The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title II
STATE ORGANIZATION

Chapter 8
CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 8.02

8.02 New counties.—When any new counties are created, such new counties shall become a part of the congressional district in which the territory for such new county is located.

History.—s. 6, ch. 6472, 1913; RGS 69; CGL 85; s. 7, ch. 16876, 1935; s. 8, ch. 21975, 1943; s. 10, ch. 26484, 1951.

F.S. 8.02 on Google Scholar

F.S. 8.02 on Casetext

Amendments to 8.02

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 8.02

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 8.02.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

PEERLESS INSURANCE COMPANY, v. TECHNOLOGY INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., 392 F. Supp. 3d 313 (E.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . This obligation is difficult to square with the Common Area definition in Section 8.02 upon which defendant . . . sidewalk, as Section 11.02 requires Vintage to "keep and maintain in good order" the sidewalk, but Section 8.02 . . .

ANDY WARHOL FOUNDATION FOR THE VISUAL ARTS, INC. v. GOLDSMITH, 382 F. Supp. 3d 312 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . ."); 2 Nimmer on Copyright § 8.02[C] (2019) ("[R]eproduction standing alone constitutes a prima facie . . .

GRIHAM, v. UNITED STATES, 389 F. Supp. 3d 986 (N.D. Ala. 2019)

. . . See District Clerks' Manual, Ch. 8, § 8.02(c)(2)(i) (explaining that "[a]lthough a new civil case is . . .

HUSTEEL CO. LTD. SeAh Co. v. UNITED STATES, TMK IPSCO, LLC USA,, 375 F. Supp. 3d 1317 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2019)

. . . Moore, Moore's Federal Practice, § 8.02[2] (3rd ed. 2017) (stating, in relation to Fed. R. of Civ. . . .

IN RE CYR, v. Le, 602 B.R. 315 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. 2019)

. . . A, at § 8.02; Exh. B, § 10.02. . . .

KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, v. FRANKLIN ADVISERS, INC. v., 600 B.R. 214 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Original Roll-Up loans; but this would not apply to any exit financing, see Original DIP Agreement, § 8.02 . . .

WORLD FUEL SERVICES, INC. v. NAMBE PUEBLO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,, 362 F. Supp. 3d 1021 (D.N.M. 2019)

. . . one difference which the Court notes in a relevant provision is that the Amended Charter states in § 8.02 . . . of the Nambe Tribal Council shall be eligible to serve on the Board concurrently," Amended Charter § 8.02 . . . (c), at 13, whereas § 8.02(c) of the Federal Charter states that no more than "two permanent or elected . . . of the Nambe Tribal Council shall be eligible to serve on the Board concurrently," Federal Charter § 8.02 . . .

IN RE DBSI INC. R. DBSI v., 593 B.R. 795 (Bankr. Idaho 2018)

. . . Inc., was formed to acquire and sell TIC interests in a leasehold interest the company acquired in 8.02 . . .

Z. J. a L. C- W. Z. J. v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO, DISTRICT NO., 344 F. Supp. 3d 988 (N.D. Ill. 2018)

. . . This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 20 U.S.C. 1415(i)(3) and 105 ILCS 5/14-8.02. . . .

IMAPIZZA, LLC, v. AT PIZZA LIMITED, 334 F. Supp. 3d 95 (D.D.C. 2018)

. . . Nimmer & David Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright § 8.02[B][2] (Matthew Bender, Rev. Ed. 2018). . . .

UNITED STATES v. KING MOUNTAIN TOBACCO COMPANY, INC., 899 F.3d 954 (9th Cir. 2018)

. . . tax Indians unless expressly prohibited from doing so by a statute or treaty, see Cohen's Handbook § 8.02 . . . See Cohen's Handbook § 8.02. . . .

JAUCH, v. CHOCTAW COUNTY, 886 F.3d 534 (5th Cir. 2018)

. . . Rule 8.02. . . .

