The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . (SeePrecedex Concentrate Label at JTX 15.13; Hospira Resp. 7, 8.) . . . (SeePrecedex Concentrate Label at JTX 15.13.) . . . (SeePrecedex Concentrate Label at JTX 15.13.) Drs. . . . (Precedex Concentrate Label at JTX 15.13; Fanikos at JTX 19.2; CSHP Guidelines at DTX 301_0015; Cain . . .
. . . Owner and his/her guests and visitors, and may limit the Owner's access to portions of Kukui'ula. ... 15.13 . . . conducted by "the Declarant, The Club, Builders designated by the Declarant, or other Owners," and Chapter 15.13 . . . Chapter 15.13 provides notice of "Blasting and Other Activities" and states, "the Owners and all occupants . . .
. . . Fung, a company incorporated and headquartered in Hong Kong, owns a 15.13% stake in the Asia JV. . . .
. . . . § 15.13. . . . Stat. § 15.13. Not some election laws. The election laws. . . . Stat. § 15.13. . . .
. . . Prac., Marital Property and Homesteads § 15.13 (“[I]f a spouse does not have a written power of attorney . . .
. . . Specifically, Section 15.13 of the Agreement states, in relevant part, as follows: “Except as set forth . . . (Id. § 15.13). . . . GE informed Alstom via letter that it had requested arbitration before the ICC pursuant to Section 15.13 . . . whether it or the IAF should resolve the disputed items in Alstom’s Dispute Notice because Section 15.13 . . . But, again, that argument ignores the beginning of Section 15.13, which carves out any disputes that . . .
. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 15.13[2], at 993 (2d ed. 1966)). . . .
. . . Section 15.13 of the PSA provides, “In case any one or more of the provisions contained in this Agreement . . .
. . . has a BYAP of 45.75%, whereas the part of Duplin County excluded from the district has a BYAP of only 15.13% . . .
. . . any well hereunder within 15 days from receipt of an invoice therefore in accordance with Article XV.15.13 . . . any well hereunder within 15 days from receipt of an invoice therefore, in accordance with Article XV.15.13 . . . In turn, JOA § 15.13 states: Each Non-Operator shall be obligated to pay Operator in advance for its . . . Id. at § 15.13 (emphasis added). . . .
. . . Likewise, Kronos’s margins fell from 15.13 percent to 7.93 percent, and Millennium’s margins fell from . . .
. . . secondary employment details will not enforce business rules or directions of the Secondary Employer. 15.13 . . .
. . . Exxon claims violations of Sections 12.6, 12.7, and 15.13 of the APA. . . . Exxon also alleges that Tredegar breached its duty under Section 15.13 of the APA, “Cooperation,” which . . . Exxon has adequately pled breaches of Sections 12.6 and 12.7, it has also pled a breach of Section 15.13 . . .
. . . and the Plan Supplement are incorporated and are a part of the Plan as if set forth in full herein. 15.13 . . .
. . . DASA Corp., 560 F.2d 1078, 1086 (2d Cir.1977) (citing 3 Moore’s Federal Practice § 15.13(2) (2d ed.1966 . . .
. . . Army Corps of Engineers (“USACE”) in 1997 that 15.13 acres of wetlands would be included in the project . . .
. . . Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 1493 (1971); 3 Moore’s Federal Practice, P 15.13(2) (1974)); . . .
. . . C, D, § 15.13 & § 14.13, respectively) (emphasis added). . . . (Teresa Deck, ¶ 17, Exhs C, D, §§ 15.13 and 14.13, respectively.) . . .
. . . (quoting 3 Moore’s Federal Practice, ¶ 15.13(2), at 984 (2d ed.1974)). . . .
. . . January 31, 2000 Federal-Mogul’s stock price fell an additional 25% to close at $15.13 per share. . . . $1.01 per share: Date Price July 1,1999 $52.00 Sept. 14,1999 $30.38 Dec. 31,1999 $20.12 Jan. 31, 2000 $15.13 . . .
. . . $1.10 For purposes of pricing the exercise of manhour increments of Option I, a composite labor rate of 15.13 . . . For purposes of pricing the exercise of manhour increments of Option I, a composite labor rate of $15.13 . . .
. . . Specifically, the letter stated that Noe was operating in violation of AGFC Codes 15.11(B) and 15.13( . . . Code 15.13(D) requires the submission of certain monthly reports. . . . They allege that Codes 15.01, 15.05, 15.11(B), 15.12, and 15.13(D) of the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission . . . remains as to whether the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission’s Codes 15.01, 15.05, 15.11(B), 15.12 and 15.13 . . .
. . . During the first day of trading, the stock opened at $15.13, peaked at $24.50 and closed at $17.88, an . . .
