Cases from cite.case.law:

UNITED STATES v. APPLE INC. v. USA, 952 F. Supp. 2d 638 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)

. . . also added two additional price caps at $16.99 and $19.99 for books listed between $30.01-$35 and $35.01 . . .

NICHOLS, v. G. BROWN,, 945 F. Supp. 2d 1079 (C.D. Cal. 2013)

. . . Amended Complaint, challenging the constitutionality of City of Redondo Beach Municipal Code sections 4-35.01 . . . applied” challenge against the Redondo Beach Defendants to City of Redondo Beach Municipal Code section 4-35.01 . . . (FAC at 36); see also Redondo Beach Municipal Code §§ 4-35.01 & 4-35.20, available at http://www.qcode.us . . . Plaintiff seeks declaratory relief finding that City of Redondo Beach Municipal Code sections 4-35.01 . . .

L. BRIDGEFORTH, v. SALAZAR, U. S., 831 F. Supp. 2d 132 (D.D.C. 2011)

. . . Park Police General Order 35.01 requires that officers must be able to perform the full range of police . . . Court has found to be non-retaliatory, plaintiff must show that defendant’s observance of General Order 35.01 . . .

PRESTON, v. CITY OF PLEASANT HILL, 642 F.3d 646 (8th Cir. 2011)

. . . Pleasant Hill, Iowa, Code § 35.01. . . .

KINDLE v. CITY OF JEFFERSONTOWN, KENTUCKY, 374 F. App'x 562 (6th Cir. 2010)

. . . The JCSC was created by ordinance § 35.01 of the City of Jeffersontown, pursuant to Ky.Rev.Stat. § 95.761 . . .

In D. MORGAN, N. W. LLC, v. D., 360 B.R. 507 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2007)

. . . CODE § 35.01 et seq. . . .

UNITED STATES v. HERNANDEZ,, 140 F. App'x 161 (11th Cir. 2005)

. . . the statement of facts supporting his plea agreement, Hernandez admitted that the offense involved 35.01 . . .

In BAYSIDE MARINA, INC. v. LDI, 282 B.R. 285 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 2002)

. . . (Section 35.01(f) of Lease). . . .

F. TAYLOR, v. D. WEST, Jr., 11 Vet. App. 206 (Vet. App. 1998)

. . . Thompson, Cyclopedia of Federal PROCEdure § 35.01 (3d ed.1984); 12 James W. . . .

S. BURKA A. v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 56 F.3d 1509 (D.C. Cir. 1995)

. . . . § 35.01, at 43 in J.A. at 166. . . .

CHAMPION BOXED BEEF COMPANY, v. LOCAL NO. UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION,, 24 F.3d 86 (10th Cir. 1994)

. . . ARTICLE 35 35.01. . . .

PARKE- HAYDEN, INC. v. LOEWS THEATRE MANAGEMENT CORP., 789 F. Supp. 1257 (S.D.N.Y. 1992)

. . . A H 35.01. . . . A, K 35.01. . . .

SOCIETY OF SEPARATIONISTS, INC. v. HERMAN,, 939 F.2d 1207 (5th Cir. 1991)

. . . maximum |100 fine for failure to attend court for impaneling); see also Tex.Code Crim.Proc.Ann. art. 35.01 . . .

STANISLAWSKI, v. UPPER RIVER SERVICES, INC., 134 F.R.D. 260 (D. Minn. 1991)

. . . Defendant argues that courts in Minnesota have authorized vocational examinations pursuant to Minn.R.Civ.P. 35.01 . . . case, however, reveals that the court was persuaded to authorize a vocational examination under Rule 35.01 . . . the vocational examination was a part of the adverse medical examination expressly allowed by Rule 35.01 . . .

In LEE WAY HOLDING COMPANY, M. LUPER, v. BANNER INDUSTRIES, INC., 105 B.R. 404 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 1989)

. . . McIntyre (“McIntyre”) for $1,250.00 leaving Banner with 35.01% of the issued and outstanding CL stock . . .

L. JACOBSEN, d b a RFD v. CRIVARO,, 851 F.2d 1067 (8th Cir. 1988)

. . . provided, however, that newsracks within the sky-walk system are subject to the regulations of section 23-35.01 . . .

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, a v. W. R. GRACE COMPANY,, 691 F. Supp. 87 (N.D. Ill. 1988)

. . . The court gave a modified version of I.P.I. 35.01 requiring that the jury find “Grace ... guilty not . . .

BUCHANAN v. KENTUCKY, 483 U.S. 402 (U.S. 1987)

. . . Milward, Kentucky Criminal Practice §§ 35.01-35.05 (1983). . . .

