Cases from cite.case.law:

SAFEWAY PREMIUM FINANCE COMPANY, a v. E. SOSA,, 15 So. 3d 8 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 23.20 (3d ed. 2006). . . .

S. BROWNING, v. ANGELFISH SWIM SCHOOL, INC., 1 So. 3d 355 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . noting tendency of commonality, typicality and adequacy to merge); see generally Moore’s, supra at § 23.20 . . .

UNITED STATES v. MANNEH,, 645 F. Supp. 2d 98 (E.D.N.Y. 2008)

. . . (which includes telephone numbers and web addresses); and § 23.20 (‘What documents are required for international . . . See 50 C.F.R. § 23.20(e). . . . for Appendix III species, an "export permit (§ 23.36) or reexport certificate (§ 23.37).” 50 C.F.R. § 23.20 . . .

ANCHOR SAVINGS BANK, FSB, v. UNITED STATES, 81 Fed. Cl. 1 (Fed. Cl. 2008)

. . . See, e.g., PX 236 at A-23.20 (“RFC incurred a pre-tax loss of $62.4 million in 1986 due to significant . . .

In DIMAS, LLC,, 357 B.R. 563 (Bankr. N.D. Cal. 2006)

. . . regard- 0.40 ing the files of Dimas LLC and request to photocopy and how best to comply. 158.00 _TOTAL_ 23.20 . . .

NEWMAN, v. RCN TELECOM SERVICES, INC., 238 F.R.D. 57 (S.D.N.Y. 2006)

. . . requirements [of Rule 23(a) ] before it may be certified under Rule 23.” 5 Moore’s Federal Practice § 23.20 . . .

E. KEMP, v. BUMBLE BEE SEAFOODS, INC., 398 F.3d 1049 (8th Cir. 2005)

. . . Thomas McCarthy, Trademarks and Unfair Competition § 23.20 (4th ed.2002) (citations- and internal quotations . . .

SHIRT v. HAZELTINE,, 336 F. Supp. 2d 976 (D.S.D. 2004)

. . . Under the dual-race method, they constitute 30.14 percent of the total population and 23.20 percent of . . .

R. MURATORE, Sr. v. DARR,, 375 F.3d 140 (1st Cir. 2004)

. . . King, 2 Collier on Bankruptcy, § 23.20 at 642^15 (14th ed.)). . . .

R. MURATORE, Sr. v. DARR,, 375 F.3d 140 (1st Cir. 2004)

. . . King, 2 Collier on Bankruptcy, § 23.20 at 642-45 (14th ed.)). . . .

LARIOS, v. COX,, 314 F. Supp. 2d 1357 (N.D. Ga. 2004)

. . . In Senate Plan 1-B, 23.20% of the districts are majority-minority; in House Plan 1-B, 24.44% of the districts . . . In the Senate there are thirteen majority-minority districts, or 23.20% of the total, using either of . . .

UNITED STATES v. NAVA,, 363 F.3d 942 (9th Cir. 2004)

. . . The gas tank was removed, and, at around 11:00 p.m., 23.20 kilos of marijuana were found inside. . . .

CLARKE, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY,, 220 F.R.D. 568 (E.D. Wis. 2004)

. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice § 23.20 (3d ed.2003) (stating that an implicit requirement of Rule 23 . . .

UNITED STATES v. RACHEL,, 289 F. Supp. 2d 688 (D. Md. 2003)

. . . TDR invoiced CSM an amount between $23.20 and $26.70 for each Hinge Repair Kit manufactured and installed . . .

BOLANOS, v. NORWEGIAN CRUISE LINES LIMITED, d b a, 212 F.R.D. 144 (S.D.N.Y. 2002)

. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice § 23.20 at 23-55 (Matthew Bender 3d ed.2002) (“A class must satisfy all . . . Visa Check/MasterMoney Antitrust Litig., 280 F.3d at 133; see also, e.g. 5 Moore’s Federal Practice § 23.20 . . .

SALLY BEAUTY COMPANY, INC. a a v. BEAUTYCO, INC. a, 304 F.3d 964 (10th Cir. 2002)

. . . McCarthy on Trademarks § 23.20. . . .

In SCHOTT, v. WyHy, 282 B.R. 1 (B.A.P. 10th Cir. 2002)

. . . Then the Debtors mailed WyHy a check for $23.20, their calculation of the payoff amount of the loan. . . .

T. GATES, v. Jo B. BARNHART,, 325 F. Supp. 2d 1342 (M.D. Fla. 2002)

. . . Calculation: (1) 23.20 hours claimed for 2001 minus 0.75 hours denied equals 22.45 hours to be awarded . . .