. . . Moore, et. al, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 15.13[2] (1996). . . .
. . . . § 15.13. 10. . . .
. . . not violate SEQRA for the simple reason that SEQRA does not apply to outdoor advertising. 17 NYCRR 15.13 . . .
. . . . § 15.13. Clearly, however, voting is one area that Congress intended the ADA to affect. . . .
. . . 69.04 RCW and rules; (xi) Horticultural plants and facilities— inspection and licensing under chapter 15.13 . . .
. . . (quoting 3 Moore’s Federal Practice § 15.13, at 846^17) (citations omitted). . . .
. . . 69.04 RCW and rules; (xi) Horticultural plants and facilities— inspection and licensing under chapter 15.13 . . .
. . . Moore, et al., Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 15.13[2] (1996)). . . .
. . . On March 18, when the punitive damages award was announced, Fleming shares closed at $15.13. . . .
. . . . § 15.13, his declaration is not inadmissible. . . .
. . . Bar, Torts, § 15.13, at 15-10 (1992 rev., 1996 supp.) . . .
. . . Antar, Vol. 15.13. Upon questioning by this court, Sam M. further testified: A. ... . . .
. . . responsibility for the “general supervision and administration of the election laws.... ” Sections 97.012 & 15.13 . . . responsibility for the “general supervision and administration of the. election laws.... ” Section 15.13 . . . Thus, based on the two Secretaries’ actions in this matter, as well as Sections 97.012 and 15.13, Fla . . .
. . . Co., 568 F.2d 902, 909 (2d Cir. 1977) (citing 3 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 15.13[1] (2d ed.1974)). . . .
. . . Moore et al, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 15.13[2], at 993 (2d ed.1966)). 1. . . .
. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 15.13[2], at 993 (2d ed.1966)). 1. . . .
. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice, ¶ 15.13[2] (2d ed.1996). . . .
. . . Moore, et. al, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 15.13[2] (1996). . . .
. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 15.13[2] (2d ed. 1996). . . .
. . . Co., 568 F.2d 902, 909 (2d Cir.1977) (citing 3 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 15.13[1] (2d ed. 1974)). . . .
. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 15.13[2] (1996) (“Moore”). . . .
. . . if the parties do not squarely recognize it as an issue in the trial.” 3 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 15.13 . . .
. . . Moore Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 15.13[2], at 15-134 to 135 (2d ed. 1994). . . .
. . . Moore and Richard Freer, Moore’s Federal Practice, ¶ 15.13[2] at pp. 15-130-32 (2d ed. 1994). 35. . . .
. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice, ¶ 15.13[3] at 15-194). . . .
. . . This disparity is statistically significant, with a Z-value of — 15.13 (probability of less that 1 in . . . but 75% of those promoted into Apprentice jobs in Deli/Bakery and General Merchandise (Z-value of —15.13 . . .
. . . Freer, Moore’s Federal Practice M 15.13-15.14 (2d ed. 1991). . . .
. . . Freer, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 15.13-15.14 (2d ed. 1991). . . .
. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice U 15.13[2], at 993 (2d ed. 1966))). . . . different theory.” ’ ” Royal Am., 885 F.2d at 1017 (quoting Browning, 560 F.2d at 1086 (quoting 3 Moore ¶ 15.13 . . .
. . . Id. at 871 (quoting 3 Moore’s Federal Practice, para. 15.13(2), at 15-130-31 (2d ed. 1985)). . . .
. . . additional evidence if the case were to be retried on a different theory.’ 3 Moore’s Federal Practice § 15.13 . . .
. . . location, and the second is the close association of the access route with the work premises. 1 Larson § 15.13 . . .
. . . Moore, Federal Practice ¶ 15.13[2], p. 15-157 (2d ed 1984) (amendment to conform to evidence may be made . . .
. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 15.13, at 993 (2d ed. 1966)). Royal American Managers, Inc. v. . . .
. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 15.13, at 993 (2d ed. 1966)). . . .
. . . such determination by the Committee shall be conclusive and binding on all persons (emphasis added). 15.13 . . .
. . . (D.I. 283, Tab 3B, ¶ 15.13 n. *.) . 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) provides: A person shall be entitled to a patent . . .
. . . McCarthy, Trademarks and Unfair Competition § 15.13 at 688-89. . . .
. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 15.13[2] (2d ed. 1985). . . .
. . . additional evidence if the case were to be retried on a different theory.” 3 Moore’s Federal Practice, ¶ 15.13 . . .
. . . 16.31 55.91 5 Bartsch, T. 38.00 28.5 15.67 53.67 16 Beck, J. 37.60 33 12.23 49.83 37 Bunch, J. 39.60 8 15.13 . . . 16.31 81.50 17 Bartsch, T. 62.51 40 15.67 78.18 26 Beck, J. 63.32 37 12.23 75.55 37 Bunch, J. 68.25 5 15.13 . . .
. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 15.13[3], at 15-194 to -196 (1984) (footnotes omitted) (hereinafter . . .
. . . Y.Arts & Cult.Aff.Law §§ 13.03, 13.07, 14.03, 14.53, 15.03.1, 15.05, 15.13, 15.17 (McKinney 1984) ("Counts . . .
. . . The situation we are presented with here is summed up very succinctly in 3 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 15.13 . . .
. . . was introduced because it was relevant to another issue in the case. 3 Moore’s Federal Practice, II 15.13 . . .
. . . The book value of the outstanding Milgo stock on that date was $15.13 per share. . . .
. . . .2d 439 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1120, 103 S.Ct. 3089 (1983); 3 Moore’s Federal Practice U 15.13 . . .
. . . Moore, Federal Practice ¶ 15.13[2], p. 15-157 (2d ed. 1984) (amendment to conform to evidence may be . . .
. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 15.13[2] n. 28 (2d ed. 1984). . . .
. . . Moore, MOORE’S FEDERAL PRACTICE ¶ 15.13[2], at 15-172 to 15-173 (2d ed. 1984). . . .
. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 15.13[2], at 15-171 — 15-172 (1983); see Dependahl, supra, 653 F.2d . . . Dependahl, supra, 653 F.2d at 1218; Standard Title, supra, 349 F.2d at 620; see also Moore, supra, ¶15.13 . . .
. . . V.3.11; V.15.13-14; Dx. 69. . . .
. . . Moore, Federal Practice, ¶ 15.13[2], pp. 15-178 — 179. (4) The amended complaint, if allowed, would interject . . .
. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice, ¶ 15.13[2], at 15-174 to -175 (2d ed. 1983). . . .
. . . DASA Corp., 560 F.2d 1078, 1086 (2d Cir.1977) (quoting 3 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 15.13[2], at 993 . . .
. . . Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(b); 3 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 15.13[2], at 15-157 (2d ed. 1983). . . .
. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 15.13(2), at 15-173 (1978 supp. to 2d ed. 1966). . . .
. . . United States, 528 F.2d 73, 75 (3d Cir.1975); 3 Moore’s Federal Practice, section 15.13[2] (2d ed. 1982 . . .
. . . See 3 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 15.13[2], at 15-157 to -179 (2d ed. 1982). . . .
. . . the old plan, the 12th District black population was 15.24% and under the new plan the population was 15.13% . . .
. . . or will only issue a policy at substantially higher rates. 2 Long, The Law of Liability Insurance, § 15.13 . . .
. . . the first part is whether there has been express or implied consent. 3 Moore’s, Federal Practice ¶ 15.13 . . .
. . . Bailey, The Law of Bank Checks §§ 15.10, 15.13 (4th ed. 1969). . . .
. . . Mental Hygiene Law § 15.13. . . .
. . . Vol. 3, Moore’s Federal Practice § 15.13 at pp. 846-847. . . .
. . . Cf. 3 Moore’s Federal Practice 15.13[2] at 15-175: Implied consent to the trial of an unpleaded issue . . .
. . . This is the standard described in 3 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 15.13(2). . . .
. . . where the parties do not squarely recognize it as an issue at trial.” 3 Moore’s Federal Practice H 15.13 . . . Discussing Rule 15(b), 3 Moore’s Federal Practice, supra, H 15.13[2], states: “The test should be whether . . .
. . . banking major, and the professional male/professional female pay disparity dropped from -17.16% to -15.13% . . .
. . . pleadings in line with the actual issues upon which the case was tried.” 3 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 15.13 . . .
. . . 5.57 16.67 6.51 24.49 7.56 Level 9 5.10 7.28 10.81 8.37 11.67 9.46 16.13 10.89 17.39 12.38 Level 8 15.13 . . .
. . . Heard, 532 F.2d 1330, 1332 (10th Cir. 1976); 3 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 15.13[2], at 165 (2d ed. 1979 . . .
. . . However, if the caretaker relative of one needy child receives SSI benefits, the family income is $15.13 . . . Obviously this is an improvement over the present standard, which results in a decrease of $15.13 where . . .
. . . and the pleadings have not been amended, no amendment can be implied.” 3 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 15.13 . . .
. . . and the pleadings have not been amended, no amendment can be implied.” 3 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 15.13 . . .
. . . charter hire. 6 Wright & Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure, § 1493; 3 Moore’s Federal Practice, § 15.13 . . .
. . . United States, 23 F.R.D. 279, 280 (D.C.Alaska 1959); 3 Moore’s Federal Practice fl 15.13[2], pp. 15-171 . . .