BROKER GENIUS, INC. v. ZALTA, NRZ LLC, LLC,, 280 F. Supp. 3d 495 (S.D.N.Y. 2017)

. . . Milgrim, Milgrim on Trade Secrets § 8.02[2] (2017). . . . Milgrim, Mil-grim on Trade Secrets § 8.02[1] (2017) (inventors must generally choose between the alternatives . . .

D. PAYNE B. N. K. v. TRI- STATE CAREFLIGHT, LLC, A., 278 F. Supp. 3d 1276 (D.N.M. 2017)

. . . they researched, or for what purpose: the Fee Statement states that they incurred LexisNexis costs of $8.02 . . .

DISNEY ENTERPRISES, INC. LLC v. VIDANGEL, INC., 869 F.3d 848 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . See 2 Nimmer on Copyright § 8.02(c) (2017) ("[S]ubject to certain ... exemptions, copyright infringement . . .

DOE, v. ANDREWS,, 275 F. Supp. 3d 880 (M.D. Tenn. 2017)

. . . Civil § 8.02 (“A battery is any intentional, unlawful, and harmful (or offensive) physical contact by . . . Civil 8.02. . . .

IN RE ACTOS PIOGLITAZONE PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION., 274 F. Supp. 3d 485 (W.D. La. 2017)

. . . MSA, § 8.02. . . .

NESTL WATERS NORTH AMERICA, INC. v. MOUNTAIN GLACIER LLC,, 572 B.R. 205 (M.D. Tenn. 2017)

. . . .) • Section 8.02, titled “Transfer of Assets,” states: “As of the Effective Date of the Plan and except . . . because, as the Bankruptcy Court Opinion held, the Plan expressly reserves the Claim through Section 8.02 . . . reserve “Causes of Action” in Section 9.02—a reservation which would have been redundant of Section 8.02 . . . The Disclosure Statement is wholly consistent with provision 8.02 of the Plan and both clearly place . . .

SFF- TIR, LLC GST GST LLC M. v. C. STEPHENSON, Jr. A. III TIR, LLC CEP LLC LLC LLC,, 250 F. Supp. 3d 856 (N.D. Okla. 2017)

. . . Merger Agreement § 8.02 (emphasis in the original). . . . See Merger Agreement § 8.02, at 10 (“The Agreement shall be governed by and be construed in accordance . . . Merger Agreement § 8.02. . . .

ARIANA M. v. HUMANA HEALTH PLAN OF TEXAS, INCORPORATED,, 854 F.3d 753 (5th Cir. 2017)

. . . .”); see also Major League Baseball, Official Baseball Rules, R. 8.02(c) (2016). . . . .

UNITED STATES v. REMBERT,, 851 F.3d 836 (8th Cir. 2017)

. . . Eighth Circuit Model Jury Instruction 8.02. . . .

BENIHANA OF TOKYO, LLC, v. ANGELO, GORDON CO. L. P., 259 F. Supp. 3d 16 (S.D.N.Y. 2017)

. . . . § 8.02(d). . . . not of such a nature; There is, in fact, only one reference in the ARA to the License Agreement, in § 8.02 . . . the Maui restaurant to which BNC is a party and having the terms and conditions set forth on Schedule 8.02 . . . ARA § 8.02(d). It is undisputed that BI complied with that provision. . . . Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, Dkt. 31, and its attached exhibits; and the Schedule referenced in § 8.02 . . .

BLACKWELL, v. CITY OF BRIDGEPORT,, 238 F. Supp. 3d 296 (D. Conn. 2017)

. . . As a result of these measures, the departmental overtime budget was reduced from $8.02 million in fiscal . . .

