The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION

Chapter 7
COUNTY BOUNDARIES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 7.42

7.42 Marion County.—The boundary lines of Marion County are as follows: Beginning in the thread of the Withlacoochee River, at the range line dividing ranges seventeen and eighteen east; thence north to the township line dividing townships fourteen and fifteen south; thence east on said township line to the middle of township fourteen south, range nineteen east; thence north to the line dividing townships eleven and twelve south; thence east on said township line to Orange Lake; thence down said lake along its southern margin to Orange Creek; thence northerly and easterly down the thread of said creek to its junction with the Oklawaha River; thence northeasterly down the south side of the Oklawaha River at low-water mark to a point on the south side of the Oklawaha River at low-water mark, where the range line dividing ranges twenty-four and twenty-five east in township eleven south, crosses said river; thence south on said range line to where it intersects the township line dividing townships eleven and twelve south; thence east on said township line to where it intersects the section line dividing sections two and three, in township twelve south, of range twenty-five east; thence south on said section line and other section lines to the southwest corner of section twenty-three of said township twelve south, of range twenty-five east; thence east on the section line dividing sections twenty-three and twenty-six and other section lines to the range line dividing ranges twenty-five and twenty-six east; thence south on said range line to the southwest corner of section seven, township thirteen south, range twenty-six east; thence east on the section line dividing sections seven and eighteen, township thirteen south, range twenty-six east, and other section lines to the west shore of Lake George; thence southwardly along the shore of Lake George to the mouth of Sulphur Spring; thence along the western bank of Lake George until it arrives at range line dividing ranges twenty-six and twenty-seven east; thence south on said range line to township line dividing townships seventeen and eighteen south; thence due west on the said township line to the thread of the Withlacoochee River; thence northwesterly down the thread of said last mentioned river to the place of beginning.

History.—s. 1, Mar. 14, 1844; s. 1, ch. 106, 1846; s. 1, ch. 548, 1853; s. 1, ch. 923, 1859; s. 1, ch. 3060, 1877; s. 1, ch. 3767, 1887; RS 39; GS 37; RGS 40; CGL 42.

F.S. 7.42 on Google Scholar

F.S. 7.42 on Casetext

Amendments to 7.42

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 7.42

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 7.42.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

UNITED STATES v. M. HOFFMAN, P. v. M. v. M. P. v. M. P., 901 F.3d 523 (5th Cir. 2018)

. . . Peter and Arata provided Davis with the company's general ledger, which noted a $7.42 million capital . . .

WASHINGTON COUNTY HEALTH CARE AUTHORITY, INC. v. BAXTER INTERNATIONAL INC., 328 F. Supp. 3d 824 (N.D. Ill. 2018)

. . . . § 7.42 ; 21 C.F.R. § 7.53. . . .

STINE, v. MR. OLIVER, ADX MR. ADX MR. C. ADX ADX,, 644 F. App'x 857 (10th Cir. 2016)

. . . The filing fee is $505, and he states under oath that he has only $7.42 in his prison account. . . . Stine’s balance of $7.42 is encumbered. . . .

BECKWORTH, Co. Co. Co. v. O. BIZIER Co., 138 F. Supp. 3d 144 (D. Conn. 2015)

. . . to the section of the Model Business Corporation Act upon which Section 33-722 was modeled (Section 7.42 . . . ) shows that such a rule is part of a well-developed and sensible statutory scheme: Section 7.42 requires . . . But the Official Comment to Section 7.42 of the Model Business Corporation Act makes it clear that even . . . , 590 F.3d 195 (2d Cir.2009), 'the court recognized that a Massachusetts statute modeled on Section 7.42 . . . Section 7.42 therefore abrogates prior common law exceptions to the demand requirement. . . .

UNITED STATES v. S. JOHNSON,, 122 F. Supp. 3d 272 (M.D.N.C. 2015)

. . . 10.17% 7.13% Vehicle Equipment 21 7.42% 8.08% ■ Vehicle Registration 23 9.87% ' 7.68% Total 251 (Id. . . .

