The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION

Chapter 7
COUNTY BOUNDARIES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 7.43

7.43 Martin County.—The boundary lines of Martin County are as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of township thirty-eight south, range thirty-seven east; thence east, concurrent with the south boundary line of St. Lucie County, to the southwest corner of section thirty-one, township thirty-seven south, range forty-one east; thence north on the west line of said section thirty-one and section thirty, township thirty-seven south, range forty-one east, 6,459 feet to a point lying within the water body of the north fork of the St. Lucie River; thence departing said line within the north fork of the St. Lucie River a bearing direction (State Plane Coordinate System, Florida East Zone) of 41 degrees north, 4 minutes west, a distance of 6,155 feet, more or less, to a point lying within the water body of the north fork of the St. Lucie River; thence departing said point a bearing direction (State Plane Coordinate System, Florida East Zone) of 45 degrees north, 16 minutes east, a distance of 2,355 feet, more or less, to a point intersecting with the north shore of the north fork of the St. Lucie River and the west edge of the Howard Creek as concurrent with the City of Port St. Lucie municipal boundary limits; thence departing said intersecting shore and edge lines following along the City of Port St. Lucie municipal boundary line north along the west edge of Howard Creek to the south line of the northeast quarter of section twenty-four, township thirty-seven south, range forty east; thence east along said south line of the northeast quarter to the intersection of the east 924.15 feet of section twenty-four, township thirty-seven south, range forty east; thence north along said east 924.15-foot line of section twenty-four, township thirty-seven south, range forty east, to the intersection of the north line of the south 508.15 feet of the northeast quarter of section twenty-four, township thirty-seven south, range forty east; thence east along said south 508.15-foot line of the northeast quarter of said section twenty-four, township thirty-seven south, range forty east, to an intersection with the west line of township thirty-seven south, range forty-one east, also being the existing Martin County boundary line; thence north concurrent with the Martin County boundary line, along the west line of sections nineteen and eighteen, township thirty-seven south, range forty-one east, to the northwest corner of section eighteen, township thirty-seven south, range forty-one east; thence east on the north line of said section eighteen and other sections to the waters of the Atlantic Ocean; thence easterly to the eastern boundary of the State of Florida; thence southward along the coast, including the waters of the Atlantic Ocean within the jurisdiction of the State of Florida, to the south line of section twenty, township forty south, range forty-three east, produced easterly; thence west on the south line of said section twenty, and other sections, to the southwest corner of section twenty-two, township forty south, range forty-two east; thence south on the east line of section twenty-eight, township forty south, range forty-two east, to the southeast corner of said section twenty-eight; thence west on the south line of said section twenty-eight and other sections to the east shore of Lake Okeechobee; thence continue west in a straight course to the northeast corner of section thirty-six, township forty south, range thirty-four east, being the southwest corner of section thirty, township forty south, range thirty-five east; thence northeasterly in a straight course to the line of normal water level on the boundary of Lake Okeechobee at its intersection with the line dividing ranges thirty-six and thirty-seven east, township thirty-eight south; thence north on said range line to the place of beginning.

History.—s. 1, ch. 10180, 1925; CGL 77; s. 3, ch. 63-200; s. 1, ch. 2012-45.

F.S. 7.43 on Google Scholar

F.S. 7.43 on Casetext

Amendments to 7.43

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 7.43

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 7.43.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

KASSEM v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC N. A., 704 F. App'x 429 (6th Cir. 2017)

. . . payments for several years, the Kassems stopped making payments when their adjustable interest rate hit 7.43% . . .

AMERICAN INFOAGE, LLC, v. REGIONS BANK,, 191 F. Supp. 3d 1335 (M.D. Fla. 2015)

. . . The swap corresponding to the Tampa loan set a 7.43% fixed rate, and the swap corresponding to the Norcross . . . even one month when In-foage’s interest rate differed from the stabilized rate for each loan (i.e., 7.43% . . .

In GENWORTH FINANCIAL INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION, 103 F. Supp. 3d 759 (E.D. Va. 2015)

. . . Accounting Guide for Life and Health Insurance Entities ("AAG”), Section 7.44 to 7.57; (2) AAG Section 7.43 . . .

In VELUCHAMY N. A. v., 524 B.R. 277 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2014)

. . . Total DWT 7.43-shde box and tongue clasp with 2 safety catches. . . .

