Cases from cite.case.law:

PREMIER COMPOUNDING PHARMACY, INC. a v. LARSON,, 250 So. 3d 94 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . The employer never posted a bond for its temporary injunction, and section 60.07, Florida Statutes, provided . . . the employment contract and the specific provision for attorney's fees in the contract, not section 60.07 . . .

TRIPP, v. W. SCHOLZ,, 872 F.3d 857 (7th Cir. 2017)

. . . districts cover approximately 2,808 and 1,810 square miles, with population densities of 38.72 and 60.07 . . .

VITAL PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. d b a VPX a v. PROFESSIONAL SUPPLEMENTS, LLC, A a k a D b a LLC USA, LLC, A a k a d b a a k a T. J. a k a a k a J. P., 210 So. 3d 766 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . Thereafter, appellees moved to recover damages resulting from the injunction under section 60.07, Florida . . . Additionally, section 60.07 provides that “[i]n injunction actions, on dissolution, the court may hear . . . Considering these two provisions together, section 60.07 presupposes the existence of a bond because . . . Here, appellees specifically sought damages under section 60.07. . . . Section 60.07 allows “the court in the main suit to determine and award damages upon dissolution of an . . .

J. ANDRIST S. v. P. SPLEEN,, 142 So. 3d 950 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . The court strictly construed section 60.07, Florida Statutes (2012), and awarded only the amount of the . . . the court erred in strictly construing Rule 1.610 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and section 60.07 . . . hear evidence and assess damages to which a defendant may be entitled under any injunction bond.” § 60.07 . . .

D. MOHAMMADI, v. NWABUISI, d b a, 990 F. Supp. 2d 723 (W.D. Tex. 2014)

. . . Plaintiffs pay stub for October 1 to 15, 2011, purported to pay her for just 60.07 hours, more than seven . . .

TOSCANO, LC, v. UNITED STATES,, 107 Fed. Cl. 179 (Fed. Cl. 2012)

. . . .”); cf. 7 Thompson on Real Property § 60.07(c)(4) (David A. . . .

HIGHWAY HOLDINGS, LLC, v. MYERS,, 114 So. 3d 215 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . (citation omitted); see also § 60.07, Fla. Stat. (2011). In Parker Tampa Two, Inc. v. . . .

BRADENTON GROUP, INC. v. STATE, 970 So. 2d 403 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . motion for rehearing, it granted the defendants’ motion for award of attorney’s fees pursuant to section 60.07 . . . In May 2004, defendants moved for damages resulting from the injunction under section 60.07. . . . The State argues that the defendants were not entitled to relief because, under section 60.07, a defendant . . . Court’s award of costs and fees to the defendants after Bradenton II, which were premised on section 60.07 . . . There, the court restated the rule that damages under section 60.07 were limited to the amount of the . . .

L. LUDWIG, v. CITY OF JAMESTOWN, NEW YORK,, 518 F. Supp. 2d 484 (W.D.N.Y. 2007)

. . . advising service would be terminated at 19 Cross Street on January 11, 2005 if payment in the amount of $60.07 . . . A separate disconnect notice addressed to Ludwig also advised that $60.07 for electric, water and sewer . . . service at 19 Cross Street would be terminated on January 11, 2005, unless payment in the amount of $60.07 . . .

S AND T BUILDERS, v. GLOBE PROPERTIES, INC., 944 So. 2d 302 (Fla. 2006)

. . . With regard to the award of damages after the dissolution of an injunction, section 60.07 of the Florida . . . necessity for an action on the injunction bond if no party has requested a jury trial on damages. § 60.07 . . .

BROWARD YACHTS, INC. d b a v. YACHTING PROMOTIONS, INC., 889 So. 2d 911 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . Yacht’s argument is that the only bases for awarding attorney’s fees in Parker Tampa Two was section 60.07 . . .

DAIWA PRODUCTS, INC. v. NATIONSBANK, N. A., 885 So. 2d 884 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . E.g., § 60.07, Fla. . . .

PONDELLA HALL FOR HIRE, INC. v. LAMAR,, 866 So. 2d 719 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . counterclaim was dismissed, but claims that it subsequently filed a “Motion for Damages pursuant to Section 60.07 . . .

YACHTING PROMOTIONS, INC. v. BROWARD YACHTS, INC. d b a, 792 So. 2d 660 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . See § 60.07, Fla. Stat. (2000). . . .

PROVIDENT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, v. CITY OF TREASURE ISLAND,, 796 So. 2d 481 (Fla. 2001)

. . . Section 60.07, Florida Statues (1989), provides a mechanism by which damages from a wrongfully issued . . . Provident filed a motion pursuant to section 60.07, and the hearing on damages in the trial court was . . .

CITY OF TREASURE ISLAND, a v. PROVIDENT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION N., 738 So. 2d 357 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . See § 60.07, Fla. Stat. (1997). Such motions suffice when no party wishes to have a jury trial. . . . Neither does section 60.07 because it only applies when an injunction bond exists. . . .

