The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION

Chapter 6
ADMISSION INTO UNION; CONCESSIONS; STATE BOUNDARIES

View Entire Chapter

CHAPTER 6

TITLE II

STATE ORGANIZATION

CHAPTER 6

ADMISSION INTO UNION; CONCESSIONS; STATE BOUNDARIES

6.01 Assent to terms of admission into the union.

6.02 United States authorized to acquire lands for certain purposes.

6.03 Condemnation of land when price not agreed upon.

6.04 Jurisdiction over such lands; how ceded to the United States.

6.05 Transfer of title and jurisdiction over land owned by state.

6.06 United States may acquire state lands for national forests.

6.07 Congress may legislate concerning state lands acquired for national forests.

6.075 Lands owned or controlled by United States Department of Interior; Governor authorized to cede concurrent jurisdiction to enforce criminal laws.

6.08 Boundary between Florida and Alabama.

6.081 Florida-Alabama boundary redefined.

6.09 Boundary between Florida and Georgia.

6.10 Confirmation of certain grants of Georgia.

6.01 Assent to terms of admission into the union.—The State of Florida assents as by the statute approved July 25, 1845, to the terms of admission of this state into the Confederacy and Union of the United States, and to the provisions of the Acts of Congress respecting the public lands of the United States in this state.

History.—s. 1, ch. 14, 1845; RS 6; GS 4; RGS 4; CGL 4.

6.02 United States authorized to acquire lands for certain purposes.—The United States may purchase, acquire, hold, own, occupy, and possess such lands within the limits of this state as they shall seek to occupy and hold as sites on which to erect and maintain forts, magazines, arsenals, dockyards, and other needful buildings, or any of them, as contemplated and provided in the Constitution of the United States; such land to be acquired either by contract with owners, or in the manner hereinafter provided.

History.—s. 1, ch. 25, 1845; RS 7; GS 5; RGS 5; CGL 5.

6.03 Condemnation of land when price not agreed upon.—If the officer or other agent employed by the United States to make such purchase and the owner of the land contemplated to be purchased, as aforesaid, cannot agree for the sale and purchase thereof, the same may be acquired by the United States by condemnation in the same manner as is hereinafter provided for condemnation of lands for other public purposes, and any officer or agent authorized by the United States may institute and conduct such proceedings in their behalf.

History.—s. 2, ch. 25, 1845; RS 8; GS 6; RGS 6; CGL 6.

6.04 Jurisdiction over such lands; how ceded to the United States.—Whenever the United States shall contract for, purchase, or acquire any land within the limits of this state for the purposes aforesaid, in either of the modes above mentioned and provided, or shall hold for such purposes lands heretofore lawfully acquired or reserved therefor, and shall desire to acquire constitutional jurisdiction over such lands for said purposes, the Governor of this state may, upon application made to him or her in writing on behalf of the United States for that purpose, accompanied by the proper evidence of said reservation, purchase, contract, or acquisition of record, describing the land sought to be ceded by convenient metes and bounds, thereupon, in the name and on behalf of this state, cede to the United States exclusive jurisdiction over the land so reserved, purchased, or acquired and sought to be ceded; the United States to hold, use, occupy, own, possess, and exercise said jurisdiction over the same for the purposes aforesaid, and none other whatsoever; provided, always, that the consent aforesaid is hereby given and the cession aforesaid is to be granted and made as aforesaid, upon the express condition that this state shall retain a concurrent jurisdiction with the United States in and over the land or lands so to be ceded, and every portion thereof, so far that all process, civil or criminal, issuing under authority of this state, or of any of the courts or judicial officers thereof may be executed by the proper officers thereof, upon any person amenable to the same, within the limits and extent of lands so ceded, in like manner and to like effect as if this law had never been passed; saving, however, to the United States security to their property within said limits and extent, and exemption of the same, and of said lands from any taxation under the authority of this state while the same shall continue to be owned, held, used, and occupied by the United States for the purposes above expressed and intended, and not otherwise.

History.—s. 3, ch. 25, 1845; RS 9; GS 7; RGS 7; CGL 7; s. 2, ch. 95-147.

6.05 Transfer of title and jurisdiction over land owned by state.—Whenever a tract of land containing not more than 4 acres shall be selected by an authorized officer or agent of the United States for the bona fide purpose of erecting thereon a lighthouse, beacon, marine hospital, or other public work, and the title to the said land shall be held by the state, then on application by the said officer or agent to the Governor of this state, the said executive may transfer to the United States the title to, and jurisdiction over, said land; provided, always, that the said transfer of title and jurisdiction is to be granted and made, as aforesaid, upon the express condition that this state shall retain a concurrent jurisdiction with the United States, in and over the lands so to be transferred, and every portion thereof, so far that all process, civil or criminal, issuing under authority of this state, or any of the courts or judicial officers thereof, may be executed by the proper officer thereof, upon any person amenable to the same, within the limits and extent of the lands so ceded, in like manner and to like effect as if this law had never been passed; saving, however, to the United States, security to their property within said limits or extent. The said lands shall hereafter remain the property of the United States and be exempt from taxation as long as they shall be needed for said purposes.

