Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 35.08 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 35.08 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 35.08

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH
Chapter 35
DISTRICT COURTS OF APPEAL
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 35.08
35.08 Power to execute its judgments.Each district court of appeal is vested with all the power and authority necessary for carrying into complete execution all of its judgments, decrees, orders, and determinations in the matters before it agreeable to the usage and principles of law.
History.s. 1, ch. 57-248.

F.S. 35.08 on Google Scholar

F.S. 35.08 on Casetext

Amendments to 35.08


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 35.08
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 35.08.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

ELDER, v. STATE, 268 So. 3d 995 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . ." § 35.08, Fla. Stat. (2018). Accordingly, the motion to enforce mandate is granted. . . .

FLORIDA DIGESTIVE HEALTH SPECIALISTS, LLP, a E. M. D. LLC, v. E. COLINA, M. D. a, 202 So. 3d 94 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . .” § 35.08, Fla. . . .

TRUST CHEM COMPANY LIMITED, v. UNITED STATES,, 791 F. Supp. 2d 1257 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2011)

. . . value based on nitric acid data from the Indian Department of Commerce’s Export Import Data Bank of 35.08 . . .

PRESTON, v. CITY OF PLEASANT HILL, 642 F.3d 646 (8th Cir. 2011)

. . . .” § 35.08(1) — (2). . . .

In SCIENTIFIC ATLANTA, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION, 754 F. Supp. 2d 1339 (N.D. Ga. 2010)

. . . As a result of these announcements, the price of S-A common stock plummeted, dropping from $35.08 per . . .

SOUTH FLORIDA EXPRESS BANKSERV, INC. v. APONTE,, 44 So. 3d 651 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . Section 35.08, Florida Statutes, gives district courts of appeal the power to execute their judgments . . .

PENA, v., 397 B.R. 566 (B.A.P. 1st Cir. 2008)

. . . 3, 1996, note was 35.71%; the October 10, 1996, note was 35.27%; and the November 30,1999, note was 35.08% . . .

In HOROB LIVESTOCK INC. In K. V. v. L. M. G., 382 B.R. 459 (Bankr. D. Mont. 2007)

. . . Section 19: Lots 1(34.99), 2(35.04), 3(35.08), 4(35.13), SE14 NW14, M SW)4 Township 15k North, Range . . .

In SCIENTIFIC- ATLANTA, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION, 571 F. Supp. 2d 1315 (N.D. Ga. 2007)

. . . The next day, the price of SA stock fell over 35%, from its July 19, 2001 close of $35.08 per share to . . .

FORMOR, v. STATE, 923 So. 2d 563 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . .” § 35.08, Fla. Stat. (2004). . . .

In Re SCIENTIFIC- ATLANTA, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION, 239 F. Supp. 2d 1351 (N.D. Ga. 2002)

. . . As a result of the announcement, the price of S-A common stock plummeted, dropping from $35.08 per share . . .

AmSOUTH BANK, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE, 774 So. 2d 747 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . Financial statements in the bank’s records showed that Vaughn owned only 35.08% of DICO shares. . . .

DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, v. TAMPA CROWN DISTRIBUTORS, INCORPORATED, In In In, 745 So. 2d 418 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . from and entering judgment for appellant where the trial court was reluctant to do so); see also § 35.08 . . .

K. STRALEY, v. FRANK,, 650 So. 2d 628 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . .; § 35.08, Fla.Stat. (1993); Fla.R.App.P. 9.300 & 9.400(c). . . .

UNITED STATES v. RODRIGUEZ,, 841 F. Supp. 79 (E.D.N.Y. 1994)

. . . See 1A Leonard Sand, et al., Modem Federal Jury Instmctions ¶ 35.08, Comment to Instruction 35-55 (1993 . . .

DACON BOLINGBROOK ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION,, 155 B.R. 467 (N.D. Ill. 1993)

. . . For a brief explanation of each, see 8 Theodore Eisenberg, Debtor-Creditor Law (“Eisenberg”) ¶ 35.08[ . . . it is unimpaired and will be paid in full does not suffice to achieve confirmation" (8 Eisenberg ¶ 35.08 . . .

S. C. BLUMBERG, v. J. JACOB,, 624 F. Supp. 669 (S.D. Ohio 1985)

. . . costs; (3) The law firm of Kohn, Milstein, Cohen & Hansfeld shall receive $200 in attorneys’ fees and $35.08 . . .

P. J. v., 70 T.C. 637 (T.C. 1978)

. . . Mertens, Law of Federal Income Taxation, sec. 35.08 (1975 rev.). . . .

A. WACKERLI v. C. B. MORTON, 390 F. Supp. 962 (D. Idaho 1975)

. . . said Block 67; thence Northerly along the West line of Lots 7 and 8 of said Block 67, a distance of 35.08 . . .

JOHN McSHAIN, INC. v. THE UNITED STATES, 188 Ct. Cl. 830 (Ct. Cl. 1969)

. . . performed its contract eight months earlier, it would have bad lower payroll expenses (after adjustment of 35.08 . . .

ATLANTIC STATES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, v. ROBERT E. LEE CO. INC. OF SOUTH CAROLINA, M., 406 F.2d 827 (4th Cir. 1969)

. . . The error amounted to $35.08 for which the district court gave credit in its order. . . . We agree with the district court that a $35.08 mistake in the accounts of a $239,060 job does not justify . . .

S. KING S. v. L L INVESTORS, INC. a, 136 So. 2d 671 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1962)

. . . And § 35.08 Fla.Stat., F.S.A., provides: “Bach district court of appeal is vested with all the power . . .

J. SULLIVAN, C. T. A E. v. CHASE FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, a M., 132 So. 2d 343 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1961)

. . . by the trial court under section 59.34, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., or otherwise-as authorized under section 35.08 . . .

J. SULLIVAN, C. T. A. E. v. CHASE FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, a M., 132 So. 2d 341 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1961)

. . . by the trial court under section 59.34, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., or otherwise as authorized under section 35.08 . . .

T. VERMEULEN P. A. CARRIER, v. T. VERMEULEN, 122 So. 2d 318 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1960)

. . . Sec. 35.08, F.S.A. . . .

In CHAKMAKIS. PEARSON, v. CHAKMAKIS, 116 So. 2d 256 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1959)

. . . been given by the trial court, under § 59.34, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., or otherwise as authorized under § 35.08 . . .

In KALB. KALB v. YELLOW MFG. ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, 127 F.2d 511 (7th Cir. 1942)

. . . The monthly payments were to be $35.08, and the June and July, 1941, payments had not been made at the . . .

TRUST CO. OF AMERICA v. CHICAGO, P. ST. L. RY. CO. OF ILLINOIS RAMSEY v. STEAD,, 199 F. 593 (S.D. Ill. 1912)

. . . Train .supplies and expenses ................B 20,969.65 13,614.41 7,355.24 35.08 Totals $346.880.47 . . .