Cases from cite.case.law:

RHEA, v. DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF SANTA FE COLLEGE,, 109 So. 3d 851 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . He sought a declaration of his rights under the College’s rule 7.36 of the “Student Complaint Procedure . . . The second count alleged that Rhea had a right under rule 7.36 to discuss any complaint from a student . . . The pleading asserted that the College had violated rule 7.36 and its duty to follow its own rules, as . . . Two, the court found no justiciable issue as to the existence of any right Rhea may have under rule 7.36 . . . Rhea sought a declaration of his rights under the College’s rule 7.36. . . .

BROWN, v. CHINA INTEGRATED ENERGY, INC. C. Pu, Li, 875 F. Supp. 2d 1096 (N.D. Cal. 2012)

. . . the majority owner of the Shenmu County Erlintu Gongtu Oil Material Company, and that he received $7.36 . . .

SCHOONER HARBOR VENTURES, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 92 Fed. Cl. 373 (Fed. Cl. 2010)

. . . In July and August 2000, in three different transactions, plaintiff sold three parcels of about 7.36 . . . the January 2000 purchase by the plaintiff of the 82 acres, Schooner Harbor sold three small parcels (7.36 . . .

NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION v. J. HARVEY, U. S., 574 F. Supp. 2d 934 (E.D. Ark. 2008)

. . . This is approximately 2% of the 7.36 trillion gallons that flow past the Clarendon Gage. . . .

UNITED STATES v. W. NICHOLSON,, 272 F. App'x 732 (10th Cir. 2008)

. . . 6.88 grams of cocaine base and on December 23, 2006, they found him in possession of approximately 7.36 . . .

LEVINE, v. ATRICURE, INC., 508 F. Supp. 2d 268 (S.D.N.Y. 2007)

. . . He sold all the shares on March 24, 2006 at $7.36. (Deck of David A. Rosen-feld, Ex. A at 1 ¶ 4.) . . .

UNITED STATES v. JACKSON,, 493 F.3d 1179 (10th Cir. 2007)

. . . Jackson and a cohort sold approximately 7.36 grams of crack cocaine and an additional 2.63 grams of cocaine . . .

In OMEPRAZOLE PATENT LITIGATION. AB, v. AB, v. Dr. S. A. AB, v. Co. D. D. AB, v. AB, v., 490 F. Supp. 2d 381 (S.D.N.Y. 2007)

. . . Davies’s 2006 testing produced values of 7.15, 7.36, and 7.53, respectively. . . .

ADVOCATES FOR TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES, INC. O O v. U. S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS J. A. L. v., 453 F. Supp. 2d 289 (D. Mass. 2006)

. . . . § 7.36(4); AR 1:12042. . . .

CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION, INC. v. ROMNEY, I. H. J. W., 421 F. Supp. 2d 344 (D. Mass. 2006)

. . . The Transit Regulation, 310 CMR 7.36; B. . . . the Amended Vent Stack Permit as a legitimate amendment to the initial Vent Stack Permit. .310 CMR 7.36 . . . : U Transit System Improvements (1) Applicability. 310 CMR 7.36 shall apply to the Executive Office of . . . improvement projects including the following projects in accordance with the schedules set forth in 310 CMR 7.36 . . . the Regulation, and that the only relevant "schedule” is the 2011 final completion deadline. 310 CMR 7.36 . . .

BRANDAID MARKETING CORPORATION. v. S. S. v., 418 F. Supp. 2d 329 (S.D.N.Y. 2005)

. . . (PX III-20; see also PX III — -21; JPTO ¶ 7.36.) . . . (JPTO ¶¶ 7.36-6.37.) . . .

PINKHAM, v. PROFESSIONAL CLAIMS BUREAU, INC., 367 F. Supp. 2d 338 (E.D.N.Y. 2005)

. . . Plaintiff has made an application for attorney’s fees and costs in the amount of $1,840.00, based on 7.36 . . . Plaintiffs attorney stated that he spent 7.36 hours on this matter, and he provided a breakdown of the . . . Accordingly, the undersigned recommends an award of attorney’s fees to the plaintiff for 7.36 hours of . . .

