The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION

Chapter 7
COUNTY BOUNDARIES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 7.59

7.59 St. Lucie County.—The boundary lines of St. Lucie County are as follows: Beginning on the eastern boundary of the State of Florida at a point where the north section line of section thirteen, township thirty-seven south, range forty-one east, produced easterly, would intersect the same; thence westerly on the north line of said section and other sections to the northwest corner of section eighteen, township thirty-seven south, range forty-one east; thence south along the range line between ranges forty east and forty-one east which is concurrent with the St. Lucie County and Martin County boundary lines to the intersection with the north line of the south 508.15 feet of the northeast quarter of section twenty-four, township thirty-seven south, range forty east; thence west along the south 508.15-foot line of the northeast quarter of section twenty-four, township thirty-seven south, range forty east and concurrent with the municipal boundary line of the City of Port St. Lucie to the intersection of the east 924.15-foot line of section twenty-four, township thirty-seven south, range forty east; thence south along the east 924.15-foot line of section twenty-four, township thirty-seven south, range forty east and continuing along the municipal boundary line of the City of Port St. Lucie, to the intersection of the south line of the northeast quarter of section twenty-four, township thirty-seven south, range forty east; thence west along the south line of the northeast quarter of section twenty-four, township thirty-seven south, range forty east to the intersection with the west edge of Howard Creek; thence southerly and along with the west edge of Howard Creek being concurrent with the municipal boundary line of the City of Port St. Lucie to the intersection of the north shore of the north fork of the St. Lucie River and the west edge of Howard Creek as concurrent with the City of Port St. Lucie municipal boundary; thence departing said north shore of the north fork of the St. Lucie River and the municipal boundary line of the City of Port St. Lucie, a bearing direction (State Plane Coordinate System, Florida East Zone) of south 45 degrees, 16 minutes west, 2,355 feet more or less, to a point within the body of water of the north fork of the St. Lucie River; thence departing said point a bearing direction (State Plane Coordinate System, Florida East Zone) of south 41 degrees, 4 minutes east, 6,155 feet more or less to a point located in the body of the north fork of the St. Lucie River which intersects with the west line of section thirty, township thirty-seven south, range forty-one east; thence south 6,459 feet along the west line of sections thirty and thirty-one, township thirty-seven south, range forty-one east, to the intersection with the township line between townships thirty-seven and thirty-eight south; also being the southwest corner of section thirty-one, township thirty-seven, range forty-one east; thence west on the said township line to the range line dividing ranges thirty-six and thirty-seven east; thence north on said range line, concurrent with the east boundary of Okeechobee County, to the northwest corner of township thirty-four south, range thirty-seven east; thence east on the township line dividing townships thirty-three and thirty-four south to a point of intersection with the easterly mean high water line of Round Island Creek; thence meandering northwesterly along said mean high water line to its intersection with the north line of Lot 25, plat of Kansas City Colony, as recorded in Plat Book 4, page 23, of the public records of St. Lucie County, Florida. Said north line of Lot 25 lying 150 feet north of, and parallel with, as measured at right angles to, the township line dividing townships thirty-three and thirty-four south; thence east along the north line of said Lot 25 to the west right-of-way line of State Road A1A; thence southeasterly along said right-of-way line to the intersection of said west right-of-way line and a line lying 45.22 feet south of, as measured at right angles to, the township line dividing townships thirty-three and thirty-four south; thence east along said line lying 45.22 feet south of, and parallel with the line dividing townships thirty-three and thirty-four south, to the Atlantic Ocean; thence continuing easterly to the eastern boundary of the State of Florida; thence southerly along said east boundary, including the waters of the Atlantic Ocean within the jurisdiction of the State of Florida, to the place of beginning.

History.—ss. 1, 19, ch. 5567, 1905; s. 1, ch. 7401, 1917; RGS 54; s. 1, ch. 10148, 1925; s. 1, ch. 10180, 1925; CGL 56; s. 2, ch. 2012-45; s. 2, ch. 2020-18.

F.S. 7.59 on Google Scholar

F.S. 7.59 on Casetext

Amendments to 7.59

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 7.59

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 7.59.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

AMERICAN STEWARDS OF LIBERTY, V. Sr. v. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, M. N., 370 F. Supp. 3d 711 (W.D. Tex. 2019)

. . . This amounts to an increase at a rate of 7.59 new sites discovered per year and a total population increase . . .

ST. JOHNS RIVERKEEPER, INC. v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, v., 304 F. Supp. 3d 1229 (M.D. Fla. 2018)

. . . storm with a maximum water surface elevation of 8.01 feet at Mayport, 6.57 feet at Dames Point, and 7.59 . . .