INTEGRITY MEDICAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, v. SURGICAL CENTER AT PREMIER, LLC, LLC, LLC LLC, v. LLC,, 234 F. Supp. 3d 1085 (D. Colo. 2017)

. . . Id. § 8.02(c). . . . ECF No. 127, Ex. 1, § 8.02(c). . . . ECF No. 127, Ex. 1, § 8.02(c). . . . First, Premier did not waive its rights under Section 8.02(c). . . . See id.-, EOF No. 127, Ex. 1, § 8.02(c). . . .

IN RE MOUNTAIN GLACIER LLC, LLC, v., 564 B.R. 314 (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. 2017)

. . . ARTICLE VIII MEANS FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PLAN *** 8.02 Transfer of Assets. . . . Here, when section 9.02 of the Plan is read in conjunction with section 8.02, other relevant plan provisions . . .

CAVER, v. CENTRAL ALABAMA ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE,, 845 F.3d 1135 (11th Cir. 2017)

. . . Loan Agreement § 6.8; CAEC Bylaws § 8.02; Ala. Code § 37-6-20. . . . CAEC Bylaws § 8.02. . . . CAEC Bylaws § 8.02. . . .

ORELLANA, v. NOBLES COUNTY, 230 F. Supp. 3d 934 (D. Minn. 2017)

. . . P. 8.01-8.02. . . . .

UNITED STATES v. CARDENA,, 842 F.3d 959 (7th Cir. 2016)

. . . Pattern Jury Instr. 8.02. . . .

ALLCO RENEWABLE ENERGY LIMITED, v. MASSACHUSETTS ELECTRIC COMPANY d b a O, 208 F. Supp. 3d 390 (D. Mass. 2016)

. . . Id § 8.02. . . .

IN RE ADKINS SUPPLY, INC. v. L. T. Jr., 556 B.R. 285 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2016)

. . . . ¶ 8.02. • Defendants computed, charged, and collected Adkins Supply’s interest using a three- to five-day . . .

JASON O. O. O. a v. MANHATTAN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO., 173 F. Supp. 3d 744 (N.D. Ill. 2016)

. . . . § 300.502; 105 I-LCS 5/14-8.02(b); and 23 Ill. Admin. Code § 226.180). . . .

PHOENIX LIGHT SF LTD. v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST CO., 172 F. Supp. 3d 700 (S.D.N.Y. 2016)

. . . Biron Decl., Ex. 1-a § 6.02(a), Ex. 52 § 8.02(a)(v). . . .

WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, v. UNIVERSITAS EDUCATION, LLC, II, LLC,, 164 F. Supp. 3d 273 (D. Conn. 2016)

. . . ECF No. 1-2 at § 8.02(d). . . .

GSAA HOME EQUITY TRUST LL FUNDS LLC, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A., 133 F. Supp. 3d 1203 (D.S.D. 2015)

. . . Defendants counter that § 8.02 of the MSTA allows LL Funds to request the documents necessary to plead . . . Section 8.02 of the MTSA states that the “Custodian shall provide access to the Mortgage Loan documents . . . Thus, § 8.02 appears not to be a vehicle for LL Funds to have obtained the documents needed to plead . . . LL Funds argues that it should be allowed to assert its tort claims because § 9.11 of the MSTA and § 8.02 . . . Similarly, Section 8.02 of the Servicing Agreement provides in part: Limitations on Liability of Servicer . . .

BELL, v. PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,, 800 F.3d 360 (7th Cir. 2015)

. . . Claveria sought compensation for overtime hours, and PNC determined that it only owed her payment for 8.02 . . .

In GARCIA K. v., 535 B.R. 721 (W.D. Tex. 2015)

. . . Section 8.02 of the Operating Agreement, under the heading Death, Resignation or Incapacity of Member . . . A, § 8.02). . . .

STEAK N SHAKE ENTERPRISES, INC. n LLC, v. GLOBEX COMPANY, LLC, LLC,, 110 F. Supp. 3d 1057 (D. Colo. 2015)

. . . (ECF No. 11-3, § 8.02 (ADA); Nos. 11-5 and 11-7, § 4.6 (License Agreements).) . . . .

