Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 7.46 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 7.46 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 7.46

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION
Chapter 7
COUNTY BOUNDARIES
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 7.46
7.46 Okaloosa County.The boundary lines of Okaloosa County are as follows: Beginning on the Alabama state line where same is intersected by range line dividing ranges twenty-five and twenty-six west; thence east on said state line to the intersection of said state line with the range line dividing ranges twenty-one and twenty-two west; thence south on said range line to the Gulf of Mexico; thence in a westerly direction following the meanderings of said gulf, including the waters of said gulf within the jurisdiction of the State of Florida, to the line dividing ranges twenty-five and twenty-six west; thence north on said range line to the place of beginning; provided that the counties of Escambia, Santa Rosa and Okaloosa shall have concurrent jurisdiction of any offenses committed on the waters of Santa Rosa Sound.
History.s. 1, ch. 6937, 1915; RGS 12; CGL 14; s. 2, ch. 23867, 1947.

F.S. 7.46 on Google Scholar

F.S. 7.46 on Casetext

Amendments to 7.46


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 7.46
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 7.46.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

SAN DIEGO COUNTY CREDIT UNION, v. CITIZENS EQUITY FIRST CREDIT UNION,, 325 F. Supp. 3d 1088 (S.D. Cal. 2018)

. . . of March 31, 2018, CEFCU's California members account for about 7.18% of CEFCU's total deposits and 7.46% . . .

BRYANT, v. THORATEC CORP., 343 F. Supp. 3d 594 (S.D. Miss. 2018)

. . . . ¶¶ 7.46, 7.49, and/or 7.53, and that Ms. . . .

WASHINGTON COUNTY HEALTH CARE AUTHORITY, INC. v. BAXTER INTERNATIONAL INC., 328 F. Supp. 3d 824 (N.D. Ill. 2018)

. . . . § 7.46(a). . . .

GATES, v. MEDTRONIC, INC., 192 F. Supp. 3d 704 (W.D. Tex. 2016)

. . . . § 7.46. . . . . § 7.46(a). . . . This includes firm-initiated recalls.’ 21 C.F.R. § 7.46(c). . . . This applies to firm-initiated recalls. 21 C.F.R. § 7.46(b). . But see Rice v. . . .

UNITED STATES TELECOM ASSOCIATION, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, 825 F.3d 674 (D.C. Cir. 2016)

. . . (WideOpenWest) 712,300 0.80% Cable ONE 496,865 0.56% Other Major Private Cable Companies 6,675,000 7.46% . . .

UNITED STATES TELECOM ASSOCIATION, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, 423 U.S. App. D.C. 183 (D.C. Cir. 2016)

. . . (WideOpenWest) 712,300 0.80% Cable ONE 496,865 0.56% Other Major Private Cable Companies 6,675,000 7.46% . . .

AMERICAN INFOAGE, LLC, v. REGIONS BANK,, 191 F. Supp. 3d 1335 (M.D. Fla. 2015)

. . . corresponding to the Tampa loan set a 7.43% fixed rate, and the swap corresponding to the Norcross loan set a 7.46% . . . s interest rate differed from the stabilized rate for each loan (i.e., 7.43% for the Tampa loan and 7.46% . . .

D. CLINE, v. ADVANCED NEUROMODULATION SYSTEMS, INC. d b a St., 17 F. Supp. 3d 1275 (N.D. Ga. 2014)

. . . . § 7.46(a). . . .

HABERLAND, v. B. BULKELEY,, 896 F. Supp. 2d 410 (E.D.N.C. 2012)

. . . By December 31, 2010, Dex One’s share price had fallen to $7.46, a 78 percent decline. Id. . . .

GROSS, v. STRYKER CORPORATION t a d b a a a, 858 F. Supp. 2d 466 (W.D. Pa. 2012)

. . . . § 7.46 (emphasis added). . . . See 21 C.F.R. §§ 7.40, 7.46. . . .

In HENSLEY,, 393 B.R. 186 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2008)

. . . $40,000.00 deposit was made to Joann Hensley’s Regular Savings account, the account had a balance of $7.46 . . .

