Cases from cite.case.law:

NEW YORK STATE RIFLE PISTOL ASSOCIATION, INC. v. CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK,, 140 S. Ct. 1525 (U.S. 2020)

. . . . §§ 60.01(3), 70.15, 265.01-265.04, 265.20(a)(3) (West Cum. Supp. 2020). . . .

IN RE SABINE OIL GAS CORPORATION, v. HPIP LLC, v. LLC,, 550 B.R. 59 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2016)

. . . Powell, Powell on Real Property, § 60.01 (2015). . 53 Rocky Mt. Min. L. . . . Powell, Powell on Real Property, § 60.01 (2015) (citing Edward Rabin,-Roberta Kwall, Jeffrey Kwall, and . . .

IN RE SABINE OIL GAS CORPORATION,, 547 B.R. 66 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2016)

. . . Powell, Powell on Real Property, § 60.01 (2015). . 53 Rocky Mt. Min. L. . . . Powell, Powell on Real Property, § 60.01 (2015) (citing Edward Rabin, Roberta Kwall, Jeffrey Kwall, and . . .

NEW YORK STATE RIFLE PISTOL ASSOCIATION, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, 86 F. Supp. 3d 249 (S.D.N.Y. 2015)

. . . Penal Law §§ 265.01, 60.01(3), 70.15. . . .

LIBERTY COINS, LLC v. GOODMAN,, 748 F.3d 682 (6th Cir. 2014)

. . . Law § 60.01 (McKinney 2014) (defining a sports collectibles dealer as “a person who is in the business . . .

MITCHELL, v. REES,, 651 F.3d 593 (6th Cir. 2011)

. . . Committee Note of 1946 to Subdivision (b) of Rule 60, as reprinted in 6A Moore’s Federal Practice § 60.01 . . .

SIEFERT, v. C. ALEXANDER,, 608 F.3d 974 (7th Cir. 2010)

. . . parties, as well as maintaining an open mind in considering issues that may come before the judge,” SCR 60.01 . . .

WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT, DIVISION OF VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION,, 667 F. Supp. 2d 1007 (W.D. Wis. 2009)

. . . Code § DWD 60.01. B. . . .

HARVEY, v. LAKE BUENA VISTA RESORT, LLC,, 568 F. Supp. 2d 1354 (M.D. Fla. 2008)

. . . SingeR, SutheRland STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION § 60.01 (1986)); see also Samara Development Corp. v. . . .

GANN, L. v. OLTESVIG, TTI,, 491 F. Supp. 2d 771 (N.D. Ill. 2007)

. . . No-Parking Zone Defendants argue that the Court should have given Illinois Pattern Civil Instruction (“IPI”) 60.01 . . . The notes to IPI 60.01 state: This instruction should be given only where the evidence would support . . . Illinois Pattern Instruction — Civil 60.01, Notes on Use (2006); see also First Springfield Bank & Trust . . . Defendants failed to show that the no-parking regulation was intended to protect human life or property, IPI 60.01 . . .

AHMED, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF UNITED STATES,, 212 F. App'x 133 (3d Cir. 2007)

. . . Penal Law § 60.01(2)(b). . . .

W. MARTIN, v. GANTNER,, 443 F. Supp. 2d 367 (E.D.N.Y. 2006)

. . . . §§ 65.05, 60.01). . . .

UNITED STATES v. CRUZ,, 136 F. App'x 386 (2d Cir. 2005)

. . . Penal Law § 60.01(4) (“In any case where a person has been sentenced to a period of probation imposed . . . Penal Law § 60.01(2)(d) ].”). . . .

R. MEHTA v. SHAH, v., 113 F. App'x 165 (7th Cir. 2004)

. . . state court’s refusal to give Shah’s tendered jury instruction, Illinois Pattern Jury Instruction N. 60.01 . . .

UNITED STATES v. ROLLINS,, 97 F. App'x 577 (6th Cir. 2004)

. . . Penal Law § 60.01; see generally Daniel E. . . .

UNITED STATES v. ROLLINS,, 378 F.3d 535 (6th Cir. 2004)

. . . Penal Law § 60.01; see generally Daniel E. . . .

In HECHINGER INVESTMENT COMPANY OF DELAWARE, INC. s v. A. s, 335 F.3d 243 (3d Cir. 2003)

. . . CCA Partnership, 70 B.R. 696, 698 (Bankr.D.Del.1987) (citing 3 Sutherland, Statutory Construction, §§ 60.01 . . .

