Cases from cite.case.law:

IN RE STANDARD CRIMINAL JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CAPITAL CASES., 244 So. 3d 172 (Fla. 2018)

. . . amended existing instructions 7.11 (Preliminary Instructions in Penalty Proceedings-Capital Cases) and 7.12 . . . Comment This instruction was adopted in 2017 [214 So.3d 1236] and amended in 2018. 7.12 DIALOGUE FOR . . .

IN RE AMENDMENTS TO RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR- SUBCHAPTER LAWYER REFERRAL SERVICES, 238 So. 3d 164 (Fla. 2018)

. . . It also proposes amending rules 4-7.12 (Required Content); 4-7.13 (Deceptive and Inherently Misleading . . . APPENDIX RULE 4-7.12 REQUIRED CONTENT (a) Name and Office Location. . . .

HARRIS, v. MEDICAL TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT, INC., 300 F. Supp. 3d 234 (D.D.C. 2018)

. . . . ¶ 54-56 (alleging that Harris's "effective hourly wage" was approximately $7.12); id. ¶ 72-74 (alleging . . .

SCOTT, v. CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE D., 711 F. App'x 871 (10th Cir. 2017)

. . . Schwartz, SECTION 1983 LITIGATION CLAIMS & DEFENSES, § 7.12[B] (2013)); accord Cacioppo v. . . .

SOUTHERN APPALACHIAN MOUNTAIN STEWARDS, v. ZINKE,, 279 F. Supp. 3d 722 (W.D. Va. 2017)

. . . from a nearby aquatic monitoring station which showed selenium levels of 19.0 pg/l, 16.9 |xg/l, and 7.12 . . .

IN RE AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION- REGULAR- CYCLE REPORT, 226 So. 3d 223 (Fla. 2017)

. . . Bar, 916 So.2d 655, 656 (Fla. 2005) (deleting rule 3-7.12 (Disciplinary Resignation from the Florida' . . . Bar (Biannual Report), 101 So.3d 807, 807-808 (Fla. 2012) (adding rule 3-7.12 (Disciplinary Revocation . . .

K. HARTE W. J. H. a K. W. L. H. a K. W. v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF COUNTY OF JOHNSON, KANSAS, 864 F.3d 1154 (10th Cir. 2017)

. . . Schwartz, Section 1983 Litigation Claims & Defenses, § 7.12[B] (2013)). . . .

IN RE STANDARD CRIMINAL JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CAPITAL CASES, 214 So. 3d 1236 (Fla. 2017)

. . . Instructions in Criminal Cases 7.11 (Preliminary Instructions in Penalty Proceedings—Capital Cases) and 7.12 . . . authorize on an interim basis the publication and use of jury instructions 3.12(e), 7.11, 7.11(a), and 7.12 . . . Comment This instruction was adopted in 2017. 7.12 DIALOGUE FOR POLLING THE JURY (DEATH PENALTY CASE! . . .

R. ZARTNER, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO, L. R. N., 242 F. Supp. 3d 1168 (D. Colo. 2017)

. . . Schwartz, Section 1983 Litigation Claims & Defenses, § 7.12[B] (2013)). . . .

D. ARTHUR v. S. DUNN,, 137 S. Ct. 725 (U.S. 2017)

. . . A, p. 177 (2014) (calculating that while 7.12% of the 1,054 executions by lethal injection between 1900 . . .

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR FIXED ANNUITIES, v. E. PEREZ,, 217 F. Supp. 3d 1 (D.D.C. 2016)

. . . 2.9.2.1 (pp. 68-72, AR 384-88) (describing the best-interest contract); and RIA sections 7.4-7.10, 7.12 . . .

D. ARTHUR, v. COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,, 840 F.3d 1268 (11th Cir. 2016)

. . . the contemporaneous news reports of all executions in the United States from 1900 to 2010, found that 7.12% . . .

IN RE GREEN, Jr. v. Jr., 556 B.R. 853 (Bankr. W.D. Mich. 2016)

. . . Harper et al., Harper, James and Gray on Torts, § 7.12, 537 (3d ed. 2007) (explaining that “the change . . .

