The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . Defendant ETF is an executive branch department created by Wisconsin Statute § 15.16 and charged with . . .
. . . be governed by Rule 15(a)(1) and may be made without leave of court”); 3 Moore’s Federal Practice, § 15.16 . . .
. . . terms (including without limitation, “Krossfít,” “Kfit,” “Xfit,” “Crossfitness,” etc.)....”([1] ¶ 19; [15.16 . . .
. . . Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 3 Coquillette, et al., MooRe’s Federal Practice § 15.16 . . .
. . . Jury Instr. 9th Cir. 15.16 (2007) (“[Y]ou must consider all relevant evidence in determining [the likelihood . . .
. . . Eastman Kodak Co., 552 F.Supp. 589, 602 (S.D.N.Y.1982) (citing 3 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 15.16[1], . . . should have some relation to the claim set forth in the original pleading. 3 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 15.16 . . .
. . . 36,645.00 David Greene 21.93 $550.00 12,061.50 Lowell Chow 64.25 $200.00 $ 12,850.00 Student Interns 15.16 . . .
. . . Id. at 1133 (citing 3 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 15.16[3], at 15-183 (2d Ed. 1989)). . . .
. . . ninety-eight (1,064,798) shares of Symbol to Symbol at the market price of fifteen dollars and sixteen cents ($15.16 . . . The fifteen dollar and sixteen cents ($15.16) price of Symbol stock on the closing date minus the five . . .
. . . These categories of expenditures are (i) donations to charities averaging $15.16 monthly, (ii) two sets . . . Donations to Charity The Creditor seeks an increase of $15.16 monthly in the Debtor’s payments to her . . . Debtor’s monthly payment to the Creditor, albeit in the sum of $7.42 rather than the requested sum of $15.16 . . .
. . . Payco’s sales of ice cream to exclusive accounts decreased from $15.16 million in 2004 to $10.62 million . . .
. . . MOORE’S FEDERAL PRACTICE § 15.16[1] (3d ed.2008); Saalfrank v. . . .
. . . See also 2-15 Moore’s Federal Practice and Procedure § 15.16 (2007)(“Legal restrictions that may limit . . . Moore’s Federal Practice and Procedure § 15.16(2007). . . . . See also 2-15 Moore’s Federal Practice and Procedure § 15.16 (2007)("Legal restrictions that may limit . . . Moore's Federal Practice and Procedure § 15.16 (2007). . . . . Moore's Federal Practice and Procedure § 15.16(2007). . Id. . . . .
. . . K at § 15.16. 1) Though plaintiffs contend that since they are not parties to the Share Purchase Agreement . . .
. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 15.16[1] (3d ed.2000). . . . .
. . . class action settlements in the Ninth Circuit in the Bajaj sample, mean and median settlements were 15.16 . . .
. . . 448, 451-52, 63 S.Ct. 1146, 87 L.Ed. 1509 (1943); 3 James William Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice § 15.16 . . . 52, 63 S.Ct. 1146, 87 L.Ed. 1509 (1943), cited in 3 James William Moore, Moore's Federal Practice § 15.16 . . .
. . . 10.00% Alderete (amount ($ 9,075.21) disbursed = $9,075.21) USDE Note 1 — Robert $ 1,210.62 $ 417.94 $ 15.16 . . .
. . . At 2350:13.75 and 2350:15.16 the aircraft’s automated Ground Proximity Warning System broadcast “sink . . . Furthermore, at 2350:13.75 and 2350:15.16 Flight 1420’s automated Ground Proximity Warning System broadcast . . .
. . . A, Preferred B and warrants (about 1% total interest undiluted)); TJJ Corporation (Preferred B & E, 15.16% . . .
. . . Moore et al., Moore's Federal Practice § 15.16[1] (3d ed.2000); accord 6 Wright, Miller & Kane, Federal . . .
. . . raised AST’s margins, allegedly resulting in an unduly high subsidy margin of 17.25 percent versus 15.16 . . . In particular, Commerce assessed a subsidy rate of 17.25%, an upward assessment from 15.16%, which was . . .
. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice, 11 15.16[1] (3d ed.1997) and cases cited therein. . . .
. . . . § 15.16. . . .
. . . (Pl.’s Ex. 1 at ¶ 15.16.) . . . Under the terms of ¶ 15.16 of the August 1999 Agreement, the parties contemplated that Brandolini would . . . (Pl.’s Ex. 1 at ¶ 15.16.) . . . record that in light of the detail accompanying the August 1999 Agreement (which by the terms of ¶ 15.16 . . .
