The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION

Chapter 7
COUNTY BOUNDARIES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 7.51

7.51 Pasco County.—The boundary lines of Pasco County are as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the section line between sections thirty-three and thirty-four of township twenty-six south, of range twenty-two east, with the township line between townships twenty-six and twenty-seven south, of range twenty-two east; thence north along the section lines to the line dividing sections three and four of said township and to the township line dividing townships twenty-five and twenty-six; thence east on said township line to the range line dividing ranges twenty-two and twenty-three east; thence north on said range line to the line dividing sections twenty-four and thirteen of township twenty-three south, of range twenty-two east; thence west to the line dividing ranges twenty and twenty-one east; thence south to the line dividing townships twenty-three and twenty-four south; thence west on said line to the Gulf of Mexico; thence southerly along the gulf coast, including islands and the waters of said gulf within the jurisdiction of the State of Florida, to the north line of Pinellas County, the township line dividing townships twenty-six and twenty-seven south; thence east on said line to the place of beginning.

History.—ss. 1, 2, ch. 107, 1847; s. 1, ch. 415, 1850; s. 1, ch. 3471, 1883; s. 8, ch. 3772, 1887; RS 46; GS 44; RGS 48; CGL 50; s. 1, ch. 25440, 1949.

F.S. 7.51 on Google Scholar

F.S. 7.51 on Casetext

Amendments to 7.51

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 7.51

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 7.51.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

IN RE A. WOLF, N. A. v. ZZC, MMQB, SHBM,, 595 B.R. 735 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2018)

. . . Scott Wolf owns all of the shares of MMQB, Inc., which he purchased for $7.51. Id. at ¶ 71. . . .

UNITED STATES v. ANTHEM, INC., 236 F. Supp. 3d 171 (D.D.C. 2017)

. . . Proposed Findings of Fact: Phase II [Dkt. 483] (depicting, the market shares and HHI data appearing in PX 7.51 . . .

ALABAMA LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS, v. ALABAMA, v., 231 F. Supp. 3d 1026 (M.D. Ala. 2017)

. . . Plan A, District 76 is 14.49 points lower, but District 77 is 3.54 points lower and District 78 is 7.51 . . .

LUJAN, v. CITY OF SANTA FE,, 122 F. Supp. 3d 1215 (D.N.M. 2015)

. . . Lujan is referring to rule 7.51(A) of the City of Santa Fe’s Personnel Rules, which states that “[t]he . . .

LUJAN, v. CITY OF SANTA FE,, 89 F. Supp. 3d 1109 (D.N.M. 2015)

. . . subject matter jurisdiction over this appeal and over the Appellant Martin Lujan, pursuant to Rule 7.51 . . . Maynes as Hearing Officer pursuant to Rule 7.51(3). 5. . . . Lujan also argues that the City of Santa Fe violated rule 7.51(B)(2), which, according to M. . . .

In REMEC INCORPORATED SECURITIES LITIGATION., 702 F. Supp. 2d 1202 (S.D. Cal. 2010)

. . . On March 25, 2004, REMEC’s stock price increased by 13.4% to close at $7.51. According to Dr. . . .

UNITED STATES v. CHARLES, Jr., 576 F.3d 1060 (10th Cir. 2009)

. . . escape from lawful custody) and (2) a controlled substance offense (possession with intent to distribute 7.51 . . . from lawful custody), and (2) a controlled substance offense (possession with intent to distribute 7.51 . . .

ST. BERNARD PARISH St. v. UNITED STATES,, 88 Fed. Cl. 528 (Fed. Cl. 2009)

. . . Surge of 7.51 ft. at Shell Beach “was higher than that recorded within most of the neighboring region . . .

LUCTERHAND, v. GRANITE MICROSYSTEMS, INCORPORATED v., 564 F.3d 809 (7th Cir. 2009)

. . . Anderson, Wisconsin Insurance Law §§ 7.51-.52 (5th ed.2004)). . . .

WEISS, v. AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, INC., 527 F. Supp. 2d 938 (D. Ariz. 2007)

. . . Following the July 26 announcement, Amkor’s stock price fell 17% from $7.51 per share to $6.25 per share . . . Following that announcement, the Company’s stock price declined 17% from $7.51 per share to$6.25 per . . .