HALEBIAN, v. J. BERV, M. A. T. R. B. G. R. III,, 644 F.3d 122 (2d Cir. 2011)

. . . section 7.44 applied to all such instances, the need for a stay — allowable by petition under section 7.43 . . . court’s ruling suggests, but only when such an action was actually stayed in accordance with section 7.43 . . .

HALEBIAN, v. J. BERV, M. A. T. R. B. G. R. III,, 590 F.3d 195 (2d Cir. 2009)

. . . Laws ch. 156D, § 7.43. . . . Section 7.43 provides that “[i]f the corporation commences an inquiry into the allegations made in the . . . And, as the district court explained, section 7.43 might be rendered meaningless if section 7.44 were . . . Similarly, commentary to section 7.43 notes that the “court may in its discretion stay the proceeding . . . Law Ann. ch. 156D, § 7.43, cmt. (West 2009). . . .

CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 90 Fed. Cl. 228 (Fed. Cl. 2009)

. . . Agreement, CEL Trust is to lend to EZH the amount due on the annual Sublease Basic Rent, at an interest of 7.43% . . . multiplied by the applicable percentage under the “Loans” caption on Schedule A, at an interest of 7.43% . . . created the principal of the Sublessee Loan, the balance of which accrues interest at a fixed rate of 7.43% . . .

In BLX GROUP, INC., 419 B.R. 457 (Bankr. D. Mont. 2009)

. . . conference) 3,168 Sqft 269,000 ($84.91 per Sqft) Lakes/Reservoirs/Wells/Pumps 174,240 Sqft 1,295,000 ($7.43 . . .

MORGAN, v. FAMILY DOLLAR STORES, INC., 551 F.3d 1233 (11th Cir. 2008)

. . . whether store managers earn "significantly" more than assistant managers. 2001: $ 9.25 2001 $ 7.93 2001: $7.43 . . .

Co. v., 32 Ct. Int'l Trade 1057 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2008)

. . . Commerce imposed an antidumping duty margin of 7.43% for the 17 Funai USA entries from the 1987-1988 . . . Customs assessed the increased antidumping duties at the 7.43% rate, plus interest, for a total bill . . . difference between the cash deposit calculated using the entered rate of 1.38% and the higher final rate of 7.43% . . . The an-tidumping duty rate 7.43% that was applied to the 17 Funai USA entries of CTVs from November 1987 . . .

TRAVELERS INDEMNITY CO. v. UNITED STATES,, 580 F. Supp. 2d 1330 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2008)

. . . Commerce imposed an antidumping duty margin of 7.43% for the 17 Funai USA entries from the 1987-1988 . . . Customs assessed the increased antidumping duties at the 7.43% rate, plus interest, for a total bill . . . difference between the cash deposit calculated using the entered rate of 1.38% and the higher final rate of 7.43% . . . The antidumping duty rate 7.43% that was applied to the 17 Funai USA entries of CTVs from November 1987 . . .

WARREN, v. SOLO CUP COMPANY, a, 516 F.3d 627 (7th Cir. 2008)

. . . As a security guard, Lorenz started at $6.50 per hour and worked his way up to $7.43. . . .

HALEBIAN, III, v. J. BERV, M. A. T. R. B. G. R. III,, 631 F. Supp. 2d 284 (S.D.N.Y. 2007)

. . . Consequently, section 7.43 of the chapter allows for a court to stay a derivative proceeding for a period . . . Id. § 7.43. . . . completed or, if [the] suit is commenced, the corporation can apply to the court for a stay under § 7.43 . . . themselves of section 7.44’s dismissal provisions had they petitioned this Court for a stay under section 7.43 . . . The provisions for a stay under section 7.43 contemplate a court issuing a stay after the suit had already . . .

L. PAYNE, H. Jo D. K. v. J. DELUCA, J. J. C. W. A. D B. E. F., 433 F. Supp. 2d 547 (W.D. Pa. 2006)

. . . 114,365 shares in the period March 27, 2000, through December 15, 2000, at prices ranging from $5.00 to $7.43 . . .

Z. GLANCY, v. TAUBMAN CENTERS, INC. S. A. T. Jr. S. J. A. S., 373 F.3d 656 (6th Cir. 2004)

. . . control of 44.0% of TRG’s units left them with direct and indirect ownership of 50.5% of TRG's units. . 7.43 . . .

