The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 60
INJUNCTIONS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 60.04

60.04 Injunction; sureties on bond of fiduciaries may restrain disposition of principal’s property.—When actions are commenced on the bond of any executor, administrator, guardian or trustee, or for an accounting, the surety on the bond may apply to the court in which the action is pending, if in chancery, or if the action is at law, then to any chancery court having jurisdiction, for an injunction restraining any principal in the bond from disposing of his or her property and from encumbering or removing it from the county in which it is located until the final disposition of the action. If it appears on the application that there is danger that the principal may dispose of his or her property before final judgment so that there will not be sufficient property of the principal to satisfy any judgment that is rendered against the administrator, executor, guardian or trustee, the court shall issue an injunction on such terms as are proper, enjoining such principal from disposing of his or her property, or so much thereof as is necessary for the protection of the surety until the final disposition of the action. It is not necessary for the surety to show that any amounts are due by said administrator, executor, guardian or trustee but the judge granting the injunction may vacate it on the executor, administrator, guardian or trustee giving adequate security, to be approved by the court, to the surety conditioned to save him or her harmless for all loss or damage he or she sustains as surety.

History.—s. 1, ch. 5406, 1905; RGS 3183; CGL 4975; s. 15, ch. 67-254; s. 317, ch. 95-147.

Note.—Former s. 64.10.

F.S. 60.04 on Google Scholar

F.S. 60.04 on Casetext

Amendments to 60.04

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 60.04

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 60.04.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

UNITED STATES v. LADWIG,, 192 F. Supp. 3d 1153 (E.D. Wash. 2016)

. . . Crim WPIC 60.04(1) (1977 & Supp. 1986) (“To convict the defendant of the crime of burglary in the second . . .

A. DIMPERIO, Jr. v. NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION,, 653 F. App'x 52 (2d Cir. 2016)

. . . Penal Law § 60.04(7)(b). . . . Instead, he sought creation of an individualized, alternative program akin to those created pursuant to § 60.04 . . .

UNITED STATES v. E. HINES,, 150 F. Supp. 3d 1227 (E.D. Wash. 2015)

. . . WPIC 60.04 (3d Ed). . . .

SUMMERS, v. FEATHER, FCI, 119 F. Supp. 3d 1284 (D. Or. 2015)

. . . The Washington Pattern Instructions— Criminal (WPIC) 60.04 provides that one of the elements of second . . .

EXCEL WILLOWBROOK, L. L. C. MR VM FL LSDSS L. L. C. v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, MR VM v. N. A. v. N. A. ORTB v. N. A. v. N. A. v. N. A. FL LSDSS L. L. C. v. N. A. v. N. A., 758 F.3d 592 (5th Cir. 2014)

. . . require privity of estate and run with the land regardless of notice. 2-12 Powell on Real Property § 60.04 . . .

WINN- DIXIE STORES, INC. LLC, v. DOLGENCORP, LLC, f. k. a. a LLC, v. a LLC, v., 746 F.3d 1008 (11th Cir. 2014)

. . . See 9 Powell on Real Property § 60.04(3)(c)(v) (Michael Allan Wolf ed., 2001 & Supp.2013). . . .

EXCEL WILLOWBROOK, L. L. C. ORTB MR VM FL LSDSS L. L. C. v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION. MR VM v. N. A. v. N. A. ORTB v. N. A. v. N. A. v. N. A. FL LSDSS L. L. C. v. N. A. v. JP N. A., 740 F.3d 972 (5th Cir. 2014)

. . . require privity of estate and run with the land regardless of notice. 2-12 Powell on Real Property § 60.04 . . .

In ENERGYTEC, INCORPORATED, v., 739 F.3d 215 (5th Cir. 2013)

. . . Powell, Powell ON Real PROPERTY § 60.04[3][c][iv] (2010). . . . Id. § 60.04[3][c][iii]. . . . Id. § 60.04[3][c][ii]-[iii]. . . .

In ENERGYTEC, INCORPORATED, v., 739 F.3d 215 (5th Cir. 2013)

. . . Powell, Powell on Real Property § 60.04[3][c][iv] (2010). . . . Id. § 60.04[3][c][iii]. . . . Id. § 60.04[3][c][ii]-[in]. . . .

PORTALATIN, v. GRAHAM, v. M. v. M., 624 F.3d 69 (2d Cir. 2010)

. . . Penal Law §§ 70.70(3)(b)(i), 70.70(3)(c), 60.04(5). . . .