W. HOLTON, v. WORLDWIDE EVENT PRODUCTIONS,, 164 So. 3d 792 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . Paragraph 8.02 of the MSA states, ‘[i]n any action to enforce the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing . . .

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA, v. SHEEHAN., 135 S. Ct. 1765 (U.S. 2015)

. . . resists arrest by barricading himself.' " Id.,at 8 (quoting San Francisco Police Department General Order 8.02 . . .

A. FOSTER, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF CITY OF CHICAGO, 611 F. App'x 874 (7th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 1414(a)(1); 105 ILCS 5/14-8.02(b). . . .

CECORT REALTY DEVELOPMENT, INC. v. LLOMPART- ZENO,, 100 F. Supp. 3d 145 (D.P.R. 2015)

. . . Art. 8.02 21 L.P.R.A. s. 3252. . . .

ADA SOLUTIONS, INC. v. MEADORS CMI, v. ADA, 98 F. Supp. 3d 240 (D. Mass. 2015)

. . . See Restatement (Third) of Agency §§ 8.02, 8.04, 8.07 (2006). . . .

IN RE MERCURY COMPANIES, INC. FNF f k a Co. USA v., 527 B.R. 438 (D. Colo. 2015)

. . . (ECF No. 23-8 § 8.02(d)(ii).) . . . (Id. § 8.02(d)(xiv).) . . .

JTEKT CORPORATION, v. UNITED STATES,, 49 F. Supp. 3d 1338 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2015)

. . . Commerce assigned a revised margin of 8.02% to NTN and a revised margin of 13.91% to Ñachi but did not . . .

LES TELECOMMUNICATIONS D HAITI S. A. M. v. CINE,, 77 F. Supp. 3d 263 (E.D.N.Y. 2014)

. . . Ciné 230,476 Contributions listed in Exhibit 8.02 None SOCABANK ■ 5,000 US$5,000,000 US$5,000,000 SOGED . . .

In G. MULLENDORE,, 517 B.R. 232 (Bankr. D. Mont. 2014)

. . . Paragraph 8.02 of the confirmed Plan provides: The Court shall retain jurisdiction of the Debtor and . . . Paragraph 8.02(d) provides that the Court shall retain jurisdiction. . . .

GOMEZ, v. PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,, 306 F.R.D. 156 (N.D. Ill. 2014)

. . . Claveria sought compensation for 73.40 overtime hours, but PNC determined that she was owed only 8.02 . . .

BENIHANA OF TOKYO, LLC, v. BENIHANA INC., 73 F. Supp. 3d 238 (S.D.N.Y. 2014)

. . . . § 8.02(d). The ARA does not contain any arbitration provisions. B. . . .

RAJAMIN, a v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, a FFMLT FFMLT FFML FFMLT, 757 F.3d 79 (2d Cir. 2014)

. . . Moreover, § 8.02(e) of the FFMLT 2006-FF11 PSA provides that “the Trustee may execute any of the trusts . . .

R. GABRIEL, v. ALASKA ELECTRICAL PENSION FUND, 755 F.3d 647 (9th Cir. 2014)

. . . hours of service in a two-year period, and is not on a qualifying leave of absence pursuant to section 8.02 . . .

R. GABRIEL, v. ALASKA ELECTRICAL PENSION FUND, 773 F.3d 945 (9th Cir. 2014)

. . . hours of service in a two-year period, and is not on a qualifying leave of absence pursuant to section 8.02 . . .

FOGG COMPANY, Co. v. UNITED STATES,, 753 F.3d 1237 (Fed. Cir. 2014)

. . . Commerce revised the rate for the two voluntary respondents to 8.02% and 9.94%. . . .

HARRIS, v. CITY OF BALCH SPRINGS, Z. B. E., 9 F. Supp. 3d 690 (N.D. Tex. 2014)

. . . 8.01 Plaintiff incorporates the foregoing paragraphs by reference as if set forth verbatim herein. 8.02 . . . Amended Complaint at ¶ 8.02; • Morris conducted a meeting with Lisa Rothwell on August 12, 2010. . . . Compl. ¶ 8.02. . . .

