The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . . § 20.02(c)(2)(A) (2019) ("substantial risk of serious bodily injury"). See, e.g. , Ind. . . .
. . . THL's valuation of other assets which is discussed below) as follows: 82.76% of the Sale Proceeds (or $ 20.02 . . . amount that exceeds the Sale Proceeds, so THL argues that the Sales Proceeds should be allocated $ 20.02 . . .
. . . . ¶ 78 (quoting Lease § 20.02(b) ).) . . . November 14, 2017, Plaintiffs sent Defendant a written notice invoking the Landlord's remedies under § 20.02 . . . (Lease § 20.02(b).) Defendant argues that this clause amounts to an unenforceable penalty. (Def.' . . .
. . . Chisum, Chisum on Patents § 20.02 (2011). . . .
. . . Chisum, Chisum on Patents § 20.02 (2011). . . .
. . . He purchased the Unit in 20.02, when he initially resided there with his son, Bruno Jr. Id. . . .
. . . Accessibility Code 120-3-20.02(3). . . .
. . . example, the 2005 Cap Letter, by significantly reducing the employer contribution on behalf of post-20.02 . . .
. . . Chisum, Chisum on Patents § 20.02[2] (2017). . . .
. . . B, Art. 20.02, Pg ID 113.) . . .
. . . In late-November/early-December 20.02, Rowe met with Heslin in New York to discuss a $20 million settlement . . .
. . . Paragraph 20.02.A of the franchise agreement specifies that it “does not create any ‘fiduciary relationship . . . As noted above, the franchise agreement at ¶ 20.02.A specifically negates any agency relationship: "[ . . .
. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 20.02(6)(a) (3d ed. 1997 & Supp. 2007) (“Rule 18, governing . . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 20.02(2)(a)(i) (3d ed. 1997 & Supp. 2014) ("The defendant has . . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 20.02(2)(b)(i) (3d ed. 1997 & Supp. 2013) ("On the other hand . . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 20.02(1)(b) (3d ed. 1997 & Supp. 2014) (footnote omitted) (citations . . .
. . . Section 20.02(a) of the FMJS permits the. development and application to juveniles of a use of force . . . Sections 20.02(j) and (k) of the FMJS authorize certified correctional officers trained in the use .of . . .
. . . In re Moffett, 356 F.3d 518 (4th Cir.2004); compare In re Kalter, 292 F.3d 1350, 1352-53 (11th Cir.20.02 . . .
. . . Model Penal Code and Commentaries § 20.02 cmt. 3, at 234. . . . Model Penal Code and Commentaries § 20.02 cmt. 3, at 237-38. . . . Model Penal Code and Commentaries § 20.02 cmt. 3, at 237. 2. . . . See Model Penal Code and Commentaries § 20.02 cmt. 3, at 237. . . .
. . . Venske, 296 F.3d 1284 (11th Cir.20.02), where the affidavit of a private investigator alleging bailiffs . . .
. . . Norton, 309 F.3d 26, 32 (D.C.Cir.20.02) (quoting Dep’t of State v. . . .
. . . Docket” carries a notation that the offense was "Burglary of a Habitation with intent to commit theft § 20.02 . . .
. . . ¶ 10, 52, 53) The stock price dropped another 10.3% on October 26, 2011, to a near-historic low of $20.02 . . . (Id. at ¶¶ 9, 54-59) This decrease in stock price from $30.06 to $20.02 per share allegedly placed the . . .
. . . At that time, Fushi’s stock price closed at $20.02 per share. . . .
. . . See also 4 Moore's Federal Practice, § 20.02 [2] [a] [iii] (stating that Rule 20 should be subject to . . .
. . . Citing Section 20.02 of the JDA, which prohibits WMATA from “unreasonably” withholding consent to an . . . Moreover, the fact that Section 20.02 prevents WMATA from “unreasonably” withholding consent suggests . . .
. . . n. 21 (citing Standardized Civil Jury Instructions for the District of Columbia, sections 20.01 and 20.02 . . . misrepresentation”); see also Standardized Civil Jury Instructions for the District of Columbia §§ 20.01, 20.02 . . .
. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice, § 20.02[1][b], [2][a][i] (3d ed. 2010) (Rule 20 “may be used . . .
. . . Coverage Disputes, § 20.02[h][3] (15th ed.) . . . Coverage Disputes, § 20.02[i], at 1525-26 (15th ed.) (citing cases). . . .
. . . the 1963 version of § 151.052 provides: " ‘Every retailer shall add the sales tax imposed by Article 20.02 . . . At issue was Article 20.02(A), which provided “Method of Collection and Rate of Limited Sales Tax. . . . using the following bracket system formula on each retail sale: ...” 371 S.W.2d at 557 (quoting Art. 20.02 . . . The court held: We construe Article 20.02 as levying a two per cent limited sales tax — a transaction . . . tax to be collected in accordance with the rates enumerated in the bracket system formula of Article 20.02 . . .
. . . Joinder is proper only if both of these requirements are satisfied. 4 Moore’s Federal Practice § 20.02 . . .
. . . expert stated that the shipment was cocaine hydrochloride, 70.4 percent pure, with a net weight of 20.02 . . .
. . . See Keener, 76 Fed.Cl. at 460; Willis, supra, at ¶ 20.02[4][c]. . . . of any settlement agreement [was] not converted into a nonpartnei’ship item”); Willis, supra, at ¶ 20.02 . . . Willis, supra, at ¶ 20.02[4][a][iv]. . . . .
. . . Newman, 2 Handbook on Insurance Coverage Disputes § 20.02[g], at 1384 (14th ed.2008). . . . .
. . . Newman, 2 Handbook on Insurance Coverage Disputes § 20.02[g], at 1384 (14th ed.2008). .See, e.g., Nat . . .
. . . A) — Redevelopment Plan 8 (providing that the Russell Cast property is Block 20.02, Lots 1 through 4 . . .
. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 20.02[l][b] (3d ed. 2009). . . .
. . . Freer, 4 Moore’s Federal Practice § 20.02[2][a][ii] (3d ed. 2005). . . .
. . . filing of the FY06 10-K, the stock price closed at $20.97, $0.95 higher than its previous close of $20.02 . . .
. . . Id. at § 20.02[A], at 747. . . . Id. at § 20.02[A], at 721. One type of deferred compensation plan is known as a top hat plan. . . . Cartano, at § 20.02[A], at 735. . . .
. . . See 4 Moore’s Federal Practice § 19.04[1]; § 20.02[l][e]. . . . See Moore’s at § 20.02[5][a] (“If plaintiff joins parties in violation of diversity of citizenship precepts . . .
. . . Postlewaite, Partnership Taxation [Hereinafter “Pennell”] ¶ 20.02[4][c] (6th ed.1999) (and eases cited . . .
. . . His overtime rate of pay was $20.02 per hour. 11. . . . At Officer Letner’s overtime rate of $20.02 per hour at that time, the total owed for that period is . . .
. . . that Amezquita locked Rangel in the break room—effectively accused her of violating Texas Penal Code § 20.02 . . . Penal Code Ann. § 20.02(a). . . .
. . . Postlewaite, Partnership Taxation ¶ 20.02[4][c] (6th ed.1999))). . . .
. . . the Appendix as part of the evidence that was before Congress when it reenacted the 1207 Program in 20.02 . . .
. . . Practice (“Moore’s") § 20.02[2][a] at 20-13; see System Fuels, Inc. v. . . . plaintiff must make a motion to amend to effect[uate] joinder” of additional plaintiffs. 4 Moore’s § 20.02 . . . if the change in structure [of the suit] would prejudice the interests of a litigant.” 4 Moore’s § 20.02 . . . Instead, in appropriate circumstances, a nonparty may seek to intervene.” 4 Moore’s § 20.02[2][c] at . . .
. . . See Pennell, supra, at ¶20.02[4][e]. . . .
. . . Penal Code § 20.02. . . .
. . . Cartano, Taxation of Compensation & Benefits, § 20.02[A], at 721 (2004)(hereinafter “Car-tano”)). . . .
