, 2012 6.04 . . .

DAVENPORT CHESTER, LLC, v. ABRAMS PROPERTIES, INC, 870 F.3d 852 (8th Cir. 2017)

. . . Section 6.04—The Tenant shall ... maintain and keep the said Demised Premises and the parking lots and . . .

IN RE WTE- S S AG ENTERPRISES, LLC, WTE- S S Ag LLC, v. GHD, n k a DVO,, 575 B.R. 397 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2017)

. . . Section 6.04(A) titled “Services, Materials, and Equipment” states, in part: Unless otherwise specified . . . The Digester Contract clearly provides that DVO, as the design/builder, was required under section 6.04 . . . The Court finds that DVO is liable for damages for breach of section 6.04(A) of the Digester Contract . . .

IN RE ZAK, v., 573 B.R. 13 (Bankr. D. Mass. 2017)

. . . publishing and/or causing to be published 35 unfair or deceptive infomercials in violation of 940 CMR 6.04 . . . publishing and/or causing to be published 35 unfair or deceptive infomercials in violation of 940 CMR 6.04 . . .

UNITED STATES v. HILLIARD,, 851 F.3d 768 (7th Cir. 2017)

. . . difference between subsection 1 of the instruction given and that of Seventh Circuit Pattern Instruction § 6.04 . . . not persuade or otherwise induce .... ” Pattern Criminal Jury Instructions of the Seventh Circuit § 6.04 . . . the required showing for inducement, Hilliard’s proposed instruction (that is, Pattern Instruction § 6.04 . . .

IN RE R. VOBORIL E. A. v., 568 B.R. 797 (Bankr. E.D. Wis. 2017)

. . . Code DFI-CCS § 6.04(d). Minor errors or omissions will not doom a financing statement under Wis. . . .

CITY OF PORTLAND, v. HOMEAWAY. COM, INC., 240 F. Supp. 3d 1099 (D. Or. 2017)

. . . Thus, citations in this Opinion and Order to PCC § 6.04 do not necessarily reflect the current language . . .

IN RE SETTLEMENT FACILITY DOW CORNING TRUST. v. s, 670 F. App'x 887 (6th Cir. 2016)

. . . [Distribution Agreement, Annex A, §§ 6.04(b)(ii), (e)(ii), (h)(v), R. 1239-6 at PageID 18909-10.] . . .

IN RE SETTLEMENT FACILITY DOW CORNING TRUST. v. s, 670 F. App'x 887 (6th Cir. 2016)

. . . [Distribution Agreement, Annex A, §§ 6.04(b)(ii), (e)(ii), (h)(v), R. 1239-6 at PageID 18909-10.] . . .

IN RE MOTORS LIQUIDATION COMPANY, f k a v. N. A., 552 B.R. 253 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2016)

. . . (Id. at 29 (citing Fisher Deck Ex, C (Collateral Agreement § 6.04) (“[JPMC is] conclusively presumed . . .

CITY OF PORTLAND, v. HOMEAWAY. COM, INC., 191 F. Supp. 3d 1157 (D. Or. 2016)

. . . s complaint contains numerous conclu-sory allegations that HomeAway is iti violation of PCC Chapter 6.04 . . . empowered to define the term by ordinance and it did so when it defined Operator and Booking Agent in PCC § 6.04 . . .

DAVILA, v. DAVIS,, 650 F. App'x 860 (5th Cir. 2016)

. . . . § 6.04(b)(2). Davila’s third written statement reveals an intent to kill at least four persons. . . .

IN RE HARDEMAN COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT d b a, 540 B.R. 229 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2015)

. . . Furthermore, the Court finds that the conditions to the Effective Date set forth in § 6.04 of the Plan . . . Subject to § 6.04 of the Plan, in accordance with § 944(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, and notwithstanding . . .