. . . he has himself caused.’ ”) (quoting Restatement (Second) of Torts § 881 (1979)); see also Id. at § 15.16 . . .
. . . Pierce, Jr„ Administrative Law Treatise § 15.16 (3d ed.1994) (discussing Lujan and stating that challenges . . .
. . . Id. at 1270, citing, McCarthy on Trademarks, § 15.16. . . .
. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 15.16[1] (2d ed. 1982)) (emphasis added); see also Albrecht v. . . .
. . . Moore, et al., Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 15.16[3] (1992 ed.). . . .
. . . 100.00% 586 99.32% 4 0.68% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% OLD SAMANTHA SCHOOL SWINDLE 772 100.00% 653 84.59% 117 15.16% . . .
. . . IPC savings deposits comprised 22.48 percent of all deposits, but by 1981, their share had fallen to 15.16 . . .
. . . $798,000 (Bank’s $168,000 unsecured claim plus all other unsecured claims totalling $630,000) equals 15.16% . . .
. . . Eastman Kodak Co., 552 F.Supp. 589, 602 (S.D.N.Y.1982) (citing 3 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 15.16[1], . . . should have some relation to the claim set forth in the original pleading. 3 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 15.16 . . .
. . . Moore’s Federal Practice ¶15.16[1] at 15-175-15-176. . . . Moore’s Federal Practice H 15.16[3] at 15-183. . . .
. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 15.16[3] (1985); 6 C. Wright & A. . . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice H 15.16[3] (1985). . . .
. . . Williams, 529 S.W.2d 883, 886-87 (Mo.1975) and Missouri Approved Instructions 15.14 and 15.16 (explicitly . . . See MAI-Cr 2d 15.14 and 15.16 (1978). . . . MAI-Cr 2d 15.16 provided: 15.16 Murder: Second Degree, Felony-Murder ((As to Count_, if) (If) you do . . .
. . . Martz, American Law of Mining § 15.16 at 165 (1960); Reeves, The Meaning of The Word “Minerals”, 54 ' . . .
. . . See 3 Moore’s Federal Practice § 15.16[2]. . . .
. . . hours of vacation time at a rate of $4.46 per hour, or $17.13, and the State would have contributed $15.16 . . . While in addition to plaintiffs wages, his employer would have had to contribute $15.16 to plaintiffs . . .
. . . claims arising out of” Article I, sections 9, 13, and 19 of the Texas Constitution, articles 1.09, 15.16 . . . [section] 13, the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Articles 15.16 [taking arrestee before a magistrate . . .
. . . his former pleading, or of which he was ignorant when it was made .... ” 3 Moore, Federal Practice ¶ 15.16 . . .
. . . purpose of a supplemental pleading is to bring a controversy up to date. 3 Moore’s Federal Practice, ¶ 15.16 . . .
. . . playing of the card games allowed in the Tribal Ordinance is prohibited by Indio City Code §§ 15.15, 15.16 . . . members, employees, and non-members of the Cabazon Band, alleging violations, inter alia, of §§ 15.15, 15.16 . . .
. . . See 3 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 15.16[1]. . . .
. . . . ¶¶ 15.4 to 15.16); that Pincus instigated this arrest pursuant to a stale bench warrant, (Id. ¶ 15.11 . . .
. . . original complaint and should not introduce a new controversy into the case.” 3 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 15.16 . . .
. . . See 3 Moore’s Federal Practice, ¶ 15.16[3] (1980). . . .
. . . See Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Foundation, American Law of Mining § 15.16, at 167 (1979). . . .
. . . McCORD and MELVIN, Associate Judges, concur. . 2 Fla.Jur.2d, Adverse Possession, § 15.16. . . .
. . . change the nature of the relief initially requested, as was done here. 3 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 15.16 . . .
. . . .-06, 15.16, and a card carried by the police tells them that “any unnecessary delay in taking an accused . . .
. . . Percent Average Category occupancy room rate Commissioner’s experts . 65.0 $21.00 All hotels . 74.1 15.16 . . .
. . . See III American Law of Property § 15.16, at 834 (1954); Brown on Personal Property § 16, at 33 (2d ed . . .
. . . billing statement dated March 8, 1971, showing a new balance of $303.14, a minimum payment due of $15.16 . . .
. . . outstanding Jack Paparo . 113,190 11.87 Trust created for the benefit of the family of Jack Paparo . 144,650 15.16 . . .