B. GODINET, v. MANAGEMENT AND TRAINING CORP., 182 F. Supp. 2d 1108 (D. Kan. 2002)

. . . Baker (23.20 hours @ $150 per hour) $ 3,480.00 Michael M. . . .

UAL v., 117 T.C. 7 (T.C. 2001)

. . . would bear the burden of proving that the additional amount of the allowance for overnight trips ($23.20 . . . Subtracting $14 from this maximum allowance for l.day to account for meal expenses leaves $22 ($23.20 . . .

FABRICANT, v. SEARS ROEBUCK,, 202 F.R.D. 306 (S.D. Fla. 2001)

. . . .2000); see also 2 Newburg on Class Actions § 6.14, at 6-61 (3d ed.1992); 5 Moore’s Federal Practice §§ 23.20 . . .

TACTICA INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. ATLANTIC HORIZON INTERNATIONAL, INC., 154 F. Supp. 2d 586 (S.D.N.Y. 2001)

. . . not involve protracted litigation to determine liability for trademark infringement.” 3 McCarthy § 23.20 . . .

J. NEUMONT, v. MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA,, 198 F.R.D. 554 (S.D. Fla. 2000)

. . . must be “capable of ascertainment under some objective standard.” 5 Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice §§ 23.20 . . .

In CM HOLDINGS, INC. G. M. G. v. CM, 254 B.R. 578 (D. Del. 2000)

. . . Anticipated Year Loading Charge Expenses Difference 1_10,00%_2,00%_8.00% 2_20,00%_6.80% 13.20% 3_30.00%_6.80% 23.20% . . .

BARBECUE MARX, INC. v. OGDEN, INC., 110 F. Supp. 2d 689 (N.D. Ill. 2000)

. . . and the context of their use in the marketplace.” 3 McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition, §§ 23.20 . . .

W. POOLE, ELLIOTT, v. TEXTRON, INC., 192 F.R.D. 494 (D. Md. 2000)

. . . The amount of computer research ($1,127.00), courier charges ($23.20), and photocopy charges ($1,040.00 . . .

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, v. MICHELIN NORTH AMERICA, INC., 47 F. Supp. 2d 984 (N.D. Ill. 1999)

. . . Finally, Michelin claims it fired Bodie because she double billed $23.20 in phone calls and made excessive . . . Finally, she admitted mistakenly charging $23.20 in phone calls to two separate departments. . . .

CLUB GENE GEORGETTI LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, v. LA LUNA ENTERPRISES, INC. d b a E. J., 889 F. Supp. 324 (N.D. Ill. 1995)

. . . and the context of their use in the marketplace. 3 McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition, §§ 23.20 . . . (citation omitted); see also 3 McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition, supra, § 23.20[2] (“[Tjhis . . .

NEWMAN, v. STATE C. J., 602 So. 2d 1351 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . Singer, Sutherland Statutory Construction §§ 2.07, 23.20 (4th ed. 1985); 16 Am.Jur.2d Constitutional . . .

IOWA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,, 961 F.2d 769 (8th Cir. 1992)

. . . . §§ 23.20(a)(2)(v)(B)(2), 255.4(e). . . .

C. WILLIAMS, v. KINGSTON SHIPPING COMPANY, INC. a a a, 925 F.2d 721 (4th Cir. 1991)

. . . For example, the court struck 23.20 claimed hours because no adequate explanation was given for staffing . . .

UNITED STATES EPA v. ENVIRONMENTAL WASTE CONTROL, INC., 737 F. Supp. 1485 (N.D. Ind. 1990)

. . . . —23.20 hours attributable to an unnecessary challenge to District Rule 14(c), with its limitation on . . .

In M. NOAKES, SEARLES, v. V. DYE,, 104 B.R. 323 (Bankr. D. Mont. 1989)

. . . Co., 59 F.2d 969 (2nd Cir.1932); 2 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 23.20 (14th Ed.).” . . .

DEUTSCH, v. G. FLANNERY, C. W. Jr. J. G. T. G. M. Jr., 823 F.2d 1361 (9th Cir. 1987)

. . . And last, he added an allegation that Flannery had sold his stock to Union Pacific for $23.20 per share . . .

B. SINGER, v. SHANNON LUCHS COMPANY,, 670 F. Supp. 1024 (D.D.C. 1987)

. . . Landen 23.20 23.20 1 23.20 R. Luchs 5.80 5.80 80 464.00 D. Huddle 1.00 1.00 80 80.00 W. . . .