In HECHINGER INVESTMENT COMPANY OF DELAWARE, INC. s v. A. s, 335 F.3d 243 (3d Cir. 2003)

. . . CCA Partnership, 70 B.R. 696, 698 (Bankr.D.Del.1987) (citing 3 Sutherland, Statutory Construction, §§ 60.01 . . .

UNITED STATES v. HIDALGO- MACIAS,, 300 F.3d 281 (2d Cir. 2002)

. . . Penal §§ 60.01(2)(b); (3); 65.00(2). . . . Penal Law § 60.01 (1997). It does not authorize the imposition of a suspended sentence. . . .

UNITED STATES v. CARSWELL,, 144 F. Supp. 2d 123 (N.D.N.Y. 2001)

. . . . §§ 60.01, 60.02, 65.00. . . .

DEMUTIIS, v. UNITED STATES,, 48 Fed. Cl. 81 (Fed. Cl. 2000)

. . . Singer, Sutherland Statutory Construction § 60.01 (5th ed.1992). . . .

UNITED STATES v. CARRILLO,, 229 F.3d 177 (2d Cir. 2000)

. . . Sand et al., 3 Modem Federal Jury Instructions ¶ 60.01, at 60-29 (1999) (Instruction 60-10). . . .

BALL, v. MEMPHIS BAR- B- Q COMPANY, INCORPORATED,, 228 F.3d 360 (4th Cir. 2000)

. . . Singer, Sutherland Statutory Construction § 60.01 (5th ed.1992). . . .

In SPRADLIN, Sr., 231 B.R. 254 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 1999)

. . . . § 60.01 (4th ed. 1986 & Supp.1991). . . .

WARNER, v. ORANGE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION,, 115 F.3d 1068 (2d Cir. 1997)

. . . Penal Law §§ 60.01(4), 65.00(2) (McKinney 1987); N.Y. Veh. & Traf. . . .

UNITED STATES v. CORDOVA CHEMICAL COMPANY OF MICHIGAN CPC, 113 F.3d 572 (6th Cir. 1997)

. . . Singer, 3 Southerland Statutory Construction § 60.01 (5th ed.1992) (the rule that remedial statutes should . . .

JOHNSON, v. MILLER, Jr., 929 F. Supp. 1529 (S.D. Ga. 1996)

. . . two heavily majority white districts were drawn: BTP BVAP H-lll 62.67 57.88 H-116 36.83 33.73 H-120 60.01 . . .

PACOUREK, v. INLAND STEEL COMPANY, INC., 916 F. Supp. 797 (N.D. Ill. 1996)

. . . Singer, Sutherland, Statutory Construction, § 60.01 (5th ed. 1992)). . . .

UNITED STATES v. CORDOVA CHEMICAL COMPANY OF MICHIGAN CPC C., 59 F.3d 584 (6th Cir. 1995)

. . . Singer, 3 Sutherland Statutory Construction § 60.01 (5th ed. 1992) (the rule that remedial statutes should . . .

RODGERS, v. JABE,, 43 F.3d 1082 (6th Cir. 1995)

. . . t of Corrections, Policy Directive 04.05.120, § II(N)(18) (1991) (emphasis added) (replacing PD-BCF-60.01 . . . Finally, Policy Directive PD-DWA-60.01, § IV (1990), explains that [i]f a prisoner is serving a sanction . . .

HOGAR AGUA Y VIDA EN EL DESIERTO, INC. v. SUAREZ- MEDINA,, 36 F.3d 177 (1st Cir. 1994)

. . . Singer, Sutherland on Statutory Construction § 60.01 (5th ed. 1992) [hereinafter Sutherland ]. . . .

LOCKHEED SANDERS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 862 F. Supp. 677 (D.N.H. 1994)

. . . taxpayer and government); Jacob Mertens, Jr., Mertens Law of Federal Income Taxation §§ 50.67, 58A.64, 60.01 . . .

PACOUREK, v. INLAND STEEL COMPANY,, 858 F. Supp. 1393 (N.D. Ill. 1994)

. . . Singer, Sutherland, Statutory Construction § 60.01 (5th ed. 1992)). . . .

UNITED STATES v. DAILEY, a k a, 24 F.3d 1323 (11th Cir. 1994)

. . . Sand et al., Modern Federal Jury Instructions ¶ 60.01, at 60-35 (1993) (footnote omitted). . . .

SMITH Jr. v. WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, TRADE AND CONSUMER PROTECTION C. T. D. J. C. s A Z,, 23 F.3d 1134 (7th Cir. 1994)

. . . therefore falls on the state’s courts and legislature. .Key violations are defined in Wis.Admin.Code § Ag 60.01 . . .

