Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 7.37 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 7.37 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 7.37

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION
Chapter 7
COUNTY BOUNDARIES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 7.37
7.37 Leon County.The boundary lines of Leon County are as follows: Beginning at a point where the range line between ranges two and three east leaves the Wakulla line at the northeast corner of Wakulla County, and the southeast corner of section twenty-five, township two south, range two east; thence north on said range line to the base parallel; thence in a direction northeast to the point where sections twenty-one, twenty-eight and twenty-nine of township one north, range three east, corner; thence north to where the township line between townships one and two north of range three east, is intersected; thence east on said line to the waters of the Miccosukee; thence up Lake Miccosukee to the south boundary line of township three north, range three east; thence on said township line to the line of section thirty-four in said township three; thence due north on the east line of section thirty-four and other sections in said township to the Georgia line; thence west along the Georgia line to where same intersects the thread of the stream of the Ochlockonee River; thence, concurrent with the east boundary line of Gadsden County, southerly along the thread of the stream of the said Ochlockonee River to where the north boundary line of section sixteen in township one south, range four west, intersects said thread of the stream of said Ochlockonee River; thence west to the west bank of said Ochlockonee River; thence southerly along the west bank of the Ochlockonee River to a point where same is intersected by the north line of section twenty, township one south, range four west; thence, concurrent with the east boundary line of Liberty County, southerly along the west bank of said Ochlockonee River to a point where same is intersected by the middle township line of township two south; thence east, concurrent with the north boundary line of Wakulla County, on said middle township line across ranges five, four, three, two, one, west and range one east, to the railroad leading from Tallahassee to St. Marks; thence south along said railroad two sections to the south boundary of section twenty-eight, township two south, range one east; thence east on said south boundary and the south boundary of other sections across ranges one and two east, to the place of beginning.
History.s. 5, Dec. 29, 1824; s. 14, Nov. 23, 1828; Nov. 14, 1829; ss. 1, 2, Feb. 13, 1831; s. 1, ch. 288, 1849; s. 1, ch. 414, 1851; s. 1, ch. 3176, 1879; s. 1, ch. 3304, 1881; RS 21; GS 19; RGS 21; CGL 23; s. 1, ch. 16436, 1933.

F.S. 7.37 on Google Scholar

F.S. 7.37 on Casetext

Amendments to 7.37


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 7.37
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 7.37.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

BILLUPS, v. CITY OF CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA,, 331 F. Supp. 3d 500 (D.S.C. 2018)

. . . Tourism generates $7.37 billion in economic impact to the Charleston area economy and is its number one . . .

CAPELLA SALES SERVICES LTD. v. UNITED STATES, ALUMINUM EXTRUSIONS FAIR TRADE COMMITTEE,, 878 F.3d 1329 (Fed. Cir. 2018)

. . . Ultimately, the MacLean-Fogg litigation resulted in an all-others rate of 7.37% on entries of aluminum . . . because of the disparity between the 374.15% rate from Commerce’s final determination and the ultimate 7.37% . . . case because of the large disparity between the 374.15% all-others rate determinéd by Commerce and the 7.37% . . . and the purportedly punitive nature of the 374.15% rate, Capella argues that Commerce must ap'ply the 7.37% . . .

IN RE DEUTSCH, v., 575 B.R. 590 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2017)

. . . Around Mortgage (the ‘Wrap Mortgage,” and together with the Wrap Note, the “Wrap”) in the amount of $7.37 . . .

CAPELLA SALES SERVICES LTD. v. UNITED STATES,, 181 F. Supp. 3d 1255 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2016)

. . . Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“CAFO”), and agency redeterminations, the all-others rate was reduced to 7.37 . . . Commerce made its fourth and final redetermination in MacLean-Fogg, establishing an all-others rate of 7.37 . . . arguing that “Commerce should adjust the effective date of the new all-others cash deposit rate of 7.37 . . . the applied all-others rate (374.15 percent ad valorem) and the post-Mac-Lean-Fogg all-others rate (7.37 . . . after 11/02/2015, [Customs] shall require, for [all others rate] entries, a cash deposit equal to [7.37 . . .

