Cases from cite.case.law:

D. CREWS, v. FLORIDA PUBLIC EMPLOYERS COUNCIL AFSCME, 113 So. 3d 1063 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . . § 11.90, Fla. Stat. (2012); see also Art. Ill, § 19(j), Fla. Const. . . .

RACK ROOM SHOES, SKIZ LLC, v. UNITED STATES,, 856 F. Supp. 2d 1291 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2012)

. . . jackets, blazers, trousers, bib and brace overalls, breeches and shorts (other than swimwear) Subheading: 11.90 . . .

DAVIS, v. DUNN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., 872 F. Supp. 2d 1291 (N.D. Ala. 2012)

. . . Caucasian Brvan Pilkington 12,55 13.00 Caucasian Stanley Conley 11.50 12,50 Caucasian Martiel Smith 10.90 11.90 . . .

In LAKEWOOD ENGINEERING MANUFACTURING CO. INC. Co. d b a v. LLC,, 459 B.R. 306 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2011)

. . . In 2008, manufacturers were selling box fans to retailers in a price range between $11.90 and $12.25. . . .

LANGFITT, v. FEDERAL MARINE TERMINALS, INC. BBC USA, LLC,, 647 F.3d 1116 (11th Cir. 2011)

. . . Body "Rate Verification Sheet” for FMT, dated April 19, 2005, which reflects an agreed upon rate of $11.90 . . . includes a specific checked-off box stating that "Workers Compensation coverage included above rates [of $11.90 . . .

In HILL,, 397 B.R. 259 (Bankr. M.D.N.C. 2007)

. . . On June 16, 2006, Ford filed a secured proof of claim for $19,870.80, payable at an interest rate of 11.90% . . .

ZIELINSKI, v. PABST BREWING COMPANY, INC., 463 F.3d 615 (7th Cir. 2006)

. . . (So if the average price today is $20, the deductible would be $11.90 ($20/1.68).) . . .

COPE, v. D. DUGGINS,, 203 F. Supp. 2d 650 (E.D. La. 2002)

. . . based on a class action settlement fund of $8,000, each person who returned a claim form will receive $11.90 . . .

TRANSIT MANAGEMENT OF SOUTHEAST LOUISIANA, INC. NME v. GROUP INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION, INC. A A A J. Jr. v. J. Jr. v., 226 F.3d 376 (5th Cir. 2000)

. . . Transit agreed to pay $11.90 per employee per month as an administrative services fee, $6 of which was . . . joint venture' agreement” explicitly provided for the distribution of the monthly per employee fee of $11.90 . . . to be paid by Transit (GIA $6.00, Bankers $5.90; GIA $11.90, Atlanta $0; GIA $11.90, Maxicare $0) and . . . instrument was identical in relevant respects to that between Bankers and GIA, except that the entire $11.90 . . .

UNITED STATES v. WARD, a k a a k a L. T., 190 F.3d 483 (6th Cir. 1999)

. . . In Ward's prior judgment and conviction order, the court counted as relevant conduct "11.90 Keys and . . .

BEASLEY, v. ALABAMA STATE UNIVERSITY,, 3 F. Supp. 2d 1325 (M.D. Ala. 1998)

. . . restriction of scholarship opportunities, according to Beasley, during the 1991-92 academic year there was an 11.90% . . . The 11.90% negative disparity figure for the 1991-92 academic year was calculated as follows: Number . . . of scholarship funds awarded to women: $ 41,286 -4- $ 307,395 = 13.43% Disparity: 25.33% - 13.43% = 11.90% . . .

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR,, 134 F.3d 1095 (D.C. Cir. 1998)

. . . . § 11.90(a) (1996). . . .

BUSH, v. HUMANA HEALTH PLAN OF ALABAMA, INC., 973 F. Supp. 1376 (M.D. Ala. 1997)

. . . Attachment Center is calculated by: 24 visits x 14 days = 336 visits; $4,000.00 divided by 336 visits = $11.90 . . . /visit, less a $20.00 co-paymenVvisit; 20 visits are $11.90 x 20 = $238.00; $238.00 less $400.00 in co-payments . . .

WHITE Jr. v. DIAMOND MOTORS, INC. d b a DIAMOND NISSAN,, 962 F. Supp. 867 (M.D. La. 1997)

. . . disclosed an amount financed of $21,507.90, a “finance charge” of $6,696.10, an annual percentage rate of 11.90% . . .

