Cases from cite.case.law:

WORLD FUEL SERVICES, INC. v. NAMBE PUEBLO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,, 362 F. Supp. 3d 1021 (D.N.M. 2019)

. . . Camps, Inc., 384 F.3d 1220, 1225 (10th Cir. 2004) (citing 2 Moore's Federal Practice § 8.07[3] (noting . . .

METROPCS CALIFORNIA, LLC, v. PICKER,, 348 F. Supp. 3d 948 (N.D. Cal. 2018)

. . . In order words, take the rate of the aggregated Commission surcharges and fees (e.g., 8.07%), multiply . . .

KELLY, v. RICHARD WRIGHT PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL, 317 F. Supp. 3d 564 (D.D.C. 2018)

. . . (first alteration in original) (quoting 2 Moore's Federal Practice § 8.07[5] (3d ed. 1999) ). . . .

JANUSZ, v. SYMMETRY MEDICAL INC., 256 F. Supp. 3d 995 (E.D. Wis. 2017)

. . . Product Liability (LJP) § 8.07. . . .

L. OLLIS, v. J. SHULKIN,, 857 F.3d 1338 (Fed. Cir. 2017)

. . . Louisell & Harold Williams, Medical Malpractice § 8.07; 1 Steven E. . . .

UNITED STATES v. JAMERSON,, 674 F. App'x 696 (9th Cir. 2017)

. . . The largest piece of recovered cocaine base was marked as Exhibit 101-A and weighed 8.07 grams at trial . . .

IN RE H. ENGEN E., 561 B.R. 523 (Bankr. D. Kan. 2016)

. . . Sommer & Margaret Dee McGarity, Collier Family Law and the Bankruptcy Code ¶ 8.07[3], at 8-65 (2016). . . .

IN RE ENERGY FUTURE HOLDINGS CORP. a k a TXU a k a TXU a k a f k a CSC v. LLC EFIH Ad EFIH In a k a TXU a k a TXU a k a NA v. LLC EFIH, 842 F.3d 247 (3d Cir. 2016)

. . . Although EFIH’s obligation to pay the make-whole appears in § 8.07 of the First Lien Indenture, the Court . . .

AGYEI, v. ENDURANCE POWER PRODUCTS, INC., 198 F. Supp. 3d 764 (S.D. Tex. 2016)

. . . Alderman, The Lawyee’s Guide To the Texas Deoeptive Teade Peactices Act § 8.07 & n.218 (2d ed. . . .

REDEEMER COMMITTEE OF HIGHLAND CREDIT STRATEGIES FUNDS, v. HIGHLAND CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L. P., 182 F. Supp. 3d 128 (S.D.N.Y. 2016)

. . . The confidentiality provisions of the Joint Plan cited by Highland are Sections 2.02 and 8.07. . . . The other cited confidentiality provision of the Joint Plan, Section 8.07, provides that “[pjursuant . . . See Joint Plan at § 8.07. . . .

IN RE MORTGAGE FUND LLC, L. v. L., 541 B.R. 467 (Bankr. N.D. Cal. 2015)

. . . Interpretation of the Settlement Agreement Section 8.07 of the Settlement Agreement provides that it . . .

WASKIEWICZ, v. UNICARE LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY,, 802 F.3d 851 (6th Cir. 2015)

. . . (Page ID 678) (Section 8.07). . . .

IN RE RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL, LLC,, 529 B.R. 806 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2015)

. . . Gosselin’s other calculations are accurate, her finance charge was understated by no greater than $8.07 . . . Gosselin argues this $55 understatement, coupled with an additional $8.07 understatement (see id.), varies . . .

ADA SOLUTIONS, INC. v. MEADORS CMI, v. ADA, 98 F. Supp. 3d 240 (D. Mass. 2015)

. . . See Restatement (Third) of Agency §§ 8.02, 8.04, 8.07 (2006). . . .

In BROOKE CAPITAL CORPORATION, v. LLC, a LLC, a a, 588 F. App'x 834 (10th Cir. 2014)

. . . The one difference was the size of the interest purchased: Northern Capital purchased an 8.07% interest . . .

In BROOKE CAPITAL CORPORATION, v. LLC, a LLC, a a, 588 F. App'x 834 (10th Cir. 2014)

. . . The one difference was the size of the interest purchased: Northern Capital purchased an 8.07% interest . . .