E. PEREZ, v. BRUISTER, E. v. v. C. L. L. C., 823 F.3d 250 (5th Cir. 2016)

. . . The immaterial $7.59 difference between our computations and the district court’s order is due to rounding . . .

CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS v. P. BECKER, J. L. F. R. Jr. R. W. Jr. R. M. Jr. Jr. J. Jr. C. Jr. J. III, L. A. Jr. C. Jr. L. Jr. A. Sr., 371 F. Supp. 3d 1218 (N.D. Ga. 2016)

. . . assigned by Professor Esposito (pages xxiii-xxxii and 189-196) were a combined length of 18 pages (7.59% . . . Here, Professor Esposito provided 18 pages to her students, or 7.59% of the total pages in Theoretical . . .

HOT STUFF FOODS, LLC, v. HOUSTON CASUALTY COMPANY,, 771 F.3d 1071 (8th Cir. 2014)

. . . . §§ 7.41-7.59, and USDA by Directive 8080.1 of the Food Safety and Inspection Service (Oct. 26, 2010 . . .

In A. GUTIERREZ,, 528 B.R. 1 (Bankr. D. Vt. 2014)

. . . See In re Wise, 453 B.R. 220, 232 (Bankr.D.Vt.2011) (holding 7.59% dividend did not represent substantial . . .

D. CRUMLY, Sr. D. Jr. C. J. K. v. COBB COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS AND VOTER REGISTRATION, 892 F. Supp. 2d 1333 (N.D. Ga. 2012)

. . . % TOTAL BLACK 19.32% 24.89% +5.57% VAP_ DISTRICT 3_ % TOTAL BLACK_8.29%_14.69%_+6.40% % TOTAL BLACK 7.59% . . .

STERLING MERCHANDISING, INC. v. NESTL S. A., 656 F.3d 112 (1st Cir. 2011)

. . . Before the merger, Sterling’s net sales had declined from $8.07 million in 2001 to $7.59 million in 2002 . . .

In A. WISE D., 453 B.R. 220 (Bankr. D. Vt. 2011)

. . . The Debtors would thus be able to pay general unsecured creditors a dividend of approximately 7.59%. . . .

JONES, v. DOLGENCORP, INC., 789 F. Supp. 2d 1090 (N.D. Iowa 2011)

. . . Joyner argues that this would give her an effective hourly pay rate of $6.54 to $7.59 an hour in March . . .

In RILEY, 428 B.R. 757 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 2010)

. . . Claim No. 5-1 (“Claim 5”) in the amount of $23,766.75, plus interest at the contract interest rate of 7.59% . . . Debtors also assert that the contract interest rate of 7.59% is “excessive and should be 4.25% [prime . . . Till requires this Court to disregard the 7.59% rate of interest in the contract between Triad and Debtors . . . In the instant case, the contract interest rate of 7.59% is not "eye-popping,” although the rate itself . . .

LANGBORD, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY,, 645 F. Supp. 2d 381 (E.D. Pa. 2009)

. . . The auction yielded $7.59 million, which was divided between the Government and Fenton. . . . .

CLARK, v. ACTAVIS GROUP HF, LLC LLC, US, UDL, 567 F. Supp. 2d 711 (D.N.J. 2008)

. . . . §§ 7.40-7.59). . . .

EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, v. AGFA- GEVAERT N. V., 560 F. Supp. 2d 227 (W.D.N.Y. 2008)

. . . grain size properties of the film sample of Batch No. 5259043015202 having an average aspect ratio of 7.59 . . .

In SOLUTIA INC., 379 B.R. 473 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2007)

. . . as for the granting of warrants to purchase shares of Solutia common stock at an exercise price of $7.59 . . .

In BEARINGPOINT, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION, To, 525 F. Supp. 2d 759 (E.D. Va. 2007)

. . . a trading volume of 13,329,500 shares, and again the next day, on December 17, 2004, from $7.75 to $7.59 . . .

Re In HUMAN TISSUE PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION, 488 F. Supp. 2d 430 (D.N.J. 2007)

. . . . §§ 7.40-7.59. . . .

In BEARINGPOINT, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION, 232 F.R.D. 534 (E.D. Va. 2006)

. . . on a trading volume of 13,329,500 shares, and again the next day, on December 17,2004 from $7.75 to $7.59 . . .

TUNG FONG INDUSTRIAL CO. INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 366 F. Supp. 2d 1308 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2005)

. . . As revised, Tung Fong’s weighted-average margin for the relevant period of investigation is 7.59%. . . . As revised, Tung Fong’s weighted-average margin for the period of investigation is 7.59%. . . . margin that the agency had calculated for Tung Fong, Commerce is revising the “all others” rate to 7.59% . . .

