The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION

Chapter 7
COUNTY BOUNDARIES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 7.53

7.53 Polk County.—The boundary lines of Polk County are as follows: Beginning at a point where the range line between ranges twenty-two and twenty-three east is intersected by the township line between townships thirty-two and thirty-three south; thence east on said township line to the west bank of Central and South Florida Flood Control District Canal C-38 (Kissimmee River); thence northerly along said west bank to Lake Kissimmee; thence northerly and westerly along the west shore of Lake Kissimmee to the west bank of Central and South Florida Flood Control District Canal C-37; thence northerly along said west bank of canal to Lake Hatchineha; thence westerly, northerly and easterly along the west and north shore of Lake Hatchineha, to the thread of the stream of Dead River; thence northerly along the thread of the stream of Dead River and Reedy Creek to the west shore of Lake Cypress; run thence northerly along said west shore of Lake Cypress to the township line between townships twenty-seven and twenty-eight south; thence west on said line to the range line dividing ranges twenty-eight and twenty-nine east; thence north along the range line to the southeast corner of section twelve township twenty-seven south, range twenty-eight east; thence west along section lines to the southwest corner of section nine, township twenty-seven south, range twenty-eight east; thence north along section lines to the southwest corner of section twenty-one, township twenty-six south, range twenty-eight east; thence northwesterly through respective section and quarter section corners to the southeast corner of township twenty-five south, range twenty-seven east; thence west on the township line to the range line between ranges twenty-six and twenty-seven east; thence north on said range line to the township line between townships twenty-four and twenty-five south; thence west on said township line to the section line between sections thirty-four and thirty-five, township twenty-four south, range twenty-five east; thence north on said section line to the northeast corner of said section thirty-four; thence west on the north line of said section thirty-four and the sections to the west of it to the range line between ranges twenty-four and twenty-five east; thence south on said range line to the township line between townships twenty-four and twenty-five south; thence west on said township line to the range line between ranges twenty-three and twenty-four east; thence south on said range line to the thread of the Withlacoochee River; thence southerly and westerly following the thread of said river to where same is intersected by the range line between ranges twenty-two and twenty-three east; thence south on said range line to the township line dividing townships twenty-five and twenty-six south; thence west on said township line to the section line dividing sections three and four in township twenty-six south, range twenty-two east; thence south along the section lines to the township line dividing townships twenty-six and twenty-seven south; thence east along said township line to the range line dividing ranges twenty-two and twenty-three east; thence south on said range line to the place of beginning. The shorelines of Lakes Kissimmee and Hatchineha shall be as physically present unless and until the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund shall establish bulkhead lines along the said lake shores; in which event, the said shorelines shall be the said bulkhead lines to the extent they are so established.

History.—s. 2, ch. 1201, 1861; s. 1, ch. 1622, 1866; ch. 1848, 1871; ss. 3, 6, ch. 1998, 1874; s. 2, ch. 3177, 1879; s. 1, ch. 3471, 1883; s. 1, ch. 3932, 1889; s. 1, ch. 4066, 1891; RS 48; GS 46; RGS 51; CGL 53; s. 2, ch. 25440, 1949; s. 2, ch. 67-592; ss. 27, 35, ch. 69-106.

F.S. 7.53 on Google Scholar

F.S. 7.53 on Casetext

Amendments to 7.53

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 7.53

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 7.53.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

BRYANT, v. THORATEC CORP., 343 F. Supp. 3d 594 (S.D. Miss. 2018)

. . . . ¶¶ 7.46, 7.49, and/or 7.53, and that Ms. . . .

WASHINGTON COUNTY HEALTH CARE AUTHORITY, INC. v. BAXTER INTERNATIONAL INC., 328 F. Supp. 3d 824 (N.D. Ill. 2018)

. . . . § 7.53. . . .

IN RE KEY ENERGY SERVICES, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION, 166 F. Supp. 3d 822 (S.D. Tex. 2016)

. . . report, #37 ¶¶ 199-202, causing an almost 4% increase in Key’s share price from a closing price of $7.53 . . .