A. NORTH, v. J. McNAMARA,, 47 F. Supp. 3d 635 (S.D. Ohio 2014)

. . . On August 2, 2013, Chemed amended its Bylaws to include Bylaw 8.07. (Doc. 14-1, Page ID 502, 528). . . . Bylaw 8.07 states: Unless the corporation consents in writing to the selection of an alternative forum . . . Enforceability of Bylaw 8.07 The determination'as to the enforceability of the forum-selection clause . . . Plaintiff makes three primary arguments as to why Bylaw 8.07 should not be enforced. . . . As such, the Court finds the circumstances do not warrant setting aside Bylaw 8.07. B. . . .

UNITED STATES v. D. KOPSTEIN, MIKEHRNY,, 759 F.3d 168 (2d Cir. 2014)

. . . .”); see also 1-8 Modern Federal Jury Instructions-Criminal 8.07 (“Your inquiry on this issue should . . . Reiss, Modern Federal Jury Instructions 8-24 (1984) (§ 8.07 — Entrapment).” Id. . . .

HARLAND CLARKE HOLDINGS CORP. v. MILKEN, 997 F. Supp. 2d 561 (W.D. Tex. 2014)

. . . Buyer or, after the Closing, any of the Purchased Subsidiaries or their Subsidiaries after Closing. 8.07 . . . Section 6.02(a) [related to taxes] or this Article VIII; provided, that the provisions of this Section 8.07 . . . other specific performance remedy under Section 6.08; provided, further, that nothing in this Section 8.07 . . .

RG STEEL, LLC, v. SEVERSTAL U. S. HOLDINGS, LLC U. S. II, LLC,, 993 F. Supp. 2d 370 (S.D.N.Y. 2014)

. . . Sections 8.02(c)-(h) and 8.03-8.07 set forth additional detailed provisions applicable to the parties . . .

ROCKY MOUNTAIN FARMERS UNION FKA v. W. COREY, D. D R. H. G. O. G. Jr. D. FKA v. W. D. D R. H. G. O. G. Jr. D., 730 F.3d 1070 (9th Cir. 2013)

. . . All existing sources were assessed the average carbon intensity value of the 2006 California market—8.07 . . . All other crude oils used the 2006 baseline average of 8.07 gC02 e/MJ. . . . -10.82 Alaska Light 14.8 4.36 8.07 + 3.71 Imported Light 44.4 4.65 8.07 + 3.42 As shown in these tables . . . -10.82 Gas Injection 1.3 12.75 8.07 -4.68 Water Flood 6.10 5.57 8.07 + 2.50 California Primary 16.5 . . . 4.31 8.07 + 3.76 Alaska Light 14.S 4.36 8.07 + 3.71 Imported Light 44.4 4.65 8.07 + 3.42 Venezuela Heavy . . .

UNITED STATES v. CROMITIE, DL,, 727 F.3d 194 (2d Cir. 2013)

. . . Reiss, Model Jury Instructions No. 807, ¶ 8.07, at 8-30 (1990). . . .

MUTUAL PHARMACEUTICAL CO. INC. v. L. BARTLETT., 570 U.S. 472 (U.S. 2013)

. . . Friedman, Products Liability § 8.07[5], pp. 8-287 to 8-293 (2012). . . .

In KHAN, v. H. H. v., 488 B.R. 515 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 2013)

. . . exists in addition to sanctions available under specific statutes or Rules”); 1 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 8.07 . . .

UNITED STATES v. WHITMAN,, 904 F. Supp. 2d 363 (S.D.N.Y. 2012)

. . . , 162 Cal.App.4th 858, 888 n. 8, 76 Cal.Rptr.3d 325 (2008) (quoting Restatement (Third) of Agency § 8.07 . . .

FARMER OIL AND GAS PROPERTIES, LLC, v. SOUTHERN UTE INDIAN TRIBE,, 899 F. Supp. 2d 1097 (D. Colo. 2012)

. . . The 80-Acre Tract is specifically addressed in only one provision of the PSA: section 8.07. . . . PSA § 8.07 (emphasis added). . . . The par-' ties agree that the “80-acre tract” in section 8.07 refers to the 80-Acre Tract. . . . PSA § 8.07. . . . Section 8.07 merely allows for eommunitization of that tract and prescribes its effect. . . .