CLARK, v. ACTAVIS GROUP HF, LLC LLC, US, UDL, 567 F. Supp. 2d 711 (D.N.J. 2008)

. . . . § 7.46(b) (stating that the FDA “will review the information submitted, advise the firm of the assigned . . . Liab., 488 F.Supp.2d at 433; see also 21 C.F.R. §§ 7.40, 7.42, 7.46, 7.49. . . .

CRAFT, v. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,, 624 F. Supp. 2d 1113 (C.D. Cal. 2008)

. . . cases from the past two years with a multiplier of more than five, with three having a multiplier of 6-7.46 . . .

In WESTERN IOWA LIMESTONE, INC. v., 375 B.R. 518 (B.A.P. 8th Cir. 2007)

. . . Leinen and Leinen, Inc., each purchased 6,700 tons of lime from the Debtor at a price of $7.46 per ton . . .

FIFTH THIRD BANK, v. UNITED STATES,, 71 Fed. Cl. 56 (Fed. Cl. 2006)

. . . Riggins, which was 7.46 %, much lower than an earlier appraisal in the Kaplan Report of 18.5 %. . . .

INNOVATIVE CASE, INC. v. TWEDDLE LITHO CO., 147 F. App'x 467 (6th Cir. 2005)

. . . 22, 2001, Tweddle issued a purchase order to Innovative for 50,000 leather Lincoln portfolios for $7.46 . . . internal inspection, Tweddle agreed to accept 22,000 of the portfolios at the full purchase price of $7.46 . . .

E. RATHBUN, v. AUTOZONE, INC., 361 F.3d 62 (1st Cir. 2004)

. . . dictates that an employee who became a PSM that year (as did the appellant) would earn somewhere between $7.46 . . . would earn between $10.13/hr. and $11.03/hr., but if placed in Quartile No. 1, she would earn between $7.46 . . . starting salary as a PSM, $8/hr., fell within the standard guideline range for PSMs hired in 1999 ($7.46 . . .

SOUTHTRUST OF GEORGIA, INC. f k a N. A. f k a FSB, v. UNITED STATES,, 54 Fed. Cl. 741 (Fed. Cl. 2002)

. . . and the [Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation], As provided for in the approval, BFC paid $7.46 . . .

H. ADAIR v. R. ENGLAND, v. R., 217 F. Supp. 2d 7 (D.D.C. 2002)

. . . For example, in 2001, Protestant liturgicals were 7.46% of DON but in the Chaplain Corps they were 34.57% . . . First, the plaintiffs present evidence that in 2001, for example, liturgical Christians comprised 7.46 . . . Navy dispute the plaintiffs’ figures that in 2000 and 2001, liturgical Christians made up 8.03 and 7.46 . . .

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. C. LYBRAND, f k a C. S. R. EFI a k a a k a a k a G R, 200 F. Supp. 2d 384 (S.D.N.Y. 2002)

. . . For example, on November 23, 1998, the publicly quoted price for ETA stock was $7.46 per share. . . .

H. PATTON, v. D. WEST, Jr., 12 Vet. App. 272 (Vet. App. 1999)

. . . “This Court has previously held that the Manual M21-1 provisions in ¶ 7.46 dealing with PTSD are substantive . . . As we noted in part H.B.2., above, this Court has held the predecessor Manual M21-1 provisions in ¶ 7.46 . . . citing, without description, Manual M21-1 ¶ 5.14 as part of a “see also ” cite following a cite to ¶ 7.46 . . .

STANDARD MANUFACTURING CO. INC. DBP, v. UNITED STATES,, 42 Fed. Cl. 748 (Fed. Cl. 1999)

. . . work performed except certain repair services which were subject to a series of profit rates between 7.46% . . .

I. FREDERICKS, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 126 F.3d 433 (3d Cir. 1997)

. . . (aaa) 1985 NA 8.24% 8.73% 8.43% 10.62% 11.37% 1986 5.24% 6.22% 6.61% 6.46% 7.68% 9.02% 1987 5.21%, 7.46% . . .

PEREZ d b a De v. ALCOA FUJIKURA, LTD. d b a Y De H., 969 F. Supp. 991 (W.D. Tex. 1997)

. . . The Court also notes that both § 7.46 and § 17.50 of the DTPA were amended by the Texas Legislature in . . .