C. LIDDELL, a LIDDELL, a D. a a St. v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF CITY OF ST. LOUIS, E. Jr. St. B. a V. a Dr. D. Sr. a G. a R. a Dr. P. a a M. a a G. a a Jr. C. J. St. W. A. E. R. M. M. F. D. E. V. B. St. St. St. H. St. St. St. AFT, AFL- CIO, C. LIDDELL, a LIDDELL, a D. a a St. v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF CITY OF ST. LOUIS E. Jr. St. B. a V. a Dr. D. Sr. a G. a R. a Dr. P. a a M. a a G. a a Jr. C. J. St. W. A. E. R. M. M. F. D. E. V. B. St. St. St. H. St. St. St. AFT, AFL- CIO,, 96 F.3d 1091 (8th Cir. 1996)

. . . VTS Students Enrolled Percent Black 1984-85 507 6.00 1985-86 821 8.20 1986-87 1162 10.70 1987-88 1370 11.90 . . .

KENNECOTT UTAH COPPER CORPORATION, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR,, 88 F.3d 1191 (D.C. Cir. 1996)

. . . . §§ 11.90-11.93; 59 Fed.Reg. at 14,287-88. . . . Assessment Plan or in the Report of the Assessment, which is released after the assessment is complete. § 11.90 . . .

CITY OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA v. G. AUSTIN,, 816 F. Supp. 351 (E.D. Pa. 1993)

. . . The rental rate for the American was $11.90 per square foot and the Madison was $10.00 per square foot . . .

STATE OF OHIO, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, Jr. Co. ASARCO NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION, v. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Co. ASARCO STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, Jr. ASARCO, Co. STATE OF COLORADO, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, Jr. Co. ASARCO STATE OF NEW YORK, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, Jr. Co. ASARCO, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, Jr. Co. ASARCO PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, K. v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, Jr. Co. ASARCO CHEMICAL MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, Jr. ASARCO PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC GAS COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, Jr. ASARCO NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, Jr. STATE OF NEW YORK, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, Jr., 880 F.2d 432 (D.C. Cir. 1989)

. . . . §§ 11.32(c), 11.32(e), 11.90. . . . .

JONES v. WAL- MART STORES, INC. Fu, 870 F.2d 982 (5th Cir. 1989)

. . . He made $11.90 an hour at this job, and he could choose to give himself overtime if any was available . . .

LIDDELL, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF CITY OF ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI, CALDWELL v. SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY,, 851 F.2d 1104 (8th Cir. 1988)

. . . Mehlville 2.0% 9.98% Parkway 4.4% 18.16% Pattonville 7.7% 20.66% Ritenour 16.9% 27.50% Rockwood 1.9% 11.90% . . .

UNITED STATES v. TOWNS, 668 F. Supp. 454 (D. Md. 1987)

. . . Towns was charged with theft of the pillow sacks, valued at $11.90, under 18 U.S.C. Section 641. . . .

ISLA PETROLEUM CORPORATION De v. DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS PHILLIPS PUERTO RICO CORE, INC. v. ORTIZ ALVAREZ, TEXACO PUERTO RICO, INC. v. ORTIZ ALVAREZ, H Mr. CIA. PETROLERA CARIBE, INC. v. ORTIZ ALVAREZ, SHELL COMPANY PUERTO RICO LIMITED v. ORTIZ ALVAREZ, ESSO STANDARD OIL CO. P. R. v. ORTIZ ALVAREZ, CARIBBEAN GULF REFINING CORPORATION, v. ORTIZ ALVAREZ, TENOCO OIL CO. INC. De El v. DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, 640 F. Supp. 474 (D.P.R. 1986)

. . . the cost of gasoline to ESSO increased 4.76 cents per gallon during the first ten days of April 1986; 11.90 . . . On April 23, the new excise tax was 11.90 cents per gallon. . . .

In C. ANDERSON, L. C., 62 B.R. 206 (Bankr. D. Haw. 1986)

. . . The Court thus denies the following: GPC ' 14.20 hours FY 11.90 hours Applicant further argues, that . . . the following amount from the various individuals: GPC 35.20 hours at $125.00 per hour $4,400.00 FY 11.90 . . .

SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, v. SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS, By CITY PUBLIC SERVICE BOARD,, 748 F.2d 266 (5th Cir. 1984)

. . . By 1975, the railroads had raised the rate to $11.90 per ton in the face of high inflation. . . .

