Cases from cite.case.law:

In ORDER DIRECTING PAYMENT OF v., 136 So. 3d 1248 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . prematurely deposited with the CFO, we agree with the circuit court that the five-year period in subsection 48.19 . . .

H. ATWATER, v. CITY OF CAPE CORAL R. H. v. H. v. f k a, 120 So. 3d 595 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . Statutory Construction • Section 48.19 A review of the record shows that the surplus funds were transferred . . .

LOGINOVSKAYA, v. BATRATCHENKO, 936 F. Supp. 2d 357 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)

. . . (See id. at ¶ 61 (statement for March 8, 2009 showed 48.19% gain on Plaintiffs investment; May 17, 2009 . . .

MADONNA, v. GAYNOR, GAYNOR, LTCSP- LLC St. LLC LLC LLC R. J. M. A. L., 95 So. 3d 990 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . See § 48.19S(l)(a). Second, it alleged that Mr. Madonna had committed tortious acts against Mr. . . .

MANSON, v. CITY OF CHICAGO,, 825 F. Supp. 2d 952 (N.D. Ill. 2011)

. . . George Koshy on October 19, 2009 ($77.00 for services rendered + $10 check fee + $48.19 witness fee advance . . . Koshy received $48.19 and $47.00 on separate occasions; Jesse Martinez received $45.00; and Bryce Ludington . . .

Co. v., 34 Ct. Int'l Trade 1045 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2010)

. . . Explanatory Note 48.19(A), at 893. . . .

CITIZEN WATCH CO. OF AMERICA, INC. v. UNITED STATES,, 724 F. Supp. 2d 1316 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2010)

. . . Explanatory Note 48.19(A), at 893. . . .

LESLIE, v. FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY,, 598 F. Supp. 2d 1176 (W.D. Wash. 2009)

. . . Thus, despite the difference in language used in the general insurance chapter, RCW 48.19, a title insurer . . .

R. KEARL D. N. v. C. RAUSSER,, 293 F. App'x 592 (10th Cir. 2008)

. . . its upward march into 2004, eventually hitting a high of $54,881 in August 2005, before declining to $48.19 . . .

COLLETON COUNTY COUNCIL Dr. a H. F. P. K. F. I. N. M. A. L. Jr. V. M. R. W. v. F. McCONNELL, H. H. K. H. W. Jr. v. F. H. F. H. v. H. F. H. F., 201 F. Supp. 2d 618 (D.S.C. 2002)

. . . that the Upstate’s point of equal opportunity is 44.61%, the Midlands’ is 47.45%, the Pee Dee’s is 48.19% . . . Epstein, opined that a district in the Pee Dee region generally requires a BVAP of only 48.19% to give . . .

GILKEY, v. CENTRAL CLEARING CO., 202 F.R.D. 515 (E.D. Mich. 2001)

. . . Accordingly, Plaintiff, who made a total payment of $298.19, paid a total of $48.19 for the benefit of . . .

NEWFOUND MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, GENERAL PARTNER OF NEWFOUND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, v. A. SEWER,, 34 F. Supp. 2d 305 (D.V.I. 1999)

. . . See Hearing on Motions, Tr. 48.19-65.12. . . .

A. SILVER, v. LEVINSON,, 648 So. 2d 240 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . for the purpose of subjecting him to the long arm jurisdiction of the Florida courts under subsection 48.19S . . .

UNITED STATES v. GRISHAM, UNITED STATES v. STUTSON,, 841 F. Supp. 1138 (N.D. Ala. 1994)

. . . Southern Division defendants represented 48.19% (80) of the total. . . . .

UNITED STATES, v. J. TETERS, U. S., 37 M.J. 370 (C.M.A. 1993)

. . . . § 45.06-48.19 (5th ed.1992). . . .

NAVIS, v. FOND DU LAC COUNTY Du, 721 F. Supp. 182 (E.D. Wis. 1989)

. . . . § 48.19(2) provides as follows: When a child is taken into physical custody as provided in this section . . .

S. DOE, a M. a W. NELSON, M. A. V. E. v. MILWAUKEE COUNTY Ed, 712 F. Supp. 1370 (E.D. Wis. 1989)

. . . If the investigating officer has reason under s. 48.19(l)(c) or (d)5 to take a child into custody, the . . . home requires immediate protection, he or she shall take the child into custody under s. 48.08(2) or 48.19 . . .

