Cases from cite.case.law:

GRABAU, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF PSYCHOLOGY,, 816 So. 2d 701 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . . § 20.42-.43, Fla. Stat. (2001); chaps. 455 & 490, Fla. Stat. (2001). . . .

CLEARFIELD BANK TRUST COMPANY, CSB v. OMEGA FINANCIAL CORPORATION,, 65 F. Supp. 2d 325 (W.D. Pa. 1999)

. . . As of the date of the evidentiary hearing, shareholders holding 20.42% of Clearfield common stock had . . .

L. McPHILLIPS, Jr. v. GOLD KEY LEASE, INC., 38 F. Supp. 2d 975 (M.D. Ala. 1999)

. . . According to plaintiff, the estimated license fee and taxes are $20.42 for 1996, $ 134.58 for 1997, and . . .

STATE v. F. MORALES,, 718 So. 2d 272 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . Morales’ recommended guideline sentence ranged from 12.25 to 20.42 years’ imprisonment. . . .

N. FLYNN v. CITY OF BOSTON,, 140 F.3d 42 (1st Cir. 1998)

. . . Nowak, Constitutional Law: Substance and Procedure § 20.42, at 272-75 (2d ed.1992). . . .

AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION, v. ASSOCIATED INDUSTRIES OF FLORIDA, INC., 678 So. 2d 1239 (Fla. 1996)

. . . Effective July 1, 1992, section 20.42, Florida Statutes, is created to read: 20.42 Agency for Health . . .

ALBERTSON S, INC. v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,, 658 So. 2d 134 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . See § 20.42, Fla. Stat. (Supp.1992). . . .

KUNZ CONSTRUCTION CO. INC. v. UNITED STATES, 16 Cl. Ct. 431 (Cl. Ct. 1989)

. . . 12.76 13.19 14.25 14.68 15.63 15.95 1986 16.17 15.31 16.27 16.38 17.34 17.23 1987 18.40 19.25 19.68 20.42 . . .

In RUSHING,, 93 B.R. 750 (Bankr. N.D. Fla. 1988)

. . . Included in the monthly living expenses are $20.42 per month insurance on the boat and $80.00 for recreation . . .

GILA RIVER PIMA- MARICOPA INDIAN COMMUNITY, v. UNITED STATES, 2 Cl. Ct. 12 (Cl. Ct. 1982)

. . . profit of $0.22 per acre was calculated from historical data: 1883 fair market value of cattle was $20.42 . . .

SYSTEM FUELS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 642 F.2d 112 (5th Cir. 1981)

. . . Petitioners also challenge the Commission’s failure to disapprove the alternating rate of $20.42 per . . . evidentiary presentation the AP&L president stated that “We do not suggest any modification” of the $20.42 . . .

S. NANCE, v. UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, CONSUMER PRODUCTS DIVISION, a, 397 F. Supp. 436 (W.D.N.C. 1975)

. . . equaling .5 and below were dropped and fractions of days exceeding .5 were added to the total; e. g., 20.42 . . .

COLORADO ANTI- DISCRIMINATION COMMISSION v. CONTINENTAL AIR LINES, INC., 372 U.S. 714 (U.S. 1963)

. . . See, e. g., 14 CFR §§ 20.40, 20.42-20.45, 20.121, 21.1, 40.300. Bethlehem Steel Co. v. . . .

BEATTY SAFWAY SCAFFOLD CO. v. UP- RIGHT, INC. a, 306 F.2d 626 (9th Cir. 1962)

. . . that it was error for the Court not to instruct the jury at that time that more was at stake than the $20.42 . . .

KANSAS TURNPIKE AUTHORITY, v. ABRAMSON P., 275 F.2d 711 (10th Cir. 1960)

. . . And finally we come to Section 20.42 of the supplemental specifications providing in detail for “compaction . . .

THEODORE RUPLEY AND CLARA W. RUPLEY, CO- PARTNERS, DOING BUSINESS UNDER THE FIRM NAME AND STYLE OF RUPLEY BROTHERS, v. THE UNITED STATES, 124 Ct. Cl. 59 (Ct. Cl. 1952)

. . . (c) Stumpage and logging costs combined would have averaged $20.42 per M. . . .

W. v., 23 Cust. Ct. 20 (Cust. Ct. 1949)

. . . 20.0 and 20.18 on the two February samples; and on the two-received in May 1946, the findings were 20.42 . . .

D. v., 7 T.C. 73 (T.C. 1946)

. . . The petitioners cite section 20.42 of the Uniform Partnership Act, which is in force in Michigan and . . . which provides as follows: § 20.42] Rights of retiring or estate of deceased partner when the business . . .

THE LACE HOUSE v. UNITED STATES, 141 F. 869 (5th Cir. 1905)

. . . case of laces and embroideries was opened in Atlanta, Ga., it contained three lace dresses, valued at $20.42 . . .