UNITED STATES v. L. CHATMON,, 742 F.3d 350 (8th Cir. 2014)

. . . instructed the jury on the meaning of possession using Eighth Circuit Model Criminal Jury Instruction 8.02 . . .

HARLAND CLARKE HOLDINGS CORP. v. MILKEN, 997 F. Supp. 2d 561 (W.D. Tex. 2014)

. . . in the Purchase Agreement and Limited Guarantees include the following: From the Purchase Agreement: 8.02 . . . Section 8.02 of the Agreement, located in Article VIII, includes “Buyer [Scantron] and its Affiliates . . . that Harland Clarke is an “Affiliate” of Scantron, which makes it a Buyer Indemnified Party under § 8.02 . . .

RG STEEL, LLC, v. SEVERSTAL U. S. HOLDINGS, LLC U. S. II, LLC,, 993 F. Supp. 2d 370 (S.D.N.Y. 2014)

. . . Section 8.02 of the SPA provides that Defendants must indemnify and hold harmless RG Steel for any breach . . . (Compl. ¶32; SPA § 8.02.) . . . Sections 8.02(c)-(h) and 8.03-8.07 set forth additional detailed provisions applicable to the parties . . . In Section 8.02, Severstal agreed to indemnify RG Steel for “Losses suffered, incurred, or sustained . . . (SPA § 8.02.) . . .

L. BAKER, v. CITY OF SEATAC,, 994 F. Supp. 2d 1148 (W.D. Wash. 2014)

. . . Larson, Unjust Dismissal § 8.02, at 8-5 (1991)). . . .

In H. MOORE, III, v. H. III A. JHM L. L. C., 739 F.3d 724 (5th Cir. 2014)

. . . therefore, required to take direction solely from the Trustee.” .See Restatement (Second) of Agency § 8.02 . . .

In H. MOORE, III, v. H. III A. JHM L. L. C., 739 F.3d 724 (5th Cir. 2014)

. . . therefore, required to take direction solely from the Trustee.” .See Restatement (Second) of Agency § 8.02 . . .

In RIVIERA DRILLING EXPLORATION COMPANY, T E. E. E. LLC, v., 502 B.R. 863 (B.A.P. 10th Cir. 2013)

. . . Id. at 11-13, ¶ 8.02, in App. at 560-62. . . . .

H. CHEN- OSTER v. GOLDMAN, SACHS CO., 293 F.R.D. 557 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)

. . . as necessary with anecdotal evidence’ ” (quoting Arthur Larson et al., Employment Discrimination § 8.02 . . .

HEALTHCARE STRATEGIES, INC. k CBU k k PS v. ING LIFE INSURANCE AND ANNUITY COMPANY,, 961 F. Supp. 2d 393 (D. Conn. 2013)

. . . Contract § 8.02, at D-App. 716. C. . . . Contract § 8.02, at D-App. 716; Pis.’ Facts ¶ 82. . . . Contract § 8.02, at D-App. 716. . . . Contract § 8.02, at D-App. 716. . . . Contract § 8.02, at D-App. 716. . . . .

ASARCO, LLC, a a v. MONTANA RESOURCES, INC. a LLP, a, 514 B.R. 168 (S.D. Tex. 2013)

. . . the partners would be liable for “Cash Calls” if necessary to meet the partnership’s expenses, [id § 8.02 . . .

SE PROPERTY HOLDINGS, LLC, v. SANDY CREEK II, LLC,, 954 F. Supp. 2d 1322 (S.D. Ala. 2013)

. . . Ala.Code § 10A-l-8.02(i)(2). . . .