In OMEPRAZOLE PATENT LITIGATION. AB, v. AB, v. Dr. S. A. AB, v. Co. D. D. AB, v. AB, v., 490 F. Supp. 2d 381 (S.D.N.Y. 2007)

. . . omeprazole was 7.07, the mean pH of 33% suspensions was 7.27-7.58, and the mean pH of 50% solutions was 7.49-7.51 . . .

SUNDANCE, INC. Co. v. DeMONTE FABRICATING LTD., 485 F. Supp. 2d 805 (E.D. Mich. 2007)

. . . . § 7.51 (2005 supp). See also Kar-am v. . . . Givens, supra, § 7.51 (1998). . . .

D. COLE, v. DOE THRU OFFICERS OF THE CITY OF EMERYVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT,, 387 F. Supp. 2d 1084 (N.D. Cal. 2005)

. . . Haberman, 26 Cal.App.4th 40, 45, 31 Cal.Rptr.2d 259 (1994) (noting that then-BAJI No. 7.51 provided that . . .

MENASHA CORPORATION v. LUMBERMENS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, 361 F. Supp. 2d 887 (E.D. Wis. 2005)

. . . Anderson, Wisconsin Insurance Law § 7.51 (5th ed.2004). . . .

SHINYEI CORPORATION OF AMERICA, v. UNITED STATES,, 355 F.3d 1297 (Fed. Cir. 2004)

. . . six subject manufacturers: Fujino (1.83%); Inoue (1.89%); Nakai (6.47%); Nankai (9.41%) and Showa (7.51% . . .

ALLOY PIPING PRODUCTS, INC. v. KANZEN TETSU SDN. BHD. U. S. A., 334 F.3d 1284 (Fed. Cir. 2003)

. . . pipe fittings in the United States at less than fair value by a weighted-average dumping margin of 7.51% . . . margins in excess of 16,000%,” 746 F.Supp. at 1111 n. 4, the dumping margin in this case was a mere 7.51% . . .

UNITED STATES v. HARRISON,, 296 F.3d 994 (10th Cir. 2002)

. . . See generally 2 Myers, supra, § 7.51, at 335-38. . . . See 2 Myers, supra, § 7.51 at 342 (“idiosyncratic detail .., may point toward reliability”). . . .

v. U. S. A., 26 Ct. Int'l Trade 330 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2002)

. . . Commerce calculated a final weighted-average dumping margin of 7.51 percent for all Malaysian producers . . . and Alloy note that the final margin was 70.44 percent, a drastic difference from the final margin of 7.51 . . .

ALLOY PIPING PRODUCTS, INC. v. UNITED STATES U. S. A., 201 F. Supp. 2d 1267 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2002)

C. HOWARD, v. EVEREX SYSTEMS, INC. L. W. C. Y. s N. V., 228 F.3d 1057 (9th Cir. 2000)

. . . Bloomenthal, Securities and Federal Corporate Law § 7.51 (1999) (listing cases). . . .

In BABY FOOD ANTITRUST LITIGATION L. L. J. Co. Co. D. C. No. v. H. J. BNNC BCN No. J. Co. v. H. J. BNNC BCN No. v. H. J. BNNC BCN No. v. H. J. BNNC BCN No. CV- v. H. J. BNNC BCN No. CV- L. L. a v. H. J. BNNC BNC No. CV- v. H. J. BNNC BNC No. Co. v. H. J. BNNC BNC No. v. H. J. BNNC BNC No. L. L. J. Co. Co. No., 166 F.3d 112 (3d Cir. 1999)

. . . illustrate - that the Nestle/Beech-Nut’s company-wide average selling price per case of baby food was $7.51 . . .

BUBBLE ROOM, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 159 F.3d 553 (Fed. Cir. 1998)

. . . Multiplying $423,298 by 7.51% (the employer FICA tax rate for 1989), the IRS determined that $31,790 . . .

BUBBLE ROOM, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 159 F.3d 553 (Fed. Cir. 1998)

. . . Multiplying $423,298 by 7.51% (the employer FICA tax rate for 1989), the IRS determined that $31,790 . . .

MORALES FELICIANO, v. ROSSELL GONZ LEZ,, 13 F. Supp. 2d 151 (D.P.R. 1998)

. . . psychiatrists required for the ambulatory mental health services of the CHP in 1993, the program had only 7.51 . . .