J. JOHNSON, v. SEACOR MARINE CORP. SEACOR v. Co. Co. v. SEACOR v. Co. L. L. C. W. L. L. C. Co. v. SEACOR, 404 F.3d 871 (5th Cir. 2005)

. . . Lord, 3 Willinston on Contracts § 7.36, at 569 (4th ed. 1992)("As a general principle, when a party does . . .

GEORGE SOLLITT CONSTRUCTION CO. v. UNITED STATES,, 64 Fed. Cl. 229 (Fed. Cl. 2005)

. . . Tr. at 2481, and defendant stated that the Navy wanted to pay for Sollitt’s profit at 7% rather than 7.36% . . . Defendant, however, has since stipulated that Sollitt is entitled to a 7.36% profit markup on subcontractor . . . The 7.36% profit markup was therefore reasonable. . . . manager overcharge $3000 Overhead markup on $3000 ($3000 X 3%) $ 90 Profit markup on $3000 ($3000 X 7.36% . . . have stipulated to certain markups to which Sollitt is entitied for subcontractor claims, including 7.36% . . .

FRANKLIN FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK, v. UNITED STATES,, 60 Fed. Cl. 55 (Fed. Cl. 2004)

. . . Jamigan $8.3 million $7.36 million $ 73,366.50 Mr. Jesse $1.9 million $ 1.9 million $ 22,691 Mr. . . .

GEORGIA, v. ASHCROFT,, 195 F. Supp. 2d 25 (D.D.C. 2002)

. . . 39.99 District 3 40.32 37.55 34.97 District 4 54.69 50.02 51.16 District 5 56.92 52.04 53.36 District 6 7.36 . . .

NUNSUCH, By NUNSUCH, v. UNITED STATES, 221 F. Supp. 2d 1027 (D. Ariz. 2001)

. . . As it fell below 7.36, it permitted a buildup of acid and a level of 7.096 was “shockingly low and not . . .

ALASKA, v. NORTON, T., 168 F. Supp. 2d 1102 (D. Alaska 2001)

. . . plus the remainder of his allotment which sits outside the boundaries of the 1961 right-of-way grant (7.36 . . .

In SUNFLOWER RACING, INC. SUNFLOWER RACING, INC. v. MID- CONTINENT RACING GAMING CO. I Co. II Co. III N. A. FCLT L. P., 226 B.R. 673 (D. Kan. 1998)

. . . value analysis: (1) the actual contract rate of interest on the date of the confirmation hearing was 7.36% . . . The bankruptcy court’s concern over the higher contract rate as of the confirmation hearing (7.36%) illustrates . . . in its plan (1) does not even provide the Creditor Group with the actual contract rate of interest (7.36% . . .

JOHNSON v. LAND O LAKES, INC., 18 F. Supp. 2d 985 (N.D. Iowa 1998)

. . . of 5,000 bushels of soybeans with a “futures option” of January 1997, a “futures option price” of $7.36 . . .

QUIROS, v. CIBA- GEIGY CORPORATION,, 7 F. Supp. 2d 380 (S.D.N.Y. 1998)

. . . Specifically, Quiros claims that while Caucasian employees received an average wage increase of 7.36% . . . records establish a discriminatory trend in that Caucasian employees received an average wage increase of 7.36% . . .

In SUNFLOWER RACING, INC. d b a, 219 B.R. 587 (Bankr. D. Kan. 1998)

. . . 1.75 percent to the 5.61 percent LIBOR market rate effective on the date of trial results in a rate of 7.36 . . .

COASTAL PETROLEUM, a v. CHILES,, 701 So. 2d 619 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . rights to explore only in the most offshore portion of the original area to which the leases pertained (7.36 . . . The “middle strip” (4.36-7.36 miles offshore) was surrendered by Coastal to the state (as specifically . . .