CAPELLA SALES SERVICES LTD. v. UNITED STATES,, 180 F. Supp. 3d 1293 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2016)

. . . The final, redetermined all-others rate was 7.37 percent ad valorem (the post-MacLean-Fogg rate). . . . the post-MacLean-Fogg all-others rate (137.65 percent, at the time of the cash deposit instructions, 7.37 . . .

GILLIS, v. QRX PHARMA LTD., 197 F. Supp. 3d 557 (S.D.N.Y. 2016)

. . . Upon that announcement, QRX’s ADRs declined 47%, from $7.37 to $3.88 per share. Id. . . . Later that day, QRX’s ADRs declined 47%, from $7.37 to $3.88 per share. Id. ¶ 62. 7. . . .

PEER BEARING COMPANY- CHANGSHAN, v. UNITED STATES,, 128 F. Supp. 3d 1286 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2015)

. . . the TRBs at issue in this case and, as a result, reduced CPZ’s weighted-average dumping margin from 7.37% . . .

G. M. M. a HERNANDEZ- ADAMS, v. KIMPSON,, 116 F. Supp. 3d 126 (E.D.N.Y. 2015)

. . . in those tables the attainment ofHispan-ics of attaining master’s degrees was in the neighborhood of 7.37 . . .

PEER BEARING COMPANY- CHANGSHAN, v. UNITED STATES,, 914 F. Supp. 2d 1343 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2013)

. . . redetermined surrogate values, Commerce revised CPZ’s weighted-average dumping margin from 24.62% to 7.37% . . .

ESSEX, D. v. W. KOBACH,, 874 F. Supp. 2d 1069 (D. Kan. 2012)

. . . Wheat State 5 has a total population deviation of 7.37 percent (relative mean deviation of 2.08 percent . . .

OSI PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC., 858 F. Supp. 2d 341 (D. Del. 2012)

. . . NMR Spectrum; (CD3SOCD3) 2.34 (s, 3H), 3.36 (s, 6H), 3.75-3.8 (m, 4H), 4.1-4.5 (m, 4H), 7.14 (d, 1H). 7.37 . . .

TECHNOLOGY PATENTS LLC, v. DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG,, 774 F. Supp. 2d 732 (D. Md. 2010)

. . . Plaintiff's Terms 12A, 13A, 17A, 18A; Defendants' Terms 7.35-7.37, 7.40 . . . .

BADEN- WINTERWOOD, v. LIFE TIME FITNESS INC., 729 F. Supp. 2d 965 (S.D. Ohio 2010)

. . . and is entitled to the following: a.12.7 hours for 4 weeks The first 6 overtime hours: $14.73 x .5 = $7.37 . . . $592.28 = $769.16 x 1.7 = $1307.57 b.7 hours for 2 weeks The first .7 overtime hours: $14.73 x .5 = $7.37 . . .

SHIPBUILDERS COUNCIL OF AMERICA, INC. v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,, 673 F. Supp. 2d 438 (E.D. Va. 2009)

. . . added in China to the hull or superstructure of the Vessel is 891.0 LT,” which Matson said represented 7.37% . . . Matson’s representation that the steel added to the vessel’s hull or superstructure in China represented 7.37% . . . NAD evaluation and conclusions,” concluded that foreign steel added to the M/V Mokihana constituted 7.37% . . .

In PFIZER INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION, 584 F. Supp. 2d 621 (S.D.N.Y. 2008)

. . . As of November 4, 2005, Pfizer had approximately 7.37 billion shares outstanding trading on the New York . . .

In L. PATTON,, 388 B.R. 629 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 2008)

. . . and not objected to) and Cain (filed in the amount of $538.09 and not objected to) plus the Trustee 7.37 . . .

In NANOVATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v., 364 B.R. 308 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2007)

. . . repaid the Bratter Notes with Nanovation stock and stock options even if the stock was valued as low as $7.37 . . .

McCARTHY, Jr. O Jr. K. J. v. DUN BRADSTREET CORPORATION,, 482 F.3d 184 (2d Cir. 2007)

. . . return earned on the assets of the Master Retirement Plan, the 6.75 discount percent rate was below the 7.37 . . . restated in 1994, in which year the average interest rate for thirty-year government securities was 7.37 . . .