. . . . § 20.02 (Vernon 2003) (elevating the offense to a felony if the victim is recklessly exposed to a substantial . . .
. . . . §§ 20.01 & 20.02 (Vernon 1995). . . .
. . . Id. at § 20.02[A], at 710. . . . Cartano, at § 20.02[A], at 721. . . .
. . . Id. at § 20.02[A], at 710. . . . Cartano, at § 20.02[A], at 721. . . .
. . . . § 20.02 (Vernon 2002). . . . On the other hand, to establish the third degree felony under Texas Penal Code § 20.02(c)(2)(A), the . . . Pen.Code Ann. § 20.02(a) (Vernon 2002). " 'Restrain' means to restrict a person's movements without consent . . . Unlike the cases Appellant cites, we are persuaded that any violation of Texas Penal Code 20.02(c)(1) . . . . § 20.02 (Vernon 2002). . . . Texas Pen.Code ANN. § 20.02 (Vernon 2002). . . .
. . . See F.R.C.P. 20; see also I Moore’s Federal Practice, Civil § 20.02(a)(i) (“The permissive party join-der . . .
. . . Plaintiffs contend that on several occasions during the course of the two lawsuits, beginning in 20.02 . . .
. . . See Homeland Security Act of 20.02, Pub.L. No. 107-296. . . .
. . . The United States intervened and on August 9, 20.02, moved to dismiss the petition. . . .
. . . . §§ 20.01 & 20.02 (Vernon 1999). . . .
. . . court’s finding that the Sergeant’s testimony was “forthright and consistent;” (District Court 6/7/20.02 . . .
. . . parties, its utility is limited to plaintiffs and defendants raising counter and crossclaims. 4 Moore’s § 20.02 . . . Id. § 20.02[6][b]. It therefore is not ordered on the court’s own initiative. . . .
. . . Moore, et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 20.02[2][a][ii] (3d ed.2004). . . . Joinder is proper only if both of these requirements are satisfied. 4 Moore’s Federal Practice § 20.02 . . .
. . . Ann. art. 20.02 (Vernon Supp.2004); In re 5 Byrd Enters., 980 S.W.2d 542, 543 (TexApp. . . . Ann. art. 20.02(d); In re 5 Byrd Enters., 980 S.W.2d at 543. . . .
. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice, § 20.02 (3d ed.1999). . . . See Moore, § 20.02. . . .
. . . Ann. 20.02(4) (same); Montana Code Ann. § 45-14-206(2) (same); N.J. Stat. . . .
. . . Moore, Moore's Federal Practice § 20.02[2][a][ii] (3d ed.2002) (“Occasionally, ... a plaintiff will fail . . .
. . . Code §§ 9.41.040(1)(a), 9.41.010(12), 9A.20.02, 9A.04.040. . . .
. . . The claim forms were submitted on October 12, 20.02. . . .
. . . Dallas is scheduled to be executed by lethal injection at 6:00 p.m. on Thursday, October 17, 20.02. . . .
. . . McConnell, 201 F.Supp.2d 618, 644 (D.S.C. 20.02). . . . .
. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice § 20.02(l)(a) (3d ed.1997). It is not self-executing, however. . . . Id., at § 20.02(2)(a)(ii). . . .
. . . percent) were liturgical Christians, 338 (or 39.58 percent) were non-liturgical Christians, and 171 (or 20.02 . . .
. . . As defense counsel aptly put it during the May 16, 20.02 hearing: the record reads like a “greatest hit . . .
. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 20.02[a][ii] (3d ed. 2000) (“Occasionally ... a plaintiff will . . .
. . . LGA specifically argues that IGV taxes are consequential damages, excluded by Section 20.02 of the Agreement . . . Section 20.02 provides: Waiver of Certain Damages. . . . LGA argues that these categories of IGV taxes are consequential damages, precluded by Section 20.02. . . .
. . . Coquillette, et al., 4 Moore’s Federal Practice 3d, §§ 20.02[1][a], 20.05[1] (1999). . . .