D. BLAZEL, v. BRADLEY, III,, 698 F. Supp. 756 (W.D. Wis. 1988)

. . . . § 48.19(1). . . . Wis.Stat. § 48.19(l)(d)(5). . . .

THELEN, v. CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES, a G. R. P. W., 691 F. Supp. 1179 (E.D. Wis. 1988)

. . . If the safety of the child requires removal, s. 48.19 shall apply. . . .

DeSHANEY, a FIRST, v. WINNEBAGO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES,, 812 F.2d 298 (7th Cir. 1987)

. . . . §§ 48.13(3), 48.19, 48.-207. . . . not held he or she will ... be subject to injury by others,” Wis.Stat. § 48.205(l)(a); see also §§ 48.19 . . .

GARZA, v. J. D. HENDERSON, S. R. R. M. J. J., 779 F.2d 390 (7th Cir. 1985)

. . . . § 48.19(l)(e), the County prosecutor obtained an ex parte order from the judge approving of the removal . . .

C. MOUZON, Jr. v. L. MOUZON,, 458 So. 2d 381 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . See, e.g., §§ 48.171, 48.181, 48.19, 61.-1308-1312, Fla.Stat. . . . .

C. LOSSMAN, v. H. PEKARSKE,, 707 F.2d 288 (7th Cir. 1983)

. . . . § 48.19(l)(d)(5), which provides, “A child may be taken into custody under ... circumstances in which . . . The order was pursuant to Wis.Stat. § 48.19(l)(c), which authorizes taking a child into custody on a . . . his custody until after the court order had been obtained, contrary to the requirement of Wis.Stat. § 48.19 . . .

LaBANCA, v. OSTERMUNCHNER, 664 F.2d 65 (5th Cir. 1981)

. . . . § 48.19 (West.Supp.1981). . . . .

UNITED STATES v. HAMM, UNITED STATES v. BUTLER, Jr., 659 F.2d 624 (5th Cir. 1981)

. . . Id. at § 48.19. . . . .

CORLEY, v. MILLIKEN, 633 F.2d 1135 (5th Cir. 1981)

. . . . § 48.19 (1977), applies in a tort action arising from an event outside of the state of Florida. . . . jurisdiction over Milliken by substitute service on the Florida Secretary of State under Fla.Stat. § 48.19 . . . Therefore, we certified the following question to the Florida Supreme Court: “Does Fla.Stat. § 48.19 . . . was actually or constructively in the waters of the state are included within the scope of section 48.19 . . . outside of state boundaries, the use of a Florida port does not satisfy the requirement of section 48.19 . . .

CORLEY, v. MILLIKEN, 389 So. 2d 976 (Fla. 1980)

. . . Upon motion by the defendants, the federal district court determined that the requirements of section 48.19 . . . Court of Appeals which has certified the following question for our consideration: Does Fla.Stat. § 48.19 . . . Section 48.19 designates the secretary of state as the agent, for purposes of service of process, of . . . was actually or constructively in the waters of the state are included within the scope of section 48.19 . . . outside the state boundaries, the use of a Florida port does not satisfy the requirement of section 48.19 . . .

CORLEY, v. MILLIKEN, 608 F.2d 238 (5th Cir. 1979)

. . . . § 48.19 (1977). Milliken moved to dismiss for, inter alia, lack of personal jurisdiction. . . . allegations contained in Corley’s Second Amended Petition, it concluded that the prerequisites of section 48.19 . . . sufficient to satisfy the jurisdictional prerequisites regarding nonresident service under Fla.Stat. § 48.19 . . . More narrowly presented, the question is: Does Fla.Stat. § 48.19 (1977) authorize service of process . . . Section 48.19 provides: The operation, navigation or maintenance by a nonresident of an aircraft or a . . .

SENG COMPANY v. BURKE, 366 So. 2d 533 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . The Seng Company, a foreign corporation, by serving the Secretary of State pursuant to Section 48.161-48.19 . . .

TURNER v. C. SALVATIERRA,, 580 F.2d 199 (5th Cir. 1978)

. . . . §§ 48.161, 48.19 by serving the Florida Secretary of State on March 12 and notifying defendant of such . . . Fla.Stat. § 48.19. . . .