History.—ss. 1, 2, ch. 630, 1855; RS 10; GS 8; RGS 8; CGL 8.

6.06 United States may acquire state lands for national forests.—The consent of the state is given to the acquisition by the United States, by purchase, gift, or condemnation with adequate compensation, of such lands in Florida as in the opinion of the Federal Government may be needed for the establishment, consolidation and extension of national forests in the state; provided, that the state shall retain a concurrent jurisdiction with the United States in and over lands so acquired so far that civil process in all cases, and such criminal process as may issue under the authority of the state against any person charged with the commission of any crime without or within said jurisdiction, may be executed thereon in like manner as if this section had not been passed.

History.—s. 1, ch. 8564, 1921; CGL 9.

6.07 Congress may legislate concerning state lands acquired for national forests.—Congress may pass such laws and make or provide for the making of such rules and regulations, of both a civil and criminal nature, and provide punishment therefor, as in its judgment may be necessary for the administration, control, and protection of such lands as may be from time to time acquired by the United States under the provisions of s. 6.06.

History.—s. 2, ch. 8564, 1921; CGL 10.

6.075 Lands owned or controlled by United States Department of Interior; Governor authorized to cede concurrent jurisdiction to enforce criminal laws.—

(1)(a) Whenever the United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service, shall desire to acquire concurrent jurisdiction to enforce criminal laws on any lands owned or controlled by the United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service, within this state and shall make application for that purpose, the Governor is authorized to cede to the United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service, such measure of jurisdiction, not exceeding that requested, as the Governor may deem proper, over all or any part of such lands as to which a cession of the concurrent jurisdiction to enforce criminal laws is requested.

(b) The application on behalf of the United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service, shall state in particular the measure of jurisdiction desired and shall be accompanied by an accurate description of the lands over which such jurisdiction is desired and by information as to which of such lands are then owned or controlled by the United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service.

(c) The cession of jurisdiction shall become effective when it is accepted on behalf of the United States, which acceptance shall be indicated, in writing upon the instrument of cession, by an authorized official of the United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service, and by filing with the Secretary of State of the State of Florida.

(2) The state reserves jurisdiction, for itself and its political subdivisions, to enforce the laws on any lands for which concurrent jurisdiction has been ceded to the United States pursuant to this act. No person residing on such lands shall be deprived of any civil or political rights, including the right of suffrage, by reason of the cession of concurrent jurisdiction to the United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service.

(3)(a) Whenever the United States tenders to the state a relinquishment of all or part of the jurisdiction theretofore acquired by it over lands within this state, the Governor is authorized to accept on behalf of the state the jurisdiction so relinquished; provided, however, that the Governor shall not accept a relinquishment of all or part of such jurisdiction over an Indian tribe recognized by the United States without the consent of its federally recognized tribal governing body.

(b) The Governor shall indicate his or her acceptance of such relinquished jurisdiction by a writing addressed to the head of the appropriate department or agency of the United States, and such acceptance shall be effective when said writing is deposited in the United States mail.

History.—ss. 1, 2, 3, ch. 86-67; s. 3, ch. 95-147.

6.08 Boundary between Florida and Alabama.—The line commencing on the Chattahoochee River near a place known as “Irwin’s Mills,” and running west to the Perdido, marked throughout by blazes on the trees, and also by mounds of earth thrown upon the line, at distances of 1 mile, more or less, from each other, and commonly known as the “Mound line” or “Ellicott’s line,” and by these names distinguished from another line above, running irregularly at different distances not exceeding one and a half miles from the “Mound line” and marked by blazes only, and known as the “Upper line,” or “Coffee’s line,” is the boundary line between the States of Florida and Alabama.

History.—s. 2, ch. 165, 1848; RS 2; GS 2; RGS 2; CGL 2.

6.081 Florida-Alabama boundary redefined.—

(1) The middle of the Perdido River at its mouth, as defined by the Constitutions of the States of Alabama and Florida, is at latitude 30°16′53″ N. and longitude 87°31′06″ W. as the control point; the boundary line at the mouth of the Perdido River is fixed, as nearly as may be, in the axis of the mouth of said river, passing through the control point and running north and south and having as its northern terminus a point of latitude 30°17′02″ N. and longitude 87°31′06″ W., and as its southern terminus a point 1,000 feet due south of the control point; from the northern terminus of the boundary line at the mouth of the river, the boundary up the lower portion of said river be a straight line to a point at latitude 30°18′00″ N., longitude 87°27′08″ W., thence by a straight line to a point in the center line of the intracoastal canal at longitude 87°27′00″ W.; the seaward boundary between Florida and Alabama extends from the south end of the boundary line at the mouth of the Perdido River, thence south 0°01′00″ W. to the seaward limit of each respective state; and shall be deemed, taken and declared, and is hereby deemed, taken and declared to be the boundary line between the States of Florida and Alabama, at the mouth of the Perdido River and adjacent thereto, and shall be deemed and taken as such by the authorities and people of this state.

