The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH

Chapter 35
DISTRICT COURTS OF APPEAL

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 35.03

35.03 Second Appellate District.—The Second Appellate District is composed of the Sixth, Twelfth, and Thirteenth Judicial Circuits.

History.—s. 1, ch. 57-248; s. 1, ch. 65-294; s. 1, ch. 79-413; s. 6, ch. 2022-163.

F.S. 35.03 on Google Scholar

F.S. 35.03 on Casetext

Amendments to 35.03

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 35.03

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 35.03.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

HEKMATI, v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN,, 278 F. Supp. 3d 145 (D.D.C. 2017)

. . . calculates that Hekmati’s worklife expectancy after earning a Master’s degree would have been another 35.03 . . .

O. B. a v. F. NORWOOD,, 170 F. Supp. 3d 1186 (N.D. Ill. 2016)

. . . relies heavily on Plaintiffs’ allegations that the in-home nursing services they receive rate only $35.03 . . .

DUNN, C. ALBERY, d b a Of v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 724 F. Supp. 2d 701 (E.D. Mich. 2010)

. . . Here, the Court supplemented Michigan Standard Civil Jury Instruction 35.03 with the following language . . . entitled to a new trial because the language supplementing Michigan Standard Civil Jury Instruction 35.03 . . .

PRYOR, v. DIRECTOR, TDCJ- CID, 643 F. Supp. 2d 861 (E.D. Tex. 2009)

. . . Texas procedures by which juries are qualified, excused, or exempted from service” and because “article 35.03 . . .

BURKE v. UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY AND LOCAL v., 462 F.3d 1253 (10th Cir. 2006)

. . . Peter Lareau, Labor and Employment Law § 35.03[4] (2006); see NLRB v. Catalytic Indus. Maint. . . .

In BAYCOL PRODUCTS LITIGATION, 219 F.R.D. 468 (D. Minn. 2003)

. . . P. 35.03, and limited by Minn. R. Civ. P. 35.04. . . . physician-patient privilege waiver rules exist for the following reasons: The policy underlying Rule 35.03 . . . obtaining access to the medical testimony to which the patient has waived his privilege as required by Rule 35.03 . . .

UNITED STATES v. BROWN,, 316 F.3d 1151 (10th Cir. 2003)

. . . . § 35.03[2] (2d ed.1987)). . . .

LUCAS, v. W. MOORE,, 798 So. 2d 41 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . Compare § 35.03, Fla. Stat. (2000), with § 35.042, Fla. Stat. (2000); see also Univ. Fed. . . .

GOVERNMENT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS, v. MARTINEZ,, 239 F.3d 293 (3d Cir. 2001)

. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 35.03[2] (2d ed. 1987). . . . .

In BEVERAGE CANNERS INTERNATIONAL CORP., 255 B.R. 89 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2000)

. . . ); In re Yates Development, Inc., 241 B.R. 247, 252-53 (Bankr.M.D.Fla.1999); Collier on Bankruptcy ¶35.03 . . .

McGINNIS, v. L. JOHNSON,, 181 F.3d 686 (5th Cir. 1999)

. . . P.Code, art. 35.03. . . . The only evidence McGinnis presents concerning the effect of article 35.03 involves his own venire. . . . only sixteen out of the thirty non-African-American venirepersons who sought excu-sal under article 35.03 . . . We.have found no cases that apply the Du-ren test to an excusal provision such as article 35.03. . . . These statistics contain no information on the number of venirepersons excused pursuant to article 35.03 . . .

ESTATE OF M. BRATTON, M. v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE CO., 24 F. Supp. 2d 667 (N.D. Miss. 1998)

. . . At a minimum, Larry Bratton paid a monthly sum of $35.03 for additional insurance at the time of his . . .

In PENKING TRUST d b a N. ROBERTS, Jr. v. SULLIVAN COUNTY, TENNESSEE E., 196 B.R. 389 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1996)

. . . A refund of $35.03 for overpayment of this tax was sent to the Trustee on October 21, 1994. Mr. . . .

UNITED STATES v. F. ANGIULO, UNITED STATES v. F. ANGIULO,, 57 F.3d 38 (1st Cir. 1995)

. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 35.03[2], at 35-36 (2d ed. 1987)). . . . .