UNITED STATES v. BOARD OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, v. L. BARRY,, 977 F. Supp. 1202 (S.D. Fla. 1997)

. . . Joint Exhibit 108 (District Policy 7.36(4)). g. . . .

JENKINS, v. STATE OF MISSOURI,, 959 F. Supp. 1151 (W.D. Mo. 1997)

. . . 12) 9.73 6.46 Class of 1995 (6-11) 8.37 7.96 Class of 1996 (4-10) 6.46 6.95 Class of 1997 (3-9) 4.88 7.36 . . .

UNITED STRUCTURES OF AMERICA, INC. v. G. R. G. ENGINEERING, S. E., 927 F. Supp. 556 (D.P.R. 1996)

. . . Copy of these pictures are enclosed with Exhibits 7.36 and 7.37, and also by the work performed by subcontractor . . . See Exhibits 7.30 through 7.36, and 7.44. See ¶ 9 of Luis R. Marin Aponte’s Unsworn Declaration. . . .

J. HAMLET, v. UNITED STATES,, 63 F.3d 1097 (Fed. Cir. 1995)

. . . . §§ 7.35, 7.36. . . .

J. HAMLET, v. UNITED STATES,, 63 F.3d 1097 (Fed. Cir. 1995)

. . . . §§ 7.35, 7.36. . . .

A. NELSON F. v. EG G ENERGY MEASUREMENTS GROUP, INC., 37 F.3d 1384 (9th Cir. 1994)

. . . The comparison is as follows: YEAR AVERAGE DURING YEAR BEGINNING OF YEAR 1987 7.36% 7.88% 1988 8.75% . . .

Co. A. K. A. AFL- CIO v. Co. U. S. A. Co., 18 Ct. Int'l Trade 119 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1994)

. . . Commerce determined that the following margins existed for the review period: Toyota 12.22%, Nissan 7.36% . . .

HYSTER CO. a. k. a. NACCO AFL- CIO v. UNITED STATES, Co. U. S. A. Co., 848 F. Supp. 178 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1994)

. . . Commerce determined that the following margins existed for the review period: Toyota 12.22%, Nissan 7.36% . . .

WEINBERGER, v. GREAT NORTHERN NEKOOSA CORP. BTZ, INC. v. GREAT NORTHERN NEKOOSA CORP. RYAN, v. GREAT NORTHERN NEKOOSA CORP., 801 F. Supp. 804 (D. Me. 1992)

. . . Francavil-la; review of deposition digests): 7 h-1 CO ^ CO .36 I — 1 \ CO CO 7.36 X $290 = $2,134.40 . . .

WESCH, v. HUNT,, 785 F. Supp. 1491 (S.D. Ala. 1992)

. . . 83.96% 12.93% 7 169 15 0.11% 2.75% 0.24% ‘ WOODMERE INFORMATION CENTER 4,986 4,502 367 100.00% 90.29% 7.36% . . .

FLEET BANK OF MAINE, v. T. STEEVES L. D. O. Co., 785 F. Supp. 209 (D. Me. 1992)

. . . accrued interest as of December 11, 1991, and interest accruing thereafter at the per diem rate of $7.36 . . .

FINEMAN v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., 774 F. Supp. 225 (D.N.J. 1991)

. . . Tr. 7.35-7.36 (“The last thing I would have done on any sales call would be to discuss with a prospective . . .

UNITED STATES v. ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, SITUATE IN KENT COUNTY, STATE OF DELAWARE, A., 736 F. Supp. 541 (D. Del. 1990)

. . . Before the taking in fee, the United States already had a clear zone easement on 7.36 acres of Tract . . .

In GILBERT, 104 B.R. 206 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 1989)

. . . Fischer, 360 F.2d 719, 725 (5th Cir.1966) (citing 6 Collier on Bankruptcy 7.36, p. 2099 (14th ed. 1964 . . .