(2) Nothing herein contained, nor any operations of the provisions of this section, shall prejudice the rights or claims of private individuals to any of the lands herein involved whether such rights or claims arise or exist upon the basis that the lands herein defined as being within the boundaries of the State of Alabama were previously a part of the State of Florida or included within the boundaries of the State of Florida or otherwise.

History.—ss. 2, 5, ch. 28141, 1953.

Note.—Boundary.—Consent given by 68 Stat. 182, May 6, 1954.

6.09 Boundary between Florida and Georgia.—

(1) The line run and marked by B. J. Whitner, Jr., on the part of Florida, and G. J. Orr, on the part of Georgia, is the permanent boundary line between the States of Florida and Georgia.

(2) The boundary line between the States of Florida and Georgia as described in subsection (1) herein shall be extended from a point 37 links north of Ellicott’s Mound on the Saint Marys River; thence down said river to the Atlantic Ocean; thence along the middle of the presently existing Saint Marys entrance navigational channel to the point of intersection with a hypothetical line connecting the seawardmost points of the jetties now protecting such channel; thence along said line to a control point of latitude 30°42′45.6″ N., longitude 81°24′15.9″ W.; thence due east to the seaward limit of Florida as now or hereafter fixed by the Congress of the United States; such boundary to be extended on the same true 90° bearing so far as a need for further delimitation may arise.

History.—s. 1, ch. 1017, 1859; Resolution No. 16, Feb. 8, 1861; RS 3; GS 3; RGS 3; CGL 3; s. 1, ch. 69-4.

Note.—Boundary.—Consent given by 84 Stat. 1094, October 22, 1970.

6.10 Confirmation of certain grants of Georgia.—The titles of bona fide holders of land under any grant from the State of Georgia prior to December 22, 1859, in the territory formerly claimed by the said state, which land is within the State of Florida by the line specified in s. 6.09 remain confirmed so far as this state had the right and power to confirm the same as provided by the act of December 22, 1859.

History.—s. 2, ch. 1017, 1859; RS 456; GS 645; RGS 1229; CGL 1785.

F.S. 6 on Google Scholar

F.S. 6 on Casetext

Amendments to 6

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 6

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 6.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

LITTLE, v. RECLAIM IDAHO,, 140 S. Ct. 2616 (U.S. 2020)

. . . DeWine , 959 F.3d 804, 808 (C.A.6 2020) (per curiam ); Angle v. . . . Whitmer , 963 F.3d 595, 597 (C.A.6 2020). . . .

CALVARY CHAPEL DAYTON VALLEY v. SISOLAK,, 140 S. Ct. 2603 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Electronic Court Filing in No. 3:20-CV-00303, Doc. 38-31, 2020 WL 4260438 (D Nev., June 4, 2020), p. 6 . . . ECF Doc. 38-6, p. 44. . . . Application 8, and n. 6 (quoting Lochhead, Sisolak, Elected Nevada Officials Discuss Systemic Racism, . . .

J. TRUMP, v. MAZARS USA, LLP, J. v. AG,, 140 S. Ct. 2019 (U.S. 2020)

. . . I, § 2, cl. 5; § 3, cl. 6. . . . Dunn , 6 Wheat. 204, 5 L.Ed. 242 (1821), relied on arguments about Congress' power of self-protection . . . Committee on Intelligence, Chairman Schiff Statement on House Intelligence Committee Investigation (Feb. 6, . . . efforts" at accommodation through limited disclosures and testimony over a period of several months. 6 . . .

J. TRUMP, v. R. VANCE, Jr., 140 S. Ct. 2412 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Beale et al., Grand Jury Law and Practice § 6:23, p. 6-243 (2014). . . . Bank of United States , 9 Wheat. 738, 867, 22 U.S. 738, 6 L.Ed. 204 (1824) ("If the trade of the Bank . . . Id. , at 5-6. . . . See ante , at 2431, and n. 6; post , at 2439 (THOMAS, J., dissenting); post , at 2448 - 2450 (ALITO, . . . I, § 6, cl. 1. . . .

MCGIRT, v. OKLAHOMA, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (U.S. 2020)

. . . . §§ 6, 10, 28, 34 Stat. 139-140, 148. . . . Georgia , 6 Pet. 515, 557, 8 L.Ed. 483 (1832) ; see also McClanahan v. . . . No. 377, 53d Cong., 2d Sess., 6 (1894). Coexistence proved complicated. . . . Brief for Muscogee (Creek) Nation as Amicus Curiae 18, n. 6. . . . Ante , at 2467, n. 6. . . .

OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE SCHOOL, v. MORRISSEY- BERRU St. v., 140 S. Ct. 2049 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Act of Uniformity, 2 & 3 Edw. 6, ch. 1. . . . held that the exception did not apply. 769 Fed.Appx. 460, 460-461 (2019) ; 911 F.3d 603, 605, 611, n. 6 . . . See Deuteronomy 6:7, 11:19. . . . See, e.g ., Mark 9:5, 11:21; John 1:38, 3:26, 4:31, 6:25, 9:2. . . . Gannon University , 462 F.3d 294, 304, n. 6, 307 (C.A.3 2006). . . .

LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR SAINTS PETER AND PAUL HOME, v. PENNSYLVANIA, J. v., 140 S. Ct. 2367 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Argued May 6, 2020 Decided July 8, 2020 Paul D. Clement, Erin E. Murphy, Andrew C. . . . Sebelius , 6 F.Supp.3d 1225 (D Colo.2013), p. 5 (Complaint). . . . Brief for 186 Members of the United States Congress as Amici Curiae 6 (hereinafter Brief for 186 Members . . . education and a career with far less risk of an unplanned pregnancy," Brief for 186 Members of Congress 5-6 . . .

COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF STATE, v. BACA,, 140 S. Ct. 2316 (U.S. 2020)

. . . July 6, 2020 L. . . .

B. CHIAFALO, v. WASHINGTON, 140 S. Ct. 2316 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Argued May 13, 2020 Decided July 6, 2020 L. . . . Ante, at 2324, n. 6. . . .

P. BARR, v. AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF POLITICAL CONSULTANTS, INC., 140 S. Ct. 2335 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Argued May 6, 2020 Decided July 6, 2020 Noel J. . . . TCPA, § 2, ¶¶3, 6, 105 Stat. 2394, note following 47 U.S.C. § 227. . . . ." ¶¶6, 10. . . . See n. 6, supra . . . . Rock Against Racism , 491 U.S. 781, 797-799, and n. 6, 109 S.Ct. 2746, 105 L.Ed.2d 661 (1989) (explaining . . .

ESPINOZA, v. MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,, 140 S. Ct. 2246 (U.S. 2020)

. . . X, § 6 (1) (1972), is emphasized in petitioners' brief and in the briefs of numerous supporting amici . . . X, § 6 (1) (1972) (emphasis added). . . . See generally Myers, Know Nothing and Ku Klux Klan, 219 North American Rev. 1 (Jan. 1924). 6 Montana . . . I, § 6 (1851) ; Ky. Const. § 189 (1891) ; Miss. Const., Art. 8, § 208 (1890) ; Nev. Const., Art. . . . X, § 6(1). . . . X, § 6 (1). . . . 435 P.3d 603, 613, 621, and n. 6 ; App to Pet. for Cert. 123, 125.) . . . X, § 6. . . . See Dept. of Ed., A Duncan et al., Education Options in the States 3-6 (2009). . . . X, § 6(1), which forbids government appropriations for sectarian purposes, including funding religious . . . Anbinder, Nativism and Slavery: The Northern Know Nothings and the Politics of the 1850s, pp. 6-8 (1992 . . .

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, v. BOOKING. COM B. V., 140 S. Ct. 2298 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Ante , at 2307, n. 6. . . . Brief for Petitioners 4; Brief for Respondent 6; see §§ 1127, 1064(3), 1065(4) (referring to "the generic . . . See Brief for Petitioners 25, n. 6; Tr. of Oral Arg. 25-26. . . .

AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, v. ALLIANCE FOR OPEN SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL, INC., 140 S. Ct. 2082 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Hopkins , 118 U.S. 356, 369, 6 S.Ct. 1064, 30 L.Ed. 220 (1886) ; cf. Bluman v. . . . Taxation With Representation of Wash. , 461 U.S. 540, 544-545, and n. 6, 103 S.Ct. 1997, 76 L.Ed.2d 129 . . . its intention to lobby.' " 570 U.S. at 215, 133 S.Ct. 2321 (quoting Regan , 461 U.S. at 545, and n. 6, . . . Regan , 461 U.S. at 545, n. 6, 103 S.Ct. 1997. . . .

JUNE MEDICAL SERVICES L. L. C. v. RUSSO, v. LLC., 140 S. Ct. 2103 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Proc. 52(a)(6). . . . Doe 6 Finally, the District Court found that, notwithstanding his good-faith efforts, Doe 6 would not . . . All four directly support the testimony of Doe 6 and the State's expert. . . . But, unlike Doe 6, Doe 5 primarily performs surgical abortions. App. 1330. . . . or render the District Court's conclusion as to Doe 6 clearly erroneous. . . . Two others, Does 5 and 6, were plaintiffs earlier but dropped out for unexplained reasons. . . . Doe 6 . Doe 6 is a Board-certified OB/GYN who practices at Women's Clinic in New Orleans. . . . Nothing in the record reveals the type of privileges about which Doe 6 inquired. . . . Shapiro et al., Supreme Court Practice § 6-26(b), p. 6-104 (11th ed. 2019) (collecting cases). . . . II, § 6 (1838); 1861 Cal. Stat., ch. 521, § 45, p. 588; Colo. (Terr.) Rev. Stat. § 42 (1868); Conn. . . . pre-enforcement challenge does not adequately demonstrate that the three relevant doctors (Does 2, 5, and 6) . . . . ----, ---- - ----, 140 S.Ct. 1575, --- L.Ed.2d ---- (2020) (THOMAS, J., concurring) (slip op., at 6- . . .