HANNAH S BOUTIQUE, INC. v. SURDEJ, d b a, 112 F. Supp. 3d 758 (N.D. Ill. 2015)

. . . the number of prom and homecoming dresses sold in the market claimed by Hannah’s,, and from 6.32% to .7.53% . . .

ANDERSON LIVING TRUST f k a H. W. SWMF v. WPX ENERGY PRODUCTION, LLC f k a WPX LLC LLC WPX LLC, f k a RMT LLC,, 306 F.R.D. 312 (D.N.M. 2015)

. . . Pennzoil Co., 729 S.W.2d 768 (Tex.Ct.App.l987)("Pennzoil suffered damages of $7.53 billion ... . . .

v., 140 T.C. 294 (T.C. 2013)

. . . 14-00 10.15 A70 E: Lot 215 375-040-33-00 17.70 M58 70.63 2 — Rock quarry F: Highway 67 326-050-11-00 7.53 . . .

In ASARCO LLC, ASARCO LLC, v. L. L. P. P. C., 477 B.R. 661 (S.D. Tex. 2012)

. . . prior actual damage figure in the Texas-Pennzoil litigation in which the jury found actual damages of $7.53 . . .

UNITED STATES v. JORDAN,, 389 F. App'x 366 (5th Cir. 2010)

. . . The district court attributed 7.53 kilograms of cocaine to Jordan that was seized after agents observed . . . and 615.7 kg of marihuana seized on May 9, 2007, 11.093 kg of cocaine seized on August 17, 2007, and 7.53 . . .

UNITED STATES v. MAZE,, 382 F. App'x 462 (6th Cir. 2010)

. . . bag contained five individually wrapped, marble-sized pieces of crack cocaine, weighing a total of 7.53 . . . He listed these facts as follows: A. 7.53 grams of crack cocaine would be indicative of drug distribution . . .

In BUTLER Sr., 403 B.R. 5 (Bankr. W.D. Ark. 2009)

. . . trustee's percentage fee would also be disbursed, which amounts to 5% of the adequate protection payment ($7.53 . . .

In OMEPRAZOLE PATENT LITIGATION. AB, v. AB, v. Dr. S. A. AB, v. Co. D. D. AB, v. AB, v., 490 F. Supp. 2d 381 (S.D.N.Y. 2007)

. . . Christian obtained alkaline readings (A03343107C), his results “varied from 6.74 to 7.53.” . . . Davies’s 2006 testing produced values of 7.15, 7.36, and 7.53, respectively. . . .

DIRECTV, INC. v. PAHNKE,, 405 F. Supp. 2d 1182 (E.D. Cal. 2005)

. . . programming stolen by such a user would be $2,748.96 (12 months’ of programming at $229.08 per month) or $7.53 . . . his January 19, 2001 purchase to April 30, 2004, which is 1197 days, and multiplying that amount by $7.53 . . . actual damages DIRECTV has suffered as a consequence of Defendant’s conduct is at least $9,013.41 ($7.53 . . .

TDS METROCOM, LLC, v. BRIDGE, M. d b a SBC, 387 F. Supp. 2d 935 (W.D. Wis. 2005)

. . . The competing carriers proposed a cost of capital assumption of 7.53% with a cost of equity estimate . . .

FANTASYLAND VIDEO, INC. v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, N. LLC, v., 373 F. Supp. 2d 1094 (S.D. Cal. 2005)

. . . Nevin’s declaration pertaining to parcel no. 326-050-11 shows the size of the parcel is 7.53 acres, states . . .

YAPP, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY,, 301 F. Supp. 2d 1030 (E.D. Mo. 2004)

. . . disparity of 112 fewer African-American selections than expected produces a statistically significant -7.53 . . .

v., 27 Ct. Int'l Trade 1023 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2003)

. . . consists of 60.8% iron oxide, 19.5% aluminum, 7.05% steel F category (with slight carbon content), 7.53% . . .

