The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . Plaintiff contends that National Coverage Determination ("NCD") No. 20.22, which was issued by CMS in . . . growth, cancer prevention, and circulation problems was not covered by Medicare, as provided in NCD 20.22 . . . Plaintiff also complained that, even though NCD 20.22 provided that Medicare excluded coverage for the . . . sought reimbursement for alternative or experimental chelation therapy excluded from coverage under NCD 20.22 . . . sought reimbursement for experimental chelation therapy that was excluded from Medicare coverage by NCD 20.22 . . .
. . . Effect of Law Enforcement Statements on the Defendant)); 11.22 (Giving Obscene Material to a Minor); 20.22 . . . None Attempt_777.04(1) 61 Comment This instruction was adopted in 2016. 20.22 UNLAWFUL FILING OF FALSE . . .
. . . He makes $20.22 per hour. . . .
. . . Swan identified a WVSCI score of 39.66 and á GLIMPSS score of 20.22. Pis.’ Ex. 25. . . .
. . . , earns $19.00 per hour in year one of the Agreement, $19.25 in year two, $19.73 in year three and $20.22 . . . ” earns $19.00 per hour in year one of the Agreement, $19.25 in year two, $19.73 in year three and $20.22 . . .
. . . Defendant states that at the time of her discharge, Plaintiff was making $20.22 per hour, the highest . . .
. . . injunctive relief where the asserted pattern of FOIA timing violations revealed an average response time of 20.22 . . .
. . . Judge DuBois’s Practices and Procedures Order of October 4, 2000 ¶ 7); Manual for Complex Litigation § 20.22 . . .
. . . Tempur-Pedic director and the Vice President of TA Associates, sold 15,941 shares of Tempur-Pedic stock at $20.22 . . .
. . . as such must be strictly construed, 157 F.3d at 642, citing Sutherland on Statutory Construction, § 20.22 . . .
. . . See § 20.22(1), Fla. . . .
. . . The five highest-paid core operators in Department 910 earned, per hour, $20.70, $20.38, $20.22, $19.64 . . .
. . . Manual, supra § 20.22, at 26. . . .
. . . Following the recommended structure set forth in the Manual for Complex Litigation (Third), § 20.22 at . . . See generally Manual for Complex Litigation (Third), § 20.22 (1995). . . .
. . . See Manual for Complex Litigation, Third, § 20.22 (1995). . . .
. . . See Manual for Complex Litigation, Third, § 20.22 (1995). . . .
. . . See Manual for Complex Litigation, Third, § 20.22 (1995). . . .
. . . Upjohn Co., 159 F.R.D. 473, 491 (W.D.Mich.1994) (quoting Manual for Complex Litigation 2nd § 20.22 at . . .
. . . The credit card receipt is for $16.22; Curry wrote in a $4.00 “tip” and a total of $20.22. . . .
. . . Among the court’s powers in aid of ADR are appointment of liaison and lead counsel, see Manual §§ 20.22 . . .
. . . arguments, discussed below, it is worth noting that the valuation range derived from the DCF analysis was $20.22 . . . The $20.22 to $22.52 per share translates to a range of $3,729.8 million to $4,154.1 million for the . . .
. . . Upjohn Co., 159 F.R.D. 473, 491 (W.D.Mich.1994) (quoting Manual for Complex Litigation 2nd § 20.22 at . . .
. . . Upjohn Co., 159 F.R.D. 473, 491 (W.D.Mich.l994)(quoting Manual for Complex Litigation 2nd § 20.22 at . . .
. . . See Manual for Complex Litigation § 20.22 at 27, (3rd ed.1995); see also In re Indigo Sec. . . .
. . . Upjohn Co., 159 F.R.D. 473, 491 (W.D.Mich. 1994) (quoting Manual for Complex Litigation 2nd § 20.22 at . . .
. . . , 54 Bus.Law. 763, 764 (1999) (discussing need for reform); and see Manuel for Complex Litigation § 20.22 . . .
. . . will exercise the functions of lead counsel as outlined in the Manual for Complex Litigation, Third §§ 20.22 . . . exercise the functions of Liaison Counsel as outlined in the Manual for Complex Litigation, Third §§ 20.22 . . .
. . . Sutherland on Statutory Construction, § 20.22, at 110 (5th ed.1992). . . . Sutherland on Statutory Construction, § 20.22, at 110 (5th ed.1992). . . .
. . . Lawsuits: A Critical Analysis, 87 Nw.U.L.Rev. 423, 429 (1993); see also Manual for Complex Litigation § 20.22 . . .