SEILA LAW LLC, v. CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, 140 S. Ct. 2183 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Perkins , 116 U.S. 483, 6 S.Ct. 449, 29 L.Ed. 700 (1886), and Morrison v. . . . In Perkins , we upheld tenure protections for a naval cadet-engineer. 116 U.S. at 485, 6 S.Ct. 449. . . . See Free Enterprise Fund , 561 U.S., at 500, n. 6, 130 S.Ct. 3138 (Madison) ; Myers , 272 U.S., at 136 . . . See Act of Dec. 23, 1913, ch. 6, 38 Stat. 251. . . . Public Company Accounting Oversight Bd. , 561 U.S. 477, 499, 500 n. 6, 130 S.Ct. 3138, 177 L.Ed.2d 706 . . . See ibid. ; § 6(a), id. , at 721; FTC Ann. . . . See § 6(g), 38 Stat. 722; National Petroleum Refiners Assn. v. . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, v. THURAISSIGIAM, 140 S. Ct. 1959 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Provide for the Security Thereof in Special Cases Where No Provision Is Already Made by Law (Sept. 6, . . . Acts ch. 2, pp. 6-7. . . . See App. 30-32; Brief for Respondent 6. . . . Id. , at 369, 6 S.Ct. 1064 ; Zadvydas v. . . . Yick Wo , 118 U.S. at 369, 6 S.Ct. 1064. . . . 1850, p. 150, n. 4 (1992); see also, e.g. , Craies, The Right of Aliens To Enter British Territory, 6 . . . Ex parte McCardle , 6 Wall. 318, 325-326, 18 L.Ed. 816 (1868). . . . See 6 U.S.C. § 251(2) (transferring authority over "[t]he detention and removal program" to the Department . . . Legal Historians Brief 5-6. . . .

C. LIU, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, 140 S. Ct. 1936 (U.S. 2020)

. . . not intended to make investors whole, but rather to deprive wrongdoers of ill-gotten gains); see also 6 . . . Post , at 6 (citing Feltner v. . . . Zacharie & Turner , 6 Pet. 648, 654, 8 L.Ed. 532 (1832). . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, v. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, J. v., 140 S. Ct. 1891 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Leavitt , 460 F.3d 1, 5-6 (CADC 2006) (Garland, J.) . . . Brief for Regents 6. . . . Wilson, Nonimmigrant and Immigrant Visa Categories: Data Brief 1-6 (2019) (Table 1). . . . Leavitt , 460 F.3d 1, 6 (2006) (Garland, J.) (internal quotation marks omitted). . . . R. 6, 116th Cong., 1st Sess. . . .

BOSTOCK, v. CLAYTON COUNTY, GEORGIA v. Jr. Co- R. G. G. R. v., 140 S. Ct. 1731 (U.S. 2020)

. . . In 1964, a legislative committee was wrapping up a 6-year campaign to remove homosexual teachers from . . . Also 6-7 sexe, (6 seex, 7 pl. sexe, 8 poss . sexe's). [ad. . . . No. 10 ¶ 6 Their Amusements .. are more adapted to the Sex than to the Species. 1730 SWIFT Let. to Mrs . . . (1975); H.R. 451, 95th Cong., 1st Sess., § 6 (1977); S. 2081, 96th Cong., 1st Sess. (1979); S. 1708, . . . Supp. 3d ----, ----, 2020 WL 2487060, *5 (D Alaska, Mar. 6, 2020). . . . See, e.g. , H.R. 14752, 93d Cong., 2d Sess., §§ 6, 11 (1974) (amending Title VII "by adding after the . . . ' " defined as "choice of sexual partner according to gender"); H.R. 451, 95th Cong., 1st Sess., §§ 6, . . .

UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, v. COWPASTURE RIVER PRESERVATION ASSOCIATION LLC, v., 140 S. Ct. 1837 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Bruce, Law of Easements and Licenses in Land § 1:1, at 1-6. . . . See, e.g. , 54 U.S.C. §§ 100102(6), 100501. . . . Ante , at 1849, n. 6. The Court's concerns do not follow. Even with the Supremacy Clause, U. S. . . . Ante , at 1849, n. 6. But it already did. See 16 U.S.C. § 1246(c) ; 54 U.S.C. § 100751(a) ; Pub. . . . Compare ante , at 1849, n. 6, with, e.g. , NPS, Reference Manual 45, at 41 (explaining complementary . . .

ROGERS, v. GREWAL,, 140 S. Ct. 1865 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Sheriff's Dept. , 837 F.3d 678, 702-703 (C.A.6 2016) (Batchelder, J., concurring in most of judgment) . . .

ANDRUS v. TEXAS, 140 S. Ct. 1875 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Exh. 6, p. 3. . . . things, "severe neglect" and exposure to domestic violence, substance abuse, and death in his childhood. 6 . . . Id. , at 6. But Andrus' counsel did not heed the caution. . . .

FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, v. AURELIUS INVESTMENT, LLC, LLC, III v. LLC, v. LLC, n De De La El Y v., 140 S. Ct. 1649 (U.S. 2020)

. . . See Act of June 6, 1900, § 10, 31 Stat. 325 (appointment of Governor of Territory of Alaska by President . . . Missouri Governor, similar); Act of Mar. 2, 1819, § 3, 3 Stat. 494 (Arkansas, similar); Act of June 6, . . . Pitot , 6 Cranch 332, 337, 3 L.Ed. 240 (1810). . . . Sere , 6 Cranch at 337. . . . No. 2275, 81st Cong., 2d Sess., 6 (1950) (Public Law 600 was a "reaffirmation by the Congress of the . . .

BANISTER, v. DAVIS,, 140 S. Ct. 1698 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Proc. 6(b)(2) (prohibiting extensions to Rule 59(e)'s deadline). . . . See Habeas Rule 6(a) ; see also Bracy v. . . . Another civil mainstay, the Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss, also has no place in habeas. . . . Steinman, Federal Practice and Procedure § 1021, n. 6 (4th ed. . . . Proc. 60(b)(1)-(6). . . .

WEXFORD HEALTH, v. GARRETT, 140 S. Ct. 1611 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Churner , 532 U.S. 731, 741, n. 6, 121 S.Ct. 1819, 149 L.Ed.2d 958 (2001). . . .

VALENTINE, v. COLLIER,, 140 S. Ct. 1598 (U.S. 2020)

. . . co-janitor, an arrangement medical experts described as tantamount to no gloves at all. 2020 WL 1916883, *5-*6, . . . Id., at *6-*7, *9-*12 ; 2020 WL 1899274. . . .

UNITED STATES, v. SINENENG- SMITH, 140 S. Ct. 1575 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Washington State Republican Party , 552 U.S. 442, 449, n. 6, 128 S.Ct. 1184, 170 L.Ed.2d 151 (2008) ) . . .

FRIENDS OF DANNY DEVITO, v. WOLF,, 140 S. Ct. 2758 (U.S. 2020)

. . . May 6, 2020 Application for stay presented to Justice Alito and by him referred to the Court denied. . . .

MAINE COMMUNITY HEALTH OPTIONS, v. UNITED STATES v. v. v., 140 S. Ct. 1308 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Langston , 118 U.S. 389, 6 S.Ct. 1185, 30 L.Ed. 164 (1886). . . . Id. , at 394, 6 S.Ct. 1185. . . . Id. , at 393, 6 S.Ct. 1185. . . . See Langston , 118 U.S. at 394, 6 S.Ct. 1185 ; cf. Raines v. . . . Id. , at 394, 6 S.Ct. 1185. . . . Bormes , 568 U.S. 6, 15-16, 133 S.Ct. 12, 184 L.Ed.2d 317 (2012) ; United States v. . . . United States , 366 U.S. 393, 81 S.Ct. 1230, 6 L.Ed.2d 365 (1961) (adjudicating suit brought by former . . .

GEORGIA, v. PUBLIC. RESOURCE. ORG, INC., 140 S. Ct. 1498 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Lathrop , 142 Mass. 29, 6 N.E. 559 (1886) ). . . . See OCGA §§ 21-2-131, 16-6-2, 16-6-18, 16-15-9 (available at www.legis.ga.gov). . . . See §§ 21-2-131, 16-6-2, 16-6-18, 16-15-9 (available at https://store.lexisnexis.com/products/official . . . Everett , 326 Ga.App. 6, 755 S.E.2d 823 (2014) ) with Ga. . . . Virginia , 6 Wheat. 264, 399, 5 L.Ed. 257 (1821) (Marshall, C. . . .

NEW YORK STATE RIFLE PISTOL ASSOCIATION, INC. v. CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK,, 140 S. Ct. 1525 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Virginia , 6 Wheat. 264, 404, 5 L.Ed. 257 (1821), "[w]e have no more right to decline the exercise of . . . Suggestion of Mootness 5-6. Our grant of certiorari also prompted action by New York State. . . . Penal Law Ann. § 400.00(6) (as in effect July 16, 2019). . . . Hazeltine Research, Inc. , 401 U.S. 321, 331, 91 S.Ct. 795, 28 L.Ed.2d 77 (1971) ; 6 Wright & Miller . . . Zamiara , 788 F.3d 207, 213-214 (C.A.6 2015) (affirming compensatory damages award for injury caused . . .

BARTON, v. P. BARR,, 140 S. Ct. 1442 (U.S. 2020)

. . . In 1996, 6½ years after his admission to this country, Barton committed aggravated assault offenses for . . .

COUNTY OF MAUI, HAWAII, v. HAWAII WILDLIFE FUND,, 140 S. Ct. 1462 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Argued November 6, 2019 Decided April 23, 2020 County of Maui, Moana M. Lutey, Richelle M. . . . . § 502(6), 86 Stat. 886. . . . Co. , 905 F.3d 925, 932-938 (C.A.6 2018) (discharges through groundwater are excluded from the Act's . . . See, e.g., Nonpoint Source Program, Annual Report (California) 6 (2016-2017) (discussing state timberland . . . See Tr. of Oral Arg. 5-6, 24-25. . . . purpose of Clean Water Act is to regulate pollution at its source); The Emily , 9 Wheat. 381, 390, 6 . . . . § 1362(6). . . .