NORTHSTAR FINANCIAL ADVISORS INC. v. SCHWAB INVESTMENTS F. A. G. B. R. W. R. W. H. F., 779 F.3d 1036 (9th Cir. 2015)

. . . Laws ch. 156D, § 7.42; Daily Income Fund, 464 U.S. at 533, 104 S.Ct. 831; Halebian, 457 Mass. at 626, . . .

G. FILLER, v. UNITED STATES, 116 Fed. Cl. 123 (Fed. Cl. 2014)

. . . . §§ 810.2, 7.42, are addressed to the Food and Drug Administration. See Am. Compl. ¶ 55. . . .

McPETERS, v. LEXISNEXIS,, 11 F. Supp. 3d 789 (S.D. Tex. 2014)

. . . representative, Helene Christine O’Clock, in which she says that LexisNex-is-competitor ProDoc charged $7.42 . . .

HALEBIAN, III, v. J. BERV, M. A. T. R. B. G. R. III,, 548 F. App'x 641 (2d Cir. 2013)

. . . echo voting claim is derivative, it would be futile because Halebian failed to make the requisite § 7.42 . . . the claims [including the echo voting claim] are in fact derivative, they fail to comply with section 7.42 . . .

SMILOVITS, v. FIRST SOLAR, INC., 295 F.R.D. 423 (D. Ariz. 2013)

. . . earnings conference call on July 29, 2010, and the next day the price of First Solar stock declined 7.42% . . .

FLOYD, a v. CITY OF NEW YORK,, 959 F. Supp. 2d 540 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)

. . . Accord id. (12/8/08 at 7.07-7.42) (suggesting that officers with low activity will be transferred); id . . .

UNITED STATES v. GIANNI,, 486 F. App'x 459 (5th Cir. 2012)

. . . kilograms of cocaine during the relevant time period and that the investigation resulted in the seizure of 7.42 . . .

HALEBIAN, III, v. J. BERV, M. A. T. R. B. G. R. III,, 869 F. Supp. 2d 420 (S.D.N.Y. 2012)

. . . regard to them prior to filing suit in violation of the universal demand requirement contained in § 7.42 . . .

In STILLWATER CAPITAL PARTNERS INC. LITIGATION, 858 F. Supp. 2d 277 (S.D.N.Y. 2012)

. . . Gerova’s share price increased from $7.42 on May 3 to $15.96 on May 18 and share trading volume increased . . .

WEINBERG, BIOMED REALTY TRUST, INC. v. D. GOLD,, 838 F. Supp. 2d 355 (D. Md. 2012)

. . . ABA, Model Business Corporation Act, § 7.42, quoted in Werbowsky, 766 A.2d at 140. . . .

NORTHSTAR FINANCIAL ADVISORS, INC. v. SCHWAB INVESTMENTS F. A. G. B. R. W. R. W. H. F., 807 F. Supp. 2d 871 (N.D. Cal. 2011)

. . . Laws ch. 156D, § 7.42. There are no exceptions (such as futility of demand) to this requirement. . . .

BAISDEN, v. I M READY PRODUCTIONS, INC. A. L. W., 793 F. Supp. 2d 970 (S.D. Tex. 2011)

. . . following expenses: Hotel and meals $840.22 Taxi 10.00 Meal 4.28 Dinner 23.00 Taxi 51.00 Breakfast 7.42 . . .

HALEBIAN, v. J. BERV, M. A. T. R. B. G. R. III,, 644 F.3d 122 (2d Cir. 2011)

. . . Laws ch. 156D, § 7.44, be applied to dismiss a derivative complaint filed timely under section 7.42 but . . .