FRIEDLAND, v. FAUVER,, 6 F. Supp. 2d 292 (D.N.J. 1998)

. . . The complaint was filed on July 29, 1996 upon payment of an initial partial filing fee of $7.51. . . .

BUBBLE ROOM, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 36 Fed. Cl. 659 (Fed. Cl. 1996)

. . . The IRS agent calculated the additional employer FICA taxes due (computed at 7.51%) on the allegedly . . . Insurance tax rate applicable to employers was 1.45% (I.R.C. § 3111(b)), for a combined FICA tax rate of 7.51% . . .

SANCHEZ, v. OVERMYER,, 891 F. Supp. 1253 (N.D. Ohio 1995)

. . . The applicable FICA rate in 1989 was 7.51%. 26 U.S.C. § 3111(a) and (b)(6). . Mrs. . . .

M. HOWES, v. MEDICAL COMPONENTS, INC., 761 F. Supp. 1193 (E.D. Pa. 1990)

. . . attorney fees, costs, and expenses, calculated from the date of entry of this Order at the rate of 7.51% . . .

RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION, v. OAKS APARTMENTS JOINT VENTURE,, 753 F. Supp. 1332 (N.D. Tex. 1990)

. . . DOLLARS ($1,252,844.39) plus post-judgment interest thereon at the rate of SEVEN AND 51/100 PERCENT (7.51% . . . 100 DOLLARS ($50,488.57) plus post-judgment interest thereon at the rate of SEVEN AND 51/100 PERCENT (7.51% . . . lOO DOLLARS ($79,459.00) plus post-judgment interest thereon at the rate of SEVEN AND 51/100 PERCENT (7.51% . . . together with post-judgment interest on each such payment at the rate of SEVEN AND 51/100 PERCENT (7.51% . . . ($22,013.75), together with post-judgment interest thereon at the rate of SEVEN AND 51/100 PERCENT (7.51% . . .

In Re C- T OF VIRGINIA, INC. f k a C- T OF VIRGINIA, INC. f k a v. PAINE WEBBER INCORPORATED,, 124 B.R. 700 (W.D. Va. 1990)

. . . GRANTED and judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff in the amount of $600,000 plus interest at 7.51% . . .

UNITED STATES v. LAWRENCE,, 918 F.2d 68 (8th Cir. 1990)

. . . other drug transactions, we calculate the total weight found by the District Court to be approximately 7.51 . . . Subtracting this amount from the 7.51 kilos attributed to Lawrence by the District Court (see note two . . .

J. GREENE, v. UNITED STATES, 745 F. Supp. 1486 (E.D. Mo. 1990)

. . . plaintiff lost $3,905.20 in wages for the period from May 21, 1987 to September 1, 1987 at the rate of $7.51 . . .

UNITED STATES v. SKELTON, UNITED STATES v. MAHAN,, 901 F.2d 1204 (4th Cir. 1990)

. . . The parties stipulated that the amount involved was 7510 grams (7.51 KG) of liquid PCPy. . . . found Skelton’s base offense level to be level 34, which is the correct level for an offense involving 7.51 . . .

In CONNECTICUT NATIONAL BANK, S S OMI YUKON, HAWAIIAN INDEPENDENT REFINERY, INC. v. OMI CORP. OMI CORP. v. CALEB BRETT U. S. A. INC., 733 F. Supp. 14 (S.D.N.Y. 1990)

. . . Figured using 1989 standards: 7.51% with a cutoff at $48,000. . 10.8 work life expectancy of decedent . . .

PUBLIC SERVICE ENTERPRISE GROUP INCORPORATED v. PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY, ATLANTIC CITY ELECTRIC COMPANY v. PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY,, 130 F.R.D. 543 (D.N.J. 1990)

. . . the ownership shares are: Atlantic City Electric Company...........................................7.51% . . . Delmarva Power & Light Company.......................................7.51% Philadelphia Electric Company . . .

PUBLIC SERVICE ENTERPRISE GROUP, INCORPORATED, v. PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY, ATLANTIC CITY ELECTRIC COMPANY, v. PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY,, 722 F. Supp. 184 (D.N.J. 1989)

. . . Agreement entered into on November 21, 1971, as follows: PSE & G (42.49%), PECO (42.49%), Atlantic City (7.51% . . . ), and Delmarva Power (7.51%). . . .