Co. v., 29 Ct. Int'l Trade 346 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2005)

In TML, INC. v. A., 291 B.R. 400 (Bankr. W.D. Mich. 2003)

. . . $153,022.74 $6.80 $11.51 1993 $124,672,48 $5.54 9.37 1994 $117,610.43 $5.23 8.8 4 1995 $101,000.88 $4.49 7.59 . . .

SMITH, v. COBB COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS v. Of v. A. L., 314 F. Supp. 2d 1274 (N.D. Ga. 2002)

. . . these same districts under the Court’s remedial plan is: District 1 12.41% District 2 19.32% District 3 7.59% . . .

COAST FEDERAL BANK, FSB, v. UNITED STATES,, 49 Fed. Cl. 53 (Fed. Cl. 2001)

. . . plaintiffs regulatory capital to assets in the quarter before the acquisition of Central was approximately 7.59% . . .

L. GLOVER, v. HEART OF AMERICA MANAGEMENT COMPANY,, 38 F. Supp. 2d 881 (D. Kan. 1999)

. . . -10 days, 83.73 hours total, 8.37 hours per day worked; June 1-15, 1997-12 days, 91.09 hours total, 7.59 . . . hours per day worked; June 16-30, 1997-10 days, 75.95 hours total, 7.59 hours per day worked; July 1 . . . evidence shows a definite reduction in plaintiffs hours because she previously averaged no less than 7.59 . . .

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, v. UNITED ASSOCIATION OF JOURNEYMEN AND APPRENTICES OF THE PLUMBING PIPEFITTING INDUSTRY, LOCAL, 9 F. Supp. 2d 836 (N.D. Ohio 1998)

. . . pipe fitters receive d 24.49% of the referrals at a time during which black pipe fitters made up only 7.59% . . .

In V M MANAGEMENT, INC., 215 B.R. 895 (Bankr. D. Mass. 1997)

. . . It also includes an initial payment of $600,000 on unsecured claims, representing an estimated 7.59 percent . . .

I. FREDERICKS, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 126 F.3d 433 (3d Cir. 1997)

. . . 4.28% 3.43% 5.87% 7.22% •1994 2.92% 5.74% 6.30% 5.31% 7.08% 7.96% 1995 3.10% 5.17% 5.40% 5.95% 6.58% 7.59% . . .

In EWI,, 208 B.R. 885 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 1997)

. . . Schroder extravagant: $265.08 for limousine service on June 25, 1996; movies-$8.35 on June 24,1996; beer-$ 7.59 . . .

ASSOCIATED GENERAL CONTRACTORS OF AMERICA, v. CITY OF COLUMBUS,, 936 F. Supp. 1363 (S.D. Ohio 1996)

. . . The share for FBEs was 6.12%, 7.59% and 7.03% respectively. PS 2d Supp.Ex. II — 8. . . .

UNITED STATES v. REYES,, 934 F. Supp. 553 (S.D.N.Y. 1996)

. . . 11,872 4,482 3,562 16.62% 25.10% Bronx 7,166 2,876 2,150 33.55% 38.77% Westchester 5,701 3,564 1,710 7.59% . . . 11,872 4,482 2,374 16.62% 25.10% Bronx 7,166 2,876 1,433 33.55% 38.77% Westchester 5,701 3,564 1,140 7.59% . . . 11,872 4,482 1,187 16.62% 25.10% Bronx 7,166 2,876 717 33.55% 38.77% Westchester ■ 5,701 3,564 570 7.59% . . . Blacks New York 11,872 4,482 0 16.62% 25.10% Bronx 7,166 2,876 0 33.55% 38.77% Westchester 5,701 3,564 0 7.59% . . .

In LYKES BROS. STEAMSHIP CO. INC. AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES, LTD. v. LYKES BROS. STEAMSHIP CO. INC. a Co. a a Co. a L. P. a N. A. GATX a GATX a a LYKES BROS. STEAMSHIP CO. INC. v. AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES, INC. Co. a a Co. a L. P. a N. A. a a, 196 B.R. 574 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1996)

. . . agreed to lend to Lykes approximately $14.2 million plus simple interest calculated at the rate of 7.59% . . .

J. TAYLOR M. v. CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA DRUG AND ALCOHOL SERVICES CORPORATION L., 890 F. Supp. 360 (M.D. Pa. 1995)

. . . 10.63 5/1/93 — $303.61 Interest from 5/1/93 to 10/31/93 6% .06 x 6/12 X $303.61 $ 9.11 6/l/93 — $303.61 7.59 . . .