ROMAG FASTENERS, INC. v. FOSSIL, INC., 140 S. Ct. 1492 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Societe Enfants Gombault et Cie , 52 F.2d 774, 778 (C.A.6 1931). The confusion doesn't end there. . . . Congress Cigar Co. , 118 F.2d 64, 71-72 (C.A.6 1941). . . . Societe Enfants Gombault et Cie , 52 F.2d 774, 778 (C.A.6 1931) ; Regis v. . . .

ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY, v. A. CHRISTIAN,, 140 S. Ct. 1335 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Section 122(e)(6) of the Act provides that, once the study begins, "no potentially responsible party . . . may undertake any remedial action" at the site without EPA approval. 42 U.S.C. § 9622(e)(6). . . . Proc. 6(6), 14(1), 14(3) (2019). . . . In addition, § 122(e)(6) applies only to sites on the Superfund list. . . . We take no issue with characterizing § 122(e)(6) as an elephant. . . . I also agree that the landowners are potentially responsible parties under § 122(e)(6) of the Comprehensive . . . But Atlantic Richfield presented its § 122(e)(6) theory as an alternate ground for reversal, and has . . . As Atlantic Richfield's counsel stated at argument, the § 122(e)(6) ruling is "sufficient to resolve . . . In answer, Atlantic Richfield directs our attention to § 122(e)(6). . . . Ante, at 1351 - 1352, and n. 6. . . .

THRYV, INC. v. CLICK- TO- CALL TECHNOLOGIES, LP,, 140 S. Ct. 1367 (U.S. 2020)

. . . See id., at 6. Still, Thryv faced a hurdle. . . .

RAMOS, v. LOUISIANA, 140 S. Ct. 1390 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Ohio , 367 U.S. 643, 81 S.Ct. 1684, 6 L.Ed.2d 1081 (1961). . . . I, § XI (1786), in 6 id., at 3753; Va. Declaration of Rights § 8 (1776), in 7 id., at 3813. See Ga. . . . IX, § 6 (1790), in 6 id., at 3264. See, e.g., Commonwealth v. . . . See Brief for Respondent 17. 6 N. Dane, Digest of American Law, ch. . . . See also post , at 1416, n. 6 (KAVANAUGH, J., concurring in part) (offering the same argument by contending . . . Ohio , 367 U.S. 643, 81 S.Ct. 1684, 6 L.Ed.2d 1081 (1961) ; Brown v. . . . Story, Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States § 777, p. 248 (1833); 6 N. . . . See Amdt. 6. . . . Brief for State of Oregon as Amicus Curiae 6-32. . . . See Brief for Respondent 36-39; Brief for State of Oregon as Amicus Curiae 6-8. . . .

BROWN, v. P. BARR,, 140 S. Ct. 2662 (U.S. 2020)

. . . of the confession of error by the Solicitor General in his brief for the respondent filed on March 6, . . .

BABB, v. WILKIE,, 140 S. Ct. 1168 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Argued January 15, 2020 Decided April 6, 2020 Joseph D. Magri, Sean M. . . .

KANSAS, v. GLOVER, 140 S. Ct. 1183 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Argued November 4, 2019 Decided April 6, 2020 Solicitor General Toby Crouse for the petitioner Michael . . . Laws § 31-11-6 (2010). . . . Stat., Tit. 47, § 6-201.1 (2011). . . . Deputy Mehrer assumed the registered owner of the truck was also the driver, Charles Glover Jr. 6. . . .

ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY,, 140 S. Ct. 1198 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Decided April 6, 2020 The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. . . .

HALPRIN v. DAVIS,, 140 S. Ct. 1200 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Decided April 6, 2020 The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. . . .

VF JEANSWEAR LP v. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, 140 S. Ct. 1202 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Decided April 6, 2020 The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. . . . Id. , at *6. . . .

REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, v. DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE,, 140 S. Ct. 1205 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 6, 2020 . . .

WALSH, IV, v. UNITED STATES., 140 S. Ct. 2638 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 6, 2020 Motion for leave to file a petition for writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix . . .

W. REBENSTORF, v. GRANT., 140 S. Ct. 2639 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 6, 2020 Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied . . .

CRENSHAW, Jr. v. L. JONES,, 140 S. Ct. 2639 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 6, 2020 Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied . . .

J. WARREN, v. J. ORMOND,, 140 S. Ct. 2639 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 6, 2020 Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied . . .

LOWERY, v. DAVIS,, 140 S. Ct. 2639 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 6, 2020 Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied . . .

G. ARMSTRONG, v. PENNSYLVANIA,, 140 S. Ct. 2639 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 6, 2020 Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time under . . .

G. ARMSTRONG, v. UNITED STATES,, 140 S. Ct. 2639 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 6, 2020 Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time under . . .

G. ARMSTRONG, v. AMTRAK POLICE., 140 S. Ct. 2640 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 6, 2020 Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time under . . .

G. ARMSTRONG, v. GEICO INSURANCE., 140 S. Ct. 2640 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 6, 2020 Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time under . . .

