The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . See Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.07 (Am. Law Inst. 2006). . . .
. . . See Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.07 cmt. b (2006) (explaining that the Third Restatement abandoned . . .
. . . 45.00 per InterOil share payable in Exxon shares, and (ii) a contingent resource payment ("CRP") for $ 7.07 . . .
. . . Commerce preliminarily calculated a weighted-average dumping margin of 5.29 percent for Habas and 7.07 . . .
. . . statute sanction[ed] this interference with tribal self-government"); COHEN'S HANDBOOK , supra , § 7.07 . . . COHEN'S HANDBOOK , supra , § 7.07[4], at 673 & n.92; see Bay Mills , 134 S.Ct. at 2032 (acknowledging . . .
. . . See Restatement (Third) of Agency Law § 7.07. . . . Id. § 7.07 (2006) ("An employee acts within the scope of employment when performing work assigned by . . .
. . . See Restatement (Third) of Agency, § 7.07 (2006). . . . not intended by the employee to serve any purpose of the employer," Restatement (Third) of Agency, § 7.07 . . .
. . . . § 7.07 cmt. b. . . .
. . . temporary access roads to bring a tracked drill rig and a service truck to off-road locations, affecting 7.07 . . .
. . . quoting Restatement (Second) of Agency § 245 cmt. f (1958)); see also Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.07 . . .
. . . . § 7.07 (agent is an employee and commits a tort while acting within the scope of employment); id. § . . . conclusion that the evidence was insufficient to allege control), with Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.07 . . . controls or has the right to control the manner and means of the agent's performance of work"), and id. § 7.07 . . . at 504 (citing Restatement (Second) of Agency § 220(2) ); see also Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.07 . . . See Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.07(1),(3), cmt. f (Am. Law Inst. 2006). . . .
. . . Plan”), November 15, 2000,: 10; Ortho product prices increased by anywhere from $7.07 ($10.97 to $18.04 . . .
. . . APA Rule 7.07 states "[psychologists do not engage in sexual relationships with students or supervisees . . .
. . . (quoting RESTATEMENT (THIRD) OF AGENCY § 7.07). . . .
. . . Restatement (Third) Agency § 7.07 cmt. c. . . .
. . . Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.07 (2006) (emphasis added); see Bohnsack v. . . . Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.07. . . . Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.07. . Garcetti, 547 U.S. at 421-22, 126 S.Ct. 1951. . Id. . . . .
. . . RESTATEMENT (THIRD) OF AGENCY § 7.07 (2006). . . .
. . . Plaintiff first argues that Local Civil Rules 7.04 and 7.07 bar the Court from considering the documents . . . See Local Rule 7.07 (limiting the scope of a reply to “matters raised initially in [the] response to . . .
. . . failure to determine the value of his vehicle before seizure would be unfair or deceptive under 940 CMR 7.07 . . . , § 34, or the property is otherwise exempt by law from such dispossession or disablement.” 940 CMR 7.07 . . . Thus, the seizure cannot be found to have been unfair under § 1692f due to any violation of 940 CMR 7.07 . . .
. . . Restatement (Third) of Agency §§ 7.03, 7.07 (2006); see also Rivera v. Nat’l R.R. . . .
. . . . § 7.07 (we say “primarily” because Barclays’ challenge under section 707(b) was not limited to subsection . . .
. . . Rest. 3d Agency § 7.07, the new counterpart to Rest.2d Agency § 228, continues to require an-, inquiry . . . Rest, 3d Agency § 7.07(2). . . .
. . . Daniels, 115 N.M. at 49, 846 P.2d at 355; Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.07(2) (2006)). . . . subject to vicarious liability to a third party harmed by an agent’s conduct when (a) as stated in § 7.07 . . .
. . . Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.07(3)(a) (2006) (“[A]n employee is an agent whose principal controls . . .
. . . Papa John’s, 244 S.W.3d at 51-52 (quoting Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.07 (2006)). . . .
. . . Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.07(2); see also Burlington Indus., Inc. v. . . . Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.07(2) (emphasis added). . . .
. . . Paint & Decorating Ctr., Inc., 142 N.M. 583, 588 [168 P.3d 155] (2007); Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.07 . . . Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.07 (emphasis added). Ms. . . . Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.07. Accordingly, ASI may be held liable for the torts of Ms. . . .