POWER TELEPHONE SUPPLY COMPANY, INC. v. SUNTRUST BANKS, INC. N. A., 447 F.3d 923 (6th Cir. 2006)

. . . a second swap on a notational amount of $20 million under which P & T would pay at a fixed rate of 7.37% . . .

USHER, Jr. v. MORTIN, E., 165 F. App'x 789 (11th Cir. 2006)

. . . list (7.4%) reflected the percentage of black persons (18 years and older) in Rockdale county in 1990 (7.37% . . .

In GEOPHARMA, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION, 411 F. Supp. 2d 434 (S.D.N.Y. 2006)

. . . $10 per share on December [first] and [second] (instead of the actual closing prices of $6.81 and $7.37 . . .

In GEOPHARMA, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION, 399 F. Supp. 2d 432 (S.D.N.Y. 2005)

. . . On December 2, 2004, GeoPharma shares rose 8.22% to close at $7.37 (at one point reaching an intra-day . . .

H. M. YOCUM, v. UNITED STATES,, 66 Fed. Cl. 579 (Fed. Cl. 2005)

. . . The interests of these investors in Lyondell ranged from a high of 7.37 percent of total Lyondell shares . . .

LUOYANG BEARING CORP. GROUP v. UNITED STATES,, 358 F. Supp. 2d 1296 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2005)

. . . Commerce, therefore, recalculated ZMC’s antidumping margin, which had been calculated at 7.37 percent . . . In its final results, however, Commerce did not revoke the order because ZMC had been assigned a 7.37 . . .

v., 29 Ct. Int'l Trade 24 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2005)

. . . Commerce, therefore, recalculated ZMC’s antidumping margin, which had been calculated at 7.37 percent . . . In its final results, however, Commerce did not revoke the order because ZMC had been assigned a 7.37 . . .

EDWARDS, d b a R D Co. v. SAFEGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY,, 323 F. Supp. 2d 1263 (M.D. Fla. 2004)

. . . McKenzie, Unfair Claims Practices and Bad Faith, in FLORIDA AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE LAW § 7.37, (Fla. . . .

v., 27 Ct. Int'l Trade 968 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2003)

. . . consolidated administrative review resulted in a final dumping margins of 18.21 percent (5th period), 7.37 . . . The remand resulted in substantially lower final dumping margins of 2.20 percent (5th period), 7.37 percent . . .

NEC SOLUTIONS AMERICA INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 277 F. Supp. 2d 1340 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2003)

. . . consolidated administrative review resulted in a final dumping margins of 18.21 percent (5th period), 7.37 . . . The remand resulted in substantially lower final dumping margins of 2.20 percent (5th period), 7.37 percent . . .

W. SELBY v. PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 197 F.R.D. 48 (S.D.N.Y. 2000)

. . . See 2 Newberg on Class Actions § 7.37 (3d ed.1992). . . .

TELEX COMMUNICATIONS, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 40 Fed. Cl. 703 (Fed. Cl. 1998)

. . . Adding the $4.40 CPI adjustment to a proposed yen adjustment of $7.37 and to the adjusted unit price . . .

UNITED STRUCTURES OF AMERICA, INC. v. G. R. G. ENGINEERING, S. E., 927 F. Supp. 556 (D.P.R. 1996)

. . . Copy of these pictures are enclosed with Exhibits 7.36 and 7.37, and also by the work performed by subcontractor . . .

ORTHO DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEMS, INC. v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES, INC., 926 F. Supp. 371 (S.D.N.Y. 1996)

. . . those three assays total $7.57, while the price for the five assay package (including free DMS) is $7.37 . . . In other words, the price realized by Abbott on the sale of the package—$7.37—is less than the total . . . comparison was to determine the added revenue generated by Abbott when it sells a five assay package for $7.37 . . .

ORTHO DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEMS, INC. v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES, INC., 920 F. Supp. 455 (S.D.N.Y. 1996)

. . . 1.14 ■ 1.05 1.25 HTLV 1.03 1.18 1.09 1.57 HIV-1/2 1.93 2.08 1.99 2.47 HBsAg _.66 _.81 .72 1.20 Total $7.37 . . . could purchase all five from Abbott, together with DMS hardware and software and other equipment, for $7.37 . . . As its package price for all five tests is $7.37, Ortho could sell its three competitive assays competitively . . .