PROVIDENT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, v. CITY OF TREASURE ISLAND, N. BELAIR, v. CITY OF TREASURE ISLAND,, 718 So. 2d 738 (Fla. 1998)

. . . In the late 1980s, there was considerable debate concerning the damages available under section 60.07 . . . Although Parker Tampa Two did not involve a municipality, nothing in that decision, in section 60.07, . . . If a bond exists, then the defendant may invoke section 60.07 or otherwise seek damages under the terms . . . Florida Statutes further provides: 60.07 Assessment of damages after dissolution. — In injunction actions . . . necessity for an action on the injunction bond if no party has requested a jury trial on damages., § 60.07 . . .

Jr SCHNEIDER, v. F. SCHLAEFER, T. C. J. L. G. P. O. P. O. St. N., 975 F. Supp. 1160 (E.D. Wis. 1997)

. . . Where by the [judge] is the fiduciary (SRC 60.07) of the court and responsible for the colors of the . . .

FU SHENG INDUSTRIAL CO. LTD. a v. T F SYSTEMS, INC. a C. SOUTHEAST CAPITAL FINANCING, INC. a v. T F SYSTEMS, INC. a C. Fu Co. a, 690 So. 2d 617 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . argument that an injunction bond issued pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610 and section 60.07 . . .

CITY OF TREASURE ISLAND, a v. PROVIDENT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION N., 678 So. 2d 1322 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . these documents as if they were amended complaints seeking damages from the City pursuant to section 60.07 . . . In the late 1980s, there was considerable debate concerning the damages available under section 60.07 . . . Although Parker Tampa Two did not involve a municipality, nothing in that decision, in section 60.07, . . . If a bond exists, then the defendant may invoke section 60.07 or otherwise seek damages under the terms . . . Section 60.07 provides: "In injunction actions, on dissolution, the court may hear evidence and assess . . .

JOHNSON, v. MILLER, Jr., 929 F. Supp. 1529 (S.D. Ga. 1996)

. . . In the final 1992 plan, the black population percentages were 60.07% BTP and 55.68% BVAP. . . .

CLOTHING CORRECTIBLES, INC. v. HIRSCHBERG,, 642 So. 2d 134 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . See § 60.07, Fla.Stat. (1993); Lake Worth Broadcasting Corp. v. . . .

STAR BRITE DISTRIBUTING, INC. v. C. GAVIN L. v. OCEAN BIO- CHEM, INC. G. F. K. M., 746 F. Supp. 633 (N.D. Miss. 1990)

. . . only here the error is not apparent on the face of the record. 6 A Moore’s Federal Practice, Paragraph 60.07 . . .

MERRETT, v. NAGEL,, 564 So. 2d 229 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . is the claimed wrongful issuance of the temporary injunction pursuant to rule 1.610(b) and section 60.07 . . . Similarly, section 60.07 provides that in an injunction action after dissolution of the injunction, “ . . . Further, courts awarding attorney’s fees under rule 1.610(b) and section 60.07 limit recovery to the . . .

PARKER TAMPA TWO, INC. v. SOMERSET DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,, 544 So. 2d 1018 (Fla. 1989)

. . . In Florida, injunction bonds are addressed by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610 and section 60.07 . . . Section 60.07 provides: 60.07 Assessment of damages after dissolution. — In injunction actions, on dissolution . . .

HATHCOCK, v. HATHCOCK,, 533 So. 2d 802 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . Both cases rely upon Section 60.07, Florida Statutes, in holding that a defendant is entitled to recover . . . However, fatal to appellant’s reliance upon the above authorities is the fact that Section 60.07 allowing . . . Section 60.07 provides: 60.07 Assessment of damages after dissolution.— In injunction actions, on dissolution . . .

CLINCHFIELD RAILROAD COMPANY v. G. LYNCH, R. Ad, 605 F. Supp. 1005 (E.D.N.C. 1985)

. . . 81.40 Catawba 67.54 Granville 63.96 Iredell 71.17 Robeson 78.70 Rowan 56.21 Rutherford 58.19 Vance 60.07 . . .

BRAUN d b a v. INTERCONTINENTAL BANK,, 452 So. 2d 998 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . order assessing damages in the form of attorney’s fees under an injunction bond pursuant to Section 60.07 . . .

CHAVEZ, v. BALESH, d b a, 704 F.2d 774 (5th Cir. 1983)

. . . Moore’s If 60.07 at 4069 (“Where the error is not apparent on the face of the record, and evidence must . . .

CLINCHFIELD RAILROAD COMPANY, v. G. LYNCH,, 527 F. Supp. 784 (E.D.N.C. 1981)

. . . Greene Swain 37.84 52.25 Halifax Transylvania 87.78 57.31 Henderson Union 66.00 51.70 Iredell Vance 60.07 . . .