DETROIT ATHLETIC CLUB, a v. UNITED STATES, 717 F. Supp. 1224 (E.D. Mich. 1989)

. . . Income All Non-Banquet Meals -7.36 -8.09 -9.03 -9.55 -9.45 -9.82 c. . . .

In HUNTER, HUNTER, v. MIXON, J. T. J., 101 B.R. 294 (Bankr. S.D. Ala. 1989)

. . . acres, that part of Lot No. 1, lying north of the south line of the N Vi of said Section 18, containing 7.36 . . . acres, that part of Lot No. 1, lying north of the south line of the N xk of said Section 18, containing 7.36 . . .

v., 92 T.C. 525 (T.C. 1989)

. . . When reduced by the $0.62 adjustment described above, this equals $7.36. . . .

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, v. W. SARVIS,, 697 F. Supp. 1161 (D. Colo. 1988)

. . . $6,742.35, interest to January 11,1988, plus additional interest at the rate set in the note, which is $7.36 . . . Sarvis shall pay to the plaintiff FDIC $31,742.35, plus interest at the rate of $7.36 per day from January . . .

GARMONG, v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY,, 668 F. Supp. 1000 (S.D. Tex. 1987)

. . . Hours Hourly Rate Expended Total Award Gerald Birnberg 225.00 85.70 19,282.60 Rebecca Bryson 160.00 7.36 . . .

BOYKIN, v. COMMERCE UNION BANK OF UNION CITY, TENNESSEE,, 109 F.R.D. 344 (W.D. Tenn. 1986)

. . . Postmaster for the amount of $7.36. The check itself states that it was “For Cert. . . .

In VALUATION PROCEEDINGS UNDER SECTIONS c AND OF REGIONAL RAIL REORGANIZATION ACT OF, 531 F. Supp. 1191 (Reg'l Rail Reorg. Ct. 1981)

. . . N at 554, for C&O in 1973 it was 7.36 percent, Shannon (D) (Feb. 12, 1981) Ex. 24, EL App. . . .

In D. FEDERICO CO. INC. D. FEDERICO CO. INC. v. NEW BEDFORD REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,, 13 B.R. 323 (Bankr. D. Mass. 1981)

. . . This finding reduces by $7.36 the amount shown on Exhibit D5 as due the Plaintiff. . . .

M. HYDE, Jr. v. CHEVRON U. S. A. INC., 514 F. Supp. 740 (E.D. La. 1981)

. . . At the time of his accident, plaintiff was earning $7.36 per hour. . . .

WILLIAMS, v. TALLAHASSEE MOTORS, INC., 607 F.2d 689 (5th Cir. 1979)

. . . ($100.00) for the last two months employed, plaintiff exceeded his $75.00 draw by only $48.13 and $7.36 . . .

NEDERLANDSE DRAADINDUSTRIE NDI B. V. v. GRAND PRE- STRESSED CORPORATION,, 466 F. Supp. 846 (E.D.N.Y. 1979)

. . . Electricity 11.29 Others 5.53 Loss 10.72 51.72 _51.72 (4) Stranding Wages 65.09 Electricity 17.04 Others 7.36 . . .

v., 70 T.C. 439 (T.C. 1978)

. . . no 1,297.10 1.73 Goldstein . no no 1,243.57 1.62 Elkin . no no 4,325.47 5.88 Beck . no no 4,844.77 7.36 . . .

PITCAIRN, v. UNITED STATES, 547 F.2d 1106 (Ct. Cl. 1976)

. . . Plaintiff sought to recover interest at a rate of 7.36% representing the average rate of interest it . . . through March 1973 (6.56%) with plaintiff’s computed average on its borrowings for the same period (7.36% . . .

STEPHEN PITCAIRN, AGENT SUBSTITUTED FOR AUTOGIRO COMPANY OF AMERICA v. THE UNITED STATES, 212 Ct. Cl. 168 (Ct. Cl. 1976)

. . . Plaintiff sought to recover interest at a rate of 7.36%, representing the average rate of interest it . . . through March 1973 (6.56%) with plaintiff’s computed average on its borrowings for the same period (7.36% . . .