In J. DONNAY A. FARRELL, ESTATE OF J. DONNAY A. v. WURM, 184 B.R. 767 (Bankr. D. Minn. 1995)

. . . the years, the parties adjusted the price as follows: Contract # 1826 Date Price or Premium 04/15/90 $7.37 . . .

NRG COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES,, 31 Fed. Cl. 659 (Fed. Cl. 1994)

. . . 8%% (1/1-6/30) 8.37% 10%% (7/1-12/31) 9% (7/1-12/31) 1986 9%% (1/1-6/30) 7.30% 1991 8%% (1/1-6/30) 7.37% . . .

NEC NEC USA v., 18 Ct. Int'l Trade 336 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1994)

. . . Commerce found dumping margins for NEC of 18.21% for the fifth review period, 7.37% for the sixth review . . .

KLINGER, v. NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES,, 824 F. Supp. 1374 (D. Neb. 1993)

. . . example, while there is evidence that the average tested grade level for female inmates at one point was 7.37 . . .

ORTHO DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEMS, INC. v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES, INC., 822 F. Supp. 145 (S.D.N.Y. 1993)

. . . Abbott pay the following: Test Price HBsAg 0.66 Anti-core 0.85 HTLV 1.03 HIV-1/2 1.93 HCV 2,90 Total 7.37 . . . its HCV, the price for the three would cost 7.57, while its price for all five of the tests would be 7.37 . . . Therefore, to meet the price of the Abbott five-test package, $7.37, Ortho alleges it would have to offer . . .

KIM, v. UNITED STATES, 822 F. Supp. 107 (E.D.N.Y. 1993)

. . . WIC check # 99140740-2 which was subsequently redeemed in violation of 10 NYCRR 60-1.8(a)(2) ... for $7.37 . . .

ROMERO, a A. ROMERO A. A. v. UNITED STATES, 806 F. Supp. 569 (E.D. Va. 1992)

. . . Cord blood pH was obtained at delivery and noted to be 7.37. . . . Moreover, Joshua had a normal cord blood pH of 7.37 at birth. Normal blood pH is 7.35 to 7.45. . . . Leviss admitted that a cord pH of 7.37 is not acidotic. 57. . . .

WESCH, v. HUNT,, 785 F. Supp. 1491 (S.D. Ala. 1992)

. . . 94.19% 49 5.47% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 0.34% KERMIT JOHNSON ELEM/PALMERDALE FIR 7,966 100.00% 7358 92.37% 587 7.37% . . . AME CHURCH 4,317 100.00% 38 0.88% 4,279 99.12% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% RILEY SCHOOL 5,401 100.00% 398 7.37% . . .

R. METZ, v. TRANSIT MIX, INC., 828 F.2d 1202 (7th Cir. 1987)

. . . give median wages as follows: Ages Hourly Wage 16-19 $3.64 20-24 $4.94 25-29 $6.52 30-34 $7.23 35-39 $7.37 . . .

L. ADALMAN S. B. J. Jr. C. M. L. D. J. H. J. S. F. M. Jr. V. J. Jr. R. Jr. C. L. O G a A. R. K. Jr. J. C. v. BAKER, WATTS CO. a M. BOYD N. B- W a W. v. JULIA M. WALSH SONS, INC. T. D. R. Co. a L. ADALMAN S. B. J. Jr. C. M. L. D. J. H. J. S. F. M. Jr. V. J. Jr. R. Jr. C. L. O G a A. R. K. Jr. J. C. v. BAKER, WATTS CO. a M. BOYD N. B- W a W. v. JULIA M. WALSH SONS, INC. T. D. R. Co. a, 807 F.2d 359 (4th Cir. 1986)

. . . Mertens Law of Federal Income Tax, § 7.37. . . .

Dr. E. AUSTIN, Dr. W. Dr. A. Dr. C. v. B. J. LOFTSGAARDEN a a Dr. E. AUSTIN, Dr. W. Dr. A. Dr. C. v. B. J. LOFTSGAARDEN a M. S. W. H. R. a Dr. E. AUSTIN, Dr. W. Dr. A. Dr. C. v. B. J. LOFTSGAARDEN a M. S. W. H. R. a, 768 F.2d 949 (8th Cir. 1985)

. . . 142-44 (1983); Salcer, 744 F.2d at 943; 1 Mertens, Law of Federal Income Taxation, § 7.34 at 7-115, § 7.37 . . .