STONER, v. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,, 846 F. Supp. 738 (W.D. Wis. 1994)

. . . Singer, Sutherland, Statutory Construction, § 60.01 (5th ed. 1992). . . .

D. GIBBS, v. J. HOPKINS, 10 F.3d 373 (6th Cir. 1993)

. . . Finally, Policy Directive PD-DWA-60.01 (8-31-87) provides at page 13: “Eeclas-sification to administrative . . .

PERCY v. JABE, Mr., 823 F. Supp. 445 (E.D. Mich. 1993)

. . . is not subject to “punishment” under Michigan Department of Corrections (“MDOC”) regulation PD-DWA-60.01 . . . "Either the prisoner or the visitor may request a rehearing on the matter per PD-DWA-60.01.” . . .

UNITED STATES v. J. PATRIARCA, 807 F. Supp. 165 (D. Mass. 1992)

. . . Arruda, 715 F.2d at 681; Coran, 589 F.2d at 72; Sand & Siefert, Modern Federal Jury Instructions, II 60.01 . . .

LOUKAS, v. HOFBAUER,, 784 F. Supp. 377 (E.D. Mich. 1991)

. . . Policy Directive BCF-60.01 states that “A prisoner may not be confined in temporary segregation without . . .

LILLEY, v. BTM CORPORATION,, 759 F. Supp. 1248 (E.D. Mich. 1991)

. . . Trial Second Trial 5,332.68 584.60 519.78 Xerox 836.80 290.20 12.17 131.02 Telephone 96.49 180.26 2.55 60.01 . . .

B. PRESSLEY, v. BROWN, Jr., 754 F. Supp. 112 (W.D. Mich. 1990)

. . . claim that this treatment was in accordance with Department of Corrections policy directive PD-DWA-60.01 . . .

R. MARKOWITZ, v. NORTHEAST LAND COMPANY. R. MARKOWITZ, 906 F.2d 100 (3d Cir. 1990)

. . . Singer, Sutherland Statutory Construction § 60.01 (Sands 4th ed. 1986); De Luz Ranchos Inv., Ltd. v. . . .

In OTASCO, INC. WHEELS, INC. v. OTASCO, INC. a, 111 B.R. 976 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. 1990)

. . . i.e., pro rata) shares of the available assets or their proceeds, 3 (Pt. 2) Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 60.01 . . .

In EASTMET CORP. MENSH, v. EASTERN STAINLESS CORP., 109 B.R. 694 (Bankr. D. Md. 1989)

. . . the bankruptcy law should be liberally construed (citing 3 Sutherland, Statutory Construction, Secs. 60.01 . . .

In AMSTERDAM AVENUE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES,, 103 B.R. 454 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1989)

. . . liberally construed, CCA Partnership, 70 B.R. at 698 (citing 3 Sutherland, Statutory Construction, §§ 60.01 . . .

v. Co., 13 Ct. Int'l Trade 546 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1989)

. . . . § 60.01 (4th rev. ed. 1986) and cases cited therein. . . .

BOMONT INDUSTRIES, v. UNITED STATES, Co., 718 F. Supp. 958 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1989)

. . . . § 60.01 (4th rev. ed. 1986) and cases cited therein. . . .

SANDERS, v. BORGERT, A. T. C O, 711 F. Supp. 889 (E.D. Mich. 1989)

. . . Michigan Department of Corrections Policy Directive PD-DWA-60.01. . . . The Michigan Supreme Court has invalidated policy directive 60.01. Martin v. . . . Administrative Procedures Act, M.C.L. § 24.201 et seq., but failed to do so when it adopted PD-DWA-60.01 . . . Because Sanders’ charges were not pending on March 28, 1986, the invalidation by Martin of PD-DWA-60.01 . . . At the time of Sanders’ charges and convictions, PD-DWA-60.01 validly defined major misconduct. C.. . . .

In IONOSPHERE CLUBS, INC., 98 B.R. 174 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1989)

. . . (quoting 3 Collier on Bankruptcy § 60.01 (14th ed. 1977)). . . .

VALDEZ v. CHURCH S FRIED CHICKEN, INC., 683 F. Supp. 596 (W.D. Tex. 1988)

. . . There may be more than one proximate cause of an event. 3 Texas Pattern Jury Charges 60.01 (1982), citing . . .