J. COLLINS, Jr. v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, C. MURTAUGH, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,, 532 F.2d 584 (8th Cir. 1976)

. . . percent payout(d,e) Percent change from 1971(c) 76.9%(i) $7.82 + 6.7% 87■9%(h) $7.56 + 3.1% 97,5% $7.36 . . . of Du Pont; they will benefit by increased earnings of five cents ($0.05) per share (from $7.31 to $7.36 . . .

AMEERIAR v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,, 438 F.2d 1028 (3d Cir. 1971)

. . . Rosenfield, Immigration Law and Procedure § 7.36, at 7-25 (Rev. ed. 1969). . . .

SINCOCK v. V. GATELY, 262 F. Supp. 739 (D. Del. 1967)

. . . persons to +939 persons and the percentage of deviation from the mean or norm rises from -6.06% to +7.36% . . .

N. AVERY D. L. v. R. FISCHER,, 360 F.2d 719 (5th Cir. 1966)

. . . . § 579 ; see 6 Collier #7.36, at 2099. . . . only on the basis of proofs of claim * * * actually filed and allowed in the proceeding.” 6 Collier #7.36 . . . See 6 Collier #9.02[2], 7.36. . . .

CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY OF PENNSYLVANIA v. PENNSYLVANIA, 370 U.S. 607 (U.S. 1962)

. . . Since 7.36% of that railroad’s track mileage is within Pennsylvania, appellant allocates 6,764 “car days . . .

ANHEUSER- BUSCH, INC. a v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,, 289 F.2d 835 (7th Cir. 1961)

. . . June 30 March 1 1954 1955 July 31 Jan. 31 1955 1956 AB 12.5 16.55 39.3 21.03 17.5 GB 14.4 12.58 4.8 7.36 . . .

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. ANHEUSER- BUSCH, INC., 363 U.S. 536 (U.S. 1960)

. . . July 31 1953 1954 1955 1955 Respondent . 12.5 16.55 39.3 21.03 Griesedieck Brothers. 14.4 12.58 4.8 7.36 . . .

COLUMBIA TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES, 167 F. Supp. 5 (E.D. Mich. 1958)

. . . Detroit from Louisiana was $7.75 per gross ton, as against $7.36 per gross ton for barge-lake carriage . . .

SOUTHEASTERN OIL FLORIDA, INC. v. THE UNITED STATES, 127 Ct. Cl. 480 (Ct. Cl. 1953)

. . . The reasonable value of the cargo was $7.36 per barrel, or a total of $31,051.84. . . .

McWHIRTER v. MONROE CALCULATING MACH. CO., 76 F. Supp. 456 (W.D. Mo. 1948)

. . . In 1939 the discounts allowed amounted to 7.36 percent of the gross sales; in 1940, 8.07 percent; in . . .

JOYNER v. OHIO NAT. LIFE INS. CO., 118 F.2d 1008 (5th Cir. 1941)

. . . certificate which he forwarded to the insurer with a money order for the required cash payment of $7.36 . . .

CHARLES H. HOOD, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,, 4 B.T.A. 1020 (B.T.A. 1926)

. . . Littleton: The Commissioner determined deficiencies of $597.00 and $7.36 for 1920 and 1921, respectively . . .

Co. v., 11 Ct. Cust. 3 (C.C.P.A. 1921)

. . . Oxygen (by difference). 7.36 The importations are from China and are produced chiefly in the district . . .

WORTH BROS. CO. v. LEDERER,, 256 F. 116 (E.D. Pa. 1919)

. . . approximately of the following dimensions and weight: outside diameter, 8.60 inches; inside diameter, 7.36 . . .

G. GULBENKIAN CO. v. UNITED STATES, 153 F. 858 (2d Cir. 1907)

. . . wool in question, without any distinction as to color, was purchased by the importers at Bagdad for 7.36 . . .