In U. S. FIDELIS, INC., 481 B.R. 503 (Bankr. E.D. Mo. 2012)

. . . Section 8.07 Limitation on Claim Interests for Securities Laws Purposes. . . . Clause (a) of this Section 8.07, however, shall not apply to the holder of a claim that is subrogated . . .

B. PARTAIN, v. MID- CONTINENT SPECIALTY INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., 838 F. Supp. 2d 547 (S.D. Tex. 2012)

. . . . ¶ 8.07.) . . . .

STERLING MERCHANDISING, INC. v. NESTL S. A., 656 F.3d 112 (1st Cir. 2011)

. . . During that period, Sterling’s sales dropped from $8.07 million to $7.01 million. . . . Before the merger, Sterling’s net sales had declined from $8.07 million in 2001 to $7.59 million in 2002 . . .

SIERRA CLUB v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS R. In U. S. v. R. U. S., 645 F.3d 978 (8th Cir. 2011)

. . . The final § 404 permit allowed SWEPCO to discharge “dredged and/or fill material” into 8.07 acres of . . .

In HARVEST OIL GAS, LLC, LLC LLC, v., 448 B.R. 444 (W.D. La. 2011)

. . . Seller would have otherwise had notice of prior to the Closing Date had Buyer complied with Section 8.07 . . .

BRUESEWITZ v. WYETH LLC, WYETH, INC., 562 U.S. 223 (U.S. 2011)

. . . Friedman, Products Liability §§ 8.07[1]-[2], pp. 8-277 to 8-278 (2010) (comment k applies “only to defects . . .

RUSSELL BRUESEWITZ, v. WYETH LLC, WYETH, INC. WYETH LABORATORIES,, 179 L. Ed. 2d 1 (U.S. 2011)

. . . Friedman, Products Liability §§ 8.07[1]-[2], pp. 8-277 to 8-278 (2010) (comment A applies “only to defects . . .

In NGUYEN J., 447 B.R. 268 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2011)

. . . In re Brooks-Hamitton, 400 B.R. at 247 (citing 1 CollieR on BanKruptoy ¶ 8.07[1] (Alan N. . . .

L. BARTLETT v. MUTUAL PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY, INC., 760 F. Supp. 2d 220 (D.N.H. 2011)

. . . Friedman, Products Liability § 8.07[5], at 8-296 (2010) (noting that because comment k “is traditionally . . .

In PREMIER ENTERTAINMENT BILOXI LLC d b a LLC d b a v. U. S. LLC,, 445 B.R. 582 (Bankr. S.D. Miss. 2010)

. . . redeemable at the Issuer’s option prior to February 1, 2008” and that their failure to comply with § 8.07 . . .

R. MACK, Co. k v. S. KUCKENMEISTER, CPA, MST, R. Co. k v. S. CPA, MST,, 619 F.3d 1010 (9th Cir. 2010)

. . . Freedman, ERISA: A Comprehensive Guide § 8.07 (2d ed.2003), at 8-44 n. 236 (comparing state and federal . . .

L. BARTLETT v. MUTUAL PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY, INC., 731 F. Supp. 2d 135 (D.N.H. 2010)

. . . prima facie ease remains the same as in any products liability case.” 1 Frumer & Friedman, supra, § 8.07 . . . unavoidably unsafe, does not qualify for the strict liability exemption,” 1 Frumer & Friedman, supra, § 8.07 . . .

In PUSATERI, III, v. III,, 432 B.R. 181 (Bankr. W.D.N.C. 2010)

. . . National Whitewater Center — $8.07 for a recreational center charge. . . .

STERLING MERCHANDISING, INC. v. NESTLE, S. A., 724 F. Supp. 2d 245 (D.P.R. 2010)

. . . allegedly competitive marketplace, between fiscal years 2001 and 2003, Sterling’s sales declined from $8.07 . . .

WACHOVIA BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, v. ENCAP GOLF HOLDINGS, LLC, v. LLC, v. LLC, II, SFT I,, 690 F. Supp. 2d 311 (S.D.N.Y. 2010)

. . . . § 8.07.) . . .

L. BARTLETT v. MUTUAL PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY, INC., 759 F. Supp. 2d 171 (D.N.H. 2010)

. . . Friedman, Products Liability § 8.07[5], at 8-296 (2010) (noting that because comment k “is traditionally . . .