B. COHEN, v. BROWN,, 10 Vet. App. 128 (Vet. App. 1997)

. . . See Manual M21-1, Part VI, ¶ 7.46(a) (1995) (setting forth detailed “diagnostic criteria as' required . . . Manual M21-1, Part VT, ¶ 7.46(b)(2) (1995); Manual M21-1, Subch. . . . Id. at 232 (quoting Manual M21-1, Part VI, ¶ 7.46(f) (Sept. 21, 1992)). . . . Manual M21-1, Part VI, ¶ 7.46.C (1995); see Moreau, 9 Vet.App. at 394-95; Doran v. . . . See Manual M21-1, Part VI, ¶ 7.46(f) (1995); 'see also Manual M21-1, Subch. . . .

J. MARCOUX, v. BROWN,, 10 Vet. App. 3 (Vet. App. 1996)

. . . M21-1, Part VI, ¶ 7.46(c)(1) (Change 40, Oct. 11, 1995). . . . 124 (1991); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.304(f), 4.125 (as amended, 61 Fed.Reg. 52,700 (1996)); M21-1, Part VI, ¶¶ 7.46 . . .

J. MOREAU, v. BROWN,, 9 Vet. App. 389 (Vet. App. 1996)

. . . 3.304(f) (1995); see also VA Adjudication PROCEDURE Manual M21-1 [hereinafter Manual M21-1], Part VI, ¶ 7.46 . . . Manual M21-1, Part VI, ¶ 7.46.C (Oct. 11, 1995) (emphasis added). . . . This Court previously has held that certain Manual M21-1 provisions in paragraph 7.46 dealing with PTSD . . . quoted above, which was contained in subparagraph e. of the September 22,1992, revision of paragraph 7.46 . . . See 38 C.F.R. § 3.304(f); see also Manual M21-1, Part VI, ¶ 7.46 (reiterating three PTSD service-connection . . .

B. DIZOGLIO, v. BROWN,, 9 Vet. App. 163 (Vet. App. 1996)

. . . stressors”); compare VA Adjudication Procedure Manual, M21-1, [hereinafter Manual M21-1] Part VI, ¶ 7.46 . . . See Manual M21-1, Part VI, ¶ 7.46(c) (1995); Doran, 6 Vet.App. at 289; see also Swann, 5 Vet.App. at . . . to “ ‘an event that is outside the range of usual human experience’” (see Manual M21-1, Part VI, ¶ 7.46 . . . Manual M21-1, Part VI, ¶ 7.46(a)(1). . . . See 38 C.F.R. § 3.304(f); Manual M21-1, Part VI, ¶ 7.46(f). III. . . .

E. DURAN, v. BROWN,, 7 Vet. App. 216 (Vet. App. 1994)

. . . or death to be a sufficient stressor to support a PTSD diagnosis, see Manual M21-1, Part VI, para. 7.46 . . . DSM-III-R, at 247-48; see also Manual M21-1, Part VI, para. 7.46(b)(1); 38 C.F.R. § 4.125 (stating that . . .

J. WEST, Jr. v. BROWN,, 7 Vet. App. 70 (Vet. App. 1994)

. . . Manual M21-1, Part VI, ¶ 7.46(e)-(f) (Dee. 21, 1992). . . . hardships of such service.” 38 U.S.C. § 1154(b); 38 C.F.R. § 3.304(d), (f); Manual M21-1, Part VI, ¶ 7.46 . . . Manual M21-1, Part VI, ¶ 7.46(b)(1) (December 21, 1992). . . . (quoting Manual M21-1, Part VI, ¶ 7.46(b)(1)). . . . See Manual M21-1, Part VI, ¶ 7.46(e)-(f); Hayes, 5 Vet.App. at 66-68; compare Ascherl v. . . .

DORAN, v. BROWN,, 6 Vet. App. 283 (Vet. App. 1994)

. . . statutory and regulatory law and the M21-1 provisions is created by the language of M21-1, Part VI, para. 7.46 . . . M21-1, Part VI, para. 7.46(f). . . .

