Cases from cite.case.law:

ALLEN, v. CITY OF KEY WEST,, 59 So. 3d 316 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . same pertinent language which reads as follows: In 1986, the City enacted former zoning code section 35.24 . . .

JOHNSON, v. CITY OF DETROIT, 446 F.3d 614 (6th Cir. 2006)

. . . . §§ 35.20 & 35.24. . . . .

JOHNSON, v. CITY OF DETROIT, 319 F. Supp. 2d 756 (E.D. Mich. 2004)

. . . paint poisoning with respect to any existing HUD-associated housing which may present such hazards. 35.24 . . . See. e.g., 24 CFR 570.680(b) (Community Development Block Grants). 24 C.F.R. §§ 35.20, 35.24, 35.5 (1992 . . .

UNITED STATES MISTICK PBT v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURGH L. D. L. D. E. B. D. L. I. J., 186 F.3d 376 (3d Cir. 1999)

. . . . §§ 35.20 — 35.24 (1998). . . . See 24 C.F.R. § 35.24. . . .

DOMINION RESOURCES, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 48 F. Supp. 2d 527 (E.D. Va. 1999)

. . . Section 35.24(c) (formerly Section 35.25(c)), a FERC regulation, to adjust the income tax component of . . .

DAVIS, a DAVIS v. PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY L., 121 F.3d 92 (3d Cir. 1997)

. . . . § 35.24. . . . hazards are eliminated as far as practicable. 42 U.S.C. § 4822(a)(1); 24 C.F.R. § 882.109©; 24 C.F.R. § 35.24 . . .

GERMAN v. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP. CAISI L. P., 885 F. Supp. 537 (S.D.N.Y. 1995)

. . . forgo testing and abate all applicable surfaces in accordance with the methods set out in 24 C.F.R. 35.24 . . .

SIMMONS D. R. v. CHARLESTON HOUSING AUTHORITY,, 881 F. Supp. 225 (S.D.W. Va. 1995)

. . . Section 35.24 of this Part is entitled ‘Requirements’ and concludes with § 35.24(4): “Any requirements . . . defective paint surfaces are found, covering or removal of the defective paint spots as described in § 35.24 . . .

CITY OF PHILADELPHIA v. LEAD INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATION, INC. NL SCM O No. No. NL SCM O No., 994 F.2d 112 (3d Cir. 1993)

. . . . §§ 35.1-35.24), while HUD’s Interim Guidelines for Hazard Identification and Abatement in Public and . . .

HURT, v. PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY,, 806 F. Supp. 515 (E.D. Pa. 1992)

. . . Section 35.24 of this Part is entitled “Requirements” and concludes with § 35.24(4): Any requirements . . .

PIERRE p. p. a. v. UNITED STATES, 741 F. Supp. 306 (D. Mass. 1990)

. . . Under § 35.24 all immediate hazards of lead based paint must be removed from “HUD-associated housing” . . . cause them to be removed or covered over by the methods specifically described in sub-section (3) of § 35.24 . . .

In L. SPANGLER. GOLDSTEIN, L. v. ALEET LEASING ASSOCIATES II N. A., 56 B.R. 990 (D. Md. 1986)

. . . Silver Spirit Corniche Total Rentals 12.57% 12.57% Purchase Price 17.96% 29.37% Projected Value 39.16 - 35.24% . . . 35.24 - 29.37% Sale Price 28.42% 30.64% Sale or Lease Paragraph 14 of the August 1981 agreement calls . . .

ASHTON, v. PIERCE, U. S. HUD,, 716 F.2d 56 (D.C. Cir. 1983)

. . . . § 35.24(b)(3)(i) (1981). . . . Id. § 35.24(b)(3)(ii). . . .

LOUISIANA CREDIT UNION LEAGUE, v. UNITED STATES, 693 F.2d 525 (5th Cir. 1982)

. . . Mertens, Law of Federal Income Taxation ¶ 35.24 (J. Doheny ed. 1975). . . . .

J. NEAL, R. J. F. J. A. Sr. C. C. B. v. CAREY CANADIAN MINES, LTD. Co. Co., 548 F. Supp. 357 (E.D. Pa. 1982)

. . . N.T. 35.22-35.24. Thus, this evidence was presented and made known to the jury. . . .

PERCY WILSON MORTGAGE AND FINANCE CORPORATION, v. J. McCURDY, W. In J. McCURDY, CITIZENS FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION OF DAYTON, v. M. MURRAY, W. In M. MURRAY, R. GROOMS, v. HOMES f. n. a. W. In HOMES,, 21 B.R. 535 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 1982)

. . . secured claim, and the balance paid as an unsecured claim pro rata with the other unsecured claims at 35.24 . . .

ASHTON, v. PIERCE,, 541 F. Supp. 635 (D.D.C. 1982)

. . . . § 35.24(a) (1981). . . . thoroughly cleaning the painted surface and repainting it with two coats of non-leaded paint. 24 C.F.R. § 35.24 . . . HUD-associated public housing before occupancy and eliminated immediate hazards as required by 24 C.F.R. § 35.24 . . .

ANAHEIM, RIVERSIDE, BANNING, COLTON, AND AZUSA, CALIFORNIA, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION,, 669 F.2d 799 (D.C. Cir. 1981)

. . . . § 35.24). . . .

FORT SMITH BEEPERS, INC. v. MOBILEFONE SERVICE, INC. d b a MSI, 533 F. Supp. 685 (W.D. Ark. 1981)

. . . It leased its tone-only pagers for $24.94 per month and its voice pagers for $35.24. . . .

WASHINGTON NURSING CENTER, INC. a a v. F. QUERN,, 442 F. Supp. 23 (S.D. Ill. 1977)

. . . . § 35.24, but was later denied reconsideration of the decision on the ground that its Medicaid occupancy . . .

A. LOBIS, v. SECRETARY OF UNITED STATES AIR FORCE, 519 F.2d 304 (D.C. Cir. 1975)

. . . Air Force declined to classify Captain Lobis as a conscientious objector within the meaning of AFR 35.24 . . .

CITY- WIDE COALITION AGAINST CHILDHOOD LEAD PAINT POISONING v. PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY,, 356 F. Supp. 123 (E.D. Pa. 1973)

. . . . § 35.24 of the regulations provides The provisions of this subpart [elimination of lead-based paint . . . with respect to enforcing, interpreting, or determining compliance with such local requirements. (§ 35.24 . . .

S. COPE, v. AETNA FINANCE COMPANY OF MAINE, In R. RICHARDS, 412 F.2d 635 (1st Cir. 1969)

. . . of the district court that: “It is not seriously disputed that the credit life insurance premium of $35.24 . . .

In R. RICHARDS L., 291 F. Supp. 537 (D. Me. 1968)

. . . It is not seriously disputed that the credit life insurance premium of $35.24 and the credit health and . . .

In R. RICHARDS L., 272 F. Supp. 480 (D. Me. 1967)

. . . The principal amount of the note included a credit life insurance premium of $35.24 and a credit health . . . amount of $1174.73 with a monthly indemnity of $46 for the term of 36 months and specifies a premium of $35.24 . . .

HALEY v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 203 F.2d 815 (5th Cir. 1953)

. . . C. 499; see also Mertens’ Law of Federal Income Taxation, Vol. 6, Sec. 35.24, p. 181, Sec. 35.18, p. . . .

A, 123 Ct. Cl. 869 (Ct. Cl. 1952)

. . . stipulation by the parties it was ordered that judgment for the plaintiff be entered in the sum of $35.24 . . .