DOE, v. D. MANSON,, 773 F. Supp. 2d 183 (D. Me. 2011)

. . . Over the three-year period at issue, these donations averaged $7.42 monthly. . . . An adjustment upward in the Debtor’s monthly payment to the Creditor, albeit in the sum of $7.42 rather . . .

FYH BEARING UNITS USA, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 753 F. Supp. 2d 1348 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2011)

. . . FYH paid estimated antidumping duties on the entries at the cash deposit rate of 7.42% ad valorem. . . . because its entries were deemed liquidated under 19 U.S.C. § 1504(d) at the original cash deposit rate of 7.42% . . .

RICHELSON, v. R. YOST,, 738 F. Supp. 2d 589 (E.D. Pa. 2010)

. . . Act § 7.42 cmt. (2005) (stating that a shareholder’s demand letter should “set forth the facts concerning . . . Act § 7.42 cmt. (2005). . Plaintiff’s failure to make an adequate demand may be cured. . . .

LOPEZ QUINONES, v. PUERTO RICO NATIONAL GUARD,, 715 F. Supp. 2d 233 (D.P.R. 2010)

. . . hour; (6) $4,603.65 for 19.59 hours attending meetings at a rate of $235 per hour; (7) $667.80 for 7.42 . . .

HALEBIAN, v. J. BERV, M. A. T. R. B. G. R. III,, 590 F.3d 195 (2d Cir. 2009)

. . . Laws ch. 156D, § 7.42; accord Forsythe v. . . . See id. § 7.42. . . . Laws Ch. 156D, § 7.42. . . . Laws ch. 156D, § 7.42. . . . . Law Ann. ch. 156D, § 7.42, cmt. 3). . . . .

LEY s v. VISTEON CORPORATION R. L. L. P,, 543 F.3d 801 (6th Cir. 2008)

. . . the market” and “[s]hares of Vis-teon fell $0.51 or 6.43 percent, on January-31, 2005, to close at $7.42 . . .

LEY s v. VISTEON CORPORATION R. L. L. P,, 540 F.3d 376 (6th Cir. 2008)

. . . the market” and “[sjhares of Visteon fell $0.51 or 6.43 percent, on January 31, 2005, to close at $7.42 . . .

CLARK, v. ACTAVIS GROUP HF, LLC LLC, US, UDL, 567 F. Supp. 2d 711 (D.N.J. 2008)

. . . . § 7.42(a)(2); see also id. § 7.46(b) (stating that the FDA “will review the information submitted, . . . Liab., 488 F.Supp.2d at 433; see also 21 C.F.R. §§ 7.40, 7.42, 7.46, 7.49. . . . See 21 C.F.R. § 7.42(2). . . .

A. RISBERG, ASPEN TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. C. McARDLE, A. P. E. E. M. L. T. Jr. R. F. E. C. B. J. W. A., 529 F. Supp. 2d 213 (D. Mass. 2008)

. . . Laws c. 156D, § 7.42, "demand must be made prior to the commencement of every derivative case, whether . . .

UNITED STATES v. BARNES,, 520 F. Supp. 2d 510 (S.D.N.Y. 2007)

. . . Division counties, are 10.17% of the voting age population, are 8.92% of the Master Jury Wheel, and are 7.42% . . . In this case, for example, African-Americans are 10.17% of the voting age population, and 7.42% of the . . .

In BROWN,, 376 B.R. 601 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 2007)

. . . The Debtors scheduled their monthly disposable income at $7.42 and indicated that the presumption of . . .

HALEBIAN, III, v. J. BERV, M. A. T. R. B. G. R. III,, 631 F. Supp. 2d 284 (S.D.N.Y. 2007)

. . . Laws ch. 156D, § 7.42. . . . Law ch. 156D § 7.42; see also Mass. Gen. . . . Law ch. 156D § 7.42, cmt. background (“Section 7.42 requires a written demand on the corporation in all . . . Law ch. 156D § 7.42, cmt. 3. . . . Law ch. 156D § 7.42(b)(1). . . .