BLACK DECKER, INC. U. S. v. NORTH AMERICAN PHILIPS CORP., 632 F. Supp. 185 (D. Conn. 1986)

. . . evidence is one of the “evidentiary routes to prove the likelihood of confusion”, McCarthy, supra, at § 23.20 . . . McCarthy, supra, at § 23.20. C. . . .

v., 85 T.C. 754 (T.C. 1985)

. . . Less: Net cost to Paccint (above) (14,195) Gross margin 4.288 Margin on unit sales $4,288/18,483 = 23.20% . . .

In ACTIVE STEEL ERECTORS, INC., 53 B.R. 851 (Bankr. D. Alaska 1985)

. . . Security contributions are treated as a tax by the Department of Labor and that the rate prescribed by AS 23.20 . . .

In HARROW LEASING CORPORATION, LASALLE NATIONAL BANK AS TRUSTEE U A DATED MAY v. HARROW LEASING CORPORATION,, 35 B.R. 916 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1983)

. . . $9,080,306.38 a) penalty rate (1%) 11/1/82 to 11/16/82 on unpaid past due principal of $55,694.70 $ 23.20 . . .

In H. CAMPBELL, U. AND I. INCORPORATED, v. L. D. FITZGERALD,, 13 B.R. 974 (Bankr. D. Idaho 1981)

. . . Collier on Bankruptcy, § 23.20 at 642-645 (* 14th Ed.). . . . Co., 59 F.2d 969 (2d Cir. 1932); 2 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 23.20 (14th Ed.). . . . Bankruptcy ¶ 721.05[1] (15th Ed.); 1 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 2.36 (14th Ed.); 2 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 23.20 . . .

In IBM PERIPHERAL EDP DEVICES ANTITRUST LITIGATION. TRANSAMERICA COMPUTER COMPANY, INC. a v. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, a, 481 F. Supp. 965 (N.D. Cal. 1979)

. . . Section 23.20 (Jewelry Industry) and 16 C.F.R. . . .

a v., 72 T.C. 42 (T.C. 1979)

. . . .$5,569.52 Rent . 1,110.20 Utilities . 24.42 Advertising . 23.20 State Franchise Board application and . . . It spent only $23.20 on advertising in its fiscal year ended August 31, 1976, and its bulletin sells . . .

T. FACKELMAN, v. B. BELL,, 564 F.2d 734 (5th Cir. 1977)

. . . The federal officials also assessed Fackelman a copying fee of $23.20 for the documénts released. . . . Fackelman filed an action pro se to gain access to the undisclosed documents and to seek recovery of the $23.20 . . .

B. ANDERSON v. UNITED STATES v. L. TURNER, Jr., 520 F.2d 1027 (5th Cir. 1975)

. . . Vrooman, 383 F.2d 556 (9th Cir. 1967); 2 Collier, Bankruptcy § 23.20 (14 ed. 1943). . . .

L. MORRIS, v. W. C. CARNATHAN,, 63 F.R.D. 374 (N.D. Miss. 1974)

. . . Carnathan, Defendant April 26, 1973 23.20 Richard Joseph, Carter Dobbs, Delores Bird and Charles Pruett . . . Morris on August 24,1973 $301.95 b) Copy of Defendant’s discovery deposition on April 26, 1973 23.20 . . .

In MERCY- DOUGLASS HOSPITAL, INC., 364 F. Supp. 1066 (E.D. Pa. 1973)

. . . Court without permission of the Bankruptcy Court. 2 Collier on Bankruptcy |f 21.13 [2] at p. 598, fMJ 23.20 . . .

TRANS OCEAN VAN SERVICE v. THE UNITED STATES, 200 Ct. Cl. 122 (Ct. Cl. 1972)

. . . defendant agree that, in lieu of the line-haul charge paid of $487.20 (based on a single-factor rate of $23.20 . . .

Co. v., 64 Cust. Ct. 598 (Cust. Ct. 1970)

. . . . $34.13 $23.20 266339-A 31.60 22.50 266340-A 33.07 22.50 266341-A The Antidumping Act of 1921 provides . . . $19.45 and adds $2.70 for actual packing and $1.05 for inland freight to arrive at the claimed value of $23.20 . . .

W. PREISLER, J. St. St. v. MAYOR OF CITY OF ST. LOUIS, St. MISSOURI,, 303 F. Supp. 1071 (E.D. Mo. 1969)

. . . 28,717 + 7.21 12 11,608 +23.80 20,342 -24.06 13 10,925 +16.52 20,579 -23.17 14 9,891 + 5.49 20,572 -23.20 . . .