UNITED STATES v. L. ROOT,, 585 F.3d 145 (3d Cir. 2009)

. . . United States Department of Justice Tax Division Criminal Tax Manual 2008, § 8.07[2] (internal citations . . . Dep’t of Justice, Criminal Tax Manual § 8.07[2] (2008)) Evasion of assessment cases often allow the Government . . .

In BROOKS- HAMILTON, A., 400 B.R. 238 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2009)

. . . See also 1 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 8.07[1] (Alan N. Resnick & Henry J. . . . See also 1 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 8.07[1] (“Authority to sanction professionals is found directly in . . .

THOMAS v. COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF PHILADELPHIA, 553 F. Supp. 2d 511 (E.D. Pa. 2008)

. . . Due to yearly increases in her salary, Plaintiff was making $8.07 per hour as a Housekeeper by July 2003 . . . Her hourly wage increased from $8.07 per hour to $9.07 per hour, the minimum hourly rate for a Grade . . .

MEADWESTVACO CORP. MEAD CORP. v. ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, 553 U.S. 16 (U.S. 2008)

. . . Hellerstein, State Taxation ¶ 8.07[1], p. 8-61 (3d ed. 2001-2005) (hereinafter Hellerstein & Hellerstein . . . capital gains should be treated as no different from dividends”); see also 1 Hellerstein & Hellerstein ¶ 8.07 . . .

In DELTA AIR LINES, INC. v., 374 B.R. 516 (S.D.N.Y. 2007)

. . . right to hold KCAB accountable for “re-let proceeds” they allege that KCAB must pursue under section 8.07 . . . The provision the appellants contend establishes their right to re-let proceeds, section 8.07(c) of the . . . The Lease is an agreement between KCAB and Delta, and thus the duty expressed in section 8.07(c) is a . . . The Indenture specifically included KCAB’s duty to re-let under section 8.07 of the Lease as one of the . . .

L. STERTEN v. OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION,, 479 F. Supp. 2d 479 (E.D. Pa. 2007)

. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 8.07[1] (3d ed.2006). . . .

In WORLDCLASS PROCESSING, INC. v. AT T AT T CIT, 346 B.R. 132 (Bankr. W.D. Pa. 2006)

. . . Dkt. 79, at__”), that the Indemnity Claim arises pursuant to Section 8.07 of the Credit Agreement and . . .

AHMAD, At- v. FURLONG, 435 F.3d 1196 (10th Cir. 2006)

. . . Moore et ah, Moore’s Federal Practice, § 8.07[2] (3d ed.1997). See Williams v. . . .

SPIRIT AIRLINES, INC. v. NORTHWEST AIRLINES, INC., 431 F.3d 917 (6th Cir. 2005)

. . . This figure was $8.07 below Northwest’s average variable cost during that time period. . . .

CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC. v. NORTHEAST UTILITIES,, 426 F.3d 524 (2d Cir. 2005)

. . . VIII, § 8.07. [A 308.] . . .

COOK, ESTATE OF F. TESSIER, a v. SHERIFF OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA,, 402 F.3d 1092 (11th Cir. 2005)

. . . Seventh, the cells at MCDC were not suicide proofed (See Florida Model Jail Standards, 8.07). . . .

ROPER, SUPERINTENDENT, POTOSI CORRECTIONAL CENTER v. SIMMONS, 543 U.S. 551 (U.S. 2005)

. . . . § 8.07(c) (West Supp. 2004-2005) (minimum age of 17) Utah Utah Code Ann. § 76-3-206(1) (Lexis 2003) . . .

TRUSTEES OF THE PAINTERS UNION DEPOSIT FUND, v. YBARRA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY M., 113 F. App'x 664 (6th Cir. 2004)

. . . The residential rates were $18.05 for hourly wages and $8.07 for hourly fringe benefit contributions. . . .

GILL, v. STATE, 886 So. 2d 988 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . presumptive prison sentence would be 129.2 months (10.76 years), with a minimum sentence of 96.6 months (8.07 . . .

RADIL, v. SANBORN WESTERN CAMPS, INC. a, 384 F.3d 1220 (10th Cir. 2004)

. . . 702, 102 S.Ct. 2099) (noting that subject matter jurisdiction cannot be waived); 2 Moore’s, supra, § 8.07 . . .