MYERS INDUSTRIES, INC. v. SCHOELLER ARCA SYSTEMS, INC. B. V. f k a N. V., 171 F. Supp. 3d 107 (S.D.N.Y. 2016)

. . . C § 7.12.) B. . . . C § 7.12); Buckhorn Inc., 618 Fed.Appx. at 1006 (“Under the express terms of the [patent license] agreement . . .

IN RE WALTER ENERGY, INC., 542 B.R. 859 (Bankr. N.D. Ala. 2015)

. . . Stalking Horse APA § 7.12 (emphasis added). 17. . . . See Stalking Horse APA § 7.12. . . . .

CAMP, v. CITY OF PELHAM,, 625 F. App'x 422 (11th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 7.12, and one day of sick leave per month, id. § 7.18. . . . Civil Service Law § 7.12. ., Citations to "Doc.” herein refer to docket entries in the district court . . .

E. GLOSSIP, v. J. GROSS,, 135 S. Ct. 2726 (U.S. 2015)

. . . A, p. 177 (2014) (calculating that while 7.12% of the 1,054 executions by lethal injection between 1900 . . .

UNITED STATES v. BROWN,, 784 F.3d 1301 (9th Cir. 2015)

. . . Ninth Circuit Model Criminal Jury Instruction 7.12 recognizes at least part of the challenge the jury . . . Ninth Circuit Model Criminal Jury Instruction 7.12. . . . .

IN RE OPUS EAST, LLC L. LLC, v. LLC, a A f b o f b o P. VII, L. P. VIII, L. P. P. LLC M. LLC LLC P. C. LLC LLC LLC LLC AE, 528 B.R. 30 (Bankr. D. Del. 2015)

. . . P-100 at § 8.8, P-101 at §§ 2.1, 2.3 & 7.13, P-102 at §§ 2.1, 2.4 & 7.12; JPTO at § IV, ¶¶23, 24, 44 . . .

PADUANO, HM LLC, v. EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC. CVS LLC,, 55 F. Supp. 3d 400 (E.D.N.Y. 2014)

. . . C, at § 7.12). . . .

In PAPPAS, f k a v., 517 B.R. 708 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. 2014)

. . . (THECB Ex. 1 at ¶ 7.12). See, e.g., Tex. Educ.Code Ann. § 52.541 (West 2006). . . .

HERRERA, T. H. a v. SANTA FE PUBLIC SCHOOLS, Fe J. Fe J. Fe Fe a ASI LLC,, 41 F. Supp. 3d 1188 (D.N.M. 2014)

. . . Schwartz, at § 7.12[B]. . . . Schwartz, at § 7.12. iii.State of mind “[A] plaintiff seeking to establish municipal liability on the . . . Schwartz, at § 7.12. Schneider v. City of Grand Junction Police Dep’t, 717 F.3d at 770. . . . Schwartz, supra, at § 7.12 (footnotes omitted). . . . Schwartz, at § 7.12[B]. 717 F.3d at 780 n. 11. . . .

In COMMERCE, LLC, f k a Ft. LLC,, 511 B.R. 812 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2014)

. . . Moreover, despite paragraph 7.12 of the DILA requiring confidentiality of the terms of the agreement, . . .

TAYLOR, v. LUTZ,, 134 So. 3d 1146 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . Again, we turn to the parties’ MSA, which provides in paragraph 7.12 the following: ENFORCEMENT OF THIS . . .

In R. BRADLEY E. v. R., 507 B.R. 192 (B.A.P. 6th Cir. 2014)

. . . James, Law of Torts 7.12, pp. 581-83 (1956)). See also Lentz v. . . .

In WEST,, 507 B.R. 252 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2014)

. . . Objection, Exhibit C (Marital Settlement Agreement), ¶ 7.12. . . .

In VINCENT ANDREWS MANAGEMENT CORP. v. v. v. Jr. v. Jr., 507 B.R. 78 (D. Conn. 2014)

. . . James, Law of Torts § 7.12, pp. 581-583 (1956) (rejecting reasonableness standard in misrepresentation . . .