SPERLING, v. HOFFMAN- LA ROCHE, INC., 118 F.R.D. 392 (D.N.J. 1988)

. . . See generally Singer, Sutherland Statutory Construction, §§ 60.01 et seq. (4th ed.). . . .

CLARK, v. UNITED STATES, 660 F. Supp. 1164 (W.D. Wash. 1987)

. . . instructions read is probably the best, or probably as good a statement as any, and in Pattern Instruction 60.01 . . .

In CCA PARTNERSHIP, DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE OF DELAWARE, v. CCA PARTNERSHIP,, 72 B.R. 765 (D. Del. 1987)

. . . (Citing 3 Sutherland, Statutory Construction, §§ 60.01, 60.02, 66.09 (4th Ed.1974)). . . .

C. SCHOENHOLTZ, v. E. DONIGER, I., 657 F. Supp. 899 (S.D.N.Y. 1987)

. . . . § 60.01 (3d ed. 1974) (remedial statutes are liberally construed to suppress the evil and advance the . . .

In CCA PARTNERSHIP, CCA PARTNERSHIP, v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE OF DELAWARE,, 70 B.R. 696 (Bankr. D. Del. 1987)

. . . such as the bankruptcy law should be liberally construed. 3 Sutherland, Statutory Construction, §§ 60.01 . . .

In TRAFALGAR ASSOCIATES, SAVOY RECORDS, INC. v. TRAFALGAR ASSOCIATES, ALPHA RICHARD CORP. v. TRAFALGAR ASSOCIATES,, 53 B.R. 693 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1985)

. . . See also 3 Collier, Bankruptcy § 60.01 at 743 (14th ed. 1977); Sampsell v. . . .

D. WALKER, a k a W. E. T. v. MINTZES,, 771 F.2d 920 (6th Cir. 1985)

. . . Mich.Admin.Code R. 791.4405; Policy Directive PD BCF-60.01. . . .

DRAKE TOWING COMPANY, INC. v. MEISNER MARINE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES, 765 F.2d 1060 (11th Cir. 1985)

. . . . §§ 60.01-5(a), 62.25-1, that the Coast Guard, by placing the temporary buoys, undertook to facilitate . . .

CHAMBERS, v. KOEHLER,, 635 F. Supp. 884 (W.D. Mich. 1984)

. . . major misconduct of Incite to Riot or Strike, Rioting or Striking, code 022, which is defined in PD-DWA 60.01 . . .

OLYMPIA SAUNA COMPANIA NAVIERA, S. A. M V YPATIA HALCOUSSI, v. UNITED STATES UNITED STATES v. FLETCHER, M V YPATIA HALCOUSSI, FLETCHER, v. KERR STEAMSHIP COMPANY, INC. a, 604 F. Supp. 1297 (D. Or. 1984)

. . . . § 60.01-1. . Id. at § 3.01-1. . Id. at § 3.65-1. . . . . See 14 U.S.C. §§ 2 and 81; 33 C.F.R. §§ 60.01-5(a), and 62.25-1 to 62.25-60. . . . See 33 C.F.R. § 60.01-1. . . . .

SCNO BARGE LINES, INC. v. SUN TRANSPORTATION CO. INC. a, 595 F. Supp. 356 (E.D. Mo. 1984)

. . . . §§ 60.01-1 through 72.05-10. . . .

STATEN ISLAND RAPID TRANSIT OPERATING AUTHORITY, v. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION SYSTEM FEDERATION NO. RAILWAY EMPLOYEES DEPARTMENT, AFL- CIO, v. G. DEROOS, BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS, v. STATEN ISLAND RAPID TRANSIT OPERATING AUTHORITY,, 718 F.2d 533 (2d Cir. 1983)

. . . Sands, Sutherland’s Statutes and Statutory Construction §§ 60.01-60.05 (4th ed. 1973). . . .

C. LEWIS, v. EXXON CORPORATION, 716 F.2d 1398 (D.C. Cir. 1983)

. . . Sands, Statutes and Statutory Construction ¶ 60.01 (4th ed. 1974) (remedial statutes are liberally construed . . .

BROWN, v. L. BROWN,, 432 So. 2d 704 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . From Federal Judgments: A Morass Unrelieved By A Rule, 30 Hastings L.J. 41 (1978); 7 Moore’s, supra ¶ 60.01 . . . See Committee Note of 1946 to Subdivision (b), 7 Moore’s, supra ¶ 60.01[8] at 4013-16. . . . limitation, and from relief by independent action, which is limited only by laches.” 7 Moore’s, supra ¶ 60.01 . . .