GRADEN, v. CONEXANT SYSTEMS INC. W. J. S. E. O K. W., 496 F.3d 291 (3d Cir. 2007)

. . . On March 5, 2004, Conexant’s common stock closed at a 52-week high of $7.42 per share. . . .

In N. DOUGLAS. v., 369 B.R. 462 (Bankr. E.D. Ark. 2007)

. . . William Houston Brown & Lawrence Ahern III, 2005 Bankruptcy Reform Legislation with Analysis, § 7.42 . . .

Re In HUMAN TISSUE PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION, 488 F. Supp. 2d 430 (D.N.J. 2007)

. . . . §§ 7.41-7.42. . . . Id. § 7.42(a)(1). . . . Id. § 7.42(a)(2). . . . Id. § 7.42(b)(l)-(2). . . .

ARMITAGE v. DOLPHIN PLUMBING MECHANICAL, LLC., 510 F. Supp. 2d 763 (M.D. Fla. 2007)

. . . March 20, 2003 $ 780.00 $ 8.13 65.04 March 27, 2003 $ 825.00 $ 8.59 68.72 April 2, 2003 $ 712.50 $ 7.42 . . .

In D. DEEMER, v. D., 360 B.R. 278 (Bankr. N.D. Iowa 2007)

. . . William Houston Brown & Lawrence Ahern III, 2005 Bankruptcy Reform Legislation with Analysis, § 7.42 . . .

UNITED STATES v. DIXON,, 179 F. App'x 541 (10th Cir. 2006)

. . . knowingly and intentionally distributing differing amounts of cocaine base on three separate occasions: 7.42 . . .

In OPPENHEIMER FUNDS FEES LITIGATION, 419 F. Supp. 2d 593 (S.D.N.Y. 2006)

. . . Laws ch. 156D, § 7.42. . . . .

FORSYTHE, v. SUN LIFE FINANCIAL, INC., 417 F. Supp. 2d 100 (D. Mass. 2006)

. . . Laws ch. 156D, § 7.42 (“No shareholder may commence a derivative proceeding” until written demand is . . .

YAMEEN, v. EATON VANCE DISTRIBUTORS, INC. B. L. H. A. H. A. M. L. R., 394 F. Supp. 2d 350 (D. Mass. 2005)

. . . Laws ch. 156D, § 7.42(1). . . .

STEGALL, v. L. LADNER, F. H. R. H. P. A. S. P. Jr. J. A. F. A. W. LLC, LLC, LLC, LP,, 394 F. Supp. 2d 358 (D. Mass. 2005)

. . . Laws ch. 156D, § 7.42 (effective July 1, 2004) (“demand must be made prior to the commencement of every . . .

In MUTUAL FUNDS INVESTMENT LITIGATION In SUBTRACK, 384 F. Supp. 2d 873 (D. Md. 2005)

. . . Laws Ann. ch. 156D, § 7.42 (2004) (effective July 1, 2004). . . .

ING PRINCIPAL PROTECTION FUNDS DERIVATIVE LITIGATION, 369 F. Supp. 2d 163 (D. Mass. 2005)

. . . Under Massachusetts General Laws chapter 156D, section 7.42, “demand must be made prior to the commencement . . . Section 7.42 provides, in relevant part, “No shareholder may commence a derivative proceeding until: . . . Laws ch. 156D, § 7.42. . . . .

AMERICAN SAVINGS BANK, F. A. v. UNITED STATES,, 62 Fed. Cl. 6 (Fed. Cl. 2004)

. . . For instance, in the fourth quarter of 1990, the balance of the Note had been reduced to $7.42 billion . . .

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA FEDERAL SAVINGS LOAN ASSOCIATION E. Jr. J. J. III, E. Sr. W. B. v. UNITED STATES, 57 Fed. Cl. 598 (Fed. Cl. 2003)

. . . if SoCal had retained its contractual capital, its capital ratio would have been 11%, high above the 7.42% . . .

