Cases from cite.case.law:

R. PINE, v. SUPERINTENDENT, GREEN HAVEN CORRECTIONAL FACILITY,, 103 F. Supp. 3d 263 (N.D.N.Y. 2015)

. . . court did not err in refusing to charge the jury as to a justification defense pursuant to Penal Law § 35.20 . . .

MONTANEZ, v. SIMON,, 755 F.3d 547 (7th Cir. 2014)

. . . their opening brief to claims of error in the calculation of printing costs, amounting to at most $35.20 . . .

NICHOLS, v. D. HARRIS,, 17 F. Supp. 3d 989 (C.D. Cal. 2014)

. . . Defendant that Plaintiff's misdemeanor conviction for violation of Redondo Beach Municipal Section 4-35.20 . . .

NICHOLS, v. G. BROWN,, 945 F. Supp. 2d 1079 (C.D. Cal. 2013)

. . . (“section 4-35.20”). . . . Plaintiff contends that section 4-35.20 violates his Second Amendment rights and is preempted by state . . . Claim One challenges the constitutionality of Municipal Code section 4-35.20, which prohibits, inter . . . A declaration by this Court that section 4-35.20 violates the Second Amendment would “interfere” with . . . Redondo Beach Municipal Code § 4r-35.20, available at http://www. qcode.us/codes/redondobeach/. . . .

ASYLUM COMPANY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SERVICES,, 10 A.3d 619 (D.C. Cir. 2010)

. . . Larson, Workers’ Compensation, § 35.20 (1997)). . . .

PETRONIO, v. WALSH,, 736 F. Supp. 2d 640 (E.D.N.Y. 2010)

. . . Penal Law § 35.20, relating to the right to use deadly force to terminate a burglary. . . . the trial Court should have instructed the jury to consider a justification defense under Penal Law § 35.20 . . . Penal Law § 35.20(3), denied him of due process; and (6) he received ineffective assistance of counsel . . .

UNITED STATES v. SONG JA CHA In, 597 F.3d 995 (9th Cir. 2010)

. . . See Guam Code Ann. tit. 8, § 35.20(c). . . .

BEYE, v. HORIZON BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF NEW JERSEY, v., 568 F. Supp. 2d 556 (D.N.J. 2008)

. . . 4.20 (HMOs), 17:48-6v (Hospital Service Corporations), 17:48-7u (Medical Service Corporations), 17:48E-35.20 . . . 4.20 (HMOs), 17:48-6v (Hospital Service Corporations), 17:48-7u (Medical Service Corporations), 17:48E-35.20 . . .

ROBERTS, v. MAHONING COUNTY, v., 495 F. Supp. 2d 719 (N.D. Ohio 2007)

. . . Provider shall make cost containment information available to the Mahoning County Health Administrator. 35.20 . . .

JOHNSON, v. CITY OF DETROIT, 446 F.3d 614 (6th Cir. 2006)

. . . . §§ 35.20 & 35.24. . . . .

JACKSON, v. EDWARDS,, 404 F.3d 612 (2d Cir. 2005)

. . . Penal Law §§ 35.15(2)(b); 35.15(2)(c); 35.20(3)). . . . New York Penal Law § 35.20 provides, in relevant part: 3. . . . Penal Law § 35.20 (McKinney 1997). . . . Penal Law §§ 35.15(2)(b), 35.20(3). . . . Penal Law §§ 35.15(2)(c), 35.20(3); N.Y. . . .

JOHNSON, v. CITY OF DETROIT, 319 F. Supp. 2d 756 (E.D. Mich. 2004)

. . . . § 35 state: 35.20 Purpose and scope. . . . See. e.g., 24 CFR 570.680(b) (Community Development Block Grants). 24 C.F.R. §§ 35.20, 35.24, 35.5 (1992 . . .

JACKSON A- v. EDWARDS,, 296 F. Supp. 2d 292 (E.D.N.Y. 2003)

. . . circumstances are such that the use of deadly physical force is authorized by subdivision three of section 35.20 . . . Subdivision three of section 35.20 authorizes the use of deadly physical force under the following circumstances . . . take the keys from petitioner — attempting to commit a burglary- — -and the requirements of section 35.20 . . .

WEIZEORICK, v. ABN AMRO MORTGAGE GROUP, INCORPORATED, a, 337 F.3d 827 (7th Cir. 2003)

. . . If we add two days of per diem interest added to the total supplied in the payoff statement, or $35.20 . . .

In H. L. HANSEN LUMBER COMPANY OF GALESBURG, INC. H. L. Of v. G H, 270 B.R. 273 (Bankr. C.D. Ill. 2001)

. . . 00 82 5783 88.81 1/27/00 82 5784 115.86 1/27/00 82 5785 116.00 1/27/00 82 5786 10.00 1/27/00 82 5817 35.20 . . .

HAYFIELD, v. HOME DEPOT U. S. A. INC., 168 F. Supp. 2d 436 (E.D. Pa. 2001)

. . . matters into her own hands and wrote Home Depot a letter of explanation with a replacement check for the $35.20 . . .

UNITED STATES MISTICK PBT v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURGH L. D. L. D. E. B. D. L. I. J., 186 F.3d 376 (3d Cir. 1999)

. . . . §§ 35.20 — 35.24 (1998). . . .

SANTIAGO, By MUNIZ, v. HERNANDEZ, 53 F. Supp. 2d 264 (E.D.N.Y. 1999)

. . . . § 35.20, which is defined as: Any residential structure that is the subject of an application for mortgage . . .

