The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . .”); 3 McCarthy on Trademarks § 19.14, at 19.48 (“Congress did not intend the issue to be resolved simply . . .
. . . . § 19.14). . . .
. . . Thomas McCarthy, 3 McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition § 19.14, at 19.47-48 (4th ed. 2014) . . . See Lane, 33 U.S.P.Q.2d at 1355; 3 McCarthy on Trademarks § 19.14, at 19.48 (“Congress did not intend . . .
. . . Laws § 23-19.14-12, provides: A party who is exempt from liability under §§ 23-19.14-7, 23-19.14-8 or . . . 23-19.14-10 of this chapter shall not be liable for claims for contribution regarding matters addressed . . .
. . . . § 8127, FAR 19.14 and FAR 19.10.” Id. at 690. . . . must continue to be considered for placement under ... the [SDVOSB] Procurement Program (see Sub-part 19.14 . . . Accordingly, the court juxtaposed 38 U.S.C. § 8127 and FAR 19.14, recognizing that § 8127 imposes a mandatory . . . In contrast, the set-aside prescriptions of FAR 19.14 are permissive. . . . compliance with FAR subpart 19.10 could concurrently satisfy the permissive prioritization of FAR subpart 19.14 . . .
. . . . § 8127, FAR [J 19.14 and FAR [] 19.10.” Id. at 3. . . . placement under ... the Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Procurement Program (see Subpart 19.14 . . . rather, this acquisition should be evaluated under the authorities promulgated by 38 U.S.C. § 8127, FAR 19.14 . . . At any rate, FAR subpart 19.14 notably is distinguishable as it is applicable to “all Federal agencies . . .
. . . Laws §§ 23-19.14-1 et seq., and the Hazardous Waste Management Act (“HWMA”), R.I. Gen. . . .
. . . . § 30-19.4 (2004), or pay office expenses, see id. at § 30-19.14' — are clearly constitutional, despite . . .
. . . Glad California Insurance Law Handbook § 46:19.14 (2004 ed.); see also, Kirk Alan Walton, California . . .
. . . enforceable without regard to the time necessary for its complete performance. 4 Corbin on Contracts § 19.14 . . .
. . . Black's Law Dictionary (7th ed.1999); 2 Couch on Insurance § 19.14 (2d ed.1983). . . . .
. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 202.07[2][b][ii], at 202-36 & n. 19.14 (3d ed.2000) (collecting . . .
. . . App. 80 (Drivers’ CBA, art., 22, sec. 4(b)); App. 116 (Mechanics' CBA, art. 19.14). . . . . App. 80 (Drivers’ CBA, art., 22, sec. 4(b)); App. 116 (Mechanics’ CBA, art. 19.14). . . . . App. 80 (Drivers’ CBA, art., 22, sec. 4(b)); App. 116 (Mechanics' CBA, art. 19.14). . . .
. . . 16,677.303 11.79% Family members of Class A shareholders (children, spouses 27,042.707 and grandchildren) 19.14% . . . A third trust, whose beneficiaries were other Sim-plot family members and their affiliates, owned 19.14% . . .
. . . (2d ed.1986), 3 Nimmer on Copyright § 12.03 (12-32 n. 18) (1980 ed.), 3A Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 19.14 . . .
. . . See 3A Moore’s Federal Practice P 19.14(2-4) (2d ed.1979). . . .
. . . Section 19.14 Signing Grievance Does Not Concede Arbitrable Issue. . . . identified in Section 1.3(f), shall be handled pursuant to the provisions of Section 19.4 and 19.6 through 19.14 . . .
. . . A, § 19.14. . E.g., Wilton v. . . .
. . . surres-ponse to the appellant’s response and supplements; in his surresponse, the Secretary argues that 19.14 . . . response to the Court’s June 18, 1998, order, the Secretary seeks to exclude as unreasonable fees for 19.14 . . . Additionally, the Secretary objects specifically to the 19.14 hours partly claimed for an analysis of . . .
. . . Of the 4,952 black persons in Rome who were 25 years and over, 19.14% (948) attended some college or . . .
