Home
Jacksonville Location Phone Call/Texting Policy How do Fees Work?
Criminal Defense DUI Defense Foreclosure Defense Copyright Workers Compensation Attorney Jacksonville Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statutes Georgia Code Jacksonville Accident Attorney Real Estate Attorney Jacksonville Florida Criminal Lawyer Jacksonville Notary Public
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 40.355 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 40.355 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 40.355

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
Title V
JUDICIAL BRANCH
Chapter 40
JURIES; PAYMENT OF JURORS AND DUE PROCESS COSTS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 40.355
40.355 Accounting and payment.—The clerk of the court shall, within 2 weeks after the last day of the state’s quarterly fiscal period, render to the state attorney, the public defender, and the criminal conflict and civil regional counsel in each circuit a full statement of accounts for state moneys received and disbursed under this chapter for the payment of witnesses.
History.—s. 28, ch. 2005-236; s. 22, ch. 2008-111.

F.S. 40.355 on Google Scholar

F.S. 40.355 on Casetext

Amendments to 40.355


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 40.355
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 40.355.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

SWATERS, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,, 826 F.3d 507 (D.C. Cir. 2016)

. . . Finally, §§ 40.27 and 40.355 prohibit employers and testing facilities from requiring an employee to . . .

SWATERS, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,, 423 U.S. App. D.C. 343 (D.C. Cir. 2016)

. . . Finally, §§ 40.27 and 40.355 prohibit employers and testing facilities from requiring an employee to . . .

L. PASTERNACK, v. LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA HOLDINGS,, 807 F.3d 14 (2d Cir. 2015)

. . . Of particular relevance is § 40.355, which provides that an MRO “must not make a determination that an . . . This is a non-delegable duty of the actual employer.” 49 C.F.R. § 40.355®. . . . Second, Pasternack points to 49 C.F.R. § 40.355(i), which provides that the MRO “must not make a determination . . . First, the district court held that if ChoicePoint’s violation of § 40.355(f) were sufficient to establish . . . identify a state law negligence claim to proceed, and “no case suggests] that a violation of 49 C.F.R. § 40.355 . . .

OLSON, v. LITTLE,, 604 F. App'x 387 (6th Cir. 2015)

. . . . § 40.355(l)(b); Pa. R. Evid. 609(a); S.C. R. Evid. 609(a)(2); Utah R. Evid. 609(a)(2); Wash. R. . . .

Dr. L. PASTERNACK, v. LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA a k a, 892 F. Supp. 2d 540 (S.D.N.Y. 2012)

. . . . § 40.355®. . . . The second regulation cited by Pasternack — 49 C.F.R. § 40.355(i) — states that, except as provided in . . . § 40.355®, an MRO “must not make a determination that an employee has refused a drug or alcohol test . . . (i) (emphasis added). § 40.355® states: As an exception to paragraph (i) of this section, you may make . . . Pasternack has cited no case suggesting that a violation of 49 C.F.R. § 40.355® provides a basis for . . .

T. FIFIE, v. D. COOKSEY, M. D., 403 F. Supp. 2d 1131 (M.D. Fla. 2005)

. . . . §§ 40.27, 40.355(a) (2003). . . .

CHAPMAN v. LAB ONE, a a v. a a a, 390 F.3d 620 (8th Cir. 2004)

. . . . §§ 40.27, 40.355(a) (2003). . . . See 49 C.F.R. §§ 40.27, 40.355(a) (2003); 49 C.F.R. § 219.701(a) (FRA regulation incorporating part 40 . . .