Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 40.26 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 40.26 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 40.26

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH
Chapter 40
JURIES; PAYMENT OF JURORS AND DUE PROCESS COSTS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 40.26
40.26 Meals and lodging for jurors.The sheriff, when required by order of the court, shall provide juries with meals and lodging, the expense to be paid by the clerk of the circuit court.
History.s. 1, ch. 3860, 1889; RS 1162; GS 1587; s. 10, ch. 7838, 1919; RGS 2789; CGL 4475; s. 15, ch. 2008-111.

F.S. 40.26 on Google Scholar

F.S. 40.26 on Casetext

Amendments to 40.26


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 40.26
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 40.26.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

PHILIP MORRIS USA, INCORPORATED, v. J. VILSACK,, 736 F.3d 284 (4th Cir. 2013)

. . . The act expresses this rate as "40.26 cents per cigar.” CHIPRA § 701(a)(3). . . . .

UNITED STATES v. L. TOURTELLOT,, 483 B.R. 72 (M.D.N.C. 2012)

. . . an excise tax on large cigars “equal to 52.75 percent of the pnce for which sold but not more than 40.26 . . . cigars under 26 U.S.C. § 5701(a)(2), which is based on a percentage of "price,” subject to a tax cap of 40.26 . . .

DUDUM v. ARNTZ, a, 640 F.3d 1098 (9th Cir. 2011)

. . . first-choice votes (41.08%), and Mark Farrell received the second highest percentage of those votes (40.26% . . .

J. MURPHY v. AIR TRANSPORT LOCAL, 123 F. Supp. 2d 55 (D. Conn. 2000)

. . . . § 40.26(h). . . .

WEIMER, v. C. WEIMER,, 677 So. 2d 86 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . The court below distributed the marital assets 40.26% to the Wife and 59.74% to the Husband. . . . Here, the marital property was divided unequally, with the Wife receiving only 40.26% of the assets, . . .

INTERSTATE BRANDS CORPORATION v. LOCAL RETAIL, WHOLESALE AND DEPARTMENT STORE UNION, AFL- CIO,, 39 F.3d 1159 (11th Cir. 1994)

. . . (Emphasis supplied) § 40.26(k). . . .

WHITTENBERG, Mr. P. NAACP, Dr. T. H. v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF GREENVILLE COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA,, 607 F. Supp. 289 (D.S.C. 1985)

. . . 28.08 26.54 30.60 28.57 22.97 8.64 66.32 28.71 20.15 18.66 35.56 24.64 11.59 60.94 3.61 10.88 35.91 40.26 . . .

FIRST JERSEY NATIONAL BANK, No. No. v. DOME PETROLEUM LIMITED No. No., 723 F.2d 335 (3d Cir. 1983)

. . . Under the incorrect formula that First Jersey employed, Dome purchased at the offering price 40.26% of . . . This portion was determined by the same incorrect proration factor (40.26%) that First Jersey had applied . . .

In TROTTER, SIMS FURNITURE COMPANY, INC. a v. TROTTER,, 12 B.R. 72 (Bankr. C.D. Cal. 1981)

. . . latter sum, plus a finance charge of $160.85, for a total of $966.24, in 24 monthly installments of $40.26 . . .

NATIONAL LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES, 381 F. Supp. 1034 (M.D. Tenn. 1974)

. . . reserve during 1965 = 12/31/65 reserve (at 2.75%) -12/31/64 reserve (at 3.50%) = 264.48 - 224.22 = 40.26 . . . deduction under Section 809(d)(5) of the Code: For 1965 = 10% x total increase in reserve = 10% x $40.26 . . .