GILKERSON, v. CHASEWOOD BANK,, 1 F. Supp. 3d 570 (S.D. Tex. 2014)

. . . Act art. 7.12(F)(1)(e), expired and replaced by Tex. Bus. Corp. . . .

GREENSTAR, LLC LLC f k a LLC, v. A. HELLER A. v. LLC LLC f k a LLC,, 17 F. Supp. 3d 422 (D. Del. 2014)

. . . also sought recovery of attorney fees, costs, and expenses incurred in the litigation, under Section 7.12 . . . (D.I. 85) Finding that Greenstar was the “prevailing party” within the meaning of Section 7.12 of the . . . therefore, is not applicable to attorney fees, which are instead described in Article VII, Section 7.12 . . . (Id. at 5) Article VII provides the following: Article VII Miscellaneous * * * * 7.12 Attorneys’ Fees . . . a payment obligation pursuant to the APA, and that the award of attorney fees arises under Section 7.12 . . .

L. HUGHES v. B., 734 F.3d 473 (6th Cir. 2013)

. . . Carlson, Long-Term Care Advocacy § 7.12(5)(e)(ii)(A) (Matthew Bender 2012). . . .

In T. H. PROPERTIES, LP, s v. T. H. LP, T. H. LP, LP,, 509 B.R. 490 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 2013)

. . . See Plan § 7.12. . . .

WILLIAMS, v. ERICKSON, 962 F. Supp. 2d 1038 (N.D. Ill. 2013)

. . . Civil Jury Instr. 7.12 & 7.13 (2009). 2. . . .

O. COONEY, v. CASADY,, 735 F.3d 514 (7th Cir. 2013)

. . . Casady, 652 F.Supp.2d 948, 950 n. 1 (N.D.Ill.2009) (quoting 325 ILCS 5/7.12). . . .

In PERRY H. KOPLIK SONS, INC. S. H. v., 499 B.R. 276 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)

. . . comply with the Investment limitations and Nature of Business limitations set forth in Sections 7.06 and 7.12 . . .

FULLINGTON, v. PFIZER, INC. LLC PLIVA, LLC, 720 F.3d 739 (8th Cir. 2013)

. . . . ¶¶ 7.09-7.12 with Bell Compl. ¶¶ 4.KM.14. . . .

CACIOPPO, v. TOWN OF VAIL, COLORADO,, 528 F. App'x 929 (10th Cir. 2013)

. . . Schwartz, Section 1983 Litigation Claims & Defenses, § 7.12[B] (2013)). . . . (quoting Schwartz, supra, at § 7.12) (internal quotation marks omitted). . . .

SCHNEIDER, v. CITY OF GRAND JUNCTION POLICE DEPARTMENT, D. A., 717 F.3d 760 (10th Cir. 2013)

. . . Schwartz, at § 7.12[B], This requirement is satisfied if the plaintiff shows that “the municipality was . . . Schwartz, at § 7.12. iii.State of mind “[A] plaintiff seeking to establish municipal liability on the . . . Schwartz, at§ 7.12[B], . . .

GREENSTAR, LLC LLC f k a LLC, v. A. HELLER A. v. LLC LLC f k a LLC,, 934 F. Supp. 2d 672 (D. Del. 2013)

. . . (Id., § 7.12) 3. Heller’s representations to Greenstar 23. . . . (JTX 16, § 7.12) 85. Fee-shifting provisions are enforced under Delaware law. . . . The court awards Greenstar, as the prevailing party, reasonable attorney fees and costs pursuant to § 7.12 . . .

In VICKERY, TKV LLC, St. LLC, LLC, St. LLC, LLC, K. IVDS a v. TKV LLC, St. LLC, LLC, St. LLC, LLC,, 488 B.R. 680 (B.A.P. 10th Cir. 2013)

. . . James, Law of Torts § 7.12 at 581-83 (1956)). . . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO THE RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR- SUBCHAPTER LAWYER ADVERTISING RULES, 108 So. 3d 609 (Fla. 2013)

. . . understood and applied in future cases, we number the new rules as follows: 4-7.11 (Application of Rules); 4-7.12 . . . RULE 4-7.12 REQUIRED CONTENT (a) Name and Office Location. . . .