T. Jr. S. v., 120 T.C. 358 (T.C. 2003)

. . . illiquidity” discount for privately placed restricted stock was approximately 7 percent, he calculated a 7.53 . . . Based on that liquidity premium of 7.53 percent and his selected price-to-NAV discount of 1.3 percent . . . 7% relative to a liquid asset, this suggests that the liquid asset is trading at a premium of about 7.53% . . .

C. W. OVER SONS, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 54 Fed. Cl. 514 (Fed. Cl. 2002)

. . . The contract provided for payment based upon a cost calculation of $7.53 per 100 pounds of steel. . . . concluded that both parties intended that plaintiff be compensated based on its actual costs and that the $7.53 . . .

CASTILLO, v. ENVOY CORPORATION,, 206 F.R.D. 464 (M.D. Tenn. 2002)

. . . 3.69) October - - 11/16/98 Actual restatement, end SEC inquiries announced $ 32.44 11/17/98 $ 39.94 7.53 . . .

G. LAURENZANO, M. D. v. BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF MASSACHUSETTS, INC. RETIREMENT INCOME TRUST,, 191 F. Supp. 2d 223 (D. Mass. 2002)

. . . Year_30-yr T-bond Less 4% 1992 7.53 3.5 1993 5.94 1.9 1994 7.94 3.9 1995 6.37 2.4 1996 6.81 2.8 1997 . . .

ESTATE OF M. BRATTON, M. v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE CO., 24 F. Supp. 2d 667 (N.D. Miss. 1998)

. . . Option A was $15.50, and that the monthly cost to Larry Bratton for long term disability coverage was $7.53 . . .

I. FREDERICKS, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 126 F.3d 433 (3d Cir. 1997)

. . . 1988 5.29% 8.30% 8.43% 7.65% 8.85% 9.71% 1989 5.53% 7.88% 7.86% 8.54% 8.50% 9.26% 1990 5.84% 7.42% 7.53% . . .

UNITED STATES v. FAROUIL,, 124 F.3d 838 (7th Cir. 1997)

. . . All tolled, the garment bag and suits contained 7.53 kilograms of heroin. . . .

B. ACHEY F. v. LINN COUNTY BANK, DSP M. R., 174 F.R.D. 489 (D. Kan. 1997)

. . . Ray, Kansas Corporation Law & Practice §§ 7.53 to 7.66 (3d ed.1988). . . .

E. DAVIS, v. RUTGERS CASUALTY INSURANCE CO., 964 F. Supp. 560 (D.N.J. 1997)

. . . . § 1274(d), are as follows: January 1991 7.53% January 1992 5.12% January 1993 4.37% January 1994 3.98% . . .

HOLMES LIMESTONE COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES, 946 F. Supp. 1310 (N.D. Ohio 1996)

. . . mined by all Plaintiffs — finding average moisture levels of 7.62%, (ex. 80e), 9.73% (ex. 80d), and 7.53% . . .

MARKSMAN PARTNERS, L. P. On v. CHANTAL PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION, 927 F. Supp. 1297 (C.D. Cal. 1996)

. . . following the publication of the Barron’s article, Marksman sold all 29,-000 shares at an average price of $7.53 . . .

UNITED STATES v., 921 F. Supp. 349 (W.D. Va. 1996)

. . . According to DesAnges, 7.53% of Clarke County is black as compared to 4.02% of the Harrisonburg Division . . .

W. WASSERMAN M. v. CITY OF CAMBRIDGE,, 151 B.R. 4 (D. Mass. 1993)

. . . The Debtors’ claim that the rate would be 4.58%; the City calculates the rate at 7.53%. 28 U.S.C. § 1961 . . .

TRI- STATE MOTOR TRANSIT COMPANY, v. JUDY,, 566 So. 2d 537 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . However, he also increased the value by assigning an inflationary index of 7.53 percent annually. . . .

FUMIGATION DEPARTMENT v. PEARSON,, 559 So. 2d 587 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . professionals,” and therefore assigned an inflationary index to the cost over the next 47 years of 7.53% . . .