W. EGNER, v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, 633 So. 2d 1157 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . See §§ 26.021(6) and 35.03, Fla.Stat. (1993). . . .

GOBUTY v. F. KAVANAGH, M. D. St. s ST. MARY S HOSPITAL, v. GOBUTY,, 795 F. Supp. 281 (D. Minn. 1992)

. . . Pursuant to Minn.R.Civ.P. 35.03, which provides for a waiver of the medical privilege when a party places . . .

K. K. P. A v. STATE, 580 So. 2d 307 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . . § 35.03, Fla.Stat. (1989). . . .

FILZ v. MAYO FOUNDATION, 136 F.R.D. 165 (D. Minn. 1991)

. . . Co., 819 F.2d 1471, 1477 (8th Cir.1987) (holding that Minnesota Rule of Civil Procedure 35.03 merely . . . Minnesota Rule of Civil Procedure 35.03 further provides that; If at any stage of an action a party voluntarily . . . The Eighth Circuit recently discussed the history of Minnesota Rule of Civil Procedure 35.03 in Cerro . . . The court noted that Rule 35.03 was established to eliminate abuse of the physician-patient privilege . . . Rule 35.03 was promulgated a decade after the Nelson case. . . .

CABALLERO, v. V. ANSELMO M., 759 F. Supp. 144 (S.D.N.Y. 1991)

. . . . § 35.03; Shields v. Gross, 58 N.Y.2d 338, 448 N.E.2d 108, 461 N.Y.S.2d 254 (1983). . . .

UNITED STATES v. KATZIN, a k a, 824 F.2d 234 (3d Cir. 1987)

. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice U 35.03[2], at 35-36 (2d ed. 1987)). . . .

CERRO GORDO CHARITY, v. FIREMAN S FUND AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Co. V. J. RICHARDS CERRO GORDO CHARITY, v. NORTH AMERICAN LIFE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Co. V. J. RICHARDS, 819 F.2d 1471 (8th Cir. 1987)

. . . Although we agree that Richards did not in the present lawsuit waive the privilege under Rule 35.03 or . . . Cerro Gordo admits that privileged information can be introduced into evidence under either Rule 35.03 . . . We conclude that Rule 35.03 was not intended to be a limitation on the instances in which a waiver of . . . Prior to the adoption of Rule 35.03, the law in Minnesota had been firmly established that the bringing . . . Rule 35.03 was promulgated a decade after Nelson v. Ackermann was decided. . . .

UNITED STATES v. DOBY, 652 F. Supp. 335 (N.D. Ind. 1987)

. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 35.03[2] at 35-37 (2d ed. 1986); 3 C. . . .

MECHMET, v. FOUR SEASONS HOTELS, LIMITED, a a d b a, 639 F. Supp. 330 (N.D. Ill. 1986)

. . . 13.90 14.40 14.90 Lunch or Breakfast 3 9.73 10.03 10.41 10.78 11.16 Cashiers & Food Checkers 8 $33.43 $35.03 . . .

CERRO GORDO CHARITY, v. FIREMAN S FUND INSURANCE CO. CERRO GORDO CHARITY, v. NORTH AMERICAN LIFE AND CASUALTY CO., 623 F. Supp. 877 (D. Minn. 1985)

. . . To ensure that the medical privilege exists as a shield and not a sword, Minn.R.Civ.P. 35.03 provides . . . The language of Rule 35.03 and subsequent case law indicate that when a waiver of medical privilege occurs . . . limited testimony previously taken in a public proceeding after a waiver of privilege under Minn.R.Civ.P. 35.03 . . .

CORALLUZZO, a By CORALLUZZO, v. FASS, M. D. M. D. s M. D. M. D. M. D. M. D. M. D. d b a a, 435 So. 2d 262 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . However, the rationale of that holding is particularly pertinent here: “The policy underlying Rule 35.03 . . .

P. GODDARD, v. BABBITT, J., 536 F. Supp. 538 (D. Ariz. 1982)

. . . Census tracts 35.02, 35.03, 35.04, 36, 40.01, 40.04, 40.08, 40.09, 40.10, 40.11 and 40.-14. . . . Census tracts 28, 29.01, 29.03, 29.04, 30.01, 30.02, 31.01, 31.02, 32, 33.01, 33.02, 34, 35.01, 35.02, 35.03 . . .