MOGILEVSKY, v. BALLY TOTAL FITNESS CORPORATION, 263 F. Supp. 2d 164 (D. Mass. 2003)

. . . During the fourth quarter of 1999, Mogi-levsky should have been paid an additional $11.13 (150% of $7.42 . . . Mogilevsky’s standard hourly rate (19.00) to the rate reflecting his commissions for the fourth quarter ($7.42 . . .

A. VICIEDO, v. NEW HORIZONS COMPUTER LEARNING CENTER OF COLUMBUS, LTD., 246 F. Supp. 2d 886 (S.D. Ohio 2003)

. . . Plaintiff Brown earned $7.42 per hour during one week. . . .

UNITED STATES v. MARTIN, 186 F. Supp. 2d 553 (E.D. Pa. 2002)

. . . At the time of the arrest, the defendant was found in possession of 2.4 grams of crack cocaine, 7.42 . . .

UNITED STATES v. PRESLEY,, 24 F. App'x 12 (2d Cir. 2001)

. . . At the police station, police found 7.42 grams of crack cocaine in a small package hidden in Presley’ . . .

UNITED STATES v. WATSON, 260 F.3d 301 (3d Cir. 2001)

. . . Laboratory tests revealed a total of 2.4 grams of crack cocaine and 7.42 grams of marijuana. . . .

MITSUBISHI INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, v. UNITED STATES,, 5 F. Supp. 2d 991 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1998)

. . . biased on the evidence provided by Mitsubishi in discovery, it appears that the motor has an output of 7.42 . . .

v., 22 Ct. Int'l Trade 324 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1998)

. . . biased on the evidenceprovidedby Mitsubishi in discovery, it appears that the motor has an output of 7.42 . . .

BANCA CREMI, S. A. n v. ALEX. BROWN SONS, INCORPORATED PSA, 132 F.3d 1017 (4th Cir. 1997)

. . . years and yielding 14.8 percent interest into a security maturing in 16.11 years and yielding only 7.42 . . .

I. FREDERICKS, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 126 F.3d 433 (3d Cir. 1997)

. . . 9.38% 1988 5.29% 8.30% 8.43% 7.65% 8.85% 9.71% 1989 5.53% 7.88% 7.86% 8.54% 8.50% 9.26% 1990 5.84% 7.42% . . .

C. BOLAND, v. Wm. ENGLE, J. M. H. A. J. D. Jr., 113 F.3d 706 (7th Cir. 1997)

. . . . § 79-4-7.42; Mont.Code Ann. § 35-1-543; Neb.Rev.Stat. § 212072; N.H.Rev.StatAnn. § 293-A:7.42; N.C.Gen . . . Governance: Analysis and Recommendations § 7.03 (1994) (hereinafter ALI Principles); Model Bus.Corp.Act § 7.42 . . .

In L. STENTZ, W. STENTZ, L. v. L. STENTZ,, 197 B.R. 966 (Bankr. D. Neb. 1996)

. . . The $965.45 amount debtor seeks to charge Howard for groceries averages approximately $7.42 per day while . . .

UNITED STRUCTURES OF AMERICA, INC. v. G. R. G. ENGINEERING, S. E., 927 F. Supp. 556 (D.P.R. 1996)

. . . defects in the materials supplied to the Roosevelt Roads Project, through Exhibits 7.39, 7.40, 7.41, 7.42 . . . (Docket #80) Reliance on Exhibits 7.39, 7.40, and 7.42 is misplaced, as these documents relate to deficiencies . . . There is no indication that a copy was ever sent to U.S.A Exhibits 7.39, 7.40, and 7.42, submitted by . . . Paragraph 3 in each of Exhibits 7.40 and 7.42, demonstrates G.R.G.’s failure to supervise its own subcontractor . . .

