Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 35.06 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 35.06 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 35.06

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH
Chapter 35
DISTRICT COURTS OF APPEAL
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 35.06
35.06 Organization of district courts of appeal.A district court of appeal shall be organized in each of the six appellate districts to be named District Court of Appeal,   District. The number of judges of each district court of appeal shall be as follows:
(1) In the first district there shall be 13 judges.
(2) In the second district there shall be 15 judges.
(3) In the third district there shall be 10 judges.
(4) In the fourth district there shall be 12 judges.
(5) In the fifth district there shall be 12 judges.
(6) In the sixth district there shall be 9 judges.
History.s. 1, ch. 57-248; s. 1, ch. 65-294; s. 1, ch. 67-11; s. 9, ch. 71-355; s. 3, ch. 76-175; s. 3, ch. 77-368; s. 3, ch. 79-312; s. 3, ch. 79-413; s. 4, ch. 80-164; s. 4, ch. 81-220; s. 4, ch. 82-238; s. 1, ch. 88-167; ss. 3, 10, ch. 89-290; s. 3, ch. 93-63; s. 5, ch. 99-151; s. 13, ch. 99-355; s. 12, ch. 2008-111; s. 1, ch. 2014-58; s. 10, ch. 2022-163.

F.S. 35.06 on Google Scholar

F.S. 35.06 on Casetext

Amendments to 35.06


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 35.06
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 35.06.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

JIANGSU SENMAO BAMBOO AND WOOD INDUSTRY CO. LTD. Co. v. UNITED STATES,, 322 F. Supp. 3d 1308 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2018)

. . . EN 35.06. . . . (heading 35.06 ). EN Chapter 39, exclusion (b). . . . See EN 35.06. . . . By the terms of HS heading 35.06, the two headings are mutually exclusive. . . . See HS heading 35.06 ("Prepared glues and other prepared adhesives, not elsewhere specified or included . . .

LE, D. Le, RJK, v. REGENCY CORPORATION d b a J., 957 F. Supp. 2d 1079 (D. Minn. 2013)

. . . Le reported and was compensated for 4.36 hours of overtime, Geiger reported and was compensated for 35.06 . . .

KINDLE v. CITY OF JEFFERSONTOWN, KENTUCKY, 374 F. App'x 562 (6th Cir. 2010)

. . . According to § 35.06, Plaintiffs are employees who are “classified within and subject to the Civil Service . . .

P. SLATTERY, Jr. v. UNITED STATES,, 69 Fed. Cl. 573 (Fed. Cl. 2006)

. . . Fin-nerty multiplied the shares outstanding (35.06 million) by the adjusted stock price ($5.62) to arrive . . .

M. A. v., 124 T.C. 80 (T.C. 2005)

. . . petitioners are entitled to recover $95.06 in litigation costs consisting of the $60 Court filing fee and $35.06 . . . that petitioners are entitled to an award of litigation costs of $60 for the Court filing fee and $35.06 . . . report for revised expense to Court 9.60 9/28/04 Postage Court for reply brief to 4.42 Total 179.01 35.06 . . . We award petitioners a total of $52.51 for postage and delivery costs, which includes the $35.06 respondent . . . iii)) is inconsistent with respondent’s concession herein that petitioners are entitled to recover $35.06 . . .

UNITED STATES v. J. CORBITT,, 13 F.3d 207 (7th Cir. 1993)

. . . United States, 368 U.S. 424, 430, 82 S.Ct. 468, 472, 7 L.Ed.2d 417 (1962); 8A Moore's Federal Practice ¶ 35.06 . . .

UNITED STATES v. SMITH, 698 F. Supp. 589 (E.D. Pa. 1988)

. . . 446, 459 (7th Cir.1982); see generally Devitt and Blackmar, Federal Jury Practice and Instructions, § 35.06 . . .

L. v., 90 T.C. 1154 (T.C. 1988)

. . . 1984 1985 Colorado $35.69 $31.56 $28.92 $28.09 $25.64 Louisiana 35.45 32.44 30.02 29.67 27.24 Texas 35.06 . . .

In ADVISORY OPINION TO GOVERNOR REQUEST OF JUNE, 374 So. 2d 959 (Fla. 1979)

. . . Additionally, in chapter 79-312, section 3, the legislature amended section 35.06(1), Florida Statutes . . .

CUNNINGHAM, v. W. J. ESTELLE, Jr., 536 F.2d 82 (5th Cir. 1976)

. . . C.C.P. arts. 35.06, 35.07 (1966), under the reasoning of Francis and under the settled law of this circuit . . .

A. WETZEL, v. GULF OIL CORPORATION, a, 455 F.2d 857 (9th Cir. 1972)

. . . He withheld payment of $35.06, of which 50 cents represented the charge for the allegedly defective brake . . .

DZIWANOSKI v. OCEAN CARRIERS CORPORATION, a a a v. NACIREMA OPERATING COMPANY,, 26 F.R.D. 595 (D. Md. 1960)

. . . physician under Rule 35 is an officer of the court is also expressed in 4 Moore, Federal Practice, see. 35.06 . . .

MAGNUS, v. UNITED STATES, 234 F.2d 673 (7th Cir. 1956)

. . . . § 35.06(f) (1) (1939 ed.). . . .

GILLIG v. BYMART- TINTAIR,, 16 F.R.D. 393 (S.D.N.Y. 1954)

. . . Co., D.C.N.D.Ohio 1951, 11 F.R.D. 496; Moore’s Federal Practice, Sec. 35.06. . . .

DUMAS v. PENNSYLVANIA R. CO., 11 F.R.D. 496 (N.D. Ohio 1951)

. . . See Moore’s Federal Practice, 2d Edition, Section 35.06, and the cases there cited. . . .

ISAAC S. LYON v. THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 19 Ct. Cl. 649 (Ct. Cl. 1884)

. . . in front of sq. 900. lot 27, assessed to ManuelMason, amounting to thirty-five and T-®-y dollars ($35.06 . . .