FORTEC CONSTRUCTORS, v. UNITED STATES, 8 Cl. Ct. 490 (Ct. Cl. 1985)

. . . ($63.16), prime contractor profit of 5.35 percent ($70.97), and a bond premium of .00525 percent ($7.37 . . .

WILLIAM Z. SALCER, PANFELD, EDELMAN, a L. M. D. C. M. D. H. E. J. M. D. D. I. M. D. L. V. W. M. D. F. J. Jr. J. B. J. L. P. L. M. D. v. ENVICON EQUITIES CORP. a U. S. a U. S. a a a B. Jr. W. W. a, 744 F.2d 935 (2d Cir. 1984)

. . . Mertens, 1 Law of Federal Income Taxation § 7.37. . . .

M. BURGESS, H. C. S. D. v. PREMIER CORPORATION, a L. M. C. L. R. A. W. E. M. BURGESS, H. C. S. D. v. PREMIER CORPORATION, a L. M. C. L. R. A. W. E., 727 F.2d 826 (9th Cir. 1984)

. . . Mertens Law of Federal Income Tax, § 7.37. VII. . . .

WESTERN FEDERAL CORPORATION, v. DAVIS a C., 553 F. Supp. 818 (D. Ariz. 1982)

. . . Mertens Law of Federal Income Tax § 7.37. . . .

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. BLINDER ROBINSON CO. INC., 511 F. Supp. 799 (D. Colo. 1981)

. . . .) ¶ 7.37. . . .

YANKTON SIOUX TRIBE v. UNITED STATES, 623 F.2d 159 (Ct. Cl. 1980)

. . . Sales in closest proximity to the northwesterly part of the subject lands ranged in price from about $7.37 . . .

THE YANKTON SIOUX TRIBE v. THE UNITED STATES, 224 Ct. Cl. 62 (Ct. Cl. 1980)

. . . Sales in closest proximity to the northwesterly part of the subject lands ranged in price from about $7.37 . . .

HOME MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,, 639 F.2d 333 (7th Cir. 1980)

. . . Mertens, supra note 26, § 7.34, at 112-14 & nn. 42.1-44, & § 7.37, at 124-25; Dobson v. . . . Mertens, supra note 26, § 7.37, at 129-30. . . . . Mertens, supra note 26, § 7.37, at 128 & n. 82 & 130. . See Maryland Casualty Co. v. . . .

M. THOMPSON v. J. BOYLE,, 499 F. Supp. 1147 (D.D.C. 1979)

. . . Grade 3 JBWs operate the Oversewing and Singer sewing machines, earning $7.37 per hour. . . .

U. S. v. Co. U. S. Co. v., 71 T.C. 874 (T.C. 1979)

. . . Based on beginning cost basis of investments Based on ending cost basis of investments 1971 $36,854.58 7.37% . . .

W. S. v., 71 T.C. 226 (T.C. 1978)

. . . Mertens, Law of Federal Income Taxation, secs. 7.34-7.37(2) (1974 rev.). . . . Mertens, Law of Federal Income Taxation, sec. 7.37, at p. 125. See also Allen v. . . .

In ESTATE HIXON,, 354 So. 2d 1238 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . See, Florida Probate Practice, Continuing Legal Education, § 7.37 (1973). . . .

ABBOTTS DAIRIES DIVISION OF FAIRMONT FOODS COMPANY, v. BERGLAND, s, 438 F. Supp. 629 (E.D. Pa. 1977)

. . . Difference Change in Value Sept. ’69 22,723,613 $7.26 $7.17 -.09 $20,451.25 Oct. ’69 24,594,803 7.33 7.37 . . . + .04 (-$9,837.92) Nov. ’69 21,907,402 7.42 7.37 -.05 $10,953.70 Dec. ’69 22,800,526 7.46 7.37 -.09 . . . $20,520.47 Jan. ’70 22,194,193 7.47 7.37 -.10 $22,194.19 Feb. ’70 20,220,229 7.51 7.37 -.14 $28,308.32 . . . Mar. ’70 21,701,959 7.47 7.37 -.10 $21,701.96 Apr. ’70 22,458,730 7.42 7.37 -.05 $11,229.37 May ’70 . . . 21,252,311 7.44 7.37 -.07 $14,876.62 June ’70 19,923,017 7.42 7.37 -.05 $ 9,961.51 July ’70 20,221,225 . . .

v., 65 T.C. 897 (T.C. 1976)

. . . Commissioner, 47 F. 2d 990 (7th Cir. 1931); 1 Mertens, Law of Federal Income Taxation, sec. 7.37, pp. . . .