UNITED STATES v. SLOAN,, 820 F. Supp. 1133 (S.D. Ind. 1993)

. . . Sahakian, 965 F.2d 740, 7.42 (9th Cir.1992); United States v. . . .

WESCH, v. HUNT,, 785 F. Supp. 1491 (S.D. Ala. 1992)

. . . 91.61% 2 0.65% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Total Lawrence County 26,499 100.00% 22,107 83.43% 2,408 9.09% 1,965 7.42% . . .

S. KAMEN, v. KEMPER FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., 939 F.2d 458 (7th Cir. 1991)

. . . No. 11, 1991); ABA, Model Business Corporation Act § 7.42(1) (1990 revision). . . .

KAMEN v. KEMPER FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., 500 U.S. 90 (U.S. 1991)

. . . See Model Business Corporation Act § 7.42(1), reprinted in 45 Bus. Law. 1241, 1244 (1990). . . .

UNITED STATES v. RUBIO- VILLAREAL,, 927 F.2d 1495 (9th Cir. 1991)

. . . KING, District Judge: Juan Rubio-Villareal appeals his convictions for conspiracy to import 7.42 kilograms . . . of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952, 960, and 963 (Count 1); importation of 7.42 kilograms . . .

CLARK, v. KIZER,, 758 F. Supp. 572 (E.D. Cal. 1990)

. . . From 1972 to 1986, the Dental Consumer Price Index increased by an average of 7.42% per year but the . . .

In CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY DERIVATIVE LITIGATION, 132 F.R.D. 455 (E.D. Mich. 1990)

. . . Proposed Amendment to the Model Business Corporation Act, while requiring a demand in all cases under § 7.42 . . . Since section 7.42 requires a demand in all cases, the distinction between demand excused and demand . . .

MARSUDA- RODGERS INTERNATIONAL, v. UNITED STATES A. U. S., 719 F. Supp. 1092 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1989)

. . . ITA published the following weighted-average dumping margins for the investigated countries: Hungary 7.42% . . .

v. A. U. S. Co., 13 Ct. Int'l Trade 622 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1989)

. . . ITA published the following weighted-average dumping margins for the investigated countries: Hungary.7.42% . . .

ITT CORPORATION, v. UNITED STATES,, 17 Cl. Ct. 199 (Cl. Ct. 1989)

. . . 12.23 7/85-6/86 7.33 7.29 7.80 7/86-6/87 6.03 6.01 6.37 7/87-6/88 6.30 6.28 6.67 7/88-6/89 6.99 6.95 7.42 . . . 1.06559 1.21129 184,136.18 1987- 88 144,925 6.67 1.00556 1.06878 1.13673 164,741.01 d c b 1988- 89 53,081 7.42 . . .

NATIONAL FARMERS ORGANIZATION, INC. v. ASSOCIATED MILK PRODUCERS, INC. NATIONAL FARMERS ORGANIZATION, INC. v. ASSOCIATED MILK PRODUCERS, INC., 850 F.2d 1286 (8th Cir. 1988)

. . . NFO estimates that 10.78% of farms in Minnesota and 7.42% of farms in Wisconsin were members of NFO. . . . NFO member dairy producers from Minnesota (10.78% x 1,957) and 206 member producers from Wisconsin (7.42% . . .

T. KLAPPER, v. COMMONWEALTH REALTY TRUST, a C. N. T. U. S. a A. M. B., 657 F. Supp. 948 (D. Del. 1987)

. . . Southmost Machinery Corp., 7.42 F.2d 786 (3d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1211, 105 S.Ct. 1179, . . .

v., 86 T.C. 1114 (T.C. 1986)

. . . to its declared purposes, has planned the development of single family, noncommercial residences on 7.42 . . .

Dr. REMSEN, v. UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA,, 429 So. 2d 1228 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . University may elect to have a grievance heard: (a) pursuant to Section 120.57; (b) pursuant to Rule 6C1-7.42 . . .