. . . R.I.Gen.Laws § 23-19.14-6 (emphasis added). . . . R.I.Gen.Laws § 23-19.14—l(i). . . . Laws § 23-19.14-6 (emphasis added). . . . R.I.Gen.Laws § 23-19.14-6 (emphasis added). . . . R.I.Gen.Laws § 23-19.14-6 (emphasis added). . . .
. . . -American Zone 3 24,578 4.52% African--American Zone 4 24,216 5.12% African--American Zone 5 24,456 19.14% . . .
. . . graduating with a G.P.A. greater than 2.0 are as follows: 1992 (21.1%); 1991 (21.51%); 1990 (19.6%); 1989 (19.14% . . .
. . . . § 1112; See also McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition, § 19.14, (3d ed. 1992). . . .
. . . population; 4.52% black; Zone 4—24,216 total population; 5.12% black; Zone 5—24,456 total population; 19.14% . . .
. . . Moore, 3A Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 19.14[1], at 19-244 to 19-248 (1990). . . .
. . . 2007 90.20 21.80 2008 95.02 21.21 2009 100.09 20.65 2010 105.44 20.12 2011 111.07 19.62 2012 117.00 19.14 . . .
. . . Id. 670-15.3, 19.14 to 19.15. . . .
. . . . § 19.14 (allowing employee representatives to be present during NRC inspections), 10 C.F.R. § 19.15 . . .
. . . . §§ 19.12-19.14 (1985), providing that after the hearing has been conducted and the finding of facts . . .
. . . Accord, 3A Moore & Lucas, Moore's Federal Practice H 19.14 [2.-4], at 19-258 (2d ed. 1985). . . .
. . . 18.39 20.39 17.51 34.59 18.77 18.01 20.06 21.28 23.64 14.72 12.87 26.94 13.13 33.58 20.72 23.12 23.97 19.14 . . .
. . . Krause, Aviation Tort Law § 19.14 (1979); Restatement (Second) of Torts § 402A comment h (1965) (“a product . . .
. . . D 19.14[1] at 19-265 to 19-267. . . . .
. . . See pp. 1045-1046 infra. . 3A Moore’s Federal Practice 19.14[2 — 4] (2d Ed. 1974); 7 Wright & Miller, . . .
. . . See The Florida Bar, Basic Practice Under Florida Probate Code § 19.14 (2d ed. 1981). . . .
. . . . §§ 19.14(a), 30.52. . . . records kept by him pursuant to the regulations in this chapter. 10 C.F.R. § 30.52; see 10 C.F.R. § 19.14 . . . Commission inspectors during ... phases of an inspection.” 10 C.F.R. § 19.14(b). . . . The licensee’s “walkaround” privilege under 10 C.F.R. § 19.14(b) is not a condition of the Commission . . . See 10 C.F.R. §§ 19.14(b), (g), .15. . . . .
. . . In December, 1974, the Croys purchased from Simpkins his 19.14% general partnership interest. . . .
. . . We think it did; see 3A Moore, Federal Practice ¶ 19.14[2.-3] (1974). . . .
. . . See generally, 3A Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 19.14[2.-2]. . . .
. . . , 269 U.S. 459, 46 S.Ct. 166, 70 L.Ed. 357 (1926). . 3A Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 19.06 at 2218, ¶ 19.14 . . .
. . . . ¶ 19.14[1], at 2402 (1967). . 28 U.S.C. § 1359. . . .
. . . We think it did; see 3A Moore, Federal Practice K 19.14 [2.-3] (1974). . . .
. . . See Moore, ¶ 19.14 [1]; 7 C. Wright & A. Miller, Federal Practice & Procedure: Civil § 1608 (1972). . . .
. . . McGinnes, 330 F.2d supra at 240; 2 Mertens, Federal Gift & Estate Taxation, § 19.14, p. 689, n. 25.5 . . . Commissioner, 45 TC 247 (1965); 2 Mertens, Federal Gift & Estate Taxation § 19.14, p. 548 (1959 and 1970 . . .
. . . The 1970 results were not materially different with an indicated failure rate of 19.14% for restoration . . .
. . . cert. denied, 366 U.S. 911, 81 S.Ct. 1085, 6 L.Ed.2d 235 (1961); 3A Moore’s Federal Practice para. 19.14 . . .