COURSEN v. A. H. ROBINS COMPANY, INC. a JOHNSON, Jo v. A. H. ROBINS COMPANY, INC. a, 764 F.2d 1329 (9th Cir. 1985)

. . . Corp., 274 Or. 343, 351-52, 546 P.2d 1065, 1071 (1976) (same); Oregon Uniform Civil Jury Instruction 35.01 . . .

G. BENDER, Jr. G. Sr. v. CITY OF ROCHESTER, NEW YORK,, 765 F.2d 7 (2d Cir. 1985)

. . . See 5A Warren’s Weed on the New York Law of Real Property, Title Examination § 35.01 (4th ed. 1984). . . .

MURPHY, v. CITY OF FLAGLER BEACH, H. MURPHY, v. FLAGLER BEACH,, 761 F.2d 622 (11th Cir. 1985)

. . . . §§ 35.01 et seq. (1981). . . .

TRANS CARIBBEAN LINES, INC. Et Al. v. TRACOR MARINE, INC. Et Al. s Co., 748 F.2d 568 (11th Cir. 1984)

. . . . §§ 35.01, et seq. (1983). In Travelers Ins. Co. v. C.J. . . .

HOLIDAY VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER, a By T. MITCHELL, v. UNITED STATES, 5 Cl. Ct. 566 (Cl. Ct. 1984)

. . . Mertens, Law of Federal Income Taxation § 35.01 (1968); S. Surrey & W. . . .

In ERTZ, d b a f d b a J L GREGOR, v. ERTZ, d b a f d b a J L, 28 B.R. 1020 (D.S.D. 1983)

. . . South Dakota Pattern Jury Instruction: Civil 35.01 (1968). . . .

J. DONOVAN, v. TONY AND SUSAN ALAMO FOUNDATION,, 567 F. Supp. 556 (W.D. Ark. 1982)

. . . 84.12 84.27 87.97 88.68 MEDICAL 6.27 13.18 8.69 8.20 8.56 11.37 UTILITIES 22.89 21.26 20.88 22.47 29.81 35.01 . . .

DUPLANTIS, v. ZIGLER SHIPYARDS, INC., 692 F.2d 372 (5th Cir. 1982)

. . . . § 35.01-1 (1981) provides that, before any welding can be performed on tanks that previously contained . . . Id. § 35.01-l(c), (d). . . .

MAGEE, v. BAYOU TECHE, S., 548 F. Supp. 270 (E.D. La. 1982)

. . . The provisions of 46 C.F.R. 35.01 and 91.50-1, which are Coast Guard regulations, state that whenever . . .

L L OIL COMPANY, INC. v. MURPHY OIL CORPORATION,, 674 F.2d 1113 (5th Cir. 1982)

. . . See 5 vonKalinowski, supra at § 35.01 .06. . . . .

P. GODDARD, v. BABBITT, J., 536 F. Supp. 538 (D. Ariz. 1982)

. . . Census tract 35.01, blocks 201 through 209, 301 through 303, 401 through 409, 501 through 505, 601 through . . . Census tract 35.01, blocks 101 through 114. . . . Census tract 35.01, blocks 806, 807 and 903 through 906. . . . Census tracts 28, 29.01, 29.03, 29.04, 30.01, 30.02, 31.01, 31.02, 32, 33.01, 33.02, 34, 35.01, 35.02 . . .

SHAYER, v. C. KIRKPATRICK, St. C. Jr. St. M. O H. OVERSCHMIDT, v. C. KIRKPATRICK, MISSOURI STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, INC. St. NAACP, St. NAACP, NAACP, NAACP, NAACP, NAACP, NAACP, NAACP, St. NAACP, v. BOND, C. MISSOURI STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, INC. NAACP, St. NAACP, NAACP, NAACP, NAACP, NAACP, NAACP, NAACP, Dr. Mr. L. v. BOND, C., 541 F. Supp. 922 (W.D. Mo. 1982)

. . . Census Tract 31 175 Census Tract 32 1,059 Census Tract 33 1,543 Census Tract 34 3,956 Census Tract 35.01 . . .

A. FERNANDEZ v. VAZQUEZ d b a, 397 So. 2d 1171 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . Boyer, 2 Florida Real Estate Transactions, §§ 35.01-02 (1980); Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant . . .

O. JACKSON L. v. FLETCHER, a a, 647 F.2d 1020 (10th Cir. 1981)

. . . The next one to be considered is Oklahoma City ordinance § 34-35.01, which reads: Notwithstanding the . . . We have indicated disapproval of the instruction based upon § 34-35.01 of the Oklahoma City Ordinances . . .

ARREDONDO v. M. L. BROCKETTE,, 482 F. Supp. 212 (S.D. Tex. 1979)

. . . . § 35.01(2) (Vernon 1975). 36. . . .