PURCHASE PARTNERS, LLC, v. CARVER FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK, s Sr., 914 F. Supp. 2d 480 (S.D.N.Y. 2012)

. . . . §§ 7.12, 7.15), which it eventually did. (See Def.’s 56.1 Resp. Nos. 13-14). . . .

SUN PACKING, INC. v. XENACARE HOLDINGS, INC. W., 924 F. Supp. 2d 749 (S.D. Tex. 2012)

. . . corporations that failed to pay franchise taxes were considered as 'dissolved’ within the meaning of article 7.12 . . .

BUILDING INVESTORS LLC, v. CITY OF SEATTLE,, 912 F. Supp. 2d 972 (W.D. Wash. 2012)

. . . See Complaint at ¶¶ 4.7, 6.1(b), 6.1(d), 8.6 (“technical”); Id. at ¶¶ 6.1(d), 7.3, 7.7, 7.9, 7.12, 9.11 . . .

In GRAYSON, s, 488 B.R. 579 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 2012)

. . . The Note gives the figure $6,863.52 for the Total of Payments, which is $7.12 more than the sum of the . . . UTI acknowledges the Note understated the Finance Charge by $7.12. (ECF No. 59 at 4). . . .

COTTS, v. OSAFO,, 692 F.3d 564 (7th Cir. 2012)

. . . Pattern civil jury instruction 7.12 states, without any reference to “cruel and unusual punishment”: . . . Seventh Circuit pattern instruction 7.12, to which the parties agreed, states that to find the defendants . . .

S. PETRI, v. UNITED STATES,, 104 Fed. Cl. 537 (Fed. Cl. 2012)

. . . . § 1214) and regulation (AFI 36-3212, ¶ 7.12), prior to separation off of the TDRL [Temporary Disability . . . As to AFI 36-3212, paragraph 7.12, the instruction provides: HQ AFPC/DPPD [Headquarters, Air Force Personnel . . . The Temporary Disability Retired List examination to which paragraph 7.12 of AFI 36-3212 refers is discussed . . . See AFI 36-3212, ¶ 7.12. . . .

AJUBA INTERNATIONAL, L. L. C. v. SAHARIA, AGS, 871 F. Supp. 2d 671 (E.D. Mich. 2012)

. . . {Id. at §§ 3.1, 7.12). . . .

In L. HINSON A. L. A. v. BAC LP P. A. C. T., 481 B.R. 364 (Bankr. E.D.N.C. 2012)

. . . The Countrywide Loan The complaint alleges that in 2001, the plaintiffs subdivided the 7.12-acre tract . . . The Substitute Trustee provided evidence of the assignment of the note and deed on the 7.12-acre property . . . The property description in the notice of sale for the foreclosure included the entire 7.12-acre tract . . . that the plaintiffs signed the deed, and additionally that the parties did not intend for the entire 7.12 . . . Here, the plaintiffs allege that the inclusion of the entire 7.12-acre tract in the deed does not reflect . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR BIANNUAL REPORT, 101 So. 3d 807 (Fla. 2012)

. . . proposes four new rules: 1-3.12 (Provision of Legal Services Following Determination of Major Disaster); 3-7.12 . . . and amount of funds used for this purpose. (4) [No Change] (5) [No Change] (m)-(n) [No Change] RULE 3-7.12 . . .

D. TURNER, v. KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, D. v., 675 F.3d 887 (5th Cir. 2012)

. . . that Turner was found to have violated KCSR “General Code of Operating Rules 2.13, 6.22, 6.28, 7.1, 7.12 . . .

E. SCHWARZ v. SELLERS MARKETS, INC. LLC, LLC, LLC,, 812 F. Supp. 2d 932 (N.D. Ill. 2011)

. . . The motion is premised on a forum selection clause in the Agreement, which reads: 7.12 Jurisdiction; . . .