. . . return to work upon tendering a doctor’s note, which is the subject of the current action, is found in § 20.02 . . .
. . . Plan at § 20.02. . . . Plan at § 20.02. . . . Plan at § 20.02. . . . whether Defendants's communications fulfilled the requirements of the Plan itself, specifically, § 20.02 . . . procedures and plaintiff's right to review of relevant documents. (6/15/98 EOB; 29 U.S.C. § 1133; Plan at § 20.02 . . .
. . . (CBA ¶20.02.) . . .
. . . (reprinted in Callman, Unfair Competition Trademarks and Monopolies, § 20.02 (4ed.1984)). . . .
. . . would receive options valued at $720 (24% of $3,000), or 36 options based on a Black-Scholes value of $20.02 . . .
. . . . § 20.02 (Vernon 1999). . . . .
. . . See Moore’s Federal Practice § 20.02[1][d]. . . . See Moore’s Federal Practice § 20.02[1][d]. . . . Moore’s Federal Practice § 20.02[6][b]. . . . Moore’s Federal Practice § 20.02[6][b]. . . . Moore’s Federal Practice § 20.02[6][b]. . . .
. . . Moore, et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 20.02[2][a][ii] n. 29 (3d. ed.1998). . . . Moore, et al., Moore’s Federal Practice § 20.02[1][a] n. 11-12 & accompanying text (3d. ed.1998). . . .
. . . See § 20.02 Fla. Stat.; Arthur J. England, Jr., and L. . . .
. . . Chisum, Patents §20.02[1][a], n. 9 (1998). In any event, 28 U. S. . . .
. . . During the summer of 1996, Beeman sold his home and 20.02 acres to his wife. . . .
. . . the ability to take authoritative action to fulfill the charge of faithfully enforcing the laws”); § 20.02 . . .
. . . the relative contribution of the patented feature to the success of the product. 7 Chi-sum, Patents § 20.02 . . .
. . . Sand, et al., 1 Modern Federal Jury Instructions ¶ 20.02 at 20-27 (instructing jury “as a matter of law . . .
. . . Newman, Handbook On Insurance Coverage Disputes § 20.02(g) at 778 (7th ed.1994). . . .
. . . Moore et al., Moore's Federal Practice, § 20.02(2)(b)(i) (3d ed.1997). . . . .
. . . The legislature has set forth a policy concerning this issue as follows: 20.02 Declaration of policy. . . . of the State Constitution. (5) Departments should he organized along junctional or program lines. § 20.02 . . .
. . . , 302 1111 19.02 Attempt to murder IPC 307 1113 15.01, 19.02 Wrongful confinement IPC 343, 346 1201 20.02 . . . IPC 364-A 1201 20.02, 20.03, 20.04 Kidnapping or abduction with intent secretly and wrongfully to confine . . . persons IPC 365 1201 20.02, 20.03, 20.04 Mischief causing damage to the amount of fifty rupees IPC 427 . . .
. . . . § 20.02(b) (Vernon Supp.1996) provides as follows: A grand juror ... who discloses anything transpiring . . . Petitioner also argues that Article 20.02(b) of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure is by its terms . . .
. . . Werner & Robert Kratovil, Real Estate Law § 20.02, p. 290 (10th ed. 1993). . . .
. . . Agreement § 20.02, as amended by art. XVII (September 21, 1987). . . . .
. . . Rosen, 1992 WL 123178 (E.D.N.Y.1992); Chisum, 5 Patents § 20.02[3] at 20-159. . . .
. . . Sand et al., Modem Federal Jury Instmctions: Cnminal, ¶ 20.02, at 20-26.1 (1994); see also Rojas v. . . .
. . . agreements contained in said Lease, including, but not limited to mortgages complying with Section 20.02 . . . Section 20.02 gave the Lessee, now Spring Valley, the right “to negotiate and obtain construction and . . . See id. § 20.02, at 29 in J.A. at 152. . . .
. . . a portion of “Medium" work (29.02% of jobs x .30% (percentage of medium jobs Rhodes can perform) = 20.02% . . .