JANMORT LEASING, INC. C. v. ECONO- CAR INTERNATIONAL, INC., 475 F. Supp. 1282 (E.D.N.Y. 1979)

. . . accounts indicate that on September 16, 1977, Janmort’s indebtedness for its New York operations was only $35.01 . . .

H. SHERROD, Jr. v. PIEDMONT AVIATION, INC., 516 F. Supp. 46 (E.D. Tenn. 1978)

. . . Illinois Pattern Jury Instructions 35.01. . . .

BOSSARD, v. EXXON CORPORATION,, 559 F.2d 1040 (5th Cir. 1977)

. . . The Coast Guard regulations, 46 C.F.R. 35.01-1 (1976), pertain to precautions taken when riveting or . . .

v. v., 67 T.C. 167 (T.C. 1976)

. . . Stelly. 35.01 0 Total. 1,374.25 Beverage Sales — 1972 J. . . .

ALLIED TOWING CORPORATION, TANKBARGE ATC, 409 F. Supp. 180 (E.D. Va. 1976)

. . . Gas Certificate Requirement 46 C.F.R. 35.01-1 (1975) provides in pertinent part: “(a) The provisions . . .

UNITED STATES v. BASYE, 410 U.S. 441 (U.S. 1973)

. . . Mertens, Law of Federal Income Taxation §§ 35.01, 35.22 (1968); A. . . . Mertens, Law of Federal Income Taxation § 35.01 (1968); S. Surrey & W. . . .

In MARINE LEASING SERVICES, INC., 328 F. Supp. 589 (E.D. La. 1971)

. . . used in September of 1965, did not constitute negligence. (5) The Government contends that Section 35.01 . . . for ready reference and use by the person in charge, and the Government further contends that Section 35.01 . . .

C. GUILLOT, v. CENAC TOWING COMPANY, BARGE MURRAY MAC,, 366 F.2d 898 (5th Cir. 1966)

. . . . § 35.01-1. . . .

A. DECKER, d b a v. UNITED STATES, 244 F. Supp. 31 (N.D. Iowa 1965)

. . . Rabkin & Johnson, Federal Income Gift and Estate Taxation, treats this subject in Volume 3, Section 35.01 . . .

B. CURTIS, L. a GRAND, Jr. a, 240 F. Supp. 475 (E.D. Mo. 1965)

. . . the restraining order. (7) Sections 476.110 to 476.140 RSMo 1959, V.A.M.S., and Supreme Court Rules 35.01 . . . Issue (7) Sections 476.110 to 476.140 V.A.M.S. and Supreme Court Rules 35.01, V.A.M.R. and 92.15, V.A.M.R . . . On September 11, separate notices of contempt, meeting the requirements of Rule 35.01, were filed and . . . Supreme Court Rule 35.01, V.A.M.R. outlines procedure for criminal contempt. . 92.15, V.A.M.R. outlines . . .

Ex FORD, v. BOEGER, St., 236 F. Supp. 831 (E.D. Mo. 1964)

. . . Procedure, has set up a procedure for criminal contempt committed out of the presence of the court in Rule 35.01 . . . Under Mo.R.Cr.P., 35.01(b), the contempt is to be desei'ibed as criminal contempt. . . . for criminal contempt under the due process requirement laid down in In re Oliver, supra, Mo.R.Cr.P. 35.01 . . . Once it is found that the petitioners had sufficient notice under Rule 35.01(b), the fact that in the . . .

J. CELEBREZZE, v. B. KILBORN,, 322 F.2d 166 (5th Cir. 1963)

. . . Mertens, Law of Federal Income Taxation § 35.01. . . .

L. SCHLAGENHAUF, v. J. HOLDER,, 321 F.2d 43 (7th Cir. 1963)

. . . Moore Federal Practice ¶ 35.01, at 2552 (Supp.1962). . . .

GLOBIG, Jr. v. GREENE GUST CO. a Co. a ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY, a, 201 F. Supp. 945 (E.D. Wis. 1962)

. . . See Industrial Commission Order No. 35.01. . . .

ADLER v. NICHOLAS,, 166 F.2d 674 (10th Cir. 1948)

. . . See also Mertens Law of Federal Income Taxation, Volume 6, Paragraph 35.01. . . .

CHESAPEAKE POTOMAC TELEPHONE CO. OF BALTIMORE CITY v. WEST, 7 F. Supp. 214 (D. Md. 1934)

. . . capital additions to the telephone property from 1924 to 1932, inclusive, was 64.99% for material and 35.01% . . .

TRAPP v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INS. CO., 70 F.2d 976 (8th Cir. 1934)

. . . were policy loans amounting, with interest, to $864.99, leaving a net cash value or net reserve of $35.01 . . .

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)