GOLDEN PANAGIA STEAMSHIP, INC. v. PANAMA CANAL COMMISSION,, 557 F. Supp. 340 (E.D. La. 1983)

. . . Pro., reprinted in 6A Moore’s Federal Practice § 60.01[8]. . Bankers Mortgage Company v. . . .

UNITED STATES, v. G. McDONAGH, U. S., 14 M.J. 415 (C.M.A. 1983)

. . . reenlistments that postdated our mandate in that case. . 3 Sutherland, Statutes and Statutory Construction § 60.01 . . .

UNITED STATES v. DALLAS COUNTY COMMISSION,, 548 F. Supp. 794 (S.D. Ala. 1982)

. . . Clair 29,965 87.36 4,335 12.64 34.300 Sumter 7,079 39.99 10,621 60.01 17.700 Talladega 47,161 69.46 20,739 . . .

KING, v. H. WELLS,, 94 F.R.D. 675 (E.D. Mich. 1982)

. . . Michigan Department of Corrections, Policy Directive DWA-60.01, effective September 28, 1981. . . . . The current departmental policy directive on prisoner disciplinary proceedings, DWA-60.01, indicates . . .

In J. CARRIERO, Jr. J. BOROFF, v. M. CARRIERO,, 21 B.R. 132 (Bankr. D. Mass. 1982)

. . . invalidate certain transactions that have occurred prior to bankruptcy. 3 Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 60.01 . . .

A. M. SEAMON v. UPHAM,, 536 F. Supp. 931 (E.D. Tex. 1982)

. . . in census tracts 20, 41, 42,43, 44, 45, 46,47, 48, 49, 50,51, 52,53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 59.01, 59.02, 60.01 . . .

In D G ASSOCIATES, INC. D G J E C. STILL, v. CITY BANK AND TRUST COMPANY,, 11 B.R. 30 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1981)

. . . of the bankruptcy law are based on the policy of equality of distribution. 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 60.01 . . .

In H. M. MAIDMAN,, 2 B.R. 569 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1980)

. . . See also 3 Sutherland on Statutory Construction § 60.01 at 29 (1974); In re Carlson, 292 F.Supp. 778, . . .

BUTNER v. UNITED STATES, 440 U.S. 48 (U.S. 1979)

. . . See generally 3 Collier, supra n. 2, ¶ 60.01, pp. 743-746. . . .

GLOVER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, v. ANDRUS, A. E., 591 F.2d 554 (10th Cir. 1979)

. . . Sutherland, Statutory Construction, 4th Ed., Vol. 3, § 60.01. . . .

KOEHRING COMPANY, a v. ADAMS,, 452 F. Supp. 635 (E.D. Wis. 1978)

. . . .) § 60.01. . . .

GRAVES v. BARNES REGESTER v. BULLOCK MARRIOTT v. SMITH, ARCHER v. SMITH A. ESCALANTE v. WHITE GASKIN v. WHITE L. CHAPMAN v. W. WHITE, Jr., 446 F. Supp. 560 (W.D. Tex. 1977)

. . . included in census tracts 42.02, 54.01, 54.02, 55.01, 55.02, 55.03, 55.04, 56, 57.01, 57.02, 58, 59, 60.01 . . .

MANDEL, Co. a k a v. R. SCANLON M., 426 F. Supp. 519 (W.D. Pa. 1977)

. . . further discussion of the fundamental policy of the Bankruptcy Act, see 3 Collier on Bankruptcy, § 60.01 . . .

In ISRAEL- BRITISH BANK LONDON LIMITED, v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION,, 536 F.2d 509 (2d Cir. 1976)

. . . Smith, 83 U.S. (16 Wall.) 277, 301, 21 L.Ed. 280 (1873); 3 Collier on Bankruptcy jl 60.01, at 743; see . . .

In UNISHOPS, INC., 422 F. Supp. 75 (S.D.N.Y. 1975)

. . . .) ¶ 60.01. . . .

KODEKEY ELECTRONICS, INC. a v. MECHANEX CORPORATION, a a, 500 F.2d 110 (10th Cir. 1974)

. . . Hahn, 36 F.Supp. 952 (S.D.N.Y.1941); 3 Moore’s Federal Practice, § 60.01, et seq. . . .

UNITED STATES v. CONNECTICUT NATIONAL BANK B., 362 F. Supp. 240 (D. Conn. 1973)

. . . share from 15.61% in 1961 to 29.09% in 1969, while the share of savings banks decreased from 67.32% to 60.01% . . .