FISHER BROS. SALES, INC. v. UNITED STATES BALMACEDA M. Y AGR LTDA LTDA LTDA LTDA LTDA LTDA LTDA LTDA LTDA El v. UNITED STATES CARBEN, INC. v. UNITED STATES COMPANIA SUD AMERICANA DE VAPORES S. A. v. UNITED STATES NEW MARKET INVESTMENT CORPORATION, v. UNITED STATES GUZMAN Y DEL REAL, LIMITRADA, v. UNITED STATES Y, 46 F.3d 279 (3d Cir. 1995)

. . . . §§ 7.40-7.59. . . .

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, v. FIGGIE INTERNATIONAL, INC., 994 F.2d 595 (9th Cir. 1993)

. . . or fraudulent” practices in its first judgment and setting the amount of liability at a minimum of $7.59 . . . district court granted summary judgment on the amount of redress. • The court found that Figgie received $7.59 . . . Therefore, the court ordered that Figgie pay $7.59 million into a fund which would refund the full-purchase . . .

In SHERWOOD SQUARE ASSOCIATES,, 107 B.R. 872 (Bankr. D. Md. 1989)

. . . to each, are: • Cost of money to the bank (Federal Home Loan Bank Board 11th District cost of funds) 7.59% . . .

In L. PRYOR, Jr. LAWTER INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. L. PRYOR, Jr., 93 B.R. 517 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 1988)

. . . total of $327,882.07 is determined to be nondischargeable in bankruptcy herein; interest at the rate of 7.59% . . .

McLAUGHLIN, U. S. v. STINECO, INC. E. A. Jr., 697 F. Supp. 436 (M.D. Fla. 1988)

. . . Restitutionary Injunction Shall Include an Award of Pre-Judgment and Post-Judgment Interest in the Amount of 7.59 . . . That rate is currently 7.59 percent per annum. . . . Interest at the rate of 7.59 percent per annum shall run on the amount owed each employee from the median . . .

E. CASEY, v. ILLINOIS CENTRAL GULF RAILROAD COMPANY, D. WALKER, v. ILLINOIS CENTRAL GULF RAILROAD COMPANY,, 687 F. Supp. 1112 (W.D. Ky. 1988)

. . . . § 1961 at the rate of 7.59 percent from March 1, 1988, until same is paid, upon Casey’s execution of . . . Walker the sum of $47,500.00, together with interest pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961 at the rate of 7.59 . . .

E. WARD A. v. AMERICAN HAWAII CRUISES, INC., 719 F. Supp. 915 (D. Haw. 1988)

. . . This court follows Turner and concludes that the applicable rate of prejudgment interest is 7.59%, the . . . Interest shall be calculated at a rate of 7.59% from May 6, 1987, until June 21, 1988. . . .

KLEIER ADVERTISING, INC. v. PREMIER PONTIAC, INC. d b a, 698 F. Supp. 851 (N.D. Okla. 1988)

. . . jointly and severally in the sum of $17,-120.05, plus costs and post judgment interest at a rate of 7.59% . . .

L. J. v., 87 T.C. 349 (T.C. 1986)

. . . listed in Moody’s Preferred Stock Yield Averages for May 1976: Stock Yield High grade industrials. 7.59 . . .

E. TEDESCO, v. A. MISHKIN,, 629 F. Supp. 1474 (S.D.N.Y. 1986)

. . . 1.39 9"x 12" Envelopes (each) .20 Address labels + labor, per addressee 1.50 Cost per class member $7.59 . . . Multiplying $7.59 by the 300 class members produces $2,277. . . .

ANDERSON, v. BANKS, JOHNSON, v. SIKES,, 520 F. Supp. 472 (S.D. Ga. 1981)

. . . At Reidsville, the freshmen of 1978 scored 7.59 in reading and 9.05 in math. . . .

UNITED GAS PIPE LINE COMPANY, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION,, 618 F.2d 1127 (5th Cir. 1980)

. . . Thus the overall rate of return allowed was 7.59%. . . . The Commission set overall rates of return on capital of 7.77% and 7.59% in Docket Nos. . . . 4.15% Preferred Stock 100,000 24.67% -0- -0- Common Equity 92,910 22.92% 15.00% 3.44% $405,397 100.00% 7.59% . . . the overall rates of return that result from costing the preferred at zero— 7.77% for RP74-20/83 and 7.59% . . .

M. THOMPSON v. J. BOYLE,, 499 F. Supp. 1147 (D.D.C. 1979)

. . . grade 4 JBWs, including the five named plaintiffs, who operate the Smyth sewing machines, are paid $7.59 . . .