LEONARD, v. W. VROOMAN,, 383 F.2d 556 (9th Cir. 1967)

. . . his official capacity and within his authority as an officer of the Court. 2 Collier, Bankruptcy § 23.20 . . . where the state court suit affects the bankrupt estate or its administration, 2 Collier, Bankruptcy § 23.20 . . .

TRANS WORLD AIRLINES, INC. v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD,, 339 F.2d 56 (2d Cir. 1964)

. . . See generally 3 Davis, Administrative Daw §§ 21.01-23.20, especially % 21.07 (1958 & 1963 Pocket Part . . .

UNITED STATES v. S. FAGO,, 162 F. Supp. 125 (W.D.N.Y. 1958)

. . . employer’s quarterly federal tax return for withheld income taxes from its employees in the sum of $23.20 . . . failure to file a tax return for the said fourth quarter of 1951, with withholding taxes amounting to $23.20 . . .

BLACK INDUSTRIES, v. BUSH, 110 F. Supp. 801 (D.N.J. 1953)

. . . upon this the plaintiff accepted a purchase order from Standby Products Company, quoting a price of $23.20 . . .

v., 5 T.C. 1 (T.C. 1945)

. . . the attorneys’ interest to petitioner, the attorneys received 2,320 shares of petitioner’s stock, or 23.20 . . . On brief, the respondent concedes this to be true, and he agrees that 23.20 percent of the land sold . . .

BANKERS SECURITIES CORPORATION v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, 146 F.2d 88 (3d Cir. 1944)

. . . show that its real estate investments in 1940 were 26.19% of its assets; in 1939, 25.96%; in 1938, 23.20% . . .

v., 27 C.C.P.A. 379 (C.C.P.A. 1940)

. . . merchandise follows: Value of Egyptian Cotton put to Process (upon which duty was paid), 175,685 Pounds at 23.20 . . . Separation_ 41, 151. 17 Factory Value of Comber Noils Cost of Noils, 34,139 lbs. at .27170 per pound (Cotton 23.20 . . . Factory Value of Comber Noils__ 8, 088. 17 Factory Value of Card Strips 10,863'lbs. at .24700 (Cotton 23.20 . . .

THORNTON v. CARTER CARTER v. THORNTON, 109 F.2d 316 (8th Cir. 1940)

. . . in court less $123.20, the costs and disbursements of the plaintiff ($100 allowed his attorneys and $23.20 . . . entered the judgment and decree which is appealed from, which provided that the $100 attorneys’ fees and $23.20 . . .

BAKEWELL v. UNITED STATES, 28 F. Supp. 504 (E.D. Mo. 1939)

. . . when the fineness of the gold dollar was changed to .900 thus increasing its pure gold content from 23.20 . . .

NORTHERN PAC. RY. CO. v. BAKER, 3 F. Supp. 1 (W.D. Wash. 1933)

. . . 80, not over 85 miles....................... 22.80 Over 85, not over 90 miles....................... 23.20 . . .

INLAND PUMP MFG. CO. v. UNITED STATES, 59 F.2d 261 (Ct. Cl. 1932)

. . . 45.00 ..........January 15, 1925. 2.50..........February 6, 1925. ' 34.53..........March 26, 1925. ' 23.20 . . .

NEW YORK CENTRAL SECURITIES CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES, 54 F.2d 122 (S.D.N.Y. 1931)

. . . This compares with the average ■dividend payment made for five and six years previously of $5.30 and $23.20 . . .

JESSOPH CO. v. BRIGGS TURIVAS,, 7 F.2d 883 (2d Cir. 1925)

. . . Q., to be delivered “on demand” of defendant, at $23.20 per “net ton of 2,000 pounds for all material . . .

RONEY v. CHASE, TALBOT CO., 161 F. 309 (2d Cir. 1908)

. . . 232 tons net register, and carried 202,791 feet of lumber; that the proper charge for demurrage was $23.20 . . .

ALONZO J. VAN DUZEE v. THE UNITED STATES, 35 Ct. Cl. 214 (Ct. Cl. 1900)

. . . .■„ 23.20 (l) Mandates to jailer for discharge of poor convicts, 169. 16. 90 (m) Applications for seaman . . .

THE CENTRAL PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES, 28 Ct. Cl. 427 (Ct. Cl. 1893)

. . . San Francisco, Oakland and Alameda Railroad Company. 23.20 383.67 The California and Oregon Eailroad . . .

THE CENTEAL PACIFIC RAILEOAD COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES, 24 Ct. Cl. 145 (Ct. Cl. 1889)

. . . San Francisco, Oakland and Alameda Railroad Company. 23.20 383.67 III. . . .