WASKIEWICZ, v. UNICARE LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY,, 802 F.3d 851 (6th Cir. 2015)

. . . on the date of termination, unless the Participant is Disabled on that date; (Page ID 673) (Section 6.04 . . .

CROWE, v. EXAMWORKS, INC., 136 F. Supp. 3d 16 (D. Mass. 2015)

. . . Code Regs. 6.04(5).. ,. . . . . Code Regs. 6.04(5)(c). . . . Code Regs. 6.04(3)(c) (utilization review programs must submit "copies of all current professional licenses . . .

TRENTADUE, v. GAY,, 538 B.R. 770 (E.D. Wis. 2015)

. . . Sommer & Margaret Dee McGarity, Collier Family Law and the Bankruptcy Code ¶ 6.04[2] (1991, Suppl. 2014 . . . Sommer & Margaret Dec McGarity, Collier Family Law and the Bankruptcy Code ¶ 6.04[2] (1991, Suppl. 2014 . . .

IN RE H. MELTZER,, 534 B.R. 757 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2015)

. . . Cir.2010) (internal quotation omitted); see also Harding Univ., 48 F.Supp.2d at 769; Vairo, supra, § 6.04 . . .

UNITED STATES v. PIERCE, Au, SB,, 785 F.3d 832 (2d Cir. 2015)

. . . Sand, et al., Modern Federal Jury Instructions ¶ 6.04, at 6-5 (rev. 2011) (“Missing Witness Not Equally . . .

LUITPOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. ED. GEISTLICH S HNE A. G. F R CHEMISCHE INDUSTRIE,, 784 F.3d 78 (2d Cir. 2015)

. . . The court focused on paragraphs 6.01 to 6.04 of the respective agreements, and concluded that “[t]here . . .

IN RE TRENTADUE,, 527 B.R. 328 (Bankr. E.D. Wis. 2015)

. . . Sommer & Margaret Dee McGarity, Collier Family Law and the Bankruptcy Code ¶ 6.04[2] (1991, Suppl.2014 . . .

IN RE M. OKREPKA,, 533 B.R. 327 (Bankr. D. Kan. 2015)

. . . Sommer & McGarity, supra note 19, ¶ 6.04[2], at 6-28 to 6-29. . . . .

IN RE WALLER, v., 525 B.R. 473 (Bankr. D. Kan. 2014)

. . . Sommer & McGarity, supra note 22, ¶ 6.04[2], at 6-28 to 6-29. . Good v. . . . Sommer & McGarity, supra note 22, ¶ 6.04[2], at 6-29. . . . . intent because the parties were unable to reach their own agreement (Sommer & McGarity, supra note 32, ¶ 6.04 . . . Sommer & McGarity, supra note 22, ¶ 6.04[2], at 6-29 (2014). . In re Sampson, 997 F.2d 717. . . . . Sommer & McGarity, supra note 22, ¶ 6.04[4]-6.04[l 1], at 6-33 to 6-55. . . . . .

DDR HOLDINGS, LLC, v. HOTELS. COM, L. P. L. P. LLC, LLC,, 773 F.3d 1245 (Fed. Cir. 2014)

. . . Damages DDR sought $6.04 million in damages for NLG’s infringement of the '572 and '399 patents; NLG . . .

TOTO, INC. v. SONY MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT,, 60 F. Supp. 3d 407 (S.D.N.Y. 2014)

. . . . ¶¶ 6.01-6.04., 9.01-9.07.) . . .

Dr. A. GUTTENBERG, v. Dr. W. EMERY,, 41 F. Supp. 3d 61 (D.C. Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 6.04 (agent’s liability in nonexistent principal situation). . . .

SONGCHAROEN, S. M. D. FACS. P. L. L. C. v. PLASTIC HAND SURGERY ASSOCIATES, P. L. L. C., 561 F. App'x 327 (5th Cir. 2014)

. . . Williams testified before the jury that Section 7.02 was supposed to reference Section 6.04, “Termination . . .

