The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 14.29 at 128 (2d ed. 1980). Saylor v. . . .
. . . had a 23.73% promotion rate through that time period, and ultimately Native American employees had a 14.29% . . .
. . . At the time, Thompson owned 14.29% of Bellecare, Inc. Thompson testimony; Exhibits 16 & 17. 5. . . .
. . . Consistent with this interpretation, Defendant suggests that only Castlerock’s 14.29 developed acres . . . remanded “the forfeiture order,” and not just the portion of the forfeiture order associated with the 14.29 . . .
. . . Post -11/7 Income) Balance on 11/7 $370,079.33 73.87% 71.83% Accounts Payable ($283,840.45) 14.70% 14.29% . . .
. . . Nine of the 63 Appellants (14.29%) made out-of-state trips for ACLM, and Appellants spent less than 286 . . .
. . . common stock; Pinchanski holds 71.42% of the non-voting common stock, while Asbaty and LaHaye each owned 14.29% . . .
. . . Focusing on families as opposed to households, 14.29% of African-American families fall within the lowest . . .
. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 14.29 (2d ed.1980). . . .
. . . . § 11.062(2)(a); § 11.066(4); § 11.70(3)(d); § 14.29(3)(b), (12); § 20.04(7)(a); § 20.19(6)(f); § 20.23 . . .
. . . of the partnership agreement, reduced the partnership interests of each of the Rathbun children from 14.29 . . .
. . . Plaintiffs achieve the 220.85-acre number in the following way: plaintiffs omitted from their takings claim 14.29 . . . These 14.29 acres constitute a reduction of 10.38 acres of land from WL 16, a reduction of 1.21 acres . . .
. . . June 2003) (14.29% break-up fee of $5 million for a $35 million purchase price is reasonable). . . .
. . . the three majority-minority wards: he received 29.56% of the vote in Ward 1, 24.68% in Ward 2, and 14.29% . . .
. . . Co., 276 F.Supp. 972, 981 (S.D.N.Y.1967), 3 Moore’s Federal Practice § 14.29 (3d ed.2003), Scharrer v . . .
. . . home space, but the City’s Mobilehome Park Rental Review Board (“Board”) approved an increase of only $14.29 . . . proposed increases on February 29, 2001, and subsequently approved a monthly rent increase of only $14.29 . . . application for $295,657 in regulatory lag rents, attorney's fees and costs incurred in obtaining the $14.29 . . .
. . . Thomas McCarthy, McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition, §§ 3.1, 11:1, 14:6.1, 14.29 (4th ed.2003 . . . Thomas McCarthy, McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition, §§ 3.1, 11:1, 14:6.1, 14.29 (4th ed.2003 . . .
. . . Devanesan, 484 So.2d 603 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986) (14.29%); Smith v. . . .
. . . The remaining share of 14.29% was attributed to lesser contributors. . . . .
. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 14.29, at 130 (2d ed.1980). . . .
. . . years in question, finding that customers had tipped, on average, 14.49% of their bills in 1991 and 14.29% . . . indisputably sound, the assumption that every patron is not only tipping, but tipping 14.49% in 1991 and 14.29% . . .
. . . . § 14.29(a)). . . .
. . . tips charged on credit cards by total credit card receipts, yielding an average tip rate of 14.49% and 14.29% . . .
. . . The Court’s method produced a result of $14.29 million. . . .
. . . See Angelí & Polk, Multi-Employer Plans, in II Employee Benefits Law § 14.29(5) (Illinois Institute of . . .
. . . Agreement, the Teamsters Fund calculated the plaintiffs pension as amounting to $171.22 per month, a $14.29 . . .
. . . In programs 11 and 12, the percentages were, respectively, 14.29% for women and 1.80% for men, and 5.43% . . .
. . . seek $197.55 for messenger service, $79.78 for postage, $113 for faxes, $1,120.10 for photocopies, $14.29 . . .
. . . In programs 11 and 12, the percentages were, respectively, 14.29% for women and 1.80% for men, and 5.43% . . .
. . . 12.32% of the representatives of the Legislature; instead, it has three representatives out of 21, or 14.29% . . . , resulting in a deviation (under this method) of +1.97% (i.e., 14.29% minus 12.32%). . . .
. . . majority-white district, includes all of one predominantly white VTD: Greenwood No. 3 (15.88% BPOP and 14.29% . . . District 121 contains 82.85% BPOP and 79.50% BVAP, while the portion in District 124 contains only 14.29% . . .
. . . Hardiman requests the Court to approve a rate of $200.00 for 1994, which represents a 14.29% increase . . .
. . . fault,” with the result that plaintiff was to be granted judgment against the defendant for l/7th (14.29% . . .
. . . See 3 Kenneth Culp Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 14.29 (2d ed. 1980), quoting Bowman Transp., . . .
. . . This authority is vested in the Attorney General by both statute, see, e.g., MCL §§ 14.28, 14.29 and . . .
. . . argue that this violates Section 2 because African-Americans’ candidates of choice will comprise only 14.29% . . .
. . . Porter, that were submitted to the City of Lansing, paid the Local 998 CBA rate, $14.29 per hour, to . . .