LUBBEN, v. SELECTIVE SERVICE SYSTEM LOCAL BOARD NO., 453 F.2d 645 (1st Cir. 1972)

. . . For more complete background information on Rule 60(b), see 6A Moore’s Federal Practice ¶¶ 60.01-60.08 . . .

In JACK KARDOW PLUMBING COMPANY, AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. v. A. NASS, Jr., 451 F.2d 123 (5th Cir. 1971)

. . . See generally 3 Collier on Bankruptcy, 1Í1Í 60.01, 60.57, 60.59 (14th ed. 1964). . . . .

DE JONG, v. PALLOTTO, a, 239 So. 2d 252 (Fla. 1970)

. . . 18, 1969, in the City of Hollywood and charged with the violation of the Hollywood Municipal Code § 60.01 . . . Hollywood Municipal Ordinance § 60.01, under which appellant stands charged, adopts Chapter 186, Florida . . .

BANKERS MORTGAGE COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES, 423 F.2d 73 (5th Cir. 1970)

. . . Moore, Federal Practice & Procedure § 60.01[8] (2d ed.) . . . Advisory Committee Note of 1946 to Subdivision (b) of Rule 60, reprinted in 6A Moore’s Federal Practice § 60.01 . . . Advisory Committee Note of 1946 to Subdivision (b) of Rule 60 reprinted 6A Moore’s Federal Practice § 60.01 . . .

In MATTHEWS ASSOCIATES, INC. a A. J. Co., 394 F.2d 101 (3d Cir. 1968)

. . . Color Corp., 1941, 313 U.S. 215, 61 S.Ct. 904, 85 L.Ed. 1293; 3 Collier, Bankruptcy, 14tli ed., IF 60.01 . . .

HENRY VAN HUMMELL, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,, 364 F.2d 746 (10th Cir. 1966)

. . . During the years in question the percentage of cash dividends paid to net income were 1956, 60.01 per . . .

In B. DAIL, t a, 257 F. Supp. 326 (E.D.N.C. 1966)

. . . Collier, Bankruptcy, Sec. 60.01, supra. . . . Collier, Sec. 60.01, pp. 759-760, supra. . . .

UNITED STATES v. SALADOFF, d, 233 F. Supp. 255 (E.D. Pa. 1964)

. . . See 3 WiUiston, Contracts §§ 678-79 (rev. ed. 1936); 10 Mertens, Taxation § 60.01 (rev. ed. 1958). . . .

PASADENA INVESTMENT CO. a v. PASADENA AIR PRODUCTS, INC. a, 234 F. Supp. 128 (S.D. Cal. 1964)

. . . Collier Bankruptcy Manual 2d, f[ 60.01, p. 619. . . .

SIMONSON, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY, v. GRANQUIST, DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE,, 369 U.S. 38 (U.S. 1962)

. . . Id., ¶ 60.01. Lienholders need no Bankruptcy Act. . . .

UNITED STATES v. THE S. S. AMERICAN HUNTER,, 192 F. Supp. 447 (S.D.N.Y. 1961)

. . . . §§ 60.01-5 and 62.25-1 (1960 Supp.). . . . .

H. FRIEDMAN v. R. SMITH,, 144 F. Supp. 349 (E.D. Pa. 1956)

. . . Paid in per share Profit (“previously credited dividends”) per share Book value per share $132.00 $60.01 . . .

ROSS v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 169 F.2d 483 (1st Cir. 1948)

. . . See Mertens, supra, §§ 60.01-60.11. Respondent relies upon the decision of this court in Crane v. . . .

FLETT v. BOWLES,, 142 F.2d 559 (Emer. Ct. App. 1944)

. . . . 5 $30.01 to $40.00 ........... 5y2 $40.01 to $50.00 ........... 7 $50.01 to $60.00 ........... 8 $60.01 . . .

WALLACE v. UNITED STATES, 50 F. Supp. 178 (W.D.N.Y. 1943)

. . . C., 2 F.R.D. 526; Moore’s Federal Practice, Vol. 3, Sec. 60.01 et seq.; Rule 6(b) and Rule 60(b) of the . . .

CAVALLO v. AGWILINES,, 2 F.R.D. 526 (S.D.N.Y. 1942)

. . . See Moore’s Federal Practice, Vol. 3 § 60.01 et seq. . . .

PREVEDEN v. HAHN, 36 F. Supp. 952 (S.D.N.Y. 1941)

. . . Moore Federal Practice, Volume 3, Sections 60.01, 60.03, and 60.04. In United States v. . . .

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)