E. ZARYCKI, v. BROWN,, 6 Vet. App. 91 (Vet. App. 1993)

. . . Manual M21-1, Part VI, para. 7.46(e), (f) (Dec. 21, 1992). . . . hardships of such service.” 38 U.S.C.A. § 1154(b); 38 C.F.R. § 3.304(d), (f); Manual M21-1, Part VI, para. 7.46 . . . Manual M21-1, Part VI, para. 7.46(b)(1) (December 21, 1992). . . . See Manual M21-1, Part VI, para. 7.46(e), (f); Hayes, 6 Vet.App. at 66-68; compare Ascherl v. . . .

A. SWANN, v. BROWN,, 5 Vet. App. 229 (Vet. App. 1993)

. . . Manual M21-1, Part VI, para. 7.46(e), (f) (Sept. 21, 1992). . . . Although appellant’s appeal was filed with this Court after Manual M21-1, paragraph 7.46 went into effect . . .

B. MONCRIEF, v. BROWN,, 6 Vet. App. 339 (Vet. App. 1993)

. . . Affairs (formerly Veterans’ Administration) (VA) Adjudication Procedure Manual, M21-1, part VI, para. 7.46 . . .

R. HAYES, v. BROWN,, 5 Vet. App. 60 (Vet. App. 1993)

. . . this case to this Court, paragraph 50.45 of Manual M21-1 has been rescinded and replaced by paragraph 7.46 . . . Manual M21-1, Part VI, para. 7.46(e), (f) (September 21, 1992). . . . provision to be a substantive provision, the VA has issued a proposed rule which would convert paragraph 7.46 . . . Based on Kamas and Hamilton and VA’s proposed rule, the Court finds that Manual M21-1, paragraph 7.46 . . . Although appellant’s appeal was filed with this Court after Manual M21-1, paragraph 7.46, went into effect . . .

ASCHERL, v. BROWN,, 4 Vet. App. 371 (Vet. App. 1993)

. . . See Manual, paragraph 7.46; see also Sayre v. Derwinski, 2 Vet. App. 224, 225-26 (1992). . . .

J. COSMAN, v. J. PRINCIPI,, 3 Vet. App. 503 (Vet. App. 1992)

. . . Paragraph 7.46(g) of the VA’s Adjudication Procedure Manual, M21-1 [hereinafter procedure manual] provides . . . Paragraph 7.46(f)(4) of the procedure manual states that despite a potentially long latency period between . . .

B. BROWNRIGG, v. J. DERWINSKI,, 3 Vet. App. 244 (Vet. App. 1992)

. . . DSM-III 247-51; see also VA Adjudication Procedure Manual, M21-1, part VI, para. 7.46 (adopting the same . . .

In ALLEGHENY INTERNATIONAL, INC. SUNBEAM- OSTER COMPANY, INC. a v. LINCOLN LIBERTY AVENUE, INC., 145 B.R. 823 (W.D. Pa. 1992)

. . . bankruptcy court noted that both parties had agreed that the actual space maintenance rate for 1988 was $7.46 . . . Lincoln Liberty still agrees that $7.46 per square foot was the actual expense rate for 1988. . . .

GOOD, v. H. AUSTIN, VAN STRATEN, v. H. AUSTIN,, 800 F. Supp. 557 (E.D. Mich. 1992)

. . . 431,643 4,909 0.84% 4,397 1.01% 2 580.956 414,968 25,324 4.35% 16,441 3.96% 3 580.956 416,628 43,356 7.46% . . .

QUILTER, v. V. VOINOVICH,, 794 F. Supp. 695 (N.D. Ohio 1992)

. . . Madison 42,310 37,068 804 2,764 1.90 7.46 39,155 33,004 711 1,523 1.82 4.61 61. . . .

In ALLEGHENY INTERNATIONAL, INC., 136 B.R. 396 (Bankr. W.D. Pa. 1991)

. . . Both parties agree that the Actual Space Maintenance rate for 1988 was $7.46. . . . Therefore, the Court’s calculation should be as follows: $ 7.46 Actual Space Maintenance — 6.50 Base . . .