BAUER, v. T. SHEPARD,, 620 F.3d 704 (7th Cir. 2010)

. . . judge or candidate for judicial office should also be mindful of the requirements of SCR 60.03 and 60.04 . . .

SIEFERT, v. C. ALEXANDER,, 608 F.3d 974 (7th Cir. 2010)

. . . judge or candidate for judicial office should also be mindful of the requirements of SCR 60.03 and 60.04 . . .

In ECKERT,, 414 B.R. 404 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2009)

. . . $218.24 07/22/08 $300.67 07/25/08 $ 96.87 08/14/08 $146.94 08/18/08 $259.24 08/27/08 $158.56 10/21/08 $ 60.04 . . .

DUWE, v. C. ALEXANDER, R. A. R. L., 490 F. Supp. 2d 968 (W.D. Wis. 2007)

. . . Conduct, Chapter 60 of the Wisconsin Supreme Court Rules, which includes the following provisions: SCR 60.04 . . . (l)(b), 60.04(4), 60.05(l)(a) and 60.06(3)(b). . . . by reference adopting the statement that they were precluded from answering by SCR 60.06(3)(b) and 60.04 . . . First, SCR 60.04(4)(f) is a recusal statute and therefore does not directly regulate speech. . . . (l)(b), 60.04(4) and 60.05(l)(a) and is in all other respects DENIED. . . .

CICHOWSKI v. D. HOLLENBECK S. C. M I L., 397 F. Supp. 2d 1082 (W.D. Wis. 2005)

. . . violated their rights under the First, Fourth, Seventh and Fourteenth Amendments and violated section 60.04 . . . Also, plaintiffs contend that defendants violated section 60.04 of the rules of the Supreme Court of . . .

In M. STANTON In G. v., 303 F.3d 939 (9th Cir. 2002)

. . . Rev.Code ch. 60.04. No mechanic's or materialman’s lien is at issue here. . . .

In M. STANTON In G. v., 285 F.3d 888 (9th Cir. 2002)

. . . Rev.Code ch. 60.04. No mechanic’s or materialman’s lien is at issue here. . . .

In M. STANTON In G. v., 285 F.3d 888 (9th Cir. 2002)

. . . Rev.Code ch. 60.04. No mechanic's or materialman's lien is at issue here. . . .

In M. STANTON In G. v., 303 F.3d 939 (9th Cir. 2002)

. . . Rev.Code ch. 60.04. No mechanic’s or materialman's lien is at issue here. . . .

In N. ENO, J. N. J. v., 269 B.R. 319 (Bankr. M.D. Pa. 2001)

. . . Moreover, most jurisdictions refer to covenants as interests in real property. 9 Powell on Real Property § 60.04 . . .

In BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED, 215 F.3d 1297 (Fed. Cir. 2000)

. . . Mertens, The Law of Federal Income Taxation [§ ] 60.04 (1976 rev.). . . .

M. FLATOW, v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN,, 999 F. Supp. 1 (D.D.C. 1998)

. . . See 3 Sutherland on statutory construction at § 60.04-05. II. . . .

UNITED STATES v. NIPPON PAPER INDUSTRIES CO. LTD., 109 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 1997)

. . . different meanings in different sections of single statute); 3 Sutherland, Statutory Construction § 60.04 . . .

J. PRESEAULT a v. UNITED STATES,, 100 F.3d 1525 (Fed. Cir. 1996)

. . . See Thompson on Real Property (§ 60.04(a)(l)(iii) "Increasing the Frequency or changing the Type of Use . . .

J. PRESEAULT a v. UNITED STATES,, 100 F.3d 1525 (Fed. Cir. 1996)

. . . See Thompson on Real Property (§ 60.04(a)(l)(iii) "Increasing the Frequency or changing the Type of Use . . .

In AIRCRASH DISASTER NEAR ROSELAWN, INDIANA ON OCTOBER, 909 F. Supp. 1083 (N.D. Ill. 1995)

. . . The Linton court reports the figure at 60.04%. . . . We cannot determine how the 60.04% figure was arrived at. . . .

In GOLD SILVERSMITHS, INC. d b a s, 170 B.R. 538 (Bankr. W.D.N.Y. 1994)

. . . had been rendered erroneous. . 6a Moore's Federal Practice ¶ 60.02. . 6a Moore's Federal Practice ¶ 60.04 . . .

E. WALKER, v. PALM BEACH COMMERCE CENTER ASSOCIATED, LTD., 614 So. 2d 1097 (Fla. 1993)

. . . E.g., § 60.04, Fla.Stat. (1991). . . .