HARRIS, v. CITY OF BALCH SPRINGS, Z. B. E., 9 F. Supp. 3d 690 (N.D. Tex. 2014)

. . . Such accusations were false. 6.04 Plaintiff was not provided adequate notice and an opportunity to be . . .

HARLAND CLARKE HOLDINGS CORP. v. MILKEN, 997 F. Supp. 2d 561 (W.D. Tex. 2014)

. . . of this Agreement; provided, that any Person that is not a Party but, by the terms of Sections 6.02, 6.04 . . . Under the Purchase Agreement, “any Person that is not a Party but, by the terms of Sections 6.02, 6.04 . . .

E. OMOTOSHO, v. GIANT EAGLE, INC., 997 F. Supp. 2d 792 (N.D. Ohio 2014)

. . . to the AO 12, the underrepresentation of African Americans in the Youngstown qualified jury wheel is 6.04% . . .

ARCHSTONE PALMETTO PARK, LLC, a v. KENNEDY, M. S. R. R. A., 132 So. 3d 347 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . Read in conjunction, Section 6.04 of the City’s Charter provides the means of commencing such proceedings . . .

BURRAGE, v. UNITED STATES., 134 S. Ct. 881 (U.S. 2014)

. . . . § 6.04 (West 2011). It chose instead to use language that imports but-for causality. . . .

BURRAGE, v. UNITED STATES., 571 U.S. 204 (U.S. 2014)

. . . . § 6.04 (West 2011). It chose instead to use language that imports but-for causality. . . .

LOS COYOTES BAND OF CAHUILLA CUPE O INDIANS, v. JEWELL A. III,, 729 F.3d 1025 (9th Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 1162(a); Cohen, supra, § 6.04. . . .

LOS COYOTES BAND OF CAHUILLA CUPE O INDIANS, v. JEWELL, A. III,, 729 F.3d 1025 (9th Cir. 2013)

. . . . § 1162(a); Cohen, supra, § 6.04. . . .

DESERET MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, v. UNITED STATES,, 112 Fed. Cl. 438 (Fed. Cl. 2013)

. . . bonds in the year 2000 (6.8 percent), rather than focusing on the yield of those bonds in October 2000 (6.04 . . . Consistent with the testimony of plaintiff’s experts, the court believes that the 6.04 percent figure . . . discount factor (9.91 percent), with an equity component that reflects a modified risk free rate of 6.04 . . .

GULF POWER COMPANY, v. COALSALES II, LLC, f. k. a., 522 F. App'x 699 (11th Cir. 2013)

. . . CSA, Sections 2.30, 6.04-6.05. . . . See, e.g., CSA, Sections 6.04 and 6.05 (designating approved sources) and Section 7.01 (setting forth . . . Id. at 7 n. 20. .See CSA, Section 6.04 ("Seller shall have the right to supply the coal to be delivered . . .

In EQUIPMENT EQUITY HOLDINGS, INC. v. S. N. L. P. L. P. II LLC, II L. P. M. II, L. Ed, 491 B.R. 792 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2013)

. . . to EBITDA Ratio (4.08), was 36% above the covenant maximum of 3.0; • The Total Debt to EBITDA Ratio (6.04 . . .

ZOOM ELECTRIC, INC. v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL IBEW IBEW IBEW IBEW IBEW v. B- B- v., 989 F. Supp. 2d 912 (N.D. Cal. 2013)

. . . B § 6.04(b) (“The Employer agrees to pay the amount specified in Appendix A for each hour worked by all . . .

WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A. v. CCC ATLANTIC, LLC,, 905 F. Supp. 2d 604 (D.N.J. 2012)

. . . (PSA §§ 6.02, 6.04) The PSA also allows for 'sub-servicing agreements” between a Master Servicer and . . . (See PSA §§ 6.02, 6.04) Likewise, the Special Servicer is allowed to hire subservicers. . . .