. . . Accordingly, the plaintiff may sue such infringers as he chooses. 3A Moore’s Federal Practice ft 19.14 . . .
. . . the contempt proceedings: Court Reporters' Fees $1810.30 Subpoenas and Witness Fees 297.40 Exhibits 19.14 . . .
. . . National Molasses Co., 394 F.2d 645 (9th Cir. 1968); 3A Moore’s Federal Practice, paragraph 19.14 [2. . . .
. . . Pelican, 232 U.S. 442, 34 S.Ct. 396, 58 L.Ed. 676 (19.14). . . .
. . . competitive bid volumes, the amendment stated that the amortization rates would be as follows : Douglas-flr_$19.14 . . .
. . . 29.47 36.95 18.18 60.80 1947- 28.94 35.31 16.81 52.02 1948- 28.88 32.80 20.49 43.58 1949- 26.92 30.29 19.14 . . .
. . . La Paz Guest Ranch, 289 F.2d 814 (9 Cir. 1961); 3 Moore’s Fed.Pract. (2d ed. 1964) ¶ 19.14 [1] p. 2178 . . .
. . . Ohio 1959); 3 Moore’s Federal Practice § 19.14 (2d Ed.1950). . . .
. . . V American Law of Property, secs. 19.1-19.8, 19.13, and 19.14 (1952). SEC. 341. . . .
. . . (d) In January 1956 the accrued taxes of $19.14 were paid. . . .
. . . Barron & Holtzoff, section 399; Moore, section 19.14(2). Accordingly, it is ordered that Donald F. . . .
. . . .) § 19.14. . . .
. . . Chandler, D.C.S.D.N.Y., 85 F.Supp. 131; Moore, Federal Practice ¶¶19.07, 19.14. . . .
. . . Plaintiffs cite 3 Moore’s Federal Practice 19.14(1), pp. 2177-78, to support this proposition. . . .
. . . Reserve ............ 577.93 1,291.07 3,510.05 4,424.55 Advance to Employees and others.. 300.21 24.13 19.14 . . .
. . . Dangberg, C.C.D.Nev., 81 F. 73; see 3 Moore’s Federal Practice par. 19.14. . . .
. . . Practice, 2d Ed., 1948, Sec. 19.14, p. 2176. Also see Consolidated Textile Corporation v. . . .
. . . and, presumably, was covered by either a general bond or single entry bonds as required by section 19.14 . . .
. . . the other by use of' 3, 4 and 5,- producing, respectively, as calculated by petitioner, 19.35% and 19.14% . . .
. . . other law in New Jersey giving an attorney a lien npon bis client’s cause of action than the act of 19.14 . . .
. . . That Bock himself did the first repair job on the Led-win leg, Defendant’s Exhibit 2, in July, 19.14, . . .
. . . 1914, we find that they amounted to a total of $18,309.08 in the eight years immediately preceding 19.14 . . .
. . . for any further coal which might be tendered under the contract; whereupon, on the 19th of December, 19.14 . . .
. . . at his office; nor had he called upon any other German official after the breaking out of the war in 19.14 . . .
. . . On September 29, 19.14, the Mammoth Copper Mining Company entered into a contract with Beer, Sondheimer . . .
. . . , Tex. .Dec. 6, 19.14. Ill 247. Adrian, Minn. .Nov. 22, 1914. 107 248. Hudson, N. . . .
. . . For some years prior to December 1, 19.14, interstate passenger rates between St. . . .
. . . D. 19.14, to the damage of this defendant in the sum of, to-wit, $275.00, which amount the defendant . . .
. . . provisions of leases alleged to be prohibited by section 3 of the act of Congress approved October 15, 19.14 . . .
. . . Hopkins was adjudicated a bankrupt July 25, 19.14, and on August 17th, Lawrence Hull was appointed trustee . . .
. . . “The evidence introduced at said hearing showed that on February 13, 19.14, Nellie Irving, the lawful . . .
. . . A correction of the error involved an additional claim of $19.14. . . .
. . . .); breadth, 19.14 m. (65.29 ft.); depth of hold, 4.8 m. (15.74ft.); extreme draft, 3.8 m. (12.46 ft. . . .