I. JACOBS, d b a v. ROBITAILLE, d b a, 406 F. Supp. 1145 (D.N.H. 1976)

. . . Nimmer, supra, vol. 1 § 1.2 at 6, 6.1 and 6.4 & n.7.37. Rosette v. . . .

WING HANG BANK, LTD. v. JAPAN AIR LINES CO. LTD., 357 F. Supp. 94 (S.D.N.Y. 1973)

. . . Plaintiff, by declaring no value, secured the cheapest air freight rate which was $7.37 per kilo. . . .

SONY CORPORATION OF AMERICA, v. BEST PRODUCTS COMPANY, INC., 354 F. Supp. 561 (D. Md. 1972)

. . . Best’s profits during the first quarter of the current year, estimated at 7.37%, are in excess of the . . .

DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,, 433 F.2d 283 (6th Cir. 1970)

. . . ore to marketable product Bromine 0.2446 409 to 1 Magnesium hydroxide 6.01 17 to 1 Calcium chloride 7.37 . . .

EVERETT PLYWOOD AND DOOR CORPORATION v. THE UNITED STATES, 190 Ct. Cl. 80 (Ct. Cl. 1969)

. . . Western white pine, and $6.72 for Western hemlock and Pacific silver fir, for a composite rate of $7.37 . . .

UNITED STATES v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF JACKSON B., 301 F. Supp. 1161 (S.D. Miss. 1969)

. . . Virginia 10.07. 19.87. 36.37. 39 32 29 250 Indiana 9.47. 9.27. 18.37. 32.3% 41 37 37 New Hampshire 7.37 . . .

E. JONES, v. UNITED STATES, 279 F. Supp. 772 (D. Del. 1968)

. . . On December 27, 1957 the taxpayer conveyed the mansion and 7.37 acres of land to Psycho Synthesis Research . . .

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY v. OXFORD FINANCE COMPANIES,, 275 F. Supp. 54 (D. Md. 1967)

. . . Massachusetts Protective Insurance Company 140,000. 29.47% Century Insurance Company, Ltd. 35,000. 7.37% . . .

LINDSEY BROS. a v. C. B. JONES, W. H., 271 F. Supp. 933 (E.D. Ark. 1967)

. . . It is argued that Section 7.37 of the regulations promulgated by the Secretary under the provision of . . .

ALICE PHELAN SULLIVAN CORPORATION, a v. UNITED STATES, 381 F.2d 399 (Ct. Cl. 1967)

. . . See Surrey & Warren, Federal Income Taxation 538 (1960); 1 Mertens, Federal Income Taxation § 7.37 (1962 . . .

ALICE PHELAN SULLIVAN CORPORATION, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION v. THE UNITED STATES, 180 Ct. Cl. 659 (Ct. Cl. 1967)

. . . See Surrey & WarREN, Federal Income Taxation 538 (1960) ; 1 MeeteNS, Federal Lstcome TaxatioN § 7.37 . . .

W. AHRENS J. v. UNITED STATES, 264 F. Supp. 518 (S.D. Ill. 1967)

. . . additional taxes and interest as follows: Year Tax 1961 $ 6.45 1962 5.43 $11.88 Interest Total $ .92 $ 7.37 . . . of the assessments made on August 27, 1964, the total amount of $13.25, being tax and interest of $7.37 . . . the amounts paid on account of the assessments made on August 27, 1964, being a claim for refund of $7.37 . . . Illinois, mailed to plaintiffs by certified mail a notice of disallowance of the claim for refund of $7.37 . . .

Co. v., 43 Cust. Ct. 564 (Cust. Ct. 1959)

. . . Value of drawing instruments Value of cases Weight of cases (pounds) 1046 MC $6.32 $.55 .660 1046 C 7.37 . . .