H. PROCTOR, c t a v. J. C. GISSENDANER,, 579 F.2d 876 (5th Cir. 1978)

. . . Sutton, Bell allegedly obtained an executed “Work Contract” specifying that 84 monthly payments of $48.19 . . . Both specify that Sutton was to make 84 monthly payments of $48.19. . . . If 84 payments in the amount of $48.19 are made, the total amount paid will be $4047.96, the amount of . . .

CAL- MAR INDUSTRIES, INC. a v. WILSON RESEARCH CORPORATION, a, 442 F. Supp. 796 (S.D. Fla. 1977)

. . . . § 48.19. 1. . . .

F. LEVITEN v. R. GAUNT,, 347 So. 2d 452 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . Service was attempted under Sections 48.161, 48.19, Florida Statutes. . . .

B. RISMAN v. S. WHITTAKER, 326 So. 2d 213 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . . §§ 48.181, 48.19, 48.171 (1973) and their predecessor statutes. . . .

ATLAS VAN LINES, INC. a v. ROSSMOORE,, 271 So. 2d 31 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

. . . authorises substituted service on nonresidents in certain situations (as does §§ 48.171, 48.182 and 48.19 . . .

LUSTIG v. FEINBERG, 257 So. 2d 299 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

. . . . § 48.161-48.19, F.S.A.) were complied with. . . .

CENTRAL NATIONAL BANK OF RICHMOND, Jr. a v. W. KELLEY, CENTRAL NATIONAL BANK OF RICHMOND, Jr. a v. FIRST AND MERCHANTS NATIONAL BANK, J. G. H., 253 So. 2d 141 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)

. . . More specifically, section 47.162 was transferred to 48.19 and the reference to aircraft operators was . . . In 1970 the Legislature amended section 48.19 by again including nonresident aircraft operators. . . . “Defendants contend that they are not subject to service of process under F.S. 48.19, F.S.A., because . . . Therefore, plaintiff says defendants were subject to service of process under F.S. 48.19, F.S.A. and . . . In the 1969 session a bill amending F.S. 48.19, F.S.A., by including nonresident aircraft operators was . . .

CANADA, v. MATHEWS, 449 F.2d 253 (5th Cir. 1971)

. . . non-residents engaged in business in Florida (§ 48.181) and that they operated a watercraft within the State (§ 48.19 . . .

S. CORBETT, v. A. BOWMAN, Jr., 327 F. Supp. 1189 (E.D. Wis. 1971)

. . . Sec. 48.19, Wis.Stats. Declaratory and injunctive relief are sought. . . .

ALLEN v. BOARD OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OF BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, S., 432 F.2d 362 (5th Cir. 1970)

. . . Lincoln Park-North Fork-Hortt-Riverland 1179 1083 2262 52.12 Walker-North Side-East Side ■ 933 1003 1936 48.19 . . .

J. GOLDBERG, v. WARREN G. KLEBAN ENGINEERING CORPORATION,, 303 F.2d 855 (5th Cir. 1962)

. . . year July 1, 1958 through June 30, 1959, out of a total volume of $197,071.82, the Employer received 48.19% . . .

W. R. HUGHES v. UNITED STATES, 196 F. Supp. 37 (E.D. Tex. 1961)

. . . of $7,334.42 plus interest of $628.20, and on January 27, 1959, taxes of $449.80 plus interest of $48.19 . . .

UNITED STATES v. CERTAIN LANDS IN TOWN OF HIGHLANDS, N. Y., 49 F. Supp. 962 (S.D.N.Y. 1943)

. . . XXIX (48.16) Cragston Associates, Inc. 960.00 XXXI (48.18) Cragston Associates, Inc. 120.00 XXXII (48.19 . . . XXXII (48.19) 2,480. XXXIII (48.20) 3,320. XXXIV (48.21) 560. $9,300. . . .

IN THE MATTER OF APPLICATION OF MATEO FAJARDO CARDONA, FOR HABEAS CORPUS, 10 P.R. Fed. 40 (D.P.R. 1917)

. . . L 42, D depoen. (48.19) L 155, See. 2 de reg. jur. (50.17) cap. 49 de reg. jur. in VI. (5.18). . . .