TRUSTEES OF EIGHTH DISTRICT ELECTRICAL PENSION FUND, v. GIETZEN ELECTRIC, INC., 898 F. Supp. 2d 1193 (D. Idaho 2012)

. . . C at §§ 6.02, 6.03, 6.04, 7.03, 8.03 to Gill Decl. (Docket No. 22, Att. 5). . . .

In U. S. FIDELIS, INC., 481 B.R. 503 (Bankr. E.D. Mo. 2012)

. . . Section 6.04 Distributions. . . .

In PENN CENTRAL TRANSPORTATION CO., 944 F. Supp. 2d 363 (E.D. Pa. 2012)

. . . Section 6.04 captioned “Pending Litigation,” provided: The Reorganized Company ... shall be substituted . . . This undermines the Reorganized Company’s argument that it was required by § 6.04 of the Consummation . . . As stated above, § 6.04 of the Consummation Order provided that the Reorganized Company “shall be substituted . . . Moreover, the permissive phrase “may continue the litigation”, in § 6.04 did not obligate the Reorganized . . .

H. EDWARDS, Jr. v. DEWALT,, 681 F.3d 780 (6th Cir. 2012)

. . . Davis, Administrative Law Text § 6.04, p. 145 (3d ed. 1972)). . . .

In LOWER BUCKS HOSPITAL,, 471 B.R. 419 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 2012)

. . . . §§ 6.03, 6.04, 6.08); • established procedures that governed the respective rights and obligations . . .

L. HUSTED, III, v. FORD MOTOR CO., 847 F. Supp. 2d 1007 (S.D. Ohio 2012)

. . . work outside of Ford while on disability, UniCare concluded that Plaintiff was in violation of Section 6.04 . . . 2008, UniCare notified Plaintiff that he was ineligible for benefits due to his violation of Section 6.04 . . . Due to Plaintiffs violation of Section 6.04 of the Plan, UniCare upheld its previous finding that he . . . Section 6.04(v) of the Plan provides the penalty for violating this provision: “[i]f the Participant . . .

PHELAN, PHELAN v. TORRES, St. s v. M. D. M. D., 843 F. Supp. 2d 259 (E.D.N.Y. 2011)

. . . City of New York, 465 F.3d 65, 82 (2d Cir.2006); Schwartz, supra, § 6.04, at 6 — 41 n. 159. . . .

DAVIS WINE COMPANY, a LLC, a v. VINA Y BODEGA ESTAMPA, S. A. a, 823 F. Supp. 2d 1159 (D. Or. 2011)

. . . DWC relies primarily on the Restatement Third of Agency § 6.04 (“ § 6.04”), as the parallel provision . . . Restatement (Third) of Agency § 6.04 (2006). . . . Section 6.04 applies to promoters of yet-to-be formed entities as well. Id. cmt. c. . . . The California courts have not explicitly adopted § 326, nor have they adopted § 6.04. . . . The court will therefore apply § 6.04 to the case at bar. . . .

OSPREY- TROY OFFICENTRE L. L. C. a v. WORLD ALLIANCE FINANCIAL CORP. f k a a, 822 F. Supp. 2d 700 (E.D. Mich. 2011)

. . . in the following manner: Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, Section 4.01, 4.02, 6.01, 6.04 . . .

WITHCO, LLC v. REPUBLIC SERVICES OF TENNESSEE, LLC,, 818 F. Supp. 2d 1040 (M.D. Tenn. 2011)

. . . Transfer Station on the Transfer Station Property have been issued, or transferred pursuant to Section 6.04 . . .

TARRANT REGIONAL WATER DISTRICT, a v. HERRMANN Ed W. K. OWRB E. a, 656 F.3d 1222 (10th Cir. 2011)

. . . . §§ 4.03(b), 5.01(b), 5.02(b), 5.04(b), 6.04(b), 7.01(b), and 8.01. . . . See id. § 4.02(b); see also §§ 4.03(b), 5.01(b), 5.02(b), 5.03(b), 5.04(b), 6.04(b), 7.01(b), and 8.01 . . .