. . . (quoting Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.07 (2006)). . . .
. . . Herrera, 927 S.W.2d 597, 601 (Tex.1996); see also Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.07(1). . . . Id. § 7.07(2).” see Bohnsack v. Varco, L.P., 668 F.3d 262, 273-274 (5th Cir.2012). . . .
. . . id. 7.04(l)(b)(23), 7.13; instructor qualifications, see id. 7.04(2); apprentice enrollment, see id. 7.07 . . . (1); reporting, see id. 7.07(2); and termination, see id. 7.08(3). . . .
. . . See Restatement (Second) of Agency § 229 (1957); see also Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.07(2), and . . .
. . . Newman, Handbook on Insurance Coverage Disputes, § 7.07, at 664 (16th ed. 2012) (“[Djirect action statutes . . .
. . . It included a base offense level of 88 given Cortez-Diaz’s responsibility for 7.07 kilograms (over fifteen . . .
. . . Walter, Employment Discrimination Law and Practice § 7.07[A] (4th ed. 2009) ("The more objectionable . . .
. . . The Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.07 similarly states, An employee acts within the scope of employment . . . torts of theft and fraud can be within the scope of employment), citing Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.07 . . . Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.07. Herrera v. Aguilar, 2013 WL 4784125, at *3 (W.D.Tex. . . .
. . . The test is similar to that set forth in the Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.07(2) (2006): An employee . . .
. . . Daniels, 115 N.M. at 49, 846 P.2d at 355; Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.07(2) (2006)). . . .
. . . Accord id. (12/8/08 at 7.07-7.42) (suggesting that officers with low activity will be transferred); id . . .
. . . .”); id. at § 7.07 ("The deliberate indifference standard has ... played a pervasive role in the law . . .
. . . Restatement (3d) of Agency § 7.07. . . .
. . . Regs. 7.07(24) (requiring disclosure that debtor cannot be sued on time-barred debt), but Illinois is . . .
. . . Daniels, 115 N.M. at 49, 846 P.2d at 355; Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.07(2) (2006)). . . . Daniels, 115 N.M. at 49, 846 P.2d at 355; Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.07(2) (2006)). . . .
. . . Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.07(2) (2006). . . .
. . . Section 7.07 of the regulations provides a list of practices that are considered unfair or deceptive . . .
. . . “Astoria Hedge,” executed on January 11, 2006, provided that if the market price were higher than $7.07 . . . If the price were below $7.07, Morgan Stanley would pay the difference (times 1800 MW) to Astoria. . . . The net effect of the agreement was that Astoria was assured of always receiving exactly $7.07 per KW-month . . . profits (if the market price were above $7.57) and subsidized any losses (if the market price were below $7.07 . . .
. . . Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.07(1) (2006). However, as explained in A & M Records, Inc. v. . . .
. . . Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.07 (2006); Restatement (Second) of Agency § 220 (1958). . . . .
. . . Under the hedge, if the market price rose above $7.07 per kW-month, Astoria would pay Morgan Stanley . . . the difference times 1800 MW; if the market price dipped below $7.07, Morgan Stanley would pay Astoria . . .
. . . 30,199 80.74% 79.98% 28,891 78.46% 77.77% -2.28% -2.21% 3 26,657 86.20% 85.01% 28,822 79.13% 77.73% -7.07% . . .
. . . Section 220 of Restatement (Second) of Agency is now part of section 7.07 of Restatement (Third) of Agency . . . Because the Kansas courts have relied on section 220, we believe they would similarly look to section 7.07 . . . .2d at 1112 (distinguishing between the exercise of the control and the right to control) and section 7.07 . . .
. . . DCAA found that its sample of twelve subcontracts represented an average PPPD rate of $7.07, whereas . . . the average PPPD and determined that the average PPPD rate at the twelve comparison sites was not $7.07 . . .
. . . Law § 7.07. By statute, it must “charge fees for its services to patients and residents.” . . .
. . . Par. 7.07. . . .
. . . Dennis Rasmussen, Inc., 273 Wis.2d 106, 682 N.W.2d 328, 333-37 (2004); Restatement (Third) op Agency § 7.07 . . . though the master did not sanction it, or even though he forbade it.”); Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.07 . . . The Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.07 cmt. b (2006) has since commented that the language used in . . . Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.07(2) (2006). . . .