In TEXACO INC. N. V. TRANS WORLD AIRLINES, INC. ACF v. TEXACO, INC. N. V., 92 B.R. 38 (S.D.N.Y. 1988)

. . . On November 19 of that year, a Texas jury agreed with Pennzoil and awarded $7.53 billion in actual damages . . .

CRIGLER, A v. PENNZOIL COMPANY,, 687 F. Supp. 120 (S.D.N.Y. 1988)

. . . jury returned a verdict in Pennzoil’s favor on November 19, 1985, awarding compensatory damages of $7.53 . . .

L. LIGHTSEY, D. J. A. Jr. W. B. v. A. WILLIAMS, Jr., 526 So. 2d 764 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . Sections 7.49 and 7.53, Florida Statutes (1987). . Section 47.071, Florida Statutes (1987). . . .

In TEXACO INC. N. V., 84 B.R. 893 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1988)

. . . favor against Texaco in the state court in Harris County, Texas, on November 19, 1985 in the amount of $7.53 . . .

C. J. KIRK, v. TEXACO, INC. N. V., 82 B.R. 678 (S.D.N.Y. 1988)

. . . The award (the “Texas judgment”), which included $7.53 billion in compensatory damages and $3 billion . . .

PENNZOIL COMPANY, v. TEXACO, INC., 107 S. Ct. 1519 (U.S. 1987)

. . . induced Getty to breach a contract to sell its shares to Pennzoil; Pennzoil sought actual damages of $7.53 . . . On November 19, 1985, a jury returned a verdict in favor of Pennzoil, finding actual damages of $7.53 . . .

PENNZOIL CO. v. TEXACO INC., 481 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1987)

PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF STATE OF NEW YORK, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY, a DIVISION OF TENNECO, INC. v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Co. Co. CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC. v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Co., 813 F.2d 448 (D.C. Cir. 1987)

. . . It then averaged these two figures (yielding 7.53%) and added this to the growth rate for the same period . . .

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT TRUST FUND, v. WALKER RANCH GENERAL PARTNERSHIP,, 496 So. 2d 153 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . Both section 7.49, Florida Statutes (1985), which describes Osceola County, and section 7.53, Florida . . . This statute, when read in conjunction with the provisions of sections 7.49 and 7.53, describing the . . . Both sections 7.49 and 7.53 provide: The shorelines of Lakes Kissimmee and Hatchineha shall be as physically . . .

FERGUSON, v. A. KNIGHT,, 792 F.2d 581 (6th Cir. 1986)

. . . 470 (1st Cir.1979) (inferred from possession of two packages of cocaine containing 165.49 grams and 7.53 . . .

TEXACO INC. v. PENNZOIL COMPANY,, 784 F.2d 1133 (2d Cir. 1986)

. . . shares at $110.00 per share plus certain additional consideration and that Pennzoil was entitled to $7.53 . . . December 10, 1985, Judge Casseb entered judgment in favor of Pennzoil against Texaco in the sum of $7.53 . . . securities laws, over which the federal court has exclusive jurisdiction, (3) that the Texas award of $7.53 . . . the result of fraud or mutual mistake; (4) that an improper method was used to compute the award of $7.53 . . .

TEXACO, INC. v. PENNZOIL COMPANY,, 626 F. Supp. 250 (S.D.N.Y. 1986)

. . . If this verdict stands, the benefit of the bargain must be assumed by mathematics to be $7.53 billion . . .

UNITED STATES v. YONKERS BOARD OF EDUCATION, 624 F. Supp. 1276 (S.D.N.Y. 1985)

. . . schools with the most inexperienced staffs in the district (Schools 6, 10, 19 and 25, ranging from 4.75-7.53 . . . 13.4 years (as to compared to 14.2 years district-wide average), a significant increase from the 4.75-7.53 . . .

DELTA STEAMSHIP LINES, INC. v. AVONDALE SHIPYARDS, INC., 747 F.2d 995 (5th Cir. 1984)

. . . Subtracting 7.53 voyages and 1.21 voyages from the total of 12.51 possible voyages, Delta lost 3.77 voyages . . . for two voyages completed only 23 days (43 day voyage average) t- .53 Voyages actually accomplished 7.53 . . . determination that the 2 voyages lost a total of only 54 days (43 day voyage average) 1.21 Voyages accomplished 7.53 . . .