In H W FOOD MART, LLC,, 461 B.R. 904 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2011)

. . . Agreement, ¶¶ 6.04-6.05. . . .

J. RUSSO, v. LORENZO, a, 67 So. 3d 1165 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . Section 6.04(a) addresses the retirement benefit in the event the officer’s services are terminated for . . . Sections 6.04(b) and (c), as amended, address the benefit payable in the event of the officer’s death . . . Officer Lorenzo’s wife was being paid pursuant to section 6.04(c), which provides as follows: § 6.04 . . . Section 6.04(c), the subsection pursuant to which the benefit was being paid the wife, speaks in terms . . . We recognize that the preamble to the Ordinance enacting the section 6.04(c) amendment stated that “the . . .

WILLIAMS, v. C D TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 808 F. Supp. 2d 1096 (E.D. Wis. 2011)

. . . Ex. 1, § 6.04.) . . .

WILLIAMS, v. C D TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 808 F. Supp. 2d 1092 (E.D. Wis. 2011)

. . . See Collective Bargaining Agreement (attached to the original complaint as Exhibit 1) § 6.04. . . .

FARM RANCH SERVICES, LTD. a v. LT FARM RANCH, LLC, U. S. LT LLC,, 779 F. Supp. 2d 949 (S.D. Iowa 2011)

. . . B ¶ 6.04(f) at 10). Dr. Tripp’s failure to perform his duties to LT signaled to Mr. . . . Lee in violation of section 6.03(d) and 6.04(f) of the Operating Agreement (LT Trial Brief [113] at 11 . . .

MORILLO, v. SEIU BENEFIT AND PENSION FUNDS, 783 F. Supp. 2d 487 (S.D.N.Y. 2011)

. . . B, Home Care Industry Local 32B-32J-144 SEIU Pension Plan, § 6.04; 1199 Home Care Industry Pension Fund . . . Plan; § 6.04) Both plans also provide that a plan participant appealing a denial of benefits may “request . . .

OWEN, v. I. C. SYSTEM, INC., 629 F.3d 1263 (11th Cir. 2011)

. . . $390.87 12/29/06 Finance Charge 5.86 $396.73 2/9/07 Finance Charge 5.95 $402.68 3/27/07 Finance Charge $ 6.04 . . .

PRINCIPAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES, v. UNITED STATES,, 95 Fed. Cl. 786 (Fed. Cl. 2010)

. . . Proc.2005-18, section 6.04 of Rev. . . .

CASTELLANOS- CONTRERAS v. DECATUR HOTELS, LLC F. III,, 622 F.3d 393 (5th Cir. 2010)

. . . The workers, who served as housekeepers, desk clerks and maintenance staff, were paid between $6.04 and . . .

HOOKS, v. THALER,, 394 F. App'x 79 (5th Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 6.04(a) (2010). . . .

K S SERVICES, INC. v. THE SCHULZ ELECTRIC GROUP OF COMPANIES,, 670 F. Supp. 2d 91 (D. Me. 2009)

. . . See Restatement (Third) of Agency § 6.04 (2006). . . .

In DEQUEEN GENERAL HOSPITAL. PLLC, d b a v. JCE LLC,, 418 B.R. 289 (Bankr. W.D. Ark. 2009)

. . . The amount left after deducting administrative expenses and the escrow set out in paragraph 6.04 will . . .

GULF POWER COMPANY, v. COALSALES II, L. L. C. f k a, 661 F. Supp. 2d 1270 (N.D. Fla. 2009)

. . . 2.05, 2.06, 2.07, 2.10, 2.12, 2.16, 2.20, 2.22, 2.23, 2.27, 2.28, 2.30, 2.34, 5.02, 5.03, 5.08, 6.02, 6.04 . . . Coalsales also refers to Sections 6.04, which describes Source C, and 6.05, which describes "other sources . . . 15.01, which either mention sources other than Source A and Source B directly or refer to Sections 6.04 . . . "It is anticipated that the approximate Annual Quality under this Agreement from Source A (Section 6.04 . . . ) will be 1,000,000 Tons and from Source B (Section 6.04) 900,000 tons.” . . .