. . . Herrera, 927 S.W.2d 597, 601 (Tex.1996); see also Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.07(1). . . . Id. § 7.07(2). . . .
. . . Section 7.07 of the Declaration allows the Association to recover “[a]ll costs and expenses” incurred . . . Moreover, the Association’s attorney’s fees are assessments: section 7.07 provides that the fees will . . .
. . . Walter, Employment Discrimination Law and Practice § 7.07[A] (4th ed. 2009) ("The more objectionable . . .
. . . guard was a servant rather than independent contractor of the store); Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.07 . . .
. . . Under that agreement, if the market price for installed capacity was above $7.07 per kW-month, Astoria . . . would pay Morgan Stanley the difference times 1800 MW; if the market price was below $7.07, Morgan Stanley . . . ) while Astoria would pay Morgan Stanley $.33 x 1800 MW under the Astoria Hedge ($7.40/ kW-month — $7.07 . . . Thus, Astoria was locked into the fixed price of $7.07/ kW-month under the Astoria Hedge. . . .
. . . Code R. 12D-7.07 (4) (2006) (stating that a person not residing in a taxing unit but owning property . . .
. . . Claim No. 101 was based upon the provisions of § 7.07(a) of the Indenture regarding the payment of reasonable . . . Indenture § 7.07, Trial Ex. 1; Test, of Todd Raziano, Trial Tr. at 441:1-442:22. . . . .
. . . Id.., § 7.07(3)(a). . . .
. . . His wallet was found some distance downstream, his front pants pockets had been turned out, and $7.07 . . .
. . . In addition, Section 7.07 of the TRA states: Except as otherwise provided in Section 7.01 through 7.06 . . . (a) and 7.07(b), above, shall be apportioned on the same basis as would arise under applicable common . . . The MBTA next contends there is an inconsistency between Sections 7.03 and 7.07 of the agreement. . . . (a) and 7.07(b) apply. . . . (See TRA Section 7.07, Compl. Ex. . . .
. . . Other provisions of the Regulations that are relevant to this dispute include §§ 5.07, 7.04, 7.05 and 7.07 . . . In addition, § 7.07(D) of the Regulations states: Meeting of Other Corporations. . . . Although it is true that the CEO has authority under § 7.07(D) of the Regulations to “act and vote, on . . . Regulations § 7.07(D). . . .
. . . See generally Restatement (Third) Agency § 7.07 (2006). . . .
. . . controls the “manner and means of the agent’s performance of work,” Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.07 . . . controls the “manner and means of the agent’s performance of work,” Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.07 . . . Id. § 7.07 cmt. f. . . .
. . . . §§ 5.07, 7.07. . . . Law §§ 5.07, 7.07, 41.03, 41.42, 41.39; N.Y. Comp.Codes R. & Regs. tit. 18 §§ 485-87. . . . Law §§ 7.01, 7.07. . . . Law § § 5.07, 7.07. . Id. §§ 41.03, 41.42, 41.39. . Id. § 7.07. . Id. . . . . . § 7.07(a); id. § 5.07 (requiring OMH to formulate each year "a statewide comprehensive five-year plan . . .
. . . CBA Art. 7.01-7.07. . . .
. . . The following day, Plaintiffs allege Maxim’s stock price fell an additional 7.07%, from $20.80 to $19.33 . . .
. . . . §§ 2.04, 7.03, 7.07-.08. . . . Id. § 7.07(3)(a). . . . E.g., Restatement (Third) of Agency §§ 2.04, 7.03, 7.07-.08. . . . See, e.g., Restatement (Third) Agency § 7.07(3)(a). . . .
. . . whose removal is now sought only seeks a declaratory judgment against Monitronics as to paragraphs 7.07 . . . In Section 7.07 of the Alarm Monitoring Purchase Agreement, the parties agreed that said contract, and . . .
. . . Shapo, 246 F.Supp.2d at 962; Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.07. . . .
. . . Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.07 (2006). Accord, e.g., Cement-Lock v. . . .
. . . Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.07 (2006). Accord, e.g., Cement-Lock v. . . .
. . . . §§ 5.07, 7.07. . . . L. § 7.07. . . . L. § 7.07. . . . L. § 7.07(a). . . . L. § 7.07(b). . . . .