. . . collective bargaining agreement, 416 F.2d at 124, 130; 280 F.Supp. 720-723; 3 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 15.16 . . .
. . . housing factors for the city as a whole, the variances from the ideal population were found as high as +15.16% . . .
. . . 1,064,000.00 389,000.00 % Profit (of total sales) 11.2 % * 8.20% * 3.00% * % Profit (of Renegot. sales) ■ 15.16% . . . business) from 20.50%, 24.68%, and 28.01%, respectively, for the three review years, to 11.51%, 13.20% and 15.16% . . .
. . . 1,064,000.00 389,000.00 % Profit (of total sales) 11.2% * 8.20% * 3.00% * % Profit (of Renegot. sales) 15.16% . . . business) from 20.50%, 24.68%, and 28.01%, respectively, for the three review years, to 11.51%, 13.20% and 15.16% . . . 7,639,054.63 4,954,207.39 11.51% FY 1967 11,214,217.12 7,117,445.02 13.20% PY 1968 12,880,823.00 7,019,823.00 15.16% . . .
. . . their ownership of 23.88 percent of the stock of Berger Machine, an interest equal to an additional 15.16 . . .
. . . Moore, Federal Practice fl 15.16[3] (2d ed. 1975).) . . .
. . . On page 15.16 of reference (a), you state again that your “. . . beliefs were not fully crystallized . . .
. . . United States, 319 F.Supp. 265, 268 (D.Kan.1970); 2 Mertens, Law of Federal Income Taxation § 15.16 at . . .
. . . If 15.16 [1] pp. 1081-82. . . . .
. . . Devitt, Federal Jury Practice and Instructions, § 15.16 (1965). . . .
. . . Articles 15.16 and 15.18 (1966). Additionally, he asserts that Tex.Code Crim. Procedure Ann. . . .
. . . transportation to go to and from work 29.12% 36.57% 11.55% 184.30% Portion of unemployed in county 28.74% 47.85% 15.16% . . .
. . . prior to and subsequent to the 1963 amendment, is found in 3 Moore’s Federal Practice (2d ed.), j[ 15.16 . . .
. . . the form of Allen instruction set out in Federal Jury Practice and Instructions, Mathes and Devitt, § 15.16 . . . of certain language near the end of the form of Allen instruction contained in Mathes and Dev-itt, § 15.16 . . . the full instruction would have been substantially the same as that set out in Mathes and Devitt, § 15.16 . . .
. . . Devitt, Federal Jury Practice and Instructions, § 15.16 (1965). . . .
. . . See 2 Mertens, Daw of Federal Income Taxation, (rev. ed. 1967), § 15.16. . . .
. . . of the Allen charge included in the 1965 Edition of Mathes and Devitt, Fed.Jury Prac. and Instr., § 15.16 . . .
. . . See 2 Mertens, Law of Federal Income Taxation, (rev. ed. 1967), § 15.16. . . .
. . . County (1, 2, & 3 averaged) —22.94 11 -10.90 14 +27.23 21 —15.05 Richmond County (22 & 23 averaged) +15.16 . . . The problem comes in justifying a present variance of +15.16 per cent as to the districts averaged. . . .
. . . Arithmetically the large volumes at 20 cents would have a strong effect on the weighted average of 15.16 . . .
. . . its relative share of offices in the whole local market has declined since the merger from 16.71% to 15.16% . . .
. . . analogous treatment is advocated in 2 Mertens, Law of Federal Income Taxation, (rev. ed. 1961) 38, § 15.16 . . .
. . . See 3 Moore, Federal Practice § 15.16 at 859 and n. 10 (2d ed. 1948). . . .
. . . See 3 Moore’s Federal Practice § 15.16, pp. 858, 859. . . .
. . . As of July 30, 1957, there was due thereon $402 principal and $15.16 interest. 2. . . .
. . . translations, stenographic service, incidentals — November 25, 1927, to August 3, 1936, Frs. 25,805.30 at Frs. 15.16 . . . Drake and not included by him in his claims: Frs. 21,413.30 at Frs; 15.16 to the dollar.......... 1,412.00 . . .
. . . See also § 15.16 Paul’s Federal Estate and Gift Taxation. . . .
. . . B. 1940-2, pp. 295, 296; also paragraph 15.16, Paul’s Federal Estate and Gift Taxation. . . .
. . . bankrupts, with whom he had two accounts, both showing a cash balance in the claimant’s favor,—one for $15.16 . . .