The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title IV
EXECUTIVE BRANCH

Chapter 20
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 20.37

20.37 Department of Veterans’ Affairs.—There is created a Department of Veterans’ Affairs.

(1) The head of the department is the Governor and Cabinet. The executive director of the department shall be appointed by the Governor subject to a majority vote of the Governor and Cabinet, with the Governor on the prevailing side. The appointment is subject to confirmation by the Senate. The executive director shall serve at the pleasure of the Governor and Cabinet.

(2) The following divisions, and bureaus within these divisions, of the Department of Veterans’ Affairs are established:

(a) Division of Administration and Public Information.

1. Bureau of Information and Research.

(b) Division of Veterans’ Benefits and Assistance.

1. Bureau of Veteran Claims Services.

2. Bureau of Veteran Field Services.

3. Bureau of State Approving for Veterans’ Training.

History.—s. 13, ch. 88-290; s. 2, ch. 99-255; s. 3, ch. 2022-14; s. 1, ch. 2023-162.

F.S. 20.37 on Google Scholar

F.S. 20.37 on Casetext

Amendments to 20.37

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 20.37

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 20.37.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

UNITED STATES v. CRUZ- GARC A, 391 F. Supp. 3d 180 (D. P.R. 2019)

. . . . § 20.37. See United States v. Schnitzer, 567 F.2d 536 (2d Cir. 1977) ; United States v. . . .

COPART, INC. v. SPARTA CONSULTING, INC. KPIT KPIT v., 339 F. Supp. 3d 959 (E.D. Cal. 2018)

. . . The jury also found Sparta committed professional negligence and awarded Copart $20.37 million. . . . on its claims for fraud-concealment and professional negligence, awarding Copart $4.69 million and $20.37 . . . The jury awarded $20.37 million in damages to Copart. Verdict Form at 4. . . . gravity of the harm here is larger than it was for fraud-concealment, reflected in the jury's award of $20.37 . . . The jury also considered payments for Milestones 1 through 7 as part of the jury's award of $20.37 million . . .

B. C. J. C. T. H. T. H. v. MOUNT VERNON SCHOOL DISTRICT,, 837 F.3d 152 (2d Cir. 2016)

. . . In that year, approximately 20.37% of the special education high school students took AIS courses, as . . .

In WEBB MTN, LLC, LLC, v. L. P. LLC, M A, 414 B.R. 308 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2009)

. . . should have been $83,447.28 based upon the consideration of the debt owed in the amount of $22,553,-20.37 . . .

UNITED STATES v. GILKERSON,, 527 F. Supp. 2d 932 (D.S.D. 2007)

. . . I do not understand this rationale since § 20.37 provides: “No person shall receive or have in custody . . .

ROTHE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, v. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE U. S., 499 F. Supp. 2d 775 (W.D. Tex. 2007)

. . . Asian Americans represent 20.37 percent of the available construction firms and received 8.7 percent . . .

BISCHOFF, a Co. L. L. C. Co. L. L. C. v. BOAR S HEAD PROVISIONS CO. INC. III S. Co. L. L. C. s Co. a Co. L. L. C. a s Co. Co. L. L. C., 436 F. Supp. 2d 626 (S.D.N.Y. 2006)

. . . Bischoff, a New York resident and Brunckhorst’s great-grandson, is a member and 20.37% owner of FB Co . . .

CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, v. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT,, 422 F. Supp. 2d 1115 (N.D. Cal. 2006)

. . . FEA estimated that the total consumer surplus value lost as a result of the temporary closure was $20.37 . . .

GILBERT, v. ALTA HEALTH LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 122 F. Supp. 2d 1267 (N.D. Ala. 2000)

. . . APJI Civil 20.37. . . . APJI Civil 20.37. . . . APJI Civil 20.37. . . .

TRIFINERY, A Co- v. BANQUE PARIBAS, v. VITOL, S. A. INC., 762 F. Supp. 1119 (S.D.N.Y. 1991)

. . . vacuum tower bottoms at USD 11.25 per barrel and/or approximately 11,850 barrels of distillate at USD 20.37 . . .