ROBIDOUX, v. J. O BRIEN,, 643 F.3d 334 (1st Cir. 2011)

. . . . § 7.12(a), at 281 n. 28 (same). . . .

SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC. v. AIG UNITED GUARANTY CORP. a k a, 784 F. Supp. 2d 585 (E.D. Va. 2011)

. . . And it is not because the Master Policy, in Section 7.12, sets forth specific criteria for amending the . . . Although Section 7.12 does not clearly prohibit amending the "Reporting Program Guidelines” in the manner . . .

BNP PARIBAS MORTGAGE CORPORATION BNP v. BANK OF AMERICA, N. A. AG, v. N. A., 778 F. Supp. 2d 375 (S.D.N.Y. 2011)

. . . Base Indenture § 7.12. . . .

In SEMINOLE WALLS CEILINGS CORP. v. L. J. E. PITA v. J. L. PITA, 446 B.R. 572 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2011)

. . . further are correct that PITA is not a proper defendant to these proceedings because, under Article 7.12 . . .

In J. BERKEBILE, J. v. LLC, 444 B.R. 326 (Bankr. W.D. Pa. 2011)

. . . No. 97, at 23, § 7.12. . . . .

PLUMBERS UNION LOCAL NO. PENSION FUND, NECA- IBEW v. NOMURA ASSET ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION P. UBS LLC Co., 632 F.3d 762 (1st Cir. 2011)

. . . person inquiry, resolving that issue on a motion to dismiss is often inappropriate. 2 Hazen, supra, § 7.12 . . .

MENKES, v. STOLT- NIELSEN S. A. G. J. R., 270 F.R.D. 80 (D. Conn. 2010)

. . . . # 113, ¶¶ 3.2, 3.6, 5.2, 6, 7.1, 7.12.) . . .

BODUM USA, INC. v. LA CAFETIERE, INC., 621 F.3d 624 (7th Cir. 2010)

. . . Allan Farnsworth, Contracts § 7.12, p. 464 (4th ed.2004), which forbids using extrinsic evidence to contradict . . .

E. KIA v. IMAGING SCIENCES INTERNATIONAL, INC., 735 F. Supp. 2d 256 (E.D. Pa. 2010)

. . . Moreover, in Section 7.12, Kia acknowledged, "that I have had the opportunity to consult legal counsel . . .

In L. VETAL, Jr. v. L. Jr., 433 B.R. 524 (Bankr. D. Md. 2010)

. . . James, Law of Torts § 7.12, pp. 581-583 (1956)). . . .

KOCH INDUSTRIES, INC. KoSa B. V. S. A. R. L. S. A. R. L. v. AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, CNA s, 727 F. Supp. 2d 199 (S.D.N.Y. 2010)

. . . APA §§ 7.9(b), 7.12(a), 7.29. . . . APA § 7.12(a). . . .

In CITIGROUP INC. BOND LITIGATION, 723 F. Supp. 2d 568 (S.D.N.Y. 2010)

. . . potential liabilities and thus “maintained its ‘well-capitalized’ position with a Tier 1 capital ration of 7.12% . . .

BLUEWATER NETWORK, v. SALAZAR,, 721 F. Supp. 2d 7 (D.C. Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 7.12. . . .

DRY DOCK, L. L. C. v. GODFREY CONVEYOR COMPANY, INC. d b a d b a, 717 F. Supp. 2d 825 (W.D. Wis. 2010)

. . . Apfeld et al., Contract Law in Wisconsin §§ 7.9-7.12 (3d ed. 2007). . . .

WELLS FARGO COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES, v. UNITED STATES,, 91 Fed. Cl. 35 (Fed. Cl. 2010)

. . . (PX1014 at 11508, Cal-trans Lot 1, 7.12%; PX1014 at 11534, Cal-trans Lot 2, 7.13%; PX829 at 37385, NJT . . .