TRANSPORTES AEREOS DE ANGOLA, v. JET TRADERS INVESTMENT CORPORATION d b a JET TRADERS INVESTMENT CORPORATION, v. TEKAIR, LTD., 624 F. Supp. 264 (D. Del. 1985)

. . . that date to the date of this judgment, December 6, 1985, at a rate of $3.00 per day to Tekair and $7.46 . . . 16,641.49 Prejudgment Interest, 10/1/85-12/6/85 $ 201.00 $ 499.82 (total of 67 days) ($3.00/day) ($7.46 . . .

J. NEAL, R. J. F. J. A. Sr. C. C. B. v. CAREY CANADIAN MINES, LTD. Co. Co., 548 F. Supp. 357 (E.D. Pa. 1982)

. . . N.T. 7.43-7.46. Dr. . . .

CAMEL MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES, 215 Ct. Cl. 460 (Ct. Cl. 1978)

. . . 215,236.92 160,972.79 Net Operating Profit 664,928.55 570,135.32 94,793.23 % Profit (of total sales) 8.7% * 7.46% . . .

CAMEL MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. UNITED STATES, 572 F.2d 280 (Ct. Cl. 1978)

. . . 215,236.92 160,972.79 Net Operating Profit 664,928.55 570,135.32 94,793.23 % Profit (of total sales) 8.7% * 7.46% . . .

CROKER, P. Sr. W. Jr. v. BOEING COMPANY VERTOL DIVISION, 437 F. Supp. 1138 (E.D. Pa. 1977)

. . . 1969 was as follows: Number of Leadmen Percentage of Black Leadmen 487 6.36 533 7.5 1968 564 7.45 509 7.46 . . .

ABBOTTS DAIRIES DIVISION OF FAIRMONT FOODS COMPANY, v. BERGLAND, s, 438 F. Supp. 629 (E.D. Pa. 1977)

. . . 24,594,803 7.33 7.37 + .04 (-$9,837.92) Nov. ’69 21,907,402 7.42 7.37 -.05 $10,953.70 Dec. ’69 22,800,526 7.46 . . .

CRUZ, Jr. v. H. SKELTON, G. a a, 543 F.2d 86 (5th Cir. 1976)

. . . for continued care (physical or mental). 7.455 If there is a need for continued vocational training. [7.46 . . .

ASSATEAGUE ISLAND CONDEMNATION CASES OPINION NO. UNITED STATES v. CERTAIN LAND IN COUNTY OF WORCESTER, STATE OF MARYLAND, a UNITED STATES v. ACRES OF LAND, IN COUNTY OF WORCESTER, STATE OF MARYLAND, M., 356 F. Supp. 357 (D. Md. 1973)

. . . by assuming that a prudent owner would want an annual rental of 11.5% on the property to cover the 7.46% . . .

E. KOHN, v. AMERICAN METAL CLIMAX, INC. ROAN SELECTION TRUST, LIMITED, E. KOHN,, 458 F.2d 255 (3d Cir. 1972)

. . . Bromberg, § 7.46(b), supra; W. . . .

JAMES LEO KING AND LODENA KING, TOM FOUTS AND JENNIE FOUTS, PEARL HAWKINS, FRED SHAW AND FAY SHAW, GEORGE K. WINTER AND RACHAEL WINTER, WILLIAM F. WAGNER, ADM. ESTATE OF LUCY DAME, J. W. HOLLISTER AND CORA L. HOLLISTER, J. C. KING AND JEAN KING, RUSSEL McCONNAUGHEY, AND MARVIN L. WINTER, ALL OF THE STATE OF KANSAS v. THE UNITED STATES, 192 Ct. Cl. 548 (Ct. Cl. 1970)

. . . flows of over 19,000 c.f.s. averaged 37,900 c.f.s. and coincided with monthly total rainfalls averaging 7.46 . . .

H. BRUNER v. REPUBLIC SUPPLY COMPANY,, 416 F.2d 763 (5th Cir. 1969)

. . . .-3978% per annum, using the amount found by the jury to have been the total interest paid or 7.46% per . . .

THE TLINGIT AND HAIDA INDIANS OF ALASKA AND HARRY DOUGLAS, ET AL. INTERVENORS v. THE UNITED STATES, 182 Ct. Cl. 130 (Ct. Cl. 1968)

. . . In that year, the four companies produced 137,857 cases valued at $1,023,231, or $7.46 per case, with . . .