In POOL PRODUCTS DISTRIBUTION MARKET ANTITRUST LITIGATION, 946 F. Supp. 2d 554 (E.D. La. 2013)

. . . Nixon, 37 S.W.3d 237, 240 (Mo.2001) (quoting attorney general regulation, 15 CSR 60-8.02). . . .

COUNTY OF OAKLAND E. v. FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY,, 716 F.3d 935 (6th Cir. 2013)

. . . Paul purchased building materials and was charged $8.02 in North Dakota sales tax that they refused to . . . ] within its scope a sales tax....,” and thus the Land Bank was statutorily exempt from paying the $8.02 . . .

UNITED STATES v. CITY OF NEW YORK,, 717 F.3d 72 (2d Cir. 2013)

. . . bolstered as necessary with anecdotal evidence.” 1 Arthur Larson et al., Employment Discrimination § 8.02 . . .

POLICEMEN S ANNUITY AND BENEFIT FUND OF CITY OF CHICAGO, v. BANK OF AMERICA, NA U. S., 943 F. Supp. 2d 428 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)

. . . forth certain representations and warranties, § 8.01 sets forth the Trustee’s pre-default duties, and § 8.02 . . . Section 8.02 provides that “[e]xcept as otherwise provided in Section 8.01” neither the Trustee nor the . . . (Id. § 8.02(iv).) requires the Trustee to have “actual knowledge” — or have received written notice — . . . (Id. § 8.02(vi).) . . . Section 8.02 of the PSA would also require the Trustee to perforin an investigation if 25% or more of . . .

In L. HARRIS a k a v. Co. J. III,, 494 B.R. 215 (Bankr. M.D. Pa. 2013)

. . . Friedman, Ladner Pennsylvania Real Estate Law, § 8.02 (Joint Tenancy) at 8-2 (5th ed. 2012) citing American . . .

J. MALMSTEEN, v. UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP, INC. UMG, 940 F. Supp. 2d 123 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)

. . . See Agreement § 8.02 (providing that “royalties on Phonograph Records sold outside the United States . . . the Agreement, UMG need not pay royalties to Malmsteen until UMG receives such payment, Agreement § 8.02 . . .

CONWAY, v. CONWAY,, 111 So. 3d 925 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . Paragraph 8.02 of the MSA states, “[i]n any action to enforce the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing . . .

CAPITOL RECORDS, LLC, v. ReDIGI INC., 934 F. Supp. 2d 640 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)

. . . See Nimmer on Copyright § 8.02 (stating that “in order to infringe the reproduction right, the defendant . . .

In CLEAR PEAK ENERGY, INC. a a v. a, 488 B.R. 647 (Bankr. D. Ariz. 2013)

. . . Security, the Performance Assurance, and any other cash posted by the Debtor pursuant to Sections 3.06 and 8.02 . . .

ENGENIUM SOLUTIONS, INC. v. SYMPHONIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 924 F. Supp. 2d 757 (S.D. Tex. 2013)

. . . DGI Techs., Inc., 166 F.3d 772, 787-88 n. 54 (5th Cir.1999) (citing 2 Nimmer on Copyright § 8.02[B] [ . . .

ASSURED GUARANTY MUNICIPAL CORP. f k a v. FLAGSTAR BANK, FSB ABS, LLC,, 920 F. Supp. 2d 475 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)

. . . PL Ex. 90 § 6.05; PL Ex. 451 § 7.02; PL Ex. 198 § 8.02. . . .

UNITED STATES v. MATHISON,, 909 F. Supp. 2d 1060 (N.D. Iowa 2012)

. . . See Eighth Circuit Model Instruction 8.02. . . .

POLICEMEN S ANNUITY AND BENEFIT FUND OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO, v. BANK OF AMERICA, NA U. S., 907 F. Supp. 2d 536 (S.D.N.Y. 2012)

. . . (PSA. at 145 (§ 8.02(iv)).) . . . (Section 8.02(vi)).) D. . . . Defendants’ argument that section 8.02(iv) of the PSA only requires the Trustee to investigate upon receiving . . . Section 8.02(iv) applies only "prior to an Event of Default and after the curing of all Events of Default . . . Accordingly, PSA § 8.02 does not absolve the Trustee of its duty to investigate here. . In Ret. . . .