. . . Block 304 47 47 100.00% 100.00% 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0 0 0.00% 0.00% Block 305 56 48 100.00% 85.71% 8 0 14.29% . . . 702 12 100.00% 98.32% • 1.68% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block Group 2 Block 201 7-6 1 100.00% 85.71% 14.29% . . . 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% WEST BLOCKTON-WEST Tract 9513 Block Group 3 Block 306B 77 66 11 100.00% 85.71% 14.29% . . . 0.00% Block 305 18 100.00% 18 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Block 306 7 100.00% 6 85.71% 1 14.29% . . . 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block Group 3 Block 310 0 0 0 6 o o Block 311 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 312 - 7 1 6 100.00% 14.29% . . .
. . . Institution Black White Race Other Missing All Alabama A & M 12.15 17.15 12.12 14.29 12.44 U of Montevallo . . .
. . . MILLER, COLORADO PERSONAL INJURY PRACTICE, §§ 14.28-14.29 (1989) (in cases “commenced on or after July . . .
. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, § 14.29 (2d ed. 1980)). . . .
. . . Thus, Continental Gin is responsible for a total of 14.29 percent of Davis’ damages. VII. . . . Continental Gin is liable to Davis for 14.29 percent of Davis' $125,000 damages, which equals $17,862.50 . . .
. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 14.29 (2d ed. 1980). . . .
. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 14.29 at 128-31 (2d ed. 1980), as opposed to administrative rulemaking . . .
. . . marketing division had to pay 16 cents per gallon corresponding to a previously-enacted excise tax, plus 14.29 . . . The new tax, as of May 1986, added an additional 14.29 cents per gallon, for a total tax of 30.29 cents . . . As will be seen, the 14.29-cent tax is subject to DACO’s antipass-through provision as per regulatory . . .
. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 14.29 (2d ed. 1980). . . .
. . . of this motion, the Secretary cited an OSHA review of Cerro’s safety record showing an LWDI rate of 14.29 . . .
. . . These slides scoured 14.29 miles of streams. . . .
. . . . § 14.29. . . .
. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 14.29 at 128 (2d ed. 1980). . . .
. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 14.29, at 130 (2d ed. 1980). . . .
. . . Moore, Federal Practice ¶ 14.29. . . . Moore, supra at ¶ 14.29. . . .
. . . A check to Drug Emporium was dated April 15, 1980, and was for the amount of $14.29. . . .
. . . Little Rock, one of whom was black; therefore, the percentage of black cement finisher foremen was 14.29% . . . The court noted that blacks comprised only 14.29% (one of seven) of the cement finisher foremen in 1974 . . . The 14.29% figure corresponds to the percentage of black cement finisher foremen employed by Pickens-Bond . . .
. . . The six individual defendants sold a total of 959,179 shares to Fuqua, representing approximately 14.29% . . .
. . . ; Hart & Wechsler, The Federal Courts and the Federal System 1388 (1973); 2 Moore, Federal Practice 14.29 . . .
. . . Moore, Federal Practice H 14.29. . . .
. . . Falls Company at minimal cost increased the benefits to costs ratio as computed by the Defendants. 14.29 . . .
. . . million Assistant Principal, Junior High Schools, 1968 Examination (PF-43) 1319 48.82% 236 26.27% 14 14.29% . . .
. . . the Federal Tort Claims Act presents a federal question. 3 Moore’s Federal Practice (2d ed. 1968) ¶ 14.29 . . .
. . . names, in the total sum of $4,442.44, to wit: NAME TOTAL AMOUNT FOUND DUE Alfredo Almanza Barrios $ 14.29 . . .
. . . See 3 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 14.29 n. 5 at 762 (1964). . . .
. . . Moore, supra, at ¶ 14.29. . . .
. . . Thus, on the basis only of dividend yield, Heekin’s stock would similarly sell for $14.29 and $14.05 . . . Heekin’s stock on August 3, 1954, would, on the basis of Heekin’s 50-cent annual dividend payment, be $14.29 . . . Dividend yield (finding 65): 4.29 ($14.29 X 30%).............. ($14.05 X 30%).............. . . .
. . . Thus, on the basis only of dividend yield, Heekin’s stock would similarly sell for $14.29 and $14.05 . . . Heekin’s stock on August 3, 1954, would, on the basis of Heekin’s 50-cent annual dividend payment, be $14.29 . . .
. . . Exchange Orange for the 24,148 tons without the peel and oil by-products, or at the rate of almost $14.29 . . . received for the byproduct oranges processed under the TreeSweet contract was $25.10 per ton, namely, $14.29 . . .
. . . See 3 Moore’s Federal Practice, Sec. 14.29, 2d Ed. 1955. . . .
. . . date at the rate of * * * per cent per annum and costs of this suit herein taxed at $9.38, Sub Costs $14.29 . . .
. . . United States, D.C., 120 F.Supp. 217, 218; and 3 Moore, Federal Practice, § 14.29). II. . . .
. . . 686.24 624.47 150.81 1,461.52 1949 4.00 3.64 .64 8.28 1950 69.82 63.54 6.97 140.33 1951 359.34 314.03 14.29 . . .
. . . for example, as when there is serious doubt as to course of employment. . 3 Moore’s Fed.Practice, § 14.29 . . .
. . . 14.29 during the joint lives of Howard and Helen, and $4,285.72 during the life of the survivor. . . .
. . . $20 per share required to be paid by him were as follows: High, $17.64; low, $2.55; date of offer, $14.29 . . .
. . . of stored property, after due notice to the defendant; that the expense attendant on said sale was $14.29 . . . of stored property for charges, sold the posts for $112, and paid therefrom expenses in the sum of $14.29 . . .
. . . books and records, was 99.51 cents per 1,000 cubic feet, showing a deficiency below actual cost of 14.29 . . .