WYNN OIL COMPANY, a v. AMERICAN WAY SERVICE CORPORATION, a A., 736 F. Supp. 746 (E.D. Mich. 1990)

. . . See Callman, The Law of Unfair Competition, Trademarks and Monopolies, (4th Ed.1981), §§ 20.37 and 20.38 . . .

ROGAN, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a L. A. P. D., 668 F. Supp. 1384 (C.D. Cal. 1987)

. . . .); Cf. 28 C.F.R. 20.37 (1986) (“It shall be the responsibility of each criminal justice agency contributing . . . individuals is kept complete, accurate and current — ”); see also: 28 C.F.R. 20.30, 20.31(a) (1986) (Section 20.37 . . . Mackey, 387 F.Supp. at 1123; Cf. 28 C.F.R. 20.37 (1986). . . . See: Mackey, 387 F.Supp. at 1123; Cf. 28 C.F.R. 20.37 (1986). . . . application of the Fourth Amendment's particularity requirement to the separate computer record. . 28 C.F.R. 20.37 . . .

FRANKLIN v. ORDER OF UNITED COMMERCIAL TRAVELERS OF AMERICA,, 590 F. Supp. 255 (D. Mass. 1984)

. . . are organized by persons of the same religion, occupation or other group. 2A Couch on Insurance 2d, § 20.37 . . .

BISCAYNE FEDERAL SAVINGS LOAN ASSOCIATION v. FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK BOARD, T. P. D. H. T. Jr. R. M., 572 F. Supp. 997 (S.D. Fla. 1983)

. . . THE NEGOTIATION PROCESS: PHASE I BISCAYNE — POSITIVE NET WORTH 20.37 MILLION In the late fall of 1981 . . .

McKNIGHT v. WEBSTER, B. A. F. O McKNIGHT v. WEBSTER, B. A., 499 F. Supp. 420 (E.D. Pa. 1980)

. . . . § 20.37. . . .

PRUETT, v. H. LEVI,, 622 F.2d 256 (6th Cir. 1980)

. . . . § 20.37, and they provide sanctions against the contributing agency for noncompliance. 28 C.F.R. § . . . The regulations establish time guidelines for reporting dispositions. 28 C.F.R. § 20.37. . . . The regulations do not exclude notations lacking dispositions. 28 C.F.R. § 20.37. . . .

B. L. v., 66 T.C. 12 (T.C. 1976)

. . . were: Percentage of ownership Partner Prior to 8/31/69 After 8/21/69 Jones_ 65.00 62.00 Strong_ 16.43 20.37 . . .

TARLTON, v. B. SAXBE,, 407 F. Supp. 1083 (D.D.C. 1976)

. . . . §§ 20.37-.38 (1975); id. § 20.21(a)(1) (90 day period for state-administered information systems); . . .

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO. INC. v. UNITED STATES, 524 F.2d 1343 (Ct. Cl. 1975)

. . . Ibid., 20.37. . . .

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, INC. v. THE UNITED STATES, 208 Ct. Cl. 1 (Ct. Cl. 1975)

. . . Ibid., 20.37. . . .

UNITED STATES v. WESSEL DUVAL CO. THE EDWARD RUTLEDGE, 123 F. Supp. 318 (S.D.N.Y. 1954)

. . . dock. 20.00 — Line on dock. 20.30— Stand by engine. 20.33 — Half ahead, navigating as per bell book. 20.37 . . .

RETAIL CREDIT ASS N OF MINNEAPOLIS v. UNITED STATES, 30 F. Supp. 855 (D. Minn. 1938)

. . . $55.70 as and for penalty for the respective years 1933, 1934 and 1935, in the respective sums of $20.37 . . .

C. v. I., 121 Fla. 551 (Fla. 1935)

. . . certificates for unpaid taxes due to the town of Holly Hill as follows: No. 1788 for $22.04; -1789 for $20.37 . . .