In AMBOTIENE,, 316 B.R. 25 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 2004)

. . . bankruptcy courts have inherent power recognized by Supreme Court in Chambers); 1 CollieR on Bankruptcy ¶ 8.07 . . .

In MONUMENTAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. In v. In v. In Co. v., 365 F.3d 408 (5th Cir. 2004)

. . . MooRE et al., MooRe’s Federal Practice § 8.07[1], at 8-34 (3d ed.2003). . . .

Dr. MINTATOS P. C. v. MUNICIPALITY OF SAN JUAN ACE ABC, 322 F. Supp. 2d 143 (D.P.R. 2004)

. . . . § 8.07[1]. . . . See 2 Moore’s, supra, at § 8.07[2]. . . .

D. HUGHES El v. UNITED STATES,, 58 Fed. Cl. 291 (Fed. Cl. 2003)

. . . amortization period as is acceptable to [ORPOS] and Supervision of the Federal Home Loan Bank System 8.07 . . . As stated in Article 8.07 of the Merger Plan entered into by El Paso, Hughes and El Paso Federal, the . . .

UNICREDITO ITALIANO SPA, SA, v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, J. P. Co. J. P. N. A., 288 F. Supp. 2d 485 (S.D.N.Y. 2003)

. . . . §§ 7.07, 8.07, 9.01, Ex. C to Gertzman Decl. at 32, 35, 36. . . .

In CHAFFEE AGGREGATES, INC. E. v., 300 B.R. 170 (Bankr. W.D.N.Y. 2003)

. . . Nonetheless, pursuant to section 8.07 of its zoning ordinance, the Town of Sardinia allowed the continued . . .

In MONUMENTAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. In v. In v. In Co. v., 343 F.3d 331 (5th Cir. 2003)

. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice § 8.07[1], at 8-34 (3d ed.2003). . . .

HERRERA, v. DAVILA,, 272 F. Supp. 2d 154 (D.P.R. 2003)

. . . fails to prevent the violation if he has a chance to do so.” 1 Isidore Silver, Pohce Civil Liability § 8.07 . . .

THE MARK ANDREW OF THE PALM BEACHES, LTD. v. GMAC COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE CORPORATION,, 265 F. Supp. 2d 366 (S.D.N.Y. 2003)

. . . (See, e.g., Promissory Note attached as Exh. 42 to Rand III Decl. at § 8.07 (noting that promissory note . . .

L. LALONDE, v. TEXTRON, INC. A. v., 270 F. Supp. 2d 272 (D.R.I. 2003)

. . . Plan Document §§ 8.05(a), 8.07. At that time, the employee could reinvest the assets in any manner. . . .

CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC. v. NORTHEAST UTILITIES,, 249 F. Supp. 2d 387 (S.D.N.Y. 2003)

. . . . § 8.07), and the parties agree that New York law governs all claims in this action. . . .

Co. v., 120 T.C. 12 (T.C. 2003)

. . . See Bittker & Eustice, Federal Income Taxation of Corporations and Shareholders, par. 8.07[2][a], at . . .

In STOCK EXCHANGES OPTIONS TRADING ANTITRUST LITIGATION S. P. LSP L. P. K. N. P. T. I. B. A. v. a a A a a L. P. L. P. a AMEX, CBOE, PHX, PCX, M. J. T. LLC, L. P. LLC. LLC. LLC. L. P. LLC. L. L. C. L. P. Co. L. P. Co. L. L. C. LETCO, LLC. Co. LLC. Co. GHM, D. A. Co. Co. L. L. C., 317 F.3d 134 (2d Cir. 2003)

. . . Owens-Illinois, Inc., 717 F.2d 530, 532-33 (11th Cir.1983) (statutory immunity); 2 Moore’s Federal Practice § 8.07 . . .

SMITH, v. COALITION TO REDUCE CLASS SIZE K, 827 So. 2d 959 (Fla. 2002)

. . . the Dade County Code, which provided that “Initiative petitions proposed pursuant to Sections 7.01 or 8.07 . . .

NICOLE DAVIS v. Y. MINETA, E. R., 302 F.3d 1104 (10th Cir. 2002)

. . . Mandelker, NEPA Law and Litigation § 8.07[5] (2d ed.2001). . . .

CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, v. MOTOROLA, INC., 184 F. Supp. 2d 384 (S.D.N.Y. 2002)

. . . Pursuant to Section 8.07 of the Credit Agreement, Iridium was to maintain the Iridium System consistent . . . See PX 111, § 8.07. C. The Certificate and Its Aftermath 21. . . . (b) “As of the date hereof, the Company is in compliance with Section 8.07 of the Credit Agreement.” . . . of the Credit Agreement 34.Section 8.07 of the Credit Agreement required that the “Iridium System” be . . . PX 111, § 8.07; see also PX 111, § 1.01, at CH-DE 0000015. 35. . . .

D. MORROW, v. AMERICAN BAG CORPORATION, 23 F. App'x 450 (6th Cir. 2001)

. . . American Bag maintained one copy of a 300 page manual, Provision 8.07 of which provided: It is the responsibility . . .

RYLAND MORTGAGE CO. INC. v. TRAVELERS INDEMNITY CO. OF ILLINOIS,, 177 F. Supp. 2d 435 (D. Md. 2001)

. . . . §§ 3.06, 8.07. Mr. . . .

ABRAHAM Sr. Jr. E. J. Sr. J. M. D De De De De L. D. J. B. P. Jr. B. J. S. Sr. M. v. NORCAL WASTE SYSTEMS INC C. L. N. A. T. B. Sr. Jr. E. J. Sr. J. M. D D De De De De L. D. Of J. B. P. Jr. B. J. S. Sr. M. v. C. N. A. NT SA, v., 265 F.3d 811 (9th Cir. 2001)

. . . Section 8.07(3): “[The Plan agrees] to indemnify the Trustee for, and to hold it harmless against, any . . . outside the scope of the ESOP’s contractual indemnity obligations to the Trustee pursuant to Section 8.07 . . .

SYSTEM MANAGEMENT, INC. Me R. v. LOISELLE,, 154 F. Supp. 2d 195 (D. Mass. 2001)

. . . See generally 1 Derfner & Wolf, supra, ¶ 8.07 (collecting similar fee-shifting provisions). . . .

ODEN, v. OKTIBBEHA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, 246 F.3d 458 (5th Cir. 2001)

. . . Moore et al, Moore’s Federal Practice § 8.07[1], at 8-35 (3d ed. 2000) (citing Blonder-Tongue Labs., . . . Moore et al., Moore's Federal Practice § 8.07[5] (3d ed. 2000). . . . .

BEAZLEY, v. L. JOHNSON,, 242 F.3d 248 (5th Cir. 2001)

. . . Beazley maintains that article 6(5) of the ICCPR voids § 8.07(d) of the Texas Penal Code. . . . Penal Code § 8.07 (Vernon 1994). (1) Beazley did not raise this issue in either his direct appeal or . . .

THE LEGAL AID SOCIETY, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, W. N. M. P. C. UAW, AFL- CIO CLC, AFL- CIO CLC, v. N., 114 F. Supp. 2d 204 (S.D.N.Y. 2000)

. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice § 8.07[6] at 8-42 (Daniel R. . . . . § 8.07[4], at 8-40 to -41 (federal procedural law governs assertion of affirmative defense provided . . .

PERRINO, v. SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE TELEGRAPH CO., 209 F.3d 1309 (11th Cir. 2000)

. . . The provision reads in part: 8.07 Employment Termination Allowance A. Basis of Payment. . . .

OLIVER, v. COLE GIFT CENTERS, INC., 85 F. Supp. 2d 109 (D. Conn. 2000)

. . . Found., 402 U.S. 313, 350, 91 S.Ct. 1434, 28 L.Ed.2d 788 (1971); 2 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 8.07[1] . . .

HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. ANNAPOLIS BAY CHARTERS, INC. G. H., 69 F. Supp. 2d 756 (D. Md. 1999)

. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 8.07(l)(3d ed.1997)). . . .

COLSON, v. GROHMAN, 174 F.3d 498 (5th Cir. 1999)

. . . while acting as a city council member, did violate The City of Pearland Charter, Sections 8.06 and 8.07 . . .

FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION, v. SILVER LAKE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION,, 727 So. 2d 1149 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Ely, Jr., The Law of Easements and Licenses in Land ¶¶ 8.03, 8.07[3] (rev. ed.l995). . . . . . ¶ 8.07[3], . Id. . Broward County v. Bouldin, 114 So.2d 737 (Fla. 2d DCA 1959). . . . .