UNITED STATES v. DAVIS, a k a, 346 F. App'x 941 (4th Cir. 2009)

. . . Davis was found to be responsible for 7.12 grams of cocaine base, 4.41 grams of cocaine, and seven grams . . . equivalency table, 4.41 grams of cocaine had a marijuana equivalency of 882 grams of marijuana and 7.12 . . . the 4.41 grams of cocaine would again have a marijuana equivalency of 882 grams of marijuana, but the 7.12 . . . first to determine the base offense level for the quantity of cocaine base involved in the offense: 7.12 . . . Therefore, by multiplying 7.12 grams of cocaine base by 16 kilograms, the probation officer correctly . . .

COONEY, v. CASADY,, 652 F. Supp. 2d 948 (N.D. Ill. 2009)

. . . For the foregoing reasons, defendants’ motions to dismiss are denied. . 325 ILCS 5/7.12 provides that . . .

W. CHASTAIN, W. P. A. a v. CUNNINGHAM LAW GROUP, P. A. a, 16 So. 3d 203 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . .-7.12, Rules Regulating The Florida Bar, with leave to seek readmission after five years. . . . Rule 3-7.12, Rules Regulating The Florida Bar, was subsequently deleted. . . . In 1990, rule 3-7.11 was renumbered as rule 3-7.12 (Resignation from The Florida Bar). . . .

D. TURNER v. KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, 622 F. Supp. 2d 374 (E.D. La. 2009)

. . . All evidence demonstrates that Turner violated KCS Operating Rules 2.13, 6.22, 6.28, 6.5, 7.1, 7.12, . . .

LPP MORTGAGE, LTD. v. SUGARMAN,, 565 F.3d 28 (1st Cir. 2009)

. . . that extrinsic evidence cannot be admitted to override plain language. 2 Farnsworth on Contracts § 7.12 . . .

RENAISSANCE MARKETING, INC. v. MONITRONICS INTERNATIONAL, INC. ABC XYZ, 606 F. Supp. 2d 201 (D.P.R. 2009)

. . . removal is now sought only seeks a declaratory judgment against Monitronics as to paragraphs 7.07 and 7.12 . . . Section 7.12 provides: • [s]eller and purchaser agree that Dallas, Texas, is the place of making and . . .

ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, BRANDYWINE CIRA, L. P. v. TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, 317 F. App'x 219 (3d Cir. 2009)

. . . Allan Farnsworth, Contracts § 7.12 (3d ed. 1999) (“Farnsworth”). . . .

In WIBISONO v., 412 B.R. 747 (Bankr. D. Md. 2009)

. . . James, Law of Torts § 7.12, pp. 581-583 (1956)). . . .

In T. HOLMES, T. v., 414 B.R. 115 (E.D. Mich. 2009)

. . . James, Law of Torts § 7.12, pp., 581-83 (1956). . . .

SIERRA CLUB, v. WAGNER, T., 555 F.3d 21 (1st Cir. 2009)

. . . Handbook 1909.12, § 7.12 (1992). . . . .

In HIGH VOLTAGE ENGINEERING CORPORATION,, 397 B.R. 579 (Bankr. D. Mass. 2008)

. . . writing to the Department or another person designated by the Department in accordance with NJAC 7:26C-7.12 . . . Pursuant to Paragraph 9.D of the ACO dated August 24, 1989 and N.J.A.C. 7:26C-7.12, if the person responsible . . .

ASYMMETRX, INC. v. BIOCARE MEDICAL LLC, 578 F. Supp. 2d 333 (D. Mass. 2008)

. . . Section 7.12 of the Agreement states that [tjhis Agreement constitutes the entire understanding between . . .

GUARANTY RESIDENTIAL LENDING, INC. Co. v. HOMESTEAD MORTGAGE CO. L. L. C., 291 F. App'x 734 (6th Cir. 2008)

. . . Art. 7.12 § F(l)(e). . . . Specifically, under Article 7.12 § A of the Texas Business Corporation Act, a dissolved corporation continues . . . controlling and the corporation continues its existence for the limited purposes described under article 7.12 . . . By placing the right to sue or defend back in the corporation, Article 7.12 had the effect of giving . . . As the only officer of BFI, Fitzner had the authority under Article 7.12 to liquidate the assets of BFI . . .