PEGUES, On v. MISSISSIPPI STATE EMPLOYMENT SERVICE OF MISSISSIPPI EMPLOYMENT SECURITY COMMISSION,, 698 F. Supp. 116 (N.D. Miss. 1988)

. . . numerous black referred out-of-code positions exceeded that of the white referred out-of-code positions by 7.51% . . .

M. v., 89 T.C. 632 (T.C. 1987)

. . . All Bookbinders are paid $7.51 per hour (compared with wages ranging from $5.29 to $5.92 per hour paid . . .

In WICAT SECURITIES LITIGATION, 671 F. Supp. 726 (D. Utah 1987)

. . . Gardy 7.51 X $ 80 600.80 Total $132,466.40 Armstrong Firm: David E. . . .

Al J. J. v., 88 T.C. 906 (T.C. 1987)

. . . of A of A shares shares 94,985 12.22 19.40 Don 130,000 34.05 89,300 11.48 7.70 Paul — — 87,105 11.20 7.51 . . . Schneider — — 87,105 11.20 7.51 John Schneider — — 87,105 11.20 7.51 Kathleen Schneider — — 3,890 .50 . . .

UNITED STATES, v. L. STANLEY, U. S., 21 M.J. 249 (C.M.A. 1986)

. . . possession of 3.42 grams of iparihuana and, contrary to his plea, he was also convicted of sale of 7.51 . . .

BARBER, v. SCULLY,, 731 F.2d 1073 (2d Cir. 1984)

. . . Jones, 720 F.2d 7.51 (2d Cir.1983), with Washington v. Harris, 650 F.2d 447 (2d Cir.1981). . . .

J. NEAL, R. J. F. J. A. Sr. C. C. B. v. CAREY CANADIAN MINES, LTD. Co. Co., 548 F. Supp. 357 (E.D. Pa. 1982)

. . . N.T. 7.49-7.51. However, Dr. . . .

LEVIN v. N. GARFINKLE, K. B. HAW TAFU, 499 F. Supp. 1344 (E.D. Pa. 1980)

. . . collapse of the federal government, at rates higher than that of the wraparound: 7.69%, 7.56%, 7.42%, and 7.51% . . .

FORT BEND INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT v. CITY OF STAFFORD, 507 F. Supp. 211 (S.D. Tex. 1980)

. . . There is a 7.51% disparity between the percent of black students and black certified personnel. . . .

UNITED STATES v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, 454 F. Supp. 1077 (E.D. Va. 1978)

. . . Employed Employed Expected Deviation Number of Standard Deviations Difference 12/31/73 396 21 68 47 7.51 . . .

CHRYSLER CORPORATION, No. v. A. SCHLESINGER, Lt. J. No., 565 F.2d 1172 (3d Cir. 1977)

. . . . § 7.51 (1976) (Transportation Dept.); 32 C.F.R. § 286.4(b) (Defense Dept.); 41 C.F.R. § 105-60.104- . . .

ABBOTTS DAIRIES DIVISION OF FAIRMONT FOODS COMPANY, v. BERGLAND, s, 438 F. Supp. 629 (E.D. Pa. 1977)

. . . 22,800,526 7.46 7.37 -.09 $20,520.47 Jan. ’70 22,194,193 7.47 7.37 -.10 $22,194.19 Feb. ’70 20,220,229 7.51 . . .

TITLE GUARANTEE CO. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD,, 534 F.2d 484 (2d Cir. 1976)

. . . . § 7.51.) This approach was clearly intended by Congress in passing the FOIA. Sourcebook at 158. . . . .

COLEMAN MOTOR CO. a v. CHRYSLER CORPORATION, 525 F.2d 1338 (3d Cir. 1975)

. . . 1965 51.86 22.15 15.26 6.56 4.32 6.41 1966 49.01 24.01 16.52 7.28 3.45 7.01 1967 50.50 20.73 17.60 7.51 . . .

LAC COURTE OREILLES BAND OF LAKE SUPERIOR CHIPPEWA INDIANS, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, NORTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL, INC. v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION,, 510 F.2d 198 (D.C. Cir. 1975)

. . . See generally Nichols’, Eminent Domain §§ 3.21 [2], 7.5-7.51 (rev. 3d ed., J. Sackman ed. 1974). . . . .

L. BONE, v. HIBERNIA BANK, 493 F.2d 135 (9th Cir. 1974)

. . . Interest on the loan was 7.51% per annum. . . . 6) (see note 2 supra) because the “effective annual percentage rate” varies from the stated rate of 7.51% . . .