TRUJILLO, v. M. HECKLER,, 596 F. Supp. 396 (D. Colo. 1984)

. . . 729.05 598.60 $53,874.00 Solem 100 257.75 249.50 24,950.00 Taubman 100 192.50 97.80 9,780.00 Poskus 75 11.90 . . .

GREENWALD, J. v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF COUNTY OF SULLIVAN HAAS, S. v. COUNTY OF SULLIVAN,, 567 F. Supp. 200 (S.D.N.Y. 1983)

. . . 43 2.11 Highland 2.91 57 2.91 Liberty 15.33 310 15.39 Lumberland 1.88 39 1.87 Mamakating 11.97 255 11.90 . . .

BURLINGTON NORTHERN INC. v. UNITED STATES, 459 U.S. 131 (U.S. 1982)

. . . conditions, which were characterized by rapid inflation, required the railroads to raise the rate to $11.90 . . .

EQUIPMENT, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 1 Cl. Ct. 513 (Ct. Cl. 1982)

. . . firms for each year was: Average Highest Lowest Return Return Return 1966 20.28% 71.54% -4.43% 1967 11.90% . . . In 1966, the average return for the group was 20.28 percent, in 1967 the average was 11.90 percent and . . .

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS By CITY PUBLIC SERVICE BOARD, v. UNITED STATES STATE OF TEXAS, v. UNITED STATES BURLINGTON NORTHERN, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 631 F.2d 831 (D.C. Cir. 1980)

. . . Campbell County, Wyoming to San Antonio, but on 2 May 1974 the carriers revised their quotation to $11.90 . . .

BUGHER v. SOUTHLAND FABRICATORS AND ERECTORS, INC., 452 F. Supp. 870 (W.D. La. 1978)

. . . Lenzly 238 35.70 59.50 11.90 480.50 72.07 120.13 24.01 August. 1974: J. P. . . .

E. v., 70 Cust. Ct. 43 (Cust. Ct. 1973)

. . . filaments and plexiform filaments) : Of glass: ******* 309.30 Other: Valued not over 80 cents per pound_ 11.90 . . .

NORTHERN NATURAL GAS COMPANY v. GROUNDS, Co., 441 F.2d 704 (10th Cir. 1971)

. . . fixed the service rates for wellhead deliveries in the Hugoton area at 12.10 in the Texas panhandle, 11.90 . . .

v., 64 Cust. Ct. 634 (Cust. Ct. 1970)

. . . value for each shipment is $6,929 per pound, representing the gross statutory United States value of $11.90 . . . that appraisement of the merchandise shonld be determined upon the basis of such sales at a price of $11.90 . . . the ordinary course of trade, seven were of quantities of 100 pounds or more at a uniform price of $11.90 . . . quantity was 100 pounds or more and that, accordingly, the gross statutory United States value was $11.90 . . .

GARRETT FREIGHTLINES, INC. v. UNITED STATES R. A., 305 F. Supp. 149 (D. Idaho 1969)

. . . As noted, applicant’s proposal will result in savings to applicant of $11.90 to $30.80 each way. . . .

UNITED STATES D. SLIGH M. L. d b a v. FULLERTON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, 296 F. Supp. 518 (D.S.C. 1968)

. . . Sump Pumps: Duplex Non Clog-799.00 1111 Hose Faucetts: Type 65- 1/2" 4.00 1111 Wall-Hydrants-Type. 205 11.90 . . .

J. TOOMBS, G. L. v. W. FORTSON, Jr., 277 F. Supp. 821 (N.D. Ga. 1967)

. . . 30 1 —12.09 17,777 31 2 —10.78 36,082 34 2 -12.46 35,404 38 1 -13.61 17,468 39 2 +10.44 44,663 45 1 —11.90 . . . Montgomery) -13.46 -21.12 17,500 18,000 30 (Putnam Hancock) -12.09 -19.37 17,777 18,400 45 (Emmanuel) -11.90 . . .

L. STOUT v. D. BOTTORFF, GRILLS, v. D. BRANIGIN,, 249 F. Supp. 488 (S.D. Ind. 1965)

. . . and Steuben Counties) is 9.67% above the ideal and District 6 (Clay, Sullivan, and Vigo Counties) is 11.90% . . .