H. SEYMOUR v. HULL MORELAND ENGINEERING No. AFL- CIO,, 418 F. Supp. 190 (C.D. Cal. 1976)

. . . rates for persons employed in the classifications of Party Chief and Chainman are $8.25 per hour and $7.59 . . . For all time worked by each improperly hired person in the capacity of Chain-man: (a) The sum of $7.59 . . .

O. EVANS, v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OF UNITED STATES,, 446 F.2d 821 (5th Cir. 1971)

. . . . §§ 7.59(a) (2), 7.65”. . . .

SUN OIL COMPANY, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION,, 445 F.2d 764 (D.C. Cir. 1971)

. . . natural gas transmission companies shows that for the year 1965 the average earned rate of return was 7.59 . . .

AMERICAN COMMERCIAL LINES, INC. v. LOUISVILLE NASHVILLE RAILROAD CO., 392 U.S. 571 (U.S. 1968)

. . . The fully distributed cost to the railroads of this service was $7.59 per ton, and the “long term out-of-pocket . . .

WEBB v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,, 394 F.2d 366 (5th Cir. 1968)

. . . he often sold a twelve-bottle case of Thunderbird wine for $7.50 (by 1960 wholesale prices, only a 7.59% . . .

KILGARLIN v. HILL, SECRETARY OF STATE OF TEXAS,, 386 U.S. 120 (U.S. 1967)

. . . advanced here justifies the seeming underrepresentation in Dallas and Bexar Counties, which is 6.42% and 7.59 . . .

W. KILGARLIN v. MARTIN,, 252 F. Supp. 404 (S.D. Tex. 1966)

. . . 56,594 1 56,594 — 11.38 55 64,815 1 64,815 + 1.49 56 56,750 1 56,750 — 11.13 57* 687,151 10 68,715 4" 7.59 . . .

CHELSEA FACTORS, INC. v. THE UNITED STATES, 149 Ct. Cl. 202 (Ct. Cl. 1960)

. . . This sum includes principal, a storage charge of $7.59, and accumulated interest compounded at the rate . . .

MONOLITH PORTLAND MIDWEST COMPANY, a v. RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION, a, 128 F. Supp. 824 (S.D. Cal. 1955)

. . . interest from 4/10/50 to the date of judgment herein, or 2%% per annum on $109,322.49 amounting to $7.59 . . . this proceeding the sum of $109,322.49 with interest at 2%% on said amount from 4/10/50, amounting to $7.59 . . . counterclaim, the use of a 360 day period increases the interest on the Monolith claim from $7.49 to $7.59 . . .

UNITED STATES v. REID, 110 F. Supp. 253 (D. Md. 1953)

. . . See also C.F.R. title 49, c. 1, § 7.59. . . .

UNITED STATES v. PENNSYLVANIA GREYHOUND LINES,, 85 F. Supp. 436 (E.D. Pa. 1949)

. . . Pennsylvania, 'from 12 :01 a.m. until 7:00 a.m. (49 ' C.F.R., Sum.Supp., 191.5(a); 49 C.F.R., 1947 Supp. 7.59 . . . published in full May 16, 1947 in 12 Federal Register 3198, and referred to in 49 C.F.R., 1947 Supp. 7.59 . . . It was therein ordered: “* * * That Form BMC-59 (Sec. 7.59) "Driver’s Daily Log", embracing "Instructions . . . this order to keep, or require to be kept, the said driver’s log in accordance with Form BMC-59 (Sec. 7.59 . . .

H. v. v., 31 B.T.A. 787 (B.T.A. 1934)

. . . gain or loss on later disposition was its fair market value upon that date, which we have found to be $7.59 . . .

DEITCH v. STAUB, 115 F. 309 (6th Cir. 1902)

. . . mortgage, was that for this loan they should pay interest at the lawful rate monthly, and a premium of $7.59 . . .

CAKE v. MOHUN, 164 U.S. 311 (U.S. 1896)

. . . affirmed the decree of the Supreme Court of the District, reducing the amount by a small credit of $7.59 . . .

In MACDONNELL, 16 F. Cas. 51 (C.C.S.D.N.Y. 1873)

. . . The Cases of Yeremaitre [Id. 16,915], Kaine [Id. 7.59S], and cases referred to therein, and Heilbronn . . .

In HENRICH, 11 F. Cas. 1143 (C.C.S.D.N.Y. 1867)

. . . In the Case of Kaine [Id. 7.59S], Judge Betts, in the circuit court for this district, delivered an elaborate . . .