W. WIRTZ, v. AIRE FRIO, S. A. a, 304 F. Supp. 693 (D.C.Z. 1968)

. . . Guevara 13.55 Jose Maria Fossatti 129.42 Francisco Lopez 88.53 Agileo Marin 29.42 Guillermo Mendez 7.51 . . .

PHILADELPHIA QUARTZ COMPANY v. UNITED STATES PHILADELPHIA QUARTZ COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA v. UNITED STATES, 374 F.2d 512 (Ct. Cl. 1967)

. . . drums for which a $10 deposit was required cost $6.77 on average; those requiring a $15 deposit cost $7.51 . . .

PHILADELPHIA QUARTZ COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES PHILADELPHIA QUARTZ COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA v. THE UNITED STATES, 179 Ct. Cl. 191 (Ct. Cl. 1967)

. . . drums for which a $10 deposit was required cost $6.77 on average; those requiring a $15 deposit cost $7.51 . . . required had an average cost of $6.77; those for which a $15 deposit was required had an average cost of $7.51 . . .

SINCOCK v. V. GATELY, 262 F. Supp. 739 (D. Del. 1967)

. . . County is entitled to 16.59 representatives and to 8.5 senators while Wilmington is entitled only to 7.51 . . . The figures from Table I, Column 3, indicate that Wilmington should have 7.51 representatives and Rural . . .

L. L. HAUL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES, 177 Ct. Cl. 870 (Ct. Cl. 1966)

. . . costs_ 7. 51 % The weight of the credible evidence supports additional Gr & A expenses to the extent of 7.51 . . .

UNITED STATES v. F. DAVIS,, 247 F. Supp. 84 (E.D. Mich. 1965)

. . . 1961 had recorded a jeopardy tax assessment affidavit, pursuant to Michigan Statutes Annotated Section 7.51 . . . (1)-7.51(7), which stated that a 1961 personal property tax in the amount of $1,509.92 had been levied . . .

v., 55 Cust. Ct. 120 (Cust. Ct. 1965)

. . . held that the imported plastic papaya jelly base was an unenumerated article, dutiable under paragraph 7.51 . . .

E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES, 153 Ct. Cl. 274 (Ct. Cl. 1961)

. . . In 1950, the average cost of such cylinders was $6.11, $7.51, $14.30, and $149.88, respectively. . . .

SOCONY VACUUM TRANSP. CO. THE VOCO. THE CHOAPA. THE EMPIRE GARRICK. THE BRITISH HARMONY, 93 F. Supp. 718 (S.D.N.Y. 1950)

. . . indicate that her engines were not reversed as promptly as her Master testified: Slow Ahd 7.50 Bump 7.51 . . . 3/4 Full Ast 7.51 Bump The Fifth Engineer testified that he made all of the above entries personally . . . except that he did not know who- wrote “Bump” after “Full Ast 7.51”. . . .

UNITED STATES FIDELITY GUARANTY CO. v. JOHN R. ALLEY CO., 34 F. Supp. 604 (W.D. Okla. 1940)

. . . Harry Abels & Son for $179.97; New State Hardware Company for $14.17; Stroman Motor Supply Company for $7.51 . . .

J. H. Co. v. v. J. H. Co., 20 C.C.P.A. 344 (C.C.P.A. 1932)

. . . during the period here in issue, in countries other than Morocco and the United States, ranged from $7.51 . . .

M. A. Jr. E. A. v., 25 B.T.A. 780 (B.T.A. 1932)

. . . Market and Taylor Streets property was based upon a capitalization of the net rentals at approximately 7.51 . . .

EVANS GLASS CO. v. L. E. SMITH GLASS CO., 21 F.2d 553 (W.D. Pa. 1927)

. . . The profit of 7.51 cents per pair on these lenses would amount to $3,-165.89, thus reducing to $42,731.64 . . .

UNITED STATES KILPATRICK v. CAPDEVIELLE, 118 F. 809 (5th Cir. 1902)

. . . 1873 the rate allowed for city expenses and police was 12.50 mills; the tax levied for expenses was 7.51 . . .

J. v., 2 Fla. 476 (Fla. 1849)

. . . that the record must show that the prisoner was present, when sentence of death ivas passed. 1 Chitty, 7.51 . . .