The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . R. 22.09(a). . . .
. . . He earns $22.09 per hour — a salary of $45,943.00 annually — as a Supervisory Protective Services Officer . . . Regardless of whether it comes in their paychecks or in their pension checks, they earn and receive between $22.09 . . .
. . . commonly used as a benchmark in order to measure the performance of the overall stock market — was 22.09% . . .
. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise §§ 22.09-5, 22.09-6 (Supp.1970). . . .
. . . . §§21.01-21.07, 22.01-22.09 (2000). . . .
. . . sections 21.00 through 21.07 (cigarettes and smokeless tobacco) and title 940, sections 22.00 through 22.09 . . .
. . . See Mass.Regs.Code tit. 940, §§ 22.00-22.09, as amended Jan. 19, 2000. . . . title “Sales and Distribution of Cigars in Massachusetts” (the “Cigar Regulations”) 940 C.M.R. §§ 22.00-22.09 . . .
. . . 14 1998 $395.64 $21.52 $29,670.28 18 MAY 14 1998 $395.36 $21.80 $29,648.47 19 JUN 14 1998 $395.07 $22.09 . . .
. . . Ltd. 22.09% UMA Iron & Steel Co. 15.64% Kajaria Castings Ltd. 44.84% Super Castings (India) 29.40% Country-wide . . . Rate 22.09% The Court having reviewed the Redetermi-nation Results, and Commerce having complied with . . .
. . . Ltd. 22.09% UMA Iron & Steel Co. 15.64% Kajaria Castings Ltd. 44.84% Super Castings (India) 29.40% Country-wide . . . Rate 22.09% The Court having reviewed the Redetermination Results, and Commerce having complied with . . .
. . . Newberg, Newberg on Class Actions §§ 22.09-22.10 (2d ed.1985). C. . . .
. . . Newberg, § 22.09 at 22-20. . . .
. . . within § 1335, although the stakeholder is also a claimant of the fund. 3A Moore’s Federal Practice, § 22.09 . . . interpleader is separate, of course, from the need for a federal forum.” 3A Moore’s Federal Practice, § 22.09 . . .
. . . See generally 3A Moore's Federal Practice ¶ 22.09[5], at 22-88 — 22-90 (2d ed. 1992). . . . .
. . . $152.09, regardless of whether the actual value of the beepers is the $25 suggested by the debtor, the $22.09 . . .
. . . Wells came up with a figure of 22.09%. . . .
. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, §§ 22.09-5, 22.09-6 (Supp. 1970). United States v. . . .
. . . Nov. 1986 21.65 20.79 21.98 22.09 22.95 23.49 First Half Second Half 1987 25.64 27.47 1988 31.35 34.69 . . .
. . . .-09-5, 22.09-6 (Supp.1970). . . .
. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise §§ 22.09-5, 22.09-6 (Supp. 1970) RAJ’s emphasis on ADM’s size and . . .
. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise §§ 22.09-5, 22.09-6 (Supp.1970). . . . .
. . . 23.48 31.56 9.70 75.00 25.55 21.36 28.62 28.72 16.51 56.13 8.59 15.02 33.65 31.03 35.29 32.95 4.94 22.09 . . .
. . . . * * * 33-22.09 Review and Final Action. * * * (2) The Superintendent acts as the reviewing and approving . . .
. . . Davis, ADMINISTRATIVE LAW TREATISE §§ 22.09-5, 22.09-6 (Supp.1970). . . .
. . . Franklin 25,346 95.29 1,254 4.71 26,600 Greene 2.892 27.03 7,808 72.97 10.700 Houston 54,303 77.91 15,397 22.09 . . .
. . . Milwaukee, Wis., Charter, § 22.09(1) (1977). . . . Id. at § 22.09(2). . . .
. . . a history of the development of Chapter 13 under the Bankruptcy Act, see 10 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 22.09 . . .
. . . debts through installment payments instead of being adjudicated bankrupt. 10 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 22.09 . . .
. . . California Regional Office, 497 F.2d 1325, 1327 (9th Cir. 1974); 3A Moore’s Federal Practice, supra H 22.09 . . . But see 3A Moore’s Federal Practice, supra ' 22.09[1], . . . .
. . . See also, 10 Coilier on Bankruptcy ¶ 22.09 (14th Ed. 1978), where it is said: The mere fact that an individual . . .
. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice fl 22.09 (1978) (urging the contrary). . . .