UNITED STATES v. MARTIN,, 493 F. App'x 814 (8th Cir. 2012)

. . . possession portion of Instruction No. 10, which mirrored Eighth Circuit Model Criminal Jury Instruction 8.02 . . . In Dooley, the district court modified Eighth Circuit Model Criminal Jury Instruction 8.02 to provide . . . curiam) (district court did not plainly err by giving Eighth Circuit Model Criminal Jury Instruction 8.02 . . .

FELDMAN S MEDICAL CENTER PHARMACY, INC. v. CAREFIRST, INC., 898 F. Supp. 2d 883 (D. Md. 2012)

. . . Matthew Bender, Court Awarded Attorney’s Fees, § 8.02. . . . Matthew Bender, Court Awarded Attorney’s Fees, § 8.02. . . . Matthew Bender, Court Awarded Attorney’s Fees, § 8.02. . . .

In U. S. FIDELIS, INC., 481 B.R. 503 (Bankr. E.D. Mo. 2012)

. . . Section 8.02 Term and Termination. . . . of the filing of the Certificate of Fund and shall terminate pursuant to the provisions of Section 8.02 . . .

CASTELLANOS, v. CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION,, 98 So. 3d 1180 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . be separated from it and shall pass with the title to the Unit whether or not separately described. 8.02 . . .

FOGG COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES,, 853 F. Supp. 2d 1336 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2012)

. . . , two companies that were selected as voluntary respondents received much lower individual rates of 8.02% . . .

UNITED STATES v. ESPINOZA, Jr., 684 F.3d 766 (8th Cir. 2012)

. . . See Manual of Model Criminal Jury Instructions for the District Courts of the Eighth Circuit, 8.02 (2011 . . .

SEIU HEALTH CARE MICHIGAN, v. SNYDER,, 875 F. Supp. 2d 710 (E.D. Mich. 2012)

. . . DCH then followed the procedures in § 8.02 of the Agreement, which requires DCH and the Tri-County Aging . . . the Interlocal Agreement not be terminated any earlier than the one-year procedure required under § 8.02 . . . 2012, DCH sent the Tri-County Aging Consortium a Notice to Terminate the Agreement as required under § 8.02 . . . has not agreed, and the Interlocal Agreement is scheduled to expire on April 11, 2013, pursuant to § 8.02 . . .

In EQUIPMENT FINDERS, INC. OF TENNESSEE, v. s Co. LLC,, 473 B.R. 720 (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. 2012)

. . . Trustee fees as required. 8.02 Transfer of Assets. . . .

TEAGUE, T. T. S. T. C. H. A. R. A. D. S. D. v. ARKANSAS BOARD OF EDUCATION Dr. No. El AR,, 873 F. Supp. 2d 1055 (W.D. Ark. 2012)

. . . Rule 8.02 provides that the Department shall each year compute the minority/majority racial percentage . . .

KELLY CAPITAL, LLC V, LLC, v. S M BRANDS, INC. v. SEI SEI, 873 F. Supp. 2d 659 (E.D. Va. 2012)

. . . Exhibit 2 § 8.02. . . .

SEVERSTAL U. S. HOLDINGS, LLC, U. S. II, INC. v. RG STEEL, LLC,, 865 F. Supp. 2d 430 (S.D.N.Y. 2012)

. . . Section 8.02, however, specifically carves out certain limitations of the indemnity obligations of the . . . SPA § 8.02(c)(vii). . . . In relevant part, Section 8.02(e)(vii) provides that: Except with respect to Losses resulting from a . . . SPA § 8.02(c)(vii). . . . SPA § 8.02(e)(vii). . . .

