Cases from cite.case.law:

GARCIA, v. STATE v. v., 170 So. 3d 23 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . In the third order, we stated: This appeal has been filed without a filing fee required by section 35.22 . . .

NUTEC v. DOLESHALL,, 96 So. 3d 1159 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . appeal in the lower tribunal, but failed to pay the mandatory $300 filing fee required by both section 35.22 . . . Section 35.22(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2011), requires in mandatory language that the clerk of the appellate . . .

DICKMAN, v. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC., 876 F. Supp. 2d 166 (E.D.N.Y. 2012)

. . . “Account Summary” lists “Previous Charges” in the amount of $235.63, but also reflects a credit of $35.22 . . .

SCHMIDT, v. A. McNEIL,, 354 F. App'x 391 (11th Cir. 2009)

. . . . § 35.22 and Fla.R.App.P. 9.410. . . . Stat. § 35.22. . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE, 1 So. 3d 166 (Fla. 2009)

. . . (amending §§ 25.241, 84.041, 35.22, Fla. Stat.). The legislation became effective July 1, 2008. . . .

A. McNEIL, v. J. COX,, 997 So. 2d 343 (Fla. 2008)

. . . See, e.g., §§ 34.041, 35.22, Fla. Stat. (2005). . . .

J. LYNCH, v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION Co., 988 So. 2d 25 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . See § 35.22(3), Fla. . . .

ROBERTS, v. MAHONING COUNTY, v., 495 F. Supp. 2d 719 (N.D. Ohio 2007)

. . . Referral Physician 35.22 Provider shall track all costs related to primary health care services at the . . .

SCHMIDT, v. R. McDONOUGH,, 951 So. 2d 797 (Fla. 2006)

. . . See, e.g., §§ 34.041, 35.22, Fla. Stat. (2005). . . .

H. ADAIR v. R. ENGLAND, v. R., 217 F. Supp. 2d 7 (D.D.C. 2002)

. . . Christians comprised 7.46 percent of all Navy service members but that liturgical Christians made up 35.22 . . . 2001, liturgical Christians made up 8.03 and 7.46 percent of all Navy service members but 35.25 and 35.22 . . .

PENRY v. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, 532 U.S. 782 (U.S. 2001)

. . . Ann., Art. 35.22 (Vernon 1989). . . .

SANTIAGO, By MUNIZ, v. HERNANDEZ, 53 F. Supp. 2d 264 (E.D.N.Y. 1999)

. . . . § 35.22 (emphasis added). . . .

CHILDS B. Co- v. UNITED STATES L. REESE, v. UNITED STATES, 923 F. Supp. 1570 (S.D. Ga. 1996)

. . . assumes that General would have entered the workforce at age 20 and would have a worklife expectancy of 35.22 . . . he grows $16,-990.00 until the year General would be 20 years old, and then continues to grow it for 35.22 . . .

ATTWOOD, v. STATE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,, 660 So. 2d 358 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . Appellate Court filing fee required according to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.100(b), and section 35.22 . . .

R. MARTIN, v. GARRISON J., 658 So. 2d 1019 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . Appellate Court filing fee required according to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.100(b), and section 35.22 . . .

LOWERY, v. S. KAPLAN,, 650 So. 2d 114 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . Appellate Court filing fee required according to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.100(b), and. section 35.22 . . .

MANN, v. SCOTT,, 41 F.3d 968 (5th Cir. 1994)

. . . Tex.Code CRIM.PROC.Ann. art. 35.22 (West 1989). . . .

In ORAL ARGUMENT BY VIDEO TELECONFERENCE NETWORK, 648 So. 2d 763 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . the order to cover the costs of the video teleconference for that argument, as provided in section 35.22 . . .

SOCIETY OF SEPARATIONISTS, INC. v. HERMAN,, 939 F.2d 1207 (5th Cir. 1991)

. . . Ann. arts. 19.34 (grand jurors), 35.02 (venire), 35.22 (impaneled jurors); Tex.R.Civ.P. 226 (venire), . . .

AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY, Pa. AIU v. FREMONT INDEMNITY COMPANY,, 745 F. Supp. 974 (S.D.N.Y. 1990)

. . . Exhibit G to the Napolitan Report projected aggregate losses in the 4 X 1 layer ranging from $35.22 million . . .

MAYO, v. A. LYNAUGH,, 882 F.2d 134 (5th Cir. 1989)

. . . See Tex.Crim.Proc.Code Ann. art. 35.22. . Smith v. . . .

CALDWELL, v. ESTATE OF L. McDOWELL,, 507 So. 2d 607 (Fla. 1987)

. . . fee to the appellate court as required by Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110(b) and section 35.22 . . .

SMITH, v. O. L. McCOTTER,, 798 F.2d 129 (5th Cir. 1986)

. . . . § 35.22 (Vernon 1966). . . . .

WHITTENBERG, Mr. P. NAACP, Dr. T. H. v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF GREENVILLE COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA,, 607 F. Supp. 289 (D.S.C. 1985)

. . . 33.87 26.70 26.78 16.02 6.53 39.49 13.99 46.42 27.60 24.74 31.85 13.14 31.21 16.03 47.58 15.69 21.29 35.22 . . .