GODFREY, v. IRVIN,, 871 F. Supp. 577 (W.D.N.Y. 1994)

. . . Penal Law § 35.20(3). People v. . . . N.Y.Penal Law § 35.20(3). . . . Appeals found that the trial judge properly refused to charge the jury on defense of premises under § 35.20 . . . According to the Court of Appeals, nothing in § 35.20(3) or its legislative history suggested that it . . . or her own security than the would-be burglar, and therefore cannot claim the protection of section 35.20 . . .

CAMOTEX, S. R. L. v. HUNT, Co. Al-, 741 F. Supp. 1086 (S.D.N.Y. 1990)

. . . From March 1 to March 27, 1980, the price of silver dropped from $35.20 per ounce to $10.80 per ounce . . .

In C. ANDERSON, L. C., 62 B.R. 206 (Bankr. D. Haw. 1986)

. . . .40 Based on the foregoing, the court deducts the following amount from the various individuals: GPC 35.20 . . .

BENNETT, v. CENTRAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF ILLINOIS,, 619 F. Supp. 640 (N.D. Ill. 1985)

. . . That 35.20 hour difference as to 1979 time is slight and doubtless reflects the fact the Sobek Petition . . .

In SOUTHERN BIOTECH, INC., 37 B.R. 318 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1983)

. . . Assuming a projected sales price of $35.20 per liter, the operations would produce a gross annual revenue . . . produce 60% normal plasma and 40% hyperimmune bi-products resulting in a weighted average price of $35.20 . . .

WASHINGTON, v. HARRIS,, 486 F. Supp. 1037 (S.D.N.Y. 1980)

. . . . § 35.15(2)(b), or a victim of a burglary by reference to section 35.20, see id. § 35.15(2)(c). . . . circumstances are such that the use of deadly physical force is authorized by subdivision three of section 35.20 . . .

PARENT ASSOCIATION OF ANDREW JACKSON SCHOOL, v. AMBACH,, 451 F. Supp. 1056 (E.D.N.Y. 1978)

. . . The school building is located in the southeastern corner of Health District 35.20; just to the east . . .

In ESTATE NOVOTNY,, 446 F. Supp. 1027 (S.D.N.Y. 1978)

. . . Security Benefits which were paid to the Committee beginning in 1967 at a rate of between approximately $35.20 . . .

UNITED STATES v. R. MOYNAGH, Jr., 566 F.2d 799 (1st Cir. 1977)

. . . Orfield, Criminal Procedure Under the Federal Rules § 35.20 (1967); 2 C. . . .

QUALITY EDUCATION FOR ALL CHILDREN, INC. v. SCHOOL BOARD OF SCHOOL DISTRICT OF WINNEBAGO COUNTY, ILLINOIS,, 385 F. Supp. 803 (N.D. Ill. 1974)

. . . 36.19 41.69 35.05 37.75 35.57 MEAN SCORES OF 7th GRADE STUDENTS Washington 31.94 33.92 38.76 39.59 35.20 . . .

Co. v., 61 Cust. Ct. 481 (Cust. Ct. 1968)

. . . an alleged price-list a series of invoices purportedly showing sales in Spain of such merchandise at 35.20 . . .

a c v., 48 Cust. Ct. 641 (Cust. Ct. 1962)

. . . Subsequent to October 1, 1955, Schultz & Larsen increased this price to $35.20 each to meet increased . . .

VILES, H. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,, 233 F.2d 376 (6th Cir. 1956)

. . . monthly supervision reports showing that he was employed as a truck driver at monthly wages ranging from $35.20 . . .

UNITED STATES v. WIESNER,, 216 F.2d 739 (2d Cir. 1954)

. . . lot to be $40.50 an ounce, the “oificial” and “street” prices of gold at the time being respectively $35.20 . . .

UNITED STATES v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF CALIFORNIA, 345 U.S. 295 (U.S. 1953)

. . . of a new schedule, with usual rate-making procedures before the federal body. 18 CFR §§ 35.3, 35.5, 35.20 . . . See also 18 CFR §§ 35.3, 35.20. . . .

ASHLEY v. KEITH OIL CORPORATION, 73 F. Supp. 37 (D. Mass. 1947)

. . . considered in the previous paragraph, the common stock had on December 31, 1946, a value of $28,766.10 or $35.20 . . . Its balance sheet shows, it is true, that the common stock has a value of $35.20 a share. . . .

PEFFER v. FEDERAL CARTRIDGE CORPORATION, 63 F. Supp. 291 (D. Minn. 1945)

. . . Nielson began to work as a draftsman in May, 1942, at $35.20 per week. . . .

WICHITA COCA COLA BOTTLING CO. v. UNITED STATES, 61 F. Supp. 407 (N.D. Tex. 1945)

. . . 21,491.96 5.275.03 1,930.56 1926 16,343.61 17,569.87 6,501.29 1,226.26 1927 15.765.41 15,730.21 6.466.09 (35.20 . . .

FEDERAL LIFE INS. CO. v. RUMPEL, 102 F.2d 120 (6th Cir. 1939)

. . . policy was issued to the assured May 24, 1928, and on August 5, 1933, he gave his thirty-day note for $35.20 . . .

THE MARY N. BOURKE, 145 F. 909 (2d Cir. 1906)

. . . Among the charges made is one of $4,416 for 80 lay days, being $35.20 per day for use of dry dock. . . .

THE KATIE O NEIL. BLACK DIAMOND COAL CO. v. O NEIL, 65 F. 111 (N.D. Cal. 1894)

. . . supplied and labor done to the tug, amounting to ’$42.20, of which the commissioner alowed the sum of $35.20 . . . The sums of $196.70 and $35.20 will he paid to the Pacific Marine Supply Company and William J. . . .

v., 36 F. 873 (C.C.W.D. Mo. 1888)

. . . about the 29th of September, 1880, which would make the amount of principal and interest then due $35.20 . . .

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)