UNITED STATES v. CONNOLLY,, 618 F.2d 553 (9th Cir. 1980)

. . . would run concurrently one with the other. . . . ” . 8A Moore’s Federal Practice, paragraphs 35.02 and 35.03 . . .

AMERICAN SECURITY COUNCIL EDUCATION FOUNDATION, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION CBS, 607 F.2d 438 (D.C. Cir. 1979)

. . . Sentences Words Number Percent Number Percent Viewpoint A 79 3.54 1,672 3.73 Viewpoint B 774 34.63 15,690 35.03 . . .

CENTURY VILLAGE, INC. v. WELLINGTON, E, F, K, L, H, J, M, AND G CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATIONS,, 370 So. 2d 1244 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . See Boyer, Vol. 2 Florida Real Estate Transactions, 1977 Ed., § 35.03(3), p. 1215; 49 Am.Jur.2d Landlord . . .

GORDON, v. W. DAVIS,, 267 So. 2d 874 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

. . . .-1, and Moore’s Federal Practice, 2nd Ed., Vol.4A, § 35.03(4). . . .

UNITED STATES v. LOCAL INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN AND HELPERS OF AMERICA, 328 F. Supp. 1359 (S.D.N.Y. 1971)

. . . United States, 147 F.2d 372, 374 (2d Cir. 1945) 8 Moore’s Federal Practice — Cipes, Criminal Rules § 35.03 . . .

ADAMS, v. UNITED STATES, 328 F. Supp. 228 (D. Neb. 1971)

. . . have been found indicative of the existence of a partnership are set forth in Volume 6 of Mertens, § 35.03 . . .

UNITED STATES v. BARASH,, 428 F.2d 328 (2d Cir. 1970)

. . . Moore, Federal Practice tf 35.03 [1] (1969). . . .

I. KELLER, v. ORION INSURANCE COMPANY, LIMITED OF LONDON, ENGLAND,, 285 F. Supp. 906 (D. Minn. 1968)

. . . Dry Corp., 283 F.Supp. 861 (D.C.Minn., 1968), that the “waiver of privilege” provision found in rule 35.03 . . . Minn.R.Civ.P. 35.03 provides: “If at any stage of an action a party voluntarily places in controversy . . .

J. LIND, v. CANADA DRY CORPORATION, a, 283 F. Supp. 861 (D. Minn. 1968)

. . . Defendant contends that under the recently amended Minnesota Rules of Civil Proeeure, specifically rule 35.03 . . . the question of medical privilege afforded under Minnesota law, the newly promulgated Minn.R.Civ.P. 35.03 . . . D.Md.1967), the court applied a Maryland waiver of privilege statute similar to the new Minnesota rule 35.03 . . . This court takes amendment 35.03 at its face, however, and rejects this argument. . . .

MATHER CO. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 171 F.2d 864 (3d Cir. 1949)

. . . liabilities was represented by 1850 shares of preferred stock, of which Charles was given 648 shares (35.03% . . .

WILSON v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 161 F.2d 661 (7th Cir. 1947)

. . . Income Taxation, Secs. 18.04, 35.03. . . .

W. M. v., 5 T.C. 743 (T.C. 1945)

. . . See vol. 6, sec. 35.03, Mertens Law of Federal Income Taxation. Cf. Montgomery v. . . .

W. v. v., 5 T.C. 732 (T.C. 1945)

. . . See vol. 6, sec. 35.03, Mertens Law of Federal Income Taxation. Cf. Montgomery v. . . .

v. v., 5 T.C. 94 (T.C. 1945)

. . . See Mer-tens Law of Federal Income Taxation, sec. 35.03. . . .

P. v. S. v., 5 T.C. 39 (T.C. 1945)

. . . See section 35.03, Mertens Law of Federal Income Taxation. . . .

THE GARFIELD NO. THE GLORIA WEST. THE VERONA, 36 F.2d 501 (W.D. Wash. 1929)

. . . against tbe Verona for $288.65 with interest from July 14,1927, for work ending May 14, 1927, and $35.03 . . .