J. NEAL, R. J. F. J. A. Sr. C. C. B. v. CAREY CANADIAN MINES, LTD. Co. Co., 548 F. Supp. 357 (E.D. Pa. 1982)

. . . N.T. 35.22-35.24. Thus, this evidence was presented and made known to the jury. . . .

N K FIELDS, v. ZINMAN,, 394 So. 2d 1133 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . we hold that § 57.081 Florida Statutes (1979), authorizes waiver of the service charge imposed by § 35.22 . . .

J. KLEINSCHMIDT, v. ESTATE E. KLEINSCHMIDT,, 392 So. 2d 66 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . . § 35.22(3), Fla.Stat. (1979). . See also Harrell v. . . .

CHAPPELL, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES,, 391 So. 2d 358 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . the appellate court filing fee required by Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110(b) and section 35.22 . . .

T. NICHOLS, v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION,, 393 So. 2d 13 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . before us upon petitioner’s pro se motion to be relieved of the filing fee otherwise required by § 35.22 . . .

McGRIFF, v. McGRIFF,, 392 So. 2d 914 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . within ten days of this order files with the clerk of this court a $50 filing fee as required by Section 35.22 . . .

TRANSWESTERN PIPELINE COMPANY, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION,, 626 F.2d 1266 (5th Cir. 1980)

. . . application for advance approval of R&D expenditures, which is an optional procedure offered in Section 35.22 . . .

LATISI, v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION,, 382 So. 2d 1355 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . Legislature exempts cases such as this one from payment of a filing fee, this Court must abide by § 35.22 . . .

LARRY P. P. v. RILES,, 495 F. Supp. 926 (N.D. Cal. 1979)

. . . Unified 42.78 33.33 42.9 (3/7) 40.0 Monterey Peninsula 18.76 22.22 22.7 (5/22) 18.3 Richmond Unified 35.22 . . .

PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION,, 600 F.2d 944 (D.C. Cir. 1979)

. . . . § 35.22(e)(3); 42 Fed.Reg. 30156 (June 13, 1977). . . . .

A. JENKE, v. HEARD,, 375 F. Supp. 650 (S.D. Tex. 1974)

. . . See Article 1, Section 4, of the Texas Constitution, Vernon’s Ann.St. and Articles 19.34, 35.02, and 35.22 . . .

MADELEY, v. C. V. KERN,, 488 F.2d 865 (5th Cir. 1974)

. . . Craig argued the oaths required of grand jurors, witnesses, and jurors by articles 19.34, 35.02, and 35.22 . . . I, § 4; Vernon’s Ann.Tex.Code Crim.Proc. art. 19.34, art. 35.02, art. 35.22 (1965). . . .

UNITED STATES v. BASYE, 410 U.S. 441 (U.S. 1973)

. . . Mertens, Law of Federal Income Taxation §§ 35.01, 35.22 (1968); A. . . .

UNITED STATES v. ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, IN YAKIMA COUNTY, WASHINGTON, J. Jr., 411 F.2d 432 (9th Cir. 1969)

. . . UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 35.22 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, IN YAKIMA COUNTY, . . .

A. BASYE E. v. UNITED STATES J. COOK L. v. UNITED STATES C. FISHLER H. v. UNITED STATES GRANT H. v. UNITED STATES S. HUNTER S. v. UNITED STATES W. SOROKOWSKI v. UNITED STATES, 295 F. Supp. 1289 (N.D. Cal. 1968)

. . . News, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess., p. 4722; 6 Mertens, Law of Federal Income Taxation, § 35.22, p. 63; and cf . . .

In FLORIDA APPELLATE RULES, 120 So. 2d 788 (Fla. 1960)

. . . Pursuant to the provisions of Section 35.22(3), Florida Statutes 1959, F.S.A., authorizing the Supreme . . .

LEE YOU FEE, Q. v. DULLES,, 133 F. Supp. 160 (E.D. Wis. 1955)

. . . Procedure, Sec. 35.22. . . .

MARION COUNTY CO- OP. ASS N v. CARNATION CO., 114 F. Supp. 58 (W.D. Ark. 1953)

. . . F.Supp. 608, 613, 123 Ct.Cl. 722; Vol. 10, Cyclopedia of Federal Procedure, Third Edition, Section 35.22 . . .

K. v., 5 T.C. 684 (T.C. 1945)

. . . The ratio of the assets transferred to the old company’s total assets was 35.22 percent, thus a like . . .

FRENCH AMERICAN BANKING CORPORATION v. FIREMAN S FUND INS. CO., 43 F. Supp. 494 (S.D.N.Y. 1941)

. . . The plaintiff applied for reinstatement of his policy on November 1, 1928, and paid the sum of $35.22 . . .

C. B. a v., 143 Fla. 79 (Fla. 1940)

. . . the jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendant on her set-off and counterclaim in the sum of $35.22 . . .

THE EMMA B., 162 F. 966 (D.N.J. 1908)

. . . The claim of Evans is for supplies furnished to the schooner on December 18, 1905, and amounts to $35.22 . . .