UNITED STATES v. C. CAUBLE,, 706 F.2d 1322 (5th Cir. 1983)

. . . Orfield, Criminal Procedure Under the Federal Rules § 7.53 (1966). . . . .

In HUMMEL H. BURDEN, Jr. v. HUMMEL, 23 B.R. 8 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 1982)

. . . And some $7.53 of the miscellaneous parts does not appear, under the same principles, to add any significant . . .

S. ALLEN, v. THE KATZ AGENCY, INC. EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN, T. T., 677 F.2d 193 (2d Cir. 1982)

. . . that Jones testified in response that he was referring to the imminent increase in book value from $7.53 . . .

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, v. S. N. ARONECK v. HENRY SIMS SECURITIES, INC., 509 F. Supp. 553 (D.S.C. 1979)

. . . This interest accrues at the rate of $7.53 per day and amounts to $16,603.65. . . .

CORBIN, v. FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF NEW YORK,, 475 F. Supp. 1060 (S.D.N.Y. 1979)

. . . By the end of June 1978 the rate was 7.53% and climbed steadily thereafter. . . .

UNITED STATES v. EDWARDS, UNITED STATES v. RICHARDS,, 602 F.2d 458 (1st Cir. 1979)

. . . and another exhibit containing the quantity which was left in the package seized in Edwards’ house, 7.53 . . .

DRAYTON, a v. JIFFEE CHEMICAL CORPORATION,, 591 F.2d 352 (6th Cir. 1978)

. . . to 1975 increased at an average of 6.15% per year but which from 1971-75 increased at an average of 7.53% . . .

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY, v. U. S. CARBON PRODUCTS, INC. v. ROYAL FUEL CORPORATION,, 427 F. Supp. 474 (E.D. Ill. 1976)

. . . average cost per ton of replacement' coal was $9.40, or $1.87 higher than the contract price of coal— $7.53 . . .

DRAYTON, a v. JIFFEE CHEMICAL CORPORATION,, 413 F. Supp. 834 (N.D. Ohio 1976)

. . . 1975 increased at an average of 6.15% per year but which from 1971 — 75 increased at an average of 7.53% . . . This historical analysis reflects a range from 7.53% to 4.58%. Dr. . . .

TARLTON, v. B. SAXBE,, 407 F. Supp. 1083 (D.D.C. 1976)

. . . The FBI estimated a cost of $7.53 per challenge to notify a state or local agency of an individual’s . . .

McNAMARA CONSTRUCTION OF MANITOBA, LTD. v. UNITED STATES, 509 F.2d 1166 (Ct. Cl. 1975)

. . . , 179 Ct.Cl. 39 (1967), both parties to a contract made estimates as to the cost of steel based on $7.53 . . . the contract, the contractor discovered that the price of steel was $7.98 per 100 pounds instead of $7.53 . . .

McNAMARA CONSTRUCTION OF MANITOBA, LTD. v. THE UNITED STATES, 206 Ct. Cl. 1 (Ct. Cl. 1975)

. . . , 373 F. 2d 982 (1967), both parties to a contract made estimates as to the cost of steel based on $7.53 . . . the contract, the contractor discovered that the price of steel was $7.98 per 100 pounds instead of $7.53 . . .

UNITED STATES v. STATE OF MICHIGAN, 346 F. Supp. 1277 (E.D. Mich. 1972)

. . . . § 7.53, et seq.) . Sec. 42 of 1893, No. 206, as amended (M.C.L.A. § 211.42; M.S.A. § 7.83) . . . .

DENVER PETROLEUM CORPORATION, a a v. SHELL OIL COMPANY, a, 306 F. Supp. 289 (D. Colo. 1969)

. . . total production: 1964 1965 1966 Average First purchase 65.74% 67.38% 67.48% 66.92% Second purchase 7.53 . . .

PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPE LINE CO. v. THE UNITED STATES, 187 Ct. Cl. 129 (Ct. Cl. 1969)

. . . in those years, and that such price applicable to each year is as follows: Price Year per MGF 1952 _ 7.53 . . . these purchases are taken into account, the weighted-average price per MCF under plaintiff’s method is 7.53 . . .

C. J. v., 61 Cust. Ct. 488 (Cust. Ct. 1968)

. . . defined in section 402(d), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, infra, at the “invoiced unit prices, plus 7.53 . . . that no amount for general expenses and profits was included in the invoiced price and the increase of 7.53 . . . Said value is the invoice price, plus an exchange conversion factor of 7.53 percent, plus the basis for . . .

SOUTHWEST WELDING MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. UNITED STATES, 373 F.2d 982 (Ct. Cl. 1967)

. . . One producer, Joseph Ryerson & Sons, gave a price of $7.53 per hundred pounds f. o. b. . . . This figure was based upon a steel acquisition cost of $0.753 or $7.53 per hundred pounds. . . . contract, Supplement No. 1 to Change Order No. 13, providing for payment based upon a steel cost of $7.53 . . . The mistake was that $7.53 per hundred pounds (the basis upon which the contract unit price of $0.092 . . . steel” or as “The Government will pay the acquisition cost of the steel, which we understand to be $7.53 . . .

SOUTHWEST WELDING MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES, 179 Ct. Cl. 39 (Ct. Cl. 1967)

. . . One producer, Joseph Byerson & Sons, gave a price of $7.53 per hundred pounds f.o.b. . . . This figure was based upon a steel acquisition cost of $0.0753 or $7.53 per hundred pounds. . . . contract, Supplement No. 1 to Change Order No. 13, providing for payment based upon a steel cost of $7.53 . . . The mistake was that $7.53 per hundred pounds (the basis upon which the contract unit price of $0,092 . . . steel” or as “The Government will pay the acquisition cost of the steel, which we understand to be $7.53 . . .

v., 44 Cust. Ct. 730 (Cust. Ct. 1960)

. . . 1085 S 2. 99 . 44 .520 1088 SC 4. 18 .90 . 600 1053 KC 2. 74 . 68 . 460 1092 . 98 . 35 .285 1060 KCZ 7.53 . . .

LAZAROV, v. UNITED STATES, 225 F.2d 319 (6th Cir. 1955)

. . . ascertained at the time of sale, the entire amount on hand was sold, appellants agreeing to pay therefor $7.53 . . .

SCHOENHEIT v. LUCAS,, 44 F.2d 476 (4th Cir. 1930)

. . . the average annual earnings did not at any time during the period under discussion exceed the sum of $7.53 . . .

Co. v., 7 B.T.A. 1186 (B.T.A. 1927)

. . . gross sales divided by the allowable invested capital) was 9.35 times in 1919; 12.69 times in 1920; and 7.53 . . .

HETTRICK MANUFACTURING CO. v. THE UNITED STATES, 62 Ct. Cl. 265 (Ct. Cl. 1926)

. . . thereafter, and complete delivery within 91 days after date of contract or bureau order, at a price of $7.53 . . . rate of $12.86 each, or a total of $219,906, and for the common tents (class 1347) at the rate of $7.53 . . .

BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSIONERS v. NEW YORK TELEPHONE COMPANY, 271 U.S. 23 (U.S. 1926)

. . . the company’s property in New Jersey, as of June 30, 1924, was $76,370,000; that a rate of return of 7.53 . . . is 4.93 per cent.; and by increasing net earnings $2,631,286, as directed by the order, it is made 7.53 . . .

NEW YORK TELEPHONE CO. v. BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITY COM RS., 5 F.2d 245 (D.N.J. 1925)

. . . allegation of confiscation mainly upon the contention -that even if-it be assumed that a rate of return of 7.53 . . . that, under that order, the maximum rate of return actually permitted the plaintiff is far less than 7.53 . . .

H., 37 Fla. 78 (Fla. 1896)

. . . Circuit Court for Alachua county upon a debt due by said firm for $1,139.67 damages together with $7.53 . . .