LINTON, v. AIRBUS INDUSTRIE, Mr. MOSS, v. AIRBUS INDUSTRIE,, 794 F. Supp. 650 (S.D. Tex. 1992)

. . . In the Airbus Defendants’ view, since 60.04% of AI’s shares are owned by foreign states, it is a foreign . . .

G. BURTON, REPUBLICAN PARTY, T. v. J. SHEHEEN, A. E. T. Y. A. L. I. STATEWIDE REAPPORTIONMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE, v. A. CAMPBELL, Jr. I. BLANTON, A. E. Y. A. v. A. CAMPBELL, Jr., 793 F. Supp. 1329 (D.S.C. 1992)

. . . -22.43 64.47 58.62 72.15 65.91 -18.86 55.71 57.07 55.92 51.91 -08.84 54.73 52.18 49.92 47.30 +00.75 60.04 . . .

In HUTCHINGS HARPER ENTERPRISES, INC. P. HARPER, v. HAERTL CONSTRUCTORS, INC. L M a a, 116 B.R. 786 (C.C.D. Or. 1990)

. . . Terrence Excavators, Inc., 44 Wash.App. 554, 723 P.2d 1153, 1155-56 (1986); R.C.W. 60.04.-100. . . .

UNITED STATES v. COHOON,, 886 F.2d 1036 (8th Cir. 1989)

. . . 877 F.2d at 689-90 (considering full 142.2 grams of cocaine where defendant charged with selling only 60.04 . . .

UNITED STATES v. E. MANN,, 877 F.2d 688 (8th Cir. 1989)

. . . Crismon set up another transaction with Mann in cooperation with DEA agents, and Mann was arrested with 60.04 . . . sentencing, the district court considered the 82.09 grams of cocaine seized from Crismon in addition to the 60.04 . . . A total of 60.04 grams of cocaine was seized from Mann at this time. . . . . § 841(a)(1), charging him only with the sale of 60.04 grams of cocaine seized at the time of his arrest . . . Therefore, Mann contends his offense level, based on 60.04 grams of cocaine, should be 14, which requires . . .

In AMERICAN PRECISION VIBRATOR COMPANY, AMERICAN PRECISION VIBRATOR COMPANY, v. NATIONAL AIR VIBRATOR CO., 863 F.2d 428 (5th Cir. 1989)

. . . See 6A Moore’s Federal Practice, supra note 9, ¶ 60.04[1], at 60-32. . Id. . Id. at 60-31. . . . .

In AMERICAN PRECISION VIBRATOR COMPANY, AMERICAN PRECISION VIBRATOR COMPANY, v. NATIONAL AIR VIBRATOR CO., 863 F.2d 428 (5th Cir. 1989)

. . . See 6A Moore’s Federal Practice, supra note 9, ¶ 60.04[1], at 60-32. . Id. . Id. at 60-31. . . . .

In CONTROL ELECTRIC, INC. s W. RAGSDALE, Jr. v. CITIZENS AND SOUTHERN NATIONAL BANK,, 91 B.R. 1010 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 1988)

. . . Originally, preferential transfers were lawful. 3 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 60.04, p. 767 (14th ed. 1964 . . .

UNITED STATES VA v. BEKHRAD,, 672 F. Supp. 1529 (S.D. Iowa 1987)

. . . penalties recoverable in civil cases, courts commonly subject it to strict construction. 3 Sutherland § 60.04 . . .

In HUNTERS RUN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,, 70 B.R. 297 (Bankr. W.D. Wash. 1987)

. . . to R.C.W. 60.04.060 and the commencement of a foreclosure within eight months as required by R.C.W. 60.04 . . .

In ASPEN HOMES, INC. O ROURKE, v. VALLEY BEST- WAY BUILDING SUPPLY, INC. a, 54 B.R. 541 (Bankr. E.D. Wash. 1985)

. . . the sums due and to become due, for which a potential lien claimant may claim a lien under Chapter 60.04 . . .

J. JOHNSTON R. v. UNITED STATES, 605 F. Supp. 26 (D. Mont. 1984)

. . . See cases cited at footnote 1 § 60.04, 10 Mertens, Law of Federal Income Taxation (1976). . . .

In ELECTRIC CITY, INC. A. QUIGLEY, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, 43 B.R. 336 (Bankr. W.D. Wash. 1984)

. . . property tax lien with the methods of delayed perfection for mechanics’ and materialman’s liens under RCW 60.04 . . . Examples of such relation back provisions are found in RCW 60.04 (Mechanics and Materialmans Liens), . . .