ST. BERNARD PARISH St. v. UNITED STATES,, 88 Fed. Cl. 528 (Fed. Cl. 2009)

. . . Pontchartrain; 6/0 ft NGVD at Lake Pontchartrain at West end * September 21-October Lili Minor 145-150 mph 6.04 . . .

FAIR ISAAC CORPORATION v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS INC. LLC LLC I X,, 645 F. Supp. 2d 734 (D. Minn. 2009)

. . . Classic Agreement §§ 6.01, 6.02, 6.04, 6.05. . . .

UNITED STATES v. ARAGON,, 338 F. App'x 364 (5th Cir. 2009)

. . . Penal Code § 6.04(a). . . .

HATTEN, v. QUARTERMAN,, 570 F.3d 595 (5th Cir. 2009)

. . . Under the transferred intent doctrine, Tex Penal Code § 6.04(b), Hatten’s intent to kill Robinson transfers . . .

In MORTGAGE LENDERS NETWORK USA, INC. USA, v., 406 B.R. 213 (Bankr. D. Del. 2009)

. . . G, pp. 41-42, §§ 6.04(b) and 6.04(c); Pl. Tr. Ex. H, p. 41, §§ 6.04(b) and 6.04(e).) 123. . . . G, p. 41-42, §§ 6.04(b) and 6.04(c); Pl. Tr. Ex. H, p. 41, §§ 6.04(b) and 6.04(c).) 151. . . . G, p. 41-42, §§ 6.04(b) and 6.04(c); Pl. Tr. Ex. H, p. 41, §§ 6.04(b) and 6.04(c).) 163. . . . G, p. 41-42, §§ 6.04(b) and 6.04(c); Pl. Tr. Ex. H, p. 41, §§ 6.04(b) and 6.04(c).) 174. . . . G, p. 41-42, §§ 6.04(b) and 6.04(c); Pl. Tr. Ex. H, p. 41, §§ 6.04(b) and 6.04(c).) 189. . . .

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, v. SONOSITE, INC., 641 F. Supp. 2d 793 (W.D. Wis. 2009)

. . . The weight of the entire console assembly of the lightweight Venue 40 is approximately 6.04 lbs. . . . The weight of the entire console assembly of the lightweight Venue 40 is approximately 6.04 lbs. . . .

v., 132 T.C. 131 (T.C. 2009)

. . . (quoting Davis, Administrative Law Text, sec. 6.04, at 145 (3d ed. 1972)).] . . .

N. VOLKMANN, v. WISCONSIN LABORERS HEALTH FUND, N. v., 615 F. Supp. 2d 822 (W.D. Wis. 2009)

. . . until the matter has been submitted for review under the ERISA-mandated review procedure set forth in § 6.04 . . . claimant must file an appeal in writing within 60 days of receipt of notice of the benefit denial. § 6.04 . . .

A. CRAIG, v. P. SMITH,, 597 F. Supp. 2d 814 (S.D. Ind. 2009)

. . . Plan §§ 6.01, 6.04. . . .

UNITED STATES v. L. CROCKETT,, 586 F. Supp. 2d 877 (E.D. Mich. 2008)

. . . Imwinkelried, Scientific Evidence § 6.04(c) n. 233 (4th ed. 2007) (“Giannelli & Imwinkelried”) (collecting . . .