. . . Employee of a Foreign State Kentucky law appears to have adopted the Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.07 . . .
. . . Oct. 23, $7.07 This was the third lowest share Unknown 2003 price for the month. . . .
. . . . § 7.07. . . . See Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.07 cmt. f (including as an explicit factor in determining employment . . .
. . . . § 7.07. . . .
. . . same occurred within the scope of the servant’s engagement See, Restatement Third, Agency §§ 7.03 and 7.07 . . .
. . . Rest. (3d) Agency § 7.07 cmt. c. . . .
. . . entitlement to a Disability Pension hereunder, in their sole and absolute discretion as provided in Section 7.07 . . . Section 7.07 Powers of Trustees. . . . The Pension Fund’s Plan document describes the Trustees’ discretionary power as follows: Section 7.07 . . .
. . . plus provided, however, if such Member received or was deemed to receive a single sum under Section 7.07 . . .
. . . tests revealed that Gibbons had prostate-specific antigen (“PSA”) levels of 5.52 on November 21, 2001, 7.07 . . .
. . . their intentional torts committed withing the scope of their agency); Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.07 . . .
. . . intentional torts when they are acting within the scope of their authority); Restatement (Third) of Agenoy § 7.07 . . .
. . . Local Rule 7.07 explicitly provides that "a party desiring to reply to matters raised initially in a . . .
. . . Section 7.07(2) states that “[a]n employee acts within the scope of employment when ... engaging in a . . . RESTATEMENT (THIRD) OF Agenoy § 7.07(2) (2006). . . . As such, it is likely to follow the related provision in Section 7.07, Rodriguez, 129 F.3d at 768, and . . . Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.07(2), cmt. b (2006). . . .
. . . indicates that 93A is violated if Federal consumer protection statutes are violated. 9. 94,0 C.M.R. 7.07 . . . take action that cannot legally be taken); 940 C.M.R. § 3.16(1) (unconscionability); and 940 C.M.R. § 7.07 . . . representation in [a] communication ... as to [the debt’s] status in any legal proceeding” under 940 C.M.R. § 7.07 . . . However, I need not decide this issue here, as a claim under 940 C.M.R. § 7.07(2) turns on the same factual . . . , 209 C.M.R. § 18.16(5) (threatening to take action that cannot legally be taken), and 940 C.M.R. § 7.07 . . .
. . . Cohen, Handbook of Federal Indian Law § 7.07[2][a], at 658 (2005 ed.) . . . foreign judgment may be rebuffed on any number of grounds, see Wilson, 127 F.3d at 810; Handbook § 7.07 . . .
. . . Cohen, Handbook of Federal Indian Law § 7.07[2][a], at 658 (2005 ed.) . . . foreign judgment may be rebuffed on any number of grounds, see Wilson, 127 F.3d at 810; Handbook § 7.07 . . .
. . . Davies found the mean pH of 5% suspensions of the Esteve supplied omeprazole was 7.07, the mean pH of . . .
. . . The plastic bag was determined to contain 7.07 grams of crack, or less than one-third of an ounce. . . . DISCUSSION Jones argues that the quantity of crack he allegedly possessed, 7.07 grams, in combination . . .
. . . See Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.07. . . . Restatement (Third) of Agency § 7.07(2) (1958) (emphasis added). . . .
. . . Section 7.07 of the Plan provides that the Plan Administrator shall have the exclusive discretionary . . .
. . . Section 157 was “consciously patterned on the federal mail fraud statute.” 1 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 7.07 . . . statute in holding the bankruptcy fraud statute constitutional); see also, 1 Collier on Bankruptcy § 7.07 . . .
. . . Section 157 was “consciously patterned on the federal mail fraud statute.” 1 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 7.07 . . . statute in holding the bankruptcy fraud statute constitutional); see also, 1 Collier on Bankruptcy § 7.07 . . .
. . . . § 7.07. . Ctrclm. ¶ 1. . Id. ¶ 4. . Id. . Id. ¶ 32. . . . Id. § 7.07 ("[N]either Citibank nor any affiliate of Citibank will have any obligation to any Party hereto . . .
. . . the ACC data and the ranged Nekkanti/Devi data do not include the values of $7.09 per kilogram or $7.07 . . .