In DUNNHELL SUSPENDER BELT CORP., 162 F. Supp. 608 (S.D.N.Y. 1958)

. . . $6,650.) that the objectants request were to be allowed, the dividend to general creditors would be 7.37 . . .

CUMMINS, v. CARTERET BROADCASTING COMPANY,, 137 F. Supp. 547 (E.D.N.C. 1956)

. . . 5.75 5.75 3/24/51 46 hrs. 30 min. 5.75 5.75 4/ 7/51 47 hrs. 45 min. 6.86 6.86 4/14/51 48 hrs. 20 min. 7.37 . . . 7.37 4/21/51 47 hrs. 30 min. 6.64 6.64 4/28/51 55 hrs. 45 min. 27.67 27.67 5/ 5/51 48 hrs. 30 min. 8.37 . . .

H. HOLLANDER CO. v. UNITED STATES, 124 F. Supp. 177 (D. Mass. 1954)

. . . Supervisor of the Office of Collector of Taxes wrote plaintiff that the return showed an overpayment of $7.37 . . .

TIMES- PICAYUNE PUBLISHING CO. v. UNITED STATES, 345 U.S. 594 (U.S. 1953)

. . . experience with the unit rate for general display advertising showed a New Orleans total volume of 7.37 . . .

HOPE NATURAL GAS CO. v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, 196 F.2d 803 (4th Cir. 1952)

. . . show that it' received an overall return on its net investment rate base of 8.22 per cent for 1945 and 7.37 . . .

GAYLE v. JONES, 74 F. Supp. 262 (W.D. La. 1947)

. . . 859.95 34.40 4.16 142.54 it tt tt ' tt 1941-42 900.00 36.00 5.70 184.24 tt tt tt tt 1942-43 954.00 38.16 7.37 . . .

UNITED STATES v. GROSS RUBBER PROPHYLACTICS LABELED IN PART XCELLO S PROPHYLACTICS, 65 F. Supp. 534 (D. Minn. 1946)

. . . The average defects, therefore, of all the tests is approximately 7.37 per cent. . . .

GERSON v. ANDERSON- PRICHARD PRODUCTION CORPORATION, 149 F.2d 444 (10th Cir. 1945)

. . . area consisting of 4.96 acres was probably oil producing, and a third described area consisting of 7.37 . . .

MILLER v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 144 F.2d 287 (4th Cir. 1944)

. . . the Tax Court of the United States finding that there is a deficiency in their joint income tax of $7.37 . . .

W. v. D. v., 2 T.C. 267 (T.C. 1943)

. . . Taylor’s 1939 income tax and a deficiency of $7.37 in Malcolm D. and Martha Ann Miller’s. 1940 joint . . .

EMPIRE TITLE GUARANTEE CO. v. UNITED STATES, 21 F. Supp. 754 (E.D.N.Y. 1937)

. . . figures show: 1932 _ 1933 __ 1^34 Income $12,717.76 $6,642.36 $11,406.37 or in percentage, respectively, 7.37 . . .

SEAY v. HAWKINS, 17 F.2d 710 (8th Cir. 1927)

. . . Oklahoma, for the year 1909 $.......1914 $.......1919 $ 5.097.00 1910 $.......1915 $....... 1920 $ 7.37S . . .

G. W. v. A. J. S. S. A., 78 Fla. 138 (Fla. 1919)

. . . 1913, when this request was made there was .due on the note two months and eight days interest, or $7.37 . . .

SHEPARD v. NORTHERN PAC. RY. CO. KENNEDY v. GREAT NORTHERN RY. CO. JAMES v. SAME SHILLABER v. MINNEAPOLIS ST. L. R. CO., 184 F. 765 (C.C.D. Minn. 1911)

. . . Laws Supp. 1909, §§ 2007 — 11 to 2007 — 17]),. reducing commodity rates within the state about 7.37 per . . . observe maximum rates for the transportation of these articles in Minnesota which were on the average 7.37 . . . passenger rates within that state, of 20 per cent, to 25 per cent, in rates on general merchandise, of 7.37 . . .

v., 27 F. 236 (S.D.N.Y. 1885)

. . . According to the almanac, the sun set at 7.37, so that the count was made about three-quarters of an . . .