COFFEY, Sr. H. v. UNITED STATES, 333 F.2d 945 (10th Cir. 1964)

. . . this ■case were 6 acres to Denver Public Schools in 1952, 1.1 acres to Bennett and English in 1953, 7.46 . . .

UNITED STATES v. WESSEL DUVAL CO. THE EDWARD RUTLEDGE, 123 F. Supp. 318 (S.D.N.Y. 1954)

. . . Stopped engines. 7.46 — Let go starboard anchor one shackle in water. 8.52 — Full ahead; all clear aft . . .

TODD SHIPYARDS CORP. v. UNITED STATES, 93 F. Supp. 807 (Ct. Cl. 1950)

. . . required by Article 7A-4 of the contract, and that whatever excuse for the claim may be found in paragraph 7.46 . . . Paragraph 7.46 of the Regulations referred to herein -and made a part of the contracts in suit by reference . . . Paragraph 7.46 of the Regulations, however, appears to us to describe exactly the situation here presented . . .

TODD SHIPYARDS CORPORATION v. THE UNITED STATES, 117 Ct. Cl. 766 (Ct. Cl. 1950)

. . . by Article 7 A-4 of the contract, and that whatever excuse •for the claim may be found in paragraph 7.46 . . . authority of the Merchant Marine Act of 1936, an act entirely unrelated to this action. • Paragraph 7.46 . . . Paragraph 7.46 of the Regulations, however, appears to us to describe exactly the situation here presented . . .

v. K. No. Co. v., 13 T.C. 952 (T.C. 1949)

. . . time Lydia Hopkins and Amaley Gustafson had remaining life expectancies of approximately 12.75 and 7.46 . . .

v., 1 T.C. 249 (T.C. 1942)

. . . . §§ 7.45, 7.46. . . .

FORBES v. HASSETT,, 124 F.2d 925 (1st Cir. 1942)

. . . however, considering the net value, of the assets of the Company (land and securities), .determined $7.46 . . .

FORBES v. HASSETT,, 38 F. Supp. 62 (D. Mass. 1941)

. . . The Commissioner determined $7.46 as the fair value of each share and the total value to be $16,785. . . . This sum he divided by 10,710, the outstanding shares, getting a result of $7.46, which the Commissioner . . .

INTERNATIONAL RY. CO. v. PRENDERGAST, 1 F. Supp. 623 (W.D.N.Y. 1932)

. . . service, considering the expenses of operation and the revenues, would be 7.96 per cent, for 1928; 7.46 . . .

WALTER L. HOPKINS, 2 B.T.A. 549 (B.T.A. 1925)

. . . Morrison, 7.46 per cent of the whole profits_ 10, 283.39 Mr. Walter L. . . .

SAMUEL GRAYDON, 2 B.T.A. 552 (B.T.A. 1925)

. . . Morrison_ 7.46 per cent of the whole profits 10,283.39 Mr. Walter L. . . .

CHICAGO GREAT WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES, 59 Ct. Cl. 218 (Ct. Cl. 1924)

. . . Louis, Mo., and Texarkana, Ark., $17.40, less $7.46 land grant, $9.94. . . .

In ARKANSAS RATE CASES. ST. LOUIS SOUTHWESTERN RY. CO. v. ALLEN R. R. ST. LOUIS, I. M. S. RY. CO. v. SAME, 187 F. 290 (C.C.E.D. Ark. 1911)

. . . . $ 240,101.33 30.76 Interstate .................................. 170.735.14 7.46 Miscellaneous .... . . .

SOPHIA B. DUFFY v. THE UNITED STATES, 24 Ct. Cl. 380 (Ct. Cl. 1889)

. . . sale of said property, from which said proceeds were derived, the rosin contributed to said proceeds $7.46 . . . sale of said property, from which said proceeds were derived, the rosin contributed to said proceeds $7.46 . . .

B. v., 10 Ct. Cl. 375 (Ct. Cl. 1874)

. . . sale of said property, from which said proceeds were derived, the rosin contributed to said proceeds $7.46 . . .