UNITED STATES v. NEW ORLEANS PUBLIC SERVICE, INC., 550 F. Supp. 911 (E.D. La. 1982)

. . . 11.04%) Sales Workers 57 1 (1.75%) 23,740 1,335 (5.62%) Office and Clerical 444 15 (3.38%) 51,923 3,851 (7.42% . . . 11.04%) Sales Workers 55 2 (3.64%) 23,740 1,335 (5.62%) Office and Clerical 457 14 (3.06%) 51,923 3,851 (7.42% . . .

LEVIN v. N. GARFINKLE, K. B. HAW TAFU, 499 F. Supp. 1344 (E.D. Pa. 1980)

. . . the collapse of the federal government, at rates higher than that of the wraparound: 7.69%, 7.56%, 7.42% . . .

UNITED STATES v. PALMERI, P. Sr. No. UNITED STATES v. CAMPISANO, No. UNITED STATES v. CARIELLO, No. UNITED STATES v. SMITH, No. UNITED STATES v. CHESTNUT, No., 630 F.2d 192 (3d Cir. 1980)

. . . Id. at 7.41 to 7.42, 7.67 to 7.68. . . .

J. FEHRS v. UNITED STATES E. FEHRS v. UNITED STATES, 620 F.2d 255 (Ct. Cl. 1980)

. . . company whose stock traded at 9.8 times earnings (the high end of the multiple range), realized only a 7.42 . . .

EDWARD J. FEHRS v. THE UNITED STATES VIOLETTE E. FEHRS v. THE UNITED STATES, 223 Ct. Cl. 488 (Ct. Cl. 1980)

. . . company whose stock traded at 9.8 times earnings (the high end of the multiple range), realized only a 7.42 . . .

AMERICAN DIVERSIFIED CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES, 609 F.2d 442 (Ct. Cl. 1979)

. . . Included Sales (000) Profits GFM Excluded (000) GFM GFM Included Excluded 1962 $ 2,829 $ 1,145 $ 85 3.00% 7.42% . . .

AMERICAN DIVERSIFIED CORPORATION AND JON- DELL, INC. v. THE UNITED STATES, 221 Ct. Cl. 364 (Ct. Cl. 1979)

. . . Included Sales (000) Profits GEM Excluded (000) GFM GFM Included Excluded 1962 $ 2,829 $ 1,145 $ 85 3.00% 7.42% . . .

SILVERTHORNE v. CITY OF PORT ORANGE,, 356 So. 2d 36 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . McQuillin, Municipal Corporations § 7.42 (3d ed. 1966). . . .

ABBOTTS DAIRIES DIVISION OF FAIRMONT FOODS COMPANY, v. BERGLAND, s, 438 F. Supp. 629 (E.D. Pa. 1977)

. . . 22,723,613 $7.26 $7.17 -.09 $20,451.25 Oct. ’69 24,594,803 7.33 7.37 + .04 (-$9,837.92) Nov. ’69 21,907,402 7.42 . . . 20,220,229 7.51 7.37 -.14 $28,308.32 Mar. ’70 21,701,959 7.47 7.37 -.10 $21,701.96 Apr. ’70 22,458,730 7.42 . . . 7.37 -.05 $11,229.37 May ’70 21,252,311 7.44 7.37 -.07 $14,876.62 June ’70 19,923,017 7.42 7.37 -.05 . . .

CRUZ, Jr. v. H. SKELTON, G. a a, 543 F.2d 86 (5th Cir. 1976)

. . . achievements. 7.4112 Age. 7.4113 Military record as it reflects behavior and adjustment. 7.4114 Time served. [7.42 . . .

CARGILL, INC. v. ATKINS FARMS, INC. F. K., 422 F. Supp. 239 (W.D. Ark. 1976)

. . . , the price at which defendants, Atkins and Bradshaw, sold their soybeans to Riverside ranged from $7.42 . . .