GUARANTY RESIDENTIAL LENDING, INC. Co. v. HOMESTEAD MORTGAGE CO. L. L. C., 291 F. App'x 734 (6th Cir. 2008)

. . . Art. 7.12 § F(l)(e). . . . Specifically, under Article 7.12 § A of the Texas Business Corporation Act, a dissolved corporation continues . . . controlling and the corporation continues its existence for the limited purposes described under article 7.12 . . . By placing the right to sue or defend back in the corporation, Article 7.12 had the effect of giving . . . As the only officer of BFI, Fitzner had the authority under Article 7.12 to liquidate the assets of BFI . . .

TEXAS CLINICAL LABS, INC. LLC LLC P. v. LEAVITT,, 535 F.3d 397 (5th Cir. 2008)

. . . Therefore, under article 7.12 of the Texas Business Corporation Act, Texas TCL-Gulf I had three years . . . that administrative proceedings qualify as an “action or other proceeding” for purposes of article 7.12 . . .

WHITE v. WACHOVIA BANK, N. A., 563 F. Supp. 2d 1358 (N.D. Ga. 2008)

. . . The October 31, 2007 transaction was in the amount of $7.12. (Compl.fl 17.) . . .

COYNE S COMPANY, INC. a v. ENESCO, LLC,, 565 F. Supp. 2d 1027 (D. Minn. 2008)

. . . (Distributor Agreement § 7.12.) . . .

G. F. KELLY TRUCKING, INC. v. U. S. XPRESS ENTERPRISES, INC., 281 F. App'x 855 (11th Cir. 2008)

. . . they presented evidence creating a genuine issue of material fact as to whether USX breached Section 7.12 . . .

In SEMINOLE WALLS CEILINGS CORP. J. v. T. PITA J. v. T. PITA, 412 B.R. 878 (M.D. Fla. 2008)

. . . Act. art. 7.12(A)(3) (Vernon) (emphasis added). . . .

WISNIEWSKI, v. RODALE, INC., 510 F.3d 294 (3d Cir. 2007)

. . . See Ray Andrews Brown, The Law of Personal Property §§ 2.6, 7.12 (3d ed.1975). . . .

In DURA AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS, INC. A. v. Co. N. A., 379 B.R. 257 (Bankr. D. Del. 2007)

. . . Allan Farnsworth, Farnsworth on Contracts § 7.12, pp. 272-73 (1990). . . .

MASAI TECHNOLOGIES CORP. v. UNITED STATES,, 79 Fed. Cl. 433 (Fed. Cl. 2007)

. . . was 1.5 percent less costly than the MTC proposal for the base year, but that the MTC proposal was 7.12 . . . The SSA, in his Decision Memorandum, stated that ”[t]hus, the MTC proposal is $290,896.08 or 7.12% less . . .

MARSH, D. M. v. ROSENBLOOM, ABB D., 499 F.3d 165 (2d Cir. 2007)

. . . shareholders of dissolved corporations,” Pacific Scene, 250 Cal.Rptr. 651, 758 P.2d at 1184; in Texas, Article 7.12 . . . involvement with the affairs of a dissolving corporation”); Hunter, 620 S.W.2d at 551 (stating that “Article 7.12 . . .

PENNCRO ASSOCIATES, INC. v. SPRINT SPECTRUM, L. P. d b a PCS,, 499 F.3d 1151 (10th Cir. 2007)

. . . Of course, not every state is so restrictive on this score, see generally Farnsworth on Contracts § 7.12 . . .

L. ERDMAN, v. NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 510 F. Supp. 2d 363 (M.D. Pa. 2007)

. . . regarding an unpaid “leave of absence,” paragraph 7.6 regarding “permission absences,” and paragraph 7.12 . . .

WOLFE, v. WEISNER,, 488 F.3d 234 (4th Cir. 2007)

. . . . § 14-7.12'. . . . .

ZHEN RONG LIN, v. R. GONZALES,, 230 F. App'x 795 (10th Cir. 2007)

. . . Hazard, et al., Civil Procedure § 7.12 (5th ed.2001). . . .