. . . 669, 689 n. 14, 93 S.Ct. 2405, 37 L.Ed.2d 254 (1973) [quoting Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, § 22.09 . . .
. . . Willis, Partnership Taxation, sec. 22.09, pp. 262-263 (2d ed. 1976); A. . . .
. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise §§ 22.09-5, 22.09-6 (Supp.1970). . . .
. . . See, generally: Rule 102(b), Bankruptcy Rules; 2 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 22.09 (1975 ed.). III. . . .
. . . 2,026 2,026 2.050 —1.17% G 2,216 2,216 2.050 +8.09% H 2,146 2,146 2.050 +4.68% I 1,597 1,597 2.050 —22.09% . . .
. . . With respect to the subject under consideration, Art. 22.09 of the Texas Education Code empowers the . . . and any contract for a longer period would have been voided unless the conditions set forth in Art. 22.09 . . . Sindermann, footnote 7, and it appears from the Texas Education Code, Art. 22.09; V.T.C.A., and Hix v . . .
. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 22.09-6, p. 753 (Supp. 1970). . . .
. . . Petitioner further relies on Rules 22.01, 22.04, 22.09, and 29.01 of the Missouri Rules of Criminal Procedure . . .
. . . .) § 22.09-7; Carlsbad Union School District v. Rafferty, 300 F.Supp. 434 (S.D.Cal.1969). . . .
. . . Moore, Federal Practice ¶22.09[3], at 3067 (2d ed. 1974). . . .
. . . See Davis at §§ 22.00-3, 22.09-22.09-9. . . . . Davis at 22.09-2. . See, e. g., Sierra Club v. . . .
. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise §§22.09-5, 22.09-6 (Supp. 1970). . . .
. . . Texas Education Code (1969), Sections 22.09 and 23.28. . . .
. . . computes the percentage of land actually leased by ASARCO to that which it had the right to lease at 22.09 . . .
. . . computes the percentage of land actually leased by ASARCO to that which it had the right to lease at 22.09 . . .
. . . Davis, Administrative Law Treatise §22.09 (1958), §§22.09-22.10 (1965 Supp.); Jaffe, Standing to Secure . . .
. . . of Administrative Action”: A Review, 66 Colum.L.Rev. 635, 666 (1966); 3 Davis, Administrative Law, § 22.09 . . . Administrative Action”: A Review, 66 Colum.L.Rev. 635, 659-69 (1966); Davis, Administrative Law, § 22.09 . . .
. . . Judicial Review: Public Actions, 74 Harv.L.Rev. 1265, 1266, 1284 (1961); 3 Davis, Administrative Law, Sec. 22.09 . . .
. . . Ind. 1964); 3 Moore, Federal Practice ¶ 22.09, at 3033. . . . Between State and Federal Courts 180-190 (Official Draft, Pt. 1, 1965); 3 Moore, Federal Practice ¶ 22.09 . . .
. . . Sales and Exports California Sales Barrels Bank Percentage of share of market Imports — 1,123,387 1 22.09 . . .
. . . See Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, 1958, vol. 3, §§ 22.09, 22.10; Jaffe, Standing to Secure Judicial . . .
. . . See Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, 1958, vol. 3, §§ 22.09, 22.10; Jaffe, Standing to Secure Judicial . . .
. . . Supp. 66, 70, reversed on other grounds, 3 Cir., 246 F.2d 200; 3 Moore, Federal Practice, Para. 22.09 . . .
. . . Bay City Bank and Trust Co., 9 Cir., 1956, 234 F.2d 513; 3 Moore, Federal Practice, para. 22.09 (1948 . . .
. . . set forth with sufficient particularity to determine the effective holding of the case. . 3 Moore 1)22.09 . . . Chafee, supra, fn. 7, at 974-975. . 3 Moore 1)22.09[1], at 3029 (1948 ed.). . 178 E.2d at page 225. . . . . 3 Moore 1[22.09[4], at 3037 (1948 ed.). . 178 F.2d at page 224. . . . .
. . . The question is discussed in 3 Moore, Federal Practice, paragraph 22.09, page 3029 (2d Ed. 1948), where . . .
. . . him by the agency were not countersigned by the appropriate personnel official as required by section 22.09 . . .
. . . See 3 Moore’s Federal Practice, 2d Ed., Sec. 22.09(3), p. 3033, n. 30. . . .
. . . A total length of boundary line of 116,641 feet, or 22.09 miles.” . . .