BUILDERS ASSOCIATION OF GREATER CHICAGO, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, a, 298 F. Supp. 2d 725 (N.D. Ill. 2003)

. . . for closed-out County contracts and came up with MBE participation of 11.58% and WBE participation of 7.43% . . .

E. CRANE, v. N. YURICK, II, s, 287 F. Supp. 2d 553 (D.N.J. 2003)

. . . Perritt, Jr., Employment Dismissal Law and Praotice § 7.43 (4th ed.1998). . . .

GEORGIA, v. ASHCROFT,, 195 F. Supp. 2d 25 (D.D.C. 2002)

. . . 34.97 District 4 54.69 50.02 51.16 District 5 56.92 52.04 53.36 District 6 7.36 6.87 6.27 District 7 7.43 . . .

H. TALMAGE, v. RONALD ALTMAN TRUST,, 871 F. Supp. 1577 (E.D.N.Y. 1994)

. . . King 7.43 Defendants maintain that these six- deeds conveyed the approximately 27 acres deeded to Pierson . . . deeded to Foster was located even further east of Cook Farm, as it bordered the east boundary of the 7.43 . . .

UNITED STATES v. GARCES, a k a a k a, 849 F. Supp. 852 (E.D.N.Y. 1994)

. . . Nassau and Suffolk, and that the Black population in the total District represents 20.99%, and only 7.43% . . .

MILLER ELEVATOR COMPANY, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 30 Fed. Cl. 662 (Fed. Cl. 1994)

. . . 1988 totalled $49.52 ($25.96 for direct labor, $16.13 for general and administrative overhead, and $7.43 . . .

In BOWEN, 116 B.R. 477 (Bankr. S.D. W. Va. 1990)

. . . 1982; 1983 Balance $2,571.62 INTEREST $936.53 ADDITIONS $57019 WITHHOLDING TAX June 1983 TAX INTEREST $7.43 . . .

MECHMET, v. FOUR SEASONS HOTELS, LIMITED, a a d b a, 639 F. Supp. 330 (N.D. Ill. 1986)

. . . when employees are actually allowed to fully clean room after working function 2 6.48 6.68 6.93 7.18 7.43 . . .

R. POST, v. DADE COUNTY, a, 467 So. 2d 758 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . (1984) (applying Berman rule to state action); eases collected, 2A Nichols, Law of Eminent Domain § 7.43 . . .

BFC CHEMICALS, INC. v. SMITH- DOUGLASS, INC., 46 B.R. 1009 (E.D.N.C. 1985)

. . . . ¶ 7.43, p. 1033 (1983). . . .

ATLANTIC STEEL COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES De, 592 F. Supp. 679 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1984)

. . . As a result of its Early Determination the ITA recalculated dumping margins of 7.43 percent for Cosigua . . .

Co. Co. v., 8 Ct. Int'l Trade 146 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1984)

. . . As a result of its Early Determination the ITA recalculated dumping margins of 7.43 percent for Cosigua . . .

PAPAGO TRIBAL UTILITY AUTHORITY, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION,, 723 F.2d 950 (D.C. Cir. 1983)

. . . zero rate of return on debt capital could be reasonable (though in fact even PTUA itself suggested 7.43 . . .

UNITED STATES v. J. WARWICK B., 695 F.2d 1063 (7th Cir. 1982)

. . . note is as follows: principal: $40,368.68 plus interest accrued to May 14, 1979 at a daily rate of $7.43 . . .

J. NEAL, R. J. F. J. A. Sr. C. C. B. v. CAREY CANADIAN MINES, LTD. Co. Co., 548 F. Supp. 357 (E.D. Pa. 1982)

. . . N.T. 7.43-7.46. Dr. . . .

CITIZENS COMMITTEE AGAINST INTERSTATE ROUTE v. LEWIS, U. S., 542 F. Supp. 496 (S.D. Ohio 1982)

. . . transmitted to the ODOT a report entitled “Supplemental Analysis for Interstate Route 675, GRE-675-5.87/675-7.43 . . .

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. LOCAL UNION INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS,, 469 F. Supp. 329 (E.D. Pa. 1978)

. . . Further, these employers received 17.17% of District I minority referrals but only 7.43% of all District . . .