In QUALITY REDI- MIX, INC. a HILLSDALE COUNTY NATIONAL BANK, a v. F. UHLE,, 10 B.R. 409 (Bankr. W.D. Mich. 1981)

. . . First National Bank of Cincinnati, 476 F.Supp. 474 (1978); 3 Collier on Bankruptcy (Part 2) ¶¶ 60.07, . . .

CISSELL, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CINCINNATI,, 476 F. Supp. 474 (S.D. Ohio 1979)

. . . 990-93 (9th Cir. 1965); 1 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 1.30 (1978); 3 Collier on Bankruptcy (Part 2) ¶¶ 60.07 . . .

B. KLEIN, JNT v. N. TABATCHNICK S., 459 F. Supp. 707 (S.D.N.Y. 1978)

. . . Bankruptcy Act, encompassing “anything of value which has debt-paying or debt-securing power.” 3 Collier ¶ 60.07 . . .

In OLLAG CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT CORP. MANUFACTURERS AND TRADERS TRUST COMPANY, v. GOLDMAN,, 578 F.2d 904 (2d Cir. 1978)

. . . law that would warrant our looking past this explicit authorization. . 3 Collier on Bankruptcy 1': 60.07 . . .

VENETIAN SHORES HOME AND PROPERTY OWNERS v. C. RUZAKAWSKI, 336 So. 2d 399 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . Chapter 14-60.07 G. (8), of the Florida Administrative Code as adopted to implement the Statute provides . . .

WOOD, v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BUREAU OF AVIATION, DIVISION OF MASS TRANSIT OPERATION,, 325 So. 2d 25 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . Department, sent Wood a letter directing Wood’s attention to alleged serious violations of Chapter 14-60.07 . . . our recently revised safety and minimum standards criteria as presented in paragraph 1 of Chapter 14-60.07 . . . the failure of the facility to meet minimum safety standards as prescribed in paragraph 1 of Ch. 14-60.07 . . .

I. SELBY, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, a, 405 F. Supp. 164 (E.D. Mich. 1975)

. . . . § 110. 3 Collier jf 60.07[2], at 791. . . .

CARPENTERS DISTRICT COUNCIL OF JACKSONVILLE AND VICINITY, a By H. v. J. WAYBRIGHT, IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY,, 282 So. 2d 193 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

. . . See Section 60.07, Florida Statutes, F.S.A.; Nicholas v. . . .

FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY, v. R. WATERS, Jr., 273 So. 2d 96 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

. . . financed the balance of the purchase price ($1,786.50) with Ford Motor Credit Company at a rate of $60.07 . . .

A. GENTRY, v. L. BODAN v. O. PARKER, Jr. C., 347 F. Supp. 367 (W.D. La. 1972)

. . . See, Collier, Bankruptcy Par. 60.07 at 790-791 (14th ed. 1964). . . .

Mr. F. CALCAGNI v. P. MAMBER,, 262 So. 2d 467 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)

. . . Also, compare § 60.07, Fla.Stat.1969, F.S.A. . . .

GLOBAL CONTACT LENS, INC. a v. KNIGHT,, 254 So. 2d 807 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)

. . . O’Neal, 1886, 22 Fla. 592, § 60.07, Fla.Stat.1969, F.S.A. has been enacted, which authorizes the court . . .

A. THOMAS, s, v. GULFWAY SHOPPING CENTER, INC., 320 F. Supp. 756 (S.D. Tex. 1970)

. . . See, Collier, Bankruptcy Par. 60.07 at 790-791 (14th ed. 1964). . . .

HENKIN, v. ROCKOWER BROS. INC., 259 F. Supp. 202 (S.D.N.Y. 1966)

. . . transfer only if the property transferred was property of the bankrupt. 3 Collier, Bankruptcy, [¶] 60.07 . . .

C. EBERLY v. A. DUDLEY, s,, 314 F.2d 8 (9th Cir. 1962)

. . . . § 60.07, at pages 776-777. . . . .

In BURTON, 120 F. Supp. 148 (D. Md. 1954)

. . . Collier, 14th Ed., Vol. 3, p. 777, par. 60.07, gives a similar summary as follows: “To effectuate the . . .

SILVER KING COALITION MINES CO. OF NEVADA v. SILVER KING CONSOL. MINING CO. OF UTAH SILVER KING CONSOL. MINING CO. OF UTAH v. SILVER KING COALITION MINES CO. OF NEVADA, 204 F. 166 (8th Cir. 1913)

. . . of two classes: There were 18,916 tons of ore of the first class, from which the defendant realized $60.07 . . .

LOVE v. FENDALL S TRUSTEES, 15 F. Cas. 993 (C.C.D.C. 1801)

. . . Injunction granted, upon bond and security for costs in the amount of $60.07. . . .