. . . Sutherland on Statutory Construction, § 20.22, at 110 (5th ed.1992). . . . Sutherland on Statutory Construction, § 20.22, at 110 (5th ed.1992). . . .
. . . Sutherland on Statutory Construction, § 20.22, at 110 (5th ed.1992). . . . Sutherland on Statutory Construction, § 20.22, at 110 (5th ed.1992). . . .
. . . 818 F.2d at 223 (noting that lead counsel owes fiduciary duty to class plaintiffs); see also MCL § 20.22 . . .
. . . . § 20.22(a)(2), now L.A.C. § 33.V.4139.A.2, self-executing. . . .
. . . Singer, Sutherland on Statutory Construction § 20.22 (5th ed. 1992).) . . .
. . . Manual for Complex Litigation, Second § 20.22 at 16. . . .
. . . See Manual for Complex Litigation § 20.22, at 15 (2d ed. 1985). . . .
. . . See Manual for Complex Litigation § 20.22, at 15 (2d ed. 1985). . . .
. . . SCR 20.22(l)(a). The threshold question, therefore, is whether Mr. . . .
. . . MCL 2d § 20.22 (1985). . . .
. . . In its proof of loss, plaintiff calculates that it cost $20.22 more to produce 1000 food pails by using . . .
. . . See Manual for Complex Litigation, Second, § 20.22 (1985). . . .
. . . See Manual for Complex Litigation Second, §§ 20.22, 20.224 (1985); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1407 (authorizing . . .
. . . See Manual for Complex Litigation, Second, § 20.22 (1985). . . . .
. . . In MCL 2d at § 20.22 the court’s authority to assign parties to groups having similar characteristics . . .
. . . Value With Land $ 18.96 $ 15.00 $ 20.22 $ 16.57 Subject property: 46,401 S.F. at $14.00/S.F. $649,614 . . .
. . . 18.76 23.16 24.60 16.37 23.12 23.37 25.26 24.02 22.15 20.65 27.60 23.84 24.77 27.42 31.59 18.16 14.79 20.22 . . .
. . . The defendant’s motion cited Wisconsin Supreme Court Rule 20.22 (1982) as ground for granting the motion . . . SCR 20.22 is based on Canon 4 of the American Bar Association Code of Professional Responsibility and . . . provides in pertinent part as follows: SCR 20.22 Preservation of confidences and secrets of a client . . .
. . . . §§ 20.21, 20.22 and 20.23; and educational loans and grants under 25 C.F.R. § 40.1. . . .
. . . Road job, above its ADC for April of $20.17 p.c.y., and above its ADC for the fiscal year to date of $20.22 . . .
. . . See e. g. 1A Sutherland, Statutory Construction § 20.22, p. 74 (4th ed. 1972). . . .
. . . construction, and maintenance of “gymnasia, stadia, or other recreational facilities,” id., §§ 20.21-20.22 . . . of certain facilities, such as gymnasia, are employed to repay the bonds issued thereon, see id., §§ 20.22 . . .
. . . . § 20.22(4), F.S.A.) which is headed by the Governor and Cabinet just as was the Division of Electronic . . .
. . . and the additional expense charged to this shareholder’s account was $1.50, making a total charge of $20.22 . . .
. . . Taxpayer cites, in support of this theory, Regulation 111, Section 20.22(a) (3) of the 1939 Code, which . . .
. . . Volume 3, Merten’s Law of Federal Income Taxation, Section 20.22 and see Trenton Cotton Oil Company v . . .
. . . Accounting Office certified that plaintiff had been overpaid $700.90, and that after crediting him with $20.22 . . . On January 4, 1939 plaintiff wrote a letter to the General Accounting Office requesting a refund of $20.22 . . . of settlement certified that plaintiff had been overpaid $700.90, and that after crediting him with $20.22 . . . The fact is, as we understand the record, that plaintiff’s claim for $20.22 which had been previously . . . Referring to this $20.22 claim, the Government in its brief states: ’‘These losses not covered by the . . .
. . . thereof were made by it from the above mentioned offices with the exception of tires and tubes valued at $20.22 . . .
. . . .; S. 12° W. 20.22 chs.; West 3.00 chs.; S. 23° 15' W. 67.00 chs.; S. 22°30' W. 26.00 chs.; thence, in . . .
. . . The correct net fare on the basis of 50 instead of 100 per cent land-grant deduction is $20.22, and the . . .
. . . metal to Hickman, Williams & Co., of Chicago, shortly after their purchase from the Government for $20.22 . . . The malleable iron shells were sold to said company f. o. b. cars at Toledo for $20.22 per gross ton; . . .
. . . within the state of Texas, and extends from El Paso to the boundary line ox New Mexico, a distance of 20.22 . . .