In M. ARROYO, M. v., 470 B.R. 18 (Bankr. D. Mass. 2012)

. . . It reveals a total debt of $260,196.21 as of May 14, 2008, with interest accruing at 8.02% per annum, . . .

MACLEAN- FOGG COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES,, 836 F. Supp. 2d 1367 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2012)

. . . In the final determination, Commerce issued a final CVD rate of 8.02% ad valorem for Zhongya, and 9.94% . . .

In SOUTH STATION, LLC,, 464 B.R. 46 (Bankr. D. Utah 2011)

. . . Asbestos Claimants Comm., 321 B.R. 147, 164 (Bankr.D.N.J.2005) (quoting 8 Collier on Bankruptcy 11 8.02 . . .

In BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON v. WALNUT PLACE LLC,, 819 F. Supp. 2d 354 (S.D.N.Y. 2011)

. . . A., Representative PSA dated November 1, 2006, §§ 8.01(iii), 8.02(h).) . . .

GULF STATES REORGANIZATION GROUP, INC. v. NUCOR CORPORATION,, 822 F. Supp. 2d 1201 (N.D. Ala. 2011)

. . . Monopoly power is a critical element of a Section 2 offense of actual monopolization, Id. at § 8.02(1 . . .

CSC SCIENTIFIC COMPANY, INC. v. MANORCARE HEALTH SERVICES, INC., 867 F. Supp. 2d 368 (S.D.N.Y. 2011)

. . . Section 8.02 of the Manorcare-CSC Agreement sets forth Manorcare’s indemnification obligations. . . . Manorcare-CSC Agreement § 8.02 (emphasis added). . . . indemnify CSC Scientific for amounts paid under the CSC-VWR Settlement, the court must interpret §§ 8.02 . . . To be covered by § 8.02 of the Manorcare-CSC Agreement, CSC Scientific’s loss must both be attributable . . . from sales made after July 31, 1976, any loss incurred to settle that liability is not covered by § 8.02 . . .

SIGNATURE FLIGHT SUPPORT CORPORATION, a v. LANDOW AVIATION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a a v. a, 442 F. App'x 776 (4th Cir. 2011)

. . . Section 8.02 of that contract grants Signature “[tjhe right to establish, conduct and operate a full . . .

JTEKT CORPORATION U. S. A. v. UNITED STATES,, 780 F. Supp. 2d 1357 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2011)

. . . NTN’s margin was revised from 9.32% to 8.02%. Id. at 31. . . .

CLARENDON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, v. MEDINA, Co- Co-, 645 F.3d 928 (7th Cir. 2011)

. . . See Restatement (Third) of Agency §§ 8.02, 8.06(1). . . .

UNITED STATES v. HOPKINS,, 428 F. App'x 658 (8th Cir. 2011)

. . . The Eighth Circuit Manual of Model Jury Instructions (Criminal) defines "possession” in § 8.02. . . . See Eighth Circuit Manual of Model Jury Instructions (Criminal) § 8.02 (2011). . . . The language of § 8.02 has appeared in the Eighth Circuit Manual of Model Instructions since at least . . . See Eighth Circuit Manual of Model Jury Instructions (Criminal) § 8.02 (2007). . . .

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION, On III, v. RETAIL HOLDINGS, N. V. LLC,, 639 F.3d 63 (2d Cir. 2011)

. . . Section 8.02, titled “Pension Plans,” discusses six pension plans (referred to herein as the “Enumerated . . . The EOFS Plan is not mentioned in Section 8.02. . . . The court acknowledged that “Section 8.02 does not state that the specified plans were the only ones . . . But nothing in Section 8.02 indicates that it was intended to be exhaustive. . . . The mere fact that the EOFS Plan is not specifically enumerated in Section 8.02 does not create such . . .

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION, On III, v. RETAIL HOLDINGS, N. V. LLC,, 639 F.3d 63 (2d Cir. 2011)