REED, III, v. A. RHODES, 422 F. Supp. 708 (N.D. Ohio 1976)

. . . During that same period, Moses Cleaveland’s black percentage remained virtually unchanged (7.42%-7.41% . . .

D. v. CITY OF STUART, a, 321 So. 2d 620 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

. . . Landis, 125 Fla. 392, 170 So. 100, 105 (1936); McQuillan, supra, § 7.42. . . .

ATCHISON, TOPEKA SANTA FE RAILWAY CO. v. WICHITA BOARD OF TRADE, 412 U.S. 800 (U.S. 1973)

. . . The proposed rates would increase that charge from $7.42 to $14.33. . . .

TOKYO BOEKI U. S. A. INC. v. SS NAVARINO, S. A. Co. Co. COMPANIA NAVIERA HIDALGO S. A. Co. v. TOKYO BOEKI LTD. Co., 324 F. Supp. 361 (S.D.N.Y. 1971)

. . . Of Boeki Japan’s world-wide sales for 1970, which amounted to $183 million, 4 percent, or some $7.42 . . .

GROVE PRESS, INC. a v. C. BROCKETT, W. J. O, 312 F. Supp. 496 (E.D. Wash. 1970)

. . . film was not subject to seizure merely because it was obscene because the provisions of R.C.W. ch. 7.42 . . .

BINGLER, DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. JOHNSON, 394 U.S. 741 (U.S. 1969)

. . . Mertens, Law of Federal Income Taxation § 7.42, p. 110 (P. Zimet & W. Oliver rev. ed. 1962). . . .

GENERAL TELEPHONE ELECTRONICS CORPORATION v. THE UNITED STATES, 176 Ct. Cl. 904 (Ct. Cl. 1966)

. . . 65 Zippo Lighters_:_ 6.93 Tools- 5. 92 Stationery, Cards, Printing, Labels_ 7.47 Clothing and Signs_ 7.42 . . .

L. Jr. L. v., 45 T.C. 407 (T.C. 1966)

. . . See 1 Mertens, Law of Federal Income Taxation, sec. 7.42, pp. 106-118. . . .

UNITED BANANA COMPANY, v. UNITED FRUIT COMPANY, 245 F. Supp. 161 (D. Conn. 1965)

. . . purchased through said broker 14.63% of its purchases through sources other than Fruit Dispatch, and 7.42% . . .

v., 40 Cust. Ct. 799 (Cust. Ct. 1958)

. . . ton, plus $1.00 per metric ton for grade, plus $3.00 per metric ton for size, less inland charges of $7.42 . . . metric ton, plus $1 per metric ton for grade, plus $3 per metric ton for size, less inland charges of $7.42 . . .

R. E. F. Jr. W. G. v., 45 B.T.A. 1060 (B.T.A. 1941)

. . . Its assets were distributed in July 1935, each stockholder-bondholder receiving 7.42+ percent of his . . .

ANDERSON MANUFACTURING CO., 1 B.T.A. 1243 (B.T.A. 1925)

. . . 31, 1920, and May 31, 1921, amounting for 1918 to $1,618.37; for 1920 to $3,914.82; and for 1921 to $7.42 . . .

FREDERICK v. AMERICAN SUGAR REFINING CO., 281 F. 305 (4th Cir. 1922)

. . . uninterrupted decline was shown during the balance of the year, the quotation for December 31st being 7.42 . . .

RIGGS v. CAPITAL BRICK CO. SAME v. ELDRED, 128 F. 491 (C.C.D. Conn. 1904)

. . . the court says, compels the defendant to lose the $24.75 paid originally on the stock, and also the $7.42 . . .

MAISH v. ARIZONA, 164 U.S. 599 (U.S. 1896)

. . . It appears that the assessment of ordinary range cattle was fixed by the territorial board at $7.42, . . . There is nothing tending to show that the board, in fixing the value of cattle at $7.42, acted fraudulently . . .