GUARANTY RESIDENTIAL LENDING, INC. Co. v. HOMESTEAD MORTGAGE CO. L. L. C., 291 F. App'x 734 (6th Cir. 2008)

. . . or assets, or the proceeds thereof, as provided in Subsections (3) and (4) of Section A of Article 6.04 . . . (In his capacity as an officer, he had to liquidate the assets in accordance with Article 6.04, which . . . However, any claim arising under Article 6.04 would be by a creditor of the company, not by the bankruptcy . . .

GUARANTY RESIDENTIAL LENDING, INC. Co. v. HOMESTEAD MORTGAGE CO. L. L. C., 291 F. App'x 734 (6th Cir. 2008)

FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION OF ROCHESTER, v. UNITED STATES,, 290 F. App'x 349 (Fed. Cir. 2008)

. . . The following sections of the Financing Agreement are relevant to this dispute: Section 6.04. . . . According to the government, it is clear from the language of Section 6.04 — “progress toward making . . . argument, the government contends that trial testimony shows that the regulators understood Section 6.04 . . . Thus, its failure to report the overtures by Canada Trust constituted a breach of Section 6.04. . . . We find no error by the Court of Federal Claims in its interpretation of Section 6.04 of the Financing . . .

FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION OF ROCHESTER, v. UNITED STATES,, 290 F. App'x 349 (Fed. Cir. 2008)

. . . The following sections of the Financing Agreement are relevant to this dispute: Section 6.04. . . . According to the government, it is clear from the language of Section 6.04—“progress toward making the . . . argument, the government contends that trial testimony shows that the regulators understood Section 6.04 . . . Thus, its failure to report the overtures by Canada Trust constituted a breach of Section 6.04. . . . We find no error by the Court of Federal Claims in its interpretation of Section 6.04 of the Financing . . .

GELOW, v. CENTRAL PACIFIC MORTGAGE CORPORATION,, 560 F. Supp. 2d 972 (E.D. Cal. 2008)

. . . . §§ 6.03, 6.04. . . . F (employment contract of Bruce Trout) § 6.04. . . .

UNITED STATES v. PRATHER,, 279 F. App'x 761 (11th Cir. 2008)

. . . Jury Instructions-Criminal § 6.04, Instruction 6-5 (2007); however, the commentary to those instructions . . . Id. § 6.04, Instruction 6-7 cmt. (collecting cases). Our Circuit case law supports the same result. . . .

WARREN, v. SOLO CUP COMPANY, a, 516 F.3d 627 (7th Cir. 2008)

. . . at Solo Cup Company (“Solo”), a manufacturer of disposable cups and plates, as a “packer,” earning $6.04 . . .

In CHAVEZ,, 381 B.R. 582 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 2008)

. . . Duncan’s estimated award shall be increased by $4,416.04, representing 9% interest or $6.04 per diem, . . .

In SOLUTIA INC., 379 B.R. 473 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2007)

. . . Section 6.04 of the Original Indenture provides as follows: “Provided the Notes are not then due and . . . The signatories state that pursuant to Section 6.02 and 6.04, inter alia, they waive all past defaults . . . undo an automatic acceleration under Section 6.01(7) by the giving of notice under Sections 6.02 or 6.04 . . . or the waiving of any past defaults under Sections 6.02 or 6.04. . . . What Section 6.04 adds to the rights granted to the 2009 Noteholders under Section 6.02 where automatic . . .

J. WRIGHT, D. M. v. FRANKEL, a Jr. a a, 965 So. 2d 365 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . Section 6.04 sets forth the procedure that must be followed for the filing, examination and certification . . .

DESSERT BEAUTY, INC. v. PLATINUM FUNDING CORP. v., 519 F. Supp. 2d 410 (S.D.N.Y. 2007)

. . . Inc., 1-6 Commercial Finance Guide § 6.04(l)(b) (2006). . Id. . See Robert D. Aicher and William J. . . .

B. LECKEY B. O. a k a v. W. STEFANO W. E., 501 F.3d 212 (3d Cir. 2007)

. . . have been submitted with the form itself, though it bore no date), the response referenced section 6.04 . . .