INDIAN HEAD NATIONAL BANK OF NASHUA, v. BRUNELLE, U. S. IPA, 689 F.2d 245 (1st Cir. 1982)

. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 60.04[1] at 4043 (2d ed. 1982). . . .

SEELYE CRAFTSMAN CO. a v. D. OHLHAUSER,, 91 F.R.D. 166 (D. Minn. 1981)

. . . Crawford Door Sales Co., 49 F.R.D. 3, 6-7 (D.S.Car.1970); 6A Moore’s Federal Practice, ¶ 60.04[2] (1980 . . .

UNITED ROASTERS, INC. v. COLGATE- PALMOLIVE COMPANY,, 485 F. Supp. 1049 (E.D.N.C. 1980)

. . . See Sutherland, supra at § 60.04. It is not criminal, G.S. 75-7. . . .

UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES, 612 F.2d 558 (Ct. Cl. 1979)

. . . Mertens, The Law of Federal Income Taxation § 60.04 (1976 rev.). . . .

UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION v. THE UNITED STATES, 222 Ct. Cl. 75 (Ct. Cl. 1979)

. . . Mertens, The Law of Federal Income Taxation § 60.04 (1976 rev.). . . .

MANDEL, Co. a k a v. R. SCANLON M., 426 F. Supp. 519 (W.D. Pa. 1977)

. . . the development of bankruptcy law in the United States and in England, see 3 Collier on Bankruptcy §§ 60.04 . . .

WARNER, III, a v. CITY OF BAY ST. LOUIS,, 526 F.2d 1211 (5th Cir. 1976)

. . . See Moore, Federal Practice, Vol. 6(a), If 60.04[1], p. 4043, (1973). . . .

AETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES, 403 F. Supp. 498 (D. Conn. 1975)

. . . Mertens, The Law of Federal Income Taxation § 60.04 (rev. ed. 1970), and eases cited therein. . . .

UNITED STATES v. REXACH,, 482 F.2d 10 (1st Cir. 1973)

. . . 483, 494 (1st Cir. 1948) (Frankfurter, Circuit Justice) ; 10 Mertens Law of Federal Income Taxation f 60.04 . . .

In WARREN, s, 192 F. Supp. 801 (W.D. Wash. 1961)

. . . were perfected prior to the date of bankruptcy in accordance with the procedure set out in chapter 60.04 . . .

MASSAGLIA, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,, 286 F.2d 258 (10th Cir. 1961)

. . . Commissioner, 5 Cir., 131 F.2d 662; and Mertens Law of Federal Income Taxation, §§ 60.04 and 60.14. . . .

W. HARTMAN W. v. NORTH CENTRAL AIRLINES,, 144 F. Supp. 885 (S.D. Ind. 1956)

. . . E-7491, dated June 18,1953, reduced Petitioner’s effective rate from 60.04 cents per mile to 50.02 cents . . .

A. J. JACKSON, R. Co. v. E. FLOHR, W. L. Co., 227 F.2d 607 (9th Cir. 1955)

. . . . § 60.04.-050. . “ ‘The provisions of law relating to liens created by this act, and all proceedings . . .

THE B B NO. IRA S. BUSHEY SONS, INC. v. THE B B NO., 70 F. Supp. 578 (E.D.N.Y. 1947)

. . . Ill, §§ 60.02, 60.03, 60.04; and Thompson v. . . .

McGINN v. UNITED STATES, 2 F.R.D. 562 (D. Mass. 1942)

. . . “actions”, it must, at least, mean original actions as above set out. 3 Moore, Federal Practice, § 60.04 . . . Wardman Real Estate Properties, D.C., 31 F.Supp. 685, 688; cf. 3 Moore, Federal Practice, § 60.04, p. . . . Moore, Federal Practice, Vol. 3, § 60.04, pp. 3273, 3274. In Preveden v. . . .

FRASER v. DOING, 130 F.2d 617 (D.C. Cir. 1942)

. . . See Note, 4 Federal Rules Service, 942, 943 ; 3 Moore’s Fed.Prac. (1938) §§ 60.02, 60.04; 18 Hughes, . . .

PREVEDEN v. HAHN, 36 F. Supp. 952 (S.D.N.Y. 1941)

. . . Moore Federal Practice, Volume 3, Sections 60.01, 60.03, and 60.04. In United States v. . . .