UNITED STATES, v. CLAYTON CHEMICAL PACKAGING CO., 357 F.2d 1009 (C.C.P.A. 1965)

. . . that the instant merchandise was freely offered to all purchasers in lots of 100 pounds or more at $11.90 . . . purchaser for its own purposes- The 7 sales were in quantities of 100 pounds or more at the price of $11.90 . . . sale of 25 pounds at a price of $13.90 per pound, and 7 sales of 100 pounds or more at a price of $11.90 . . .

v., 52 C.C.P.A. 111 (C.C.P.A. 1965)

. . . that the instant merchandise was freely offered to all purchasers in lots of 100 pounds or more at $11.90 . . . The 7 sales were in quantities of 100 pounds or more at the price of $11.90 per pound which appellee . . . sale of 25 pounds at a price of $13.90 per pound, and 7 sales of 100 pounds or more at a price of $11.90 . . .

v., 52 Cust. Ct. 620 (Cust. Ct. 1964)

. . . These 7 sales were in quantities of 100 pounds or more at the price of $11.90, claimed by appellee herein . . . The accountant for the importing company testified that, on the basis of the $11.90 selling price, he . . . The same witness calculated the profit based on the $11.90 selling price as 62 cents. . . . sale of 25 pounds at a price of $13.90 per pound, and 7 sales of 100 pounds or more at a price of $11.90 . . . expenses were calculated to be 18.83%, which is in excess of the amount allowed by statute, 8% of $11.90 . . .

v., 49 Cust. Ct. 409 (Cust. Ct. 1962)

. . . noted that the 7 sales last enumerated were each in quantities of 100 pounds or more at the price of $11.90 . . . a price of $13.90 per pound, and 7 were of quantities of 100 pounds or more at a uniform price of $11.90 . . . Inasmuch as this figure is in excess of the amount allowed by the statute, 8 per centum of $11.90, the . . . The same witness, calculated the profit on the basis of the $11.90 selling price as 62 cents, which, . . . per pound_ . 62 “ 11. 07 Less general expenses on $11.90 per pound_ . 952 “ 10.118 Less specific duty . . .

ABBOTT v. UNITED STATES, 175 F. Supp. 917 (Ct. Cl. 1959)

. . . . $ 30.10 1949 ....................... 11.90 1950 ....................... 71.40 1951 ................ . . .

A. v., 25 T.C. 934 (T.C. 1956)

. . . (d) (1) (A) penalty See. 291 (a) penalty 1951-1952-1953-$123.00 119.00 64.00 $7.38 7.14 3.84 $12.30 11.90 . . .

UNITED STATES, W. A. RUSHLIGHT CO. v. DAVIDSON, 71 F. Supp. 401 (D. Idaho 1947)

. . . in each of the four buildings at a cost of $91.23, of which $79.33 was for labor and materials and $11.90 . . . Davidson and against the Bonding Company in the amount of $79.33 and disallowed as to the amount of $11.90 . . .

BOWLES, O. P. A. v. BIBERMAN BROS., 152 F.2d 700 (3d. Cir. 1945)

. . . allowable margin on his $17.50 coats is, therefore, 32%; and the minimum allowable cost for such coats is $11.90 . . . ($17.50 x 32%= $5.60; $17.50 - $5.60 = $11.90).” . . .

v., 5 T.C. 417 (T.C. 1945)

. . . which the pie sales bore to the total sales in the earlier period was 23.68 percent as compared to 11.90 . . .

v., 40 B.T.A. 615 (B.T.A. 1939)

. . . others through stock ownership, was of the opinion that the value should be fixed “some place between” $11.90 . . . He concluded that if he were a willing buyer he would offer $11.90 per share, and that if he were a willing . . .

HIDALGO COUNTY WATER IMPROVEMENT DIST. NO. v. WESTERN METAL MFG. CO., 16 F.2d 893 (5th Cir. 1927)

. . . Armeo pipe C R & S18' Sections $12,630 28 50 78" Band couplers 11.90 595 00 1 Armeo 78" to 108" x 10' . . .

INTERNATIONAL CONSOLIDATED CHEMICAL CO., 2 B.T.A. 407 (B.T.A. 1925)

. . . Total_ 25.47 .05 .66 9.42 7.82 5.17 1.74 1.16 11.90 9.42 1.19 1.16 19.75 100.00 100 per cent in William . . .

v., 18 F. 15 (S.D.N.Y. 1883)

. . . at the amounts deposited and paid by the importer upon the original entries, with the exception of $11.90 . . . The small balance of S 11.90, which, upon the re-licjuidation in January, 1881, after the original decision . . .