The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH

Chapter 35
DISTRICT COURTS OF APPEAL

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 35.26

35.26 Marshal of district court; appointment; duties.—

(1) Each of the district courts of appeal shall appoint a marshal who shall hold office during the pleasure of the court.

(2) He or she shall have the power to execute the process of the court throughout the state, and in any county may deputize the sheriff or a deputy sheriff for such purpose.

(3) The marshal shall, under the direction of the district court of appeal be custodian of the headquarters occupied by the court and shall perform such other duties as directed by the court.

(4) The marshal and his or her assistants shall be the conservators of the peace in the headquarters of the district court of appeal, or in any building in which the district court of appeal is sitting, and shall apprehend, without warrant, any person disturbing the peace and deliver that person to the appropriate law enforcement officer of the municipality or county in which further proceedings may be held according to law.

(5) The marshal and his or her assistants shall attend and successfully complete a minimum standards training program approved by the Criminal Justice Standards and Training Commission within the Department of Law Enforcement.

History.—s. 1, ch. 57-248; s. 2, ch. 80-145; s. 5, ch. 83-167; s. 204, ch. 95-147; s. 4, ch. 95-325.

F.S. 35.26 on Google Scholar

F.S. 35.26 on Casetext

Amendments to 35.26

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 35.26

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 35.26.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

COVINGTON, v. NORTH CAROLINA,, 316 F.R.D. 117 (M.D.N.C. 2016)

. . . Enacted Senate District 28 also includes only 35.26% of the population of High Point, but over 60% of . . .

T. J. S. MINING, INC. Co. v. M. PATRICK OWCP,, 528 F. App'x 242 (3d Cir. 2013)

. . . At the administrative hearing, the parties stipulated that Patrick had worked in the coal mine for 35.26 . . .

UNITED STATES v. s CANDELARIA- SILVA,, 714 F.3d 651 (1st Cir. 2013)

. . . conclude that for the period October 1990-October 1991, the conspiracy-wide total quantity of heroin was 35.26 . . .

RIVERS, v. QUARTERMAN,, 661 F. Supp. 2d 675 (S.D. Tex. 2009)

. . . attorney representing the State were made based on race, that from my understanding of Batson and from 35.26 . . . Ann. art. 35.26 governed the jury selection process and use of peremptory strikes. . . . .

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, v. CLEVERLINK TRADING LIMITED, LLC H., 519 F. Supp. 2d 784 (N.D. Ill. 2007)

. . . amounts of $9,000 and $9,500 were intended to evade the requirement that they be reported to the IRS. (17:35.26 . . .

ROBERTS, v. MAHONING COUNTY, v., 495 F. Supp. 2d 719 (N.D. Ohio 2007)

. . . drug users, homosexuals, bisexuals, and persons engaging in an active sex life with numerous partners. 35.26 . . .

SOSTCHIN, d b a v. DOLL ENTERPRISES, INC., 847 So. 2d 1123 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . calculating the growth rate of the company’s generated net income from 1996 to 1997 which amounted to 35.26% . . .

PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. OF SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, PJM L. L. C., 272 F.3d 607 (D.C. Cir. 2001)

. . . . §§ 35.15, 35.26-35.29). . . .

CENTRAL VERMONT PUBLIC SERVICE CORPORATION, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION,, 214 F.3d 1366 (D.C. Cir. 2000)

. . . . § 35.26, but rather on Order 888 itself, which identifies certain situations not covered by the regulations . . . See id. § 35.26(d)(1). . . .

TRANSMISSION ACCESS POLICY STUDY GROUP, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION,, 225 F.3d 667 (D.C. Cir. 2000)

. . . . § 35.26(b)(8), 35.26(c)(l)(v)-(vi). . . . See 18 C.F.R. § 35.26(c)(2)®. . . . See 18 C.F.R. § 35.26(b)(1)®. . . . See 18 C.F.R. § 35.26(c)(2)(iii). . . . See 18 C.F.R. § 35.26(c)(2)®. . . .

TOWN OF NORWOOD, MASSACHUSETTS, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, v., 202 F.3d 392 (1st Cir. 2000)

. . . . § 35.26(b)(1), (c)(2) (1999). . . . Order No. 888, 61 Fed.Reg. at 21641; see also 18 C.F.R. § 35.26(b)(7), (c)(l)(ii). . . .

MID- TEX ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, 864 F.2d 156 (D.C. Cir. 1988)

. . . relief for a party alleging that the inclusion of CWIP in the rate base would cause price squeeze, § 35.26 . . . price squeeze will occur as a direct result of the public utility’s request for CWIP pursuant to § 35.26 . . . See Order No. 474, 52 Fed.Reg. at 23,966 (CWIP rule, 18 C.F.R. § 35.26(g)(4)(i), allows the agency to . . .

MID- TEX ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION,, 822 F.2d 1123 (D.C. Cir. 1987)

. . . . § 35.26(g)(1). . . . .

MID- TEX ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION,, 262 U.S. App. D.C. 61 (D.C. Cir. 1987)

. . . . § 35.26(g)(1). . . . .

MID- TEX ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, J. II, ALABAMA ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, J. II, AMERICAN PUBLIC POWER ASSOCIATION, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, PUBLIC SYSTEMS, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, J. II, CITIES OF ALTAMONT, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION,, 773 F.2d 327 (D.C. Cir. 1985)

. . . . § 35.26), Joint Appendix (“J.A.”) at 1298. . . .

ALABAMA AIR POLLUTION CONTROL COMMISSION v. REPUBLIC STEEL CORPORATION, a, 646 F.2d 210 (5th Cir. 1981)

. . . /hr.) 1 30.09 43 2 35.26 43 3 24.99 43 . . . .

v., 66 T.C. 770 (T.C. 1976)

. . . 49,437.13 Relationship of 40 percent of net proceeds to total space rental receipts: $49,437.13 -= 35.26 . . . percent $140,185.00 Distribution to each member-exhibitor of 35.26 percent of his space rental cost_ . . .

v., 37 C.C.P.A. 896 (C.C.P.A. 1950)

. . . Jones found the actual chlorine content of those portions to be 31.91%, 35.26%, and 32.20%, which corresponded . . .

TRUST NO. B. I. BANK OF AMERICA NAT. TRUST SAVINGS ASS N v. UNITED STATES, 25 F. Supp. 608 (S.D. Cal. 1938)

. . . laid down by the authors in Paul & Merten’s “Law of Federal Income Taxation” in Volume 4, Paragraph 35.26 . . . IV, Par. 35.26. . . .

SOUTHERN ELECTRO- CHEMICAL CO. v. E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS CO., 9 F.2d 69 (D.N.J. 1925)

. . . Sulphuric Acid. 12:00 15.36 .009 12:30 16.98 .010 1:00 35.26 .016 ■ 1:30 39.90 .016 2:00 81.59 .108 2 . . .