CRUZ, Jr. v. H. SKELTON, G. a a, 543 F.2d 86 (5th Cir. 1976)

. . . second major factor is the consideration of the kind of offense and manner in which it was committed. [7.43 . . .

SUISSA, v. AMERICAN EXPORT LINES, INC. f k a, 507 F.2d 1343 (2d Cir. 1974)

. . . payment was to be computed at the “penalty” rate of $2.74 per hour, rather than the overtime rate of $7.43 . . .

DAMPSKIBSAKTIESELSKABET, v. BELLINGHAM STEVEDORING COMPANY, AMERICAN METAL CLIMAX, INC. v. BELLINGHAM STEVEDORING COMPANY,, 457 F.2d 889 (9th Cir. 1972)

. . . left the winch control room until the boom was down; experts agreed that the winch drum would take 7.43 . . . the experts agreed that the normal period for unwinding and rewinding the cable on the winch drum was 7.43 . . . It would have taken longer than 7.43 minutes for this to happen. . . .

EL PASO NATURAL GAS COMPANY, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION., 449 F.2d 1245 (5th Cir. 1971)

. . . Return Ratio anee Return Debt..... . 70.19% 5.44% 3.8183% 71.74% 5.94% 4.2613% Preferred Stock .. . 7.43 . . .

THE UINTAH AND WHITE RIVER BANDS OF UTE INDIANS v. THE UNITED STATES, 139 Ct. Cl. 1 (Ct. Cl. 1957)

. . . He then applied this sum of $7.43 to the 181,000 animal unit months of grazing available on subject area . . .

H. J. LEWIS OYSTER CO. v. UNITED STATES, 107 F. Supp. 570 (Ct. Cl. 1952)

. . . The enlargements of the channel took 7.43 acres from plaintiff’s Lot 816, and .89 acre from plaintiff . . .

OLNEY v. UNITED STATES, 105 F. Supp. 1005 (Ct. Cl. 1952)

. . . through service with the Federal Government for the month of December 1948, during which he contributed $7.43 . . . annuity, is necessary in order to prevent the payment of an annuity entirely disproportionate to the $7.43 . . .

PETER B. OLNEY v. THE UNITED STATES, 123 Ct. Cl. 285 (Ct. Cl. 1952)

P. E. HARRIS CO. v. MULLANEY, 87 F. Supp. 248 (D. Alaska 1949)

. . . plaintiff’s exhibit 8) upon which the tax, computed at the present rates, would be 1/400 of a cent and 7.43 . . .

P. E. HARRIS CO. v. MULLANEY, 12 Alaska 476 (D. Alaska 1949)

. . . plaintiff’s exhibit 8) upon which the tax, computed at the present rates, would be 1/400 of a cent and 7.43 . . .

UNITED STATES v. JONES, RECEIVER, 336 U.S. 641 (U.S. 1949)

. . . under Plan 3 of 5.94 per cent but requiring an increased rate of 26.48 per cent under Plan 2 and of 7.43 . . .

UNITED STATES v. THE WAIPAWA. THE GEORGE N. SEGER KINGDOM OF BELGIUM v. THE WAIPAWA SHAW, SAVILL ALBION CO. v. UNITED STATES, 82 F. Supp. 151 (S.D.N.Y. 1948)

. . . Captain Whitacker admits he changed his course at 7.43 Seger time when Waipa-wa was substantially more . . . If, at 7.43 Seger time, Captain Whitacker had signalled the change of course of five degrees 'to the . . .

CLAY v. MOTOR FREIGHT EXPRESS,, 52 F. Supp. 948 (E.D. Pa. 1943)

. . . : 76% ■ ‘ .457 18.30 25.05 43.35 35.00 8.35 4/16-4/22 35.00 : 69% 1 ‘ .504 20.15 22.28 42.43 35.00 7.43 . . .

v., 1 T.C. 249 (T.C. 1942)

. . . . § 7.43. . . . the purpose of fixing such valuations until on the Tuesday next following the first Monday in June. § 7.43 . . .

Co. v., 10 B.T.A. 338 (B.T.A. 1928)

. . . percentages of total gross income for the years indicated: Per cent 1918. 10.81 1910. 9.37 1920. 10.04 1021. 7.43 . . .