DIETTRICH, v. NORTHWEST AIRLINES, INC., 168 F.3d 961 (7th Cir. 1999)

. . . attorneys’ education, as is within the court’s power under Eastern District of Wisconsin Local Rule 8.07 . . . Northwest violated both Local Rule 8.07, by going far beyond the scope of the district court’s permission . . .

MEDLOCK, Jr. v. ORTHO BIOTECH, INC. C. III, W. A. W. C., 164 F.3d 545 (10th Cir. 1999)

. . . Larson, Employment Discrimination § 8.07, at 8-109 (2d ed.1998) (noting that plaintiffs proceeding under . . .

RICHARDS, v. SEARIVER MARITIME FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. Co., 59 F. Supp. 2d 616 (S.D. Tex. 1998)

. . . Lae-son, Employment Disceimination § 8.07 (2d ed.1996) (stating that when plaintiff presents direct evidence . . .

UNITED STATES B R, INC. v. DONALD LANE CONSTRUCTION, a, 19 F. Supp. 2d 217 (D. Del. 1998)

. . . plead it), aff'd, 511 U.S. 431, 114 S.Ct. 1702, 128 L.Ed.2d 433 (1994); 2 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶¶ 8.07 . . .

BONILLA, v. VOLVO CAR CORPORATION, BONILLA, v. TREBOL MOTORS CORPORATION, T. A. BONILLA, v. TREBOL MOTORS CORPORATION, De, 150 F.3d 88 (1st Cir. 1998)

. . . See generally 1 Derfner & Wolf, Court Awarded Attorney Fees para. 8.07 (1997). . . .

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, v. H. HAINES, III N., 3 F. Supp. 2d 155 (D. Conn. 1997)

. . . Moore Et Al, Moore’s Federal Practice, ¶ 8.07(1) (3d ed.1997). . . .

HESTER INDUSTRIES, INC. v. TYSON FOODS, INC., 985 F. Supp. 236 (N.D.N.Y. 1997)

. . . Gilson, Trademark Protection and Practice § 8.07[5], at 8-169 (1988). . . .

MASHERAH, v. Dr. F. DETTLOFF,, 968 F. Supp. 336 (E.D. Mich. 1997)

. . . 8.07.] . . . .

In ARKCO PROPERTIES, INC., 207 B.R. 624 (Bankr. E.D. Ark. 1997)

. . . and have such other authority and powers as the Board of Directors may from time to time prescribe. 8.07 . . .

BANQUE FRANCO- HELLENIQUE DE COMMERCE INTERNATIONAL ET MARITIME, S. A. v. CHRISTOPHIBES,, 106 F.3d 22 (2d Cir. 1997)

. . . loan agreement lists as a default thereunder any default in the Associated agreement; and finally, ¶ 8.07 . . . Were ¶ 8.07 made on behalf of the bank, it would be a false representation that there had been no breach . . .

SOTO, v. FLORES,, 103 F.3d 1056 (1st Cir. 1997)

. . . See 2 Nahmod, Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Litigation: The Law of Section 1983, § 8.07, at 134-35 . . .

In MEDINA UNITED STATES v. OFFORD FINANCE, INC. K., 205 B.R. 216 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 1996)

. . . Williams, Tax Aspects of Bankruptcy Law and Practice, § 8.07 at 8-9 (2d ed. 1995) (stating that until . . .

MIAMI HEAT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a a v. C. LEAHY,, 682 So. 2d 198 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . That section declares: “Initiative petitions proposed pursuant to Sections 7.01 or 8.07 of the Dade County . . .

ASSOCIATED GENERAL CONTRACTORS OF AMERICA, v. CITY OF COLUMBUS,, 936 F. Supp. 1363 (S.D. Ohio 1996)

. . . the year 1992, black-owned firms received 7.48% of the prime contracts, 8.44% of the subcontracts and 8.07% . . .

EINAUGLER, M. D. v. SUPREME COURT OF STATE OF NEW YORK FOR COUNTY OF KINGS, J. C., 918 F. Supp. 619 (E.D.N.Y. 1996)

. . . ’s negligence which caused the ultimate damage.” (1 Louisell and Williams, Medical Malpractice, par 8.07 . . .

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)