AL- AMIN, v. C. WARD,, 140 S. Ct. 2640 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 6, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh . . .

SALGADO, v. UNITED STATES., 140 S. Ct. 2640 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 6, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh . . .

SEALEY, v. J. GILLIAM,, 140 S. Ct. 2641 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 6, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit . . .

NEVILLE, v. DHILLON,, 140 S. Ct. 2641 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 6, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit . . .

CONNECTICUT FINE WINE AND SPIRITS, LLC, v. H. SEAGULL,, 140 S. Ct. 2641 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 6, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit . . .

E. CRAIG, v. O KELLEY,, 140 S. Ct. 2641 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 6, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh . . .

VOSBURGH, v. BURNT HILLS- BALLSTON LAKE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT,, 140 S. Ct. 2642 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 6, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit . . .

SOUTHERN ILLINOIS STORM SHELTERS, v. COM, INCORPORATED., 140 S. Ct. 2642 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 6, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit . . .

HILL, Sr. v. G. JOHNSON,, 140 S. Ct. 2642 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 6, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh . . .

WATERS, v. GEORGIA., 140 S. Ct. 2642 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 6, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Georgia denied. . . .

COOK, v. HOPKINS,, 140 S. Ct. 2643 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 6, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit . . .

KINUTHIA, v. VELARDE,, 140 S. Ct. 2643 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 6, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit . . .

ROTHSTEIN, v. UNITED STATES., 140 S. Ct. 2643 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 6, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh . . .

COPELAND, v. UNITED STATES., 140 S. Ct. 2643 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 6, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh . . .

SMALL, v. UNITED STATES., 140 S. Ct. 2644 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 6, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit . . .

INO THERAPEUTICS LLC, v. PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC., 140 S. Ct. 2644 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 6, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit . . .

W. RAGER, v. AUGUSTINE,, 140 S. Ct. 2644 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 6, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh . . .

FELICIANOSOTO, v. UNITED STATES., 140 S. Ct. 2644 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 6, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit . . .

MITCHELL, v. UNITED STATES., 140 S. Ct. 2645 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 6, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit . . .

E. BOYD, v. CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION,, 140 S. Ct. 2645 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 6, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit . . .

ADEBOWALE, v. WOLF,, 140 S. Ct. 2645 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 6, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit . . .

PREZIOSO, v. UNITED STATES., 140 S. Ct. 2645 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 6, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit . . .

CORTEZ- ROGEL, v. UNITED STATES., 140 S. Ct. 2646 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 6, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit . . .

MENDEZ, v. UNITED STATES., 140 S. Ct. 2646 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 6, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit . . .

PACHECO- ASTRUDILLO, v. UNITED STATES., 140 S. Ct. 2646 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 6, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit . . .

GALINDO- SERRANO, v. UNITED STATES., 140 S. Ct. 2646 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 6, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit . . .

HANNA, v. UNITED STATES., 140 S. Ct. 2647 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 6, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh . . .

T. KIRVIN, v. L. GRANT,, 140 S. Ct. 2647 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 6, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit . . .

SMITH, v. W. CLARKE,, 140 S. Ct. 2647 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 6, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied. . . .

A. WILLIAMS, v. LITTON LOAN SERVICES,, 140 S. Ct. 2647 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 6, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit . . .

WELSH, v. FLORIDA., 140 S. Ct. 2647 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 6, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied. . . .

SPICE, v. MICHIGAN., 140 S. Ct. 2647 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 6, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied. . . .

HURLES, v. SHINN,, 140 S. Ct. 2648 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 6, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit . . .

PELMEAR, v. O CONNOR,, 140 S. Ct. 2648 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 6, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit . . .

PALMER, v. S. INCH,, 140 S. Ct. 2648 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 6, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh . . .

JORGE, v. FLORIDA,, 140 S. Ct. 2648 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 6, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh . . .

HILLYGUS, v. DOHERTY,, 140 S. Ct. 2649 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 6, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit . . .

JACOBS, v. MARICOPA INTEGRATED HEALTH CARE SYSTEM., 140 S. Ct. 2649 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 6, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One denied . . .

JACKSON, Jr. v. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT,, 140 S. Ct. 2649 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 6, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh . . .

SPEED, v. DAVIS,, 140 S. Ct. 2649 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 6, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit . . .

ARELLANO, v. PARAMO,, 140 S. Ct. 2650 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 6, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit . . .

R. BYRD, v. BOUTTE,, 140 S. Ct. 2650 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 6, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit . . .

PAYNE, v. MANGUM., 140 S. Ct. 2650 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 6, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit . . .

MAJOR, v. BAKER,, 140 S. Ct. 2650 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 6, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Nevada denied. . . .

SUNDY, v. FRIENDSHIP PAVILION ACQUISITION COMPANY, LLC,, 140 S. Ct. 2650 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 6, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Georgia denied. . . .

KANE, v. PENNSYLVANIA., 140 S. Ct. 2650 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 6, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Office . . .

CASTILLO, v. BACA,, 140 S. Ct. 2651 (U.S. 2020)

. . . April 6, 2020 Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Nevada denied. . . .