Cases from cite.case.law:

L. CHITTIM, v. M. CHITTIM,, 230 So. 3d 966 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . are in equity and governed by basic rules of fairness as opposed to the strict rule of law” (citing § 61.011 . . .

W. TERRY, v. CHICAGO BRIDGE IRON COMPANY,, 283 F. Supp. 3d 601 (S.D. Tex. 2017)

. . . Code § 61.011. . . . Code § 61.011. . . .

MARTINEZ, v. MARTINEZ,, 219 So. 3d 259 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . See § 61.011, Fla. Stat. (2015) (“Proceedings under this chapter are in chancery.”). . . .

M. JARRARD, v. T. JARRARD,, 157 So. 3d 332 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . See § 61.011, Fla. Stat. (2012). . Philip J. . . .

A. FORD, v. FORD,, 153 So. 3d 315 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . Guidy, 106 Fla. 94, 142 So. 818 (1932)); accord § 61.011, Fla. . . .

IHEGWORD, v. HARRIS COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT d b a d b a d b a d b a, 929 F. Supp. 2d 635 (S.D. Tex. 2013)

. . . . §§ 61.011-.020; Igal v. Brightstar Info. Tech. Group, 250 S.W.3d 78, 81-82 (Tex.2008). . . .

CHAMBERS, v. SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO., 428 F. App'x 400 (5th Cir. 2011)

. . . Code § 61.011. Chambers additionally seeks certification of a class action against Sears. . . . The Texas Payday Law, Texas Labor Code § 61.011, provides in pertinent part: (a) An employer shall pay . . . Lab.Code § 61.011(a). . Chambers Response, at 34. . . .

CHAMBERS v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO. A E LLC,, 793 F. Supp. 2d 938 (S.D. Tex. 2010)

. . . Code § 61.011. Chambers additionally seeks certification of a class action against Sears. . . . Id. § 61.011. . . . Lab.Code § 61.011. . . . . The Texas Payday Law, Texas Labor Code § 61.011, provides in pertinent part: (a) An employer shall pay . . . Lab.Code § 61.011(a). . Chambers Response, at 34. . . .

SCHNEIDER, v. SCHNEIDER,, 32 So. 3d 151 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . See § 61.011, Fla. Stat. (1995) (“Proceedings under this chapter are in chancery.”). . . .

SEVERANCE, v. PATTERSON,, 566 F.3d 490 (5th Cir. 2009)

. . . . § 61.011(a) et seq. . . . Res.Code Ann. § 61.011(a). . . . Res.Code Ann. § 61.011(a) et seq., (“OBA”), explains that there is no controlling Texas Supreme Court . . . Res.Code § 61.011(a). . . . Rbs.Code § 61.011(a) (Vernon 2009) (emphasis added). . This is not a novel concept. . . .

VITT, v. RODRIGUEZ,, 960 So. 2d 47 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . See § 61.011, Fla. Stat. (1995) (“Proceedings under this chapter are in chancery.”). . . .

MIKESKA v. CITY OF GALVESTON, 451 F.3d 376 (5th Cir. 2006)

. . . . § 61.011(a). . . . public beach easement,” and to “promulgate rules” to enforce the OBA’s public beach protections. § 61.011 . . .

SAN PEDRO, v. SAN PEDRO,, 910 So. 2d 426 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . .”); see also § 61.011, Fla. Stat. (2005) (“Proceedings under this chapter are in chancery.”). . . .

ZOLD, v. F. ZOLD,, 911 So. 2d 1222 (Fla. 2005)

. . . See also § 61.011, Fla. Stat. (2004) (“Proceedings under this chapter are in chancery.”). . . .

MIKESKA v. CITY OF GALVESTON, 419 F.3d 431 (5th Cir. 2005)

. . . . § 61.011(a). . . . public beach easement,” and to “promulgate rules” to enforce the OBA’s public beach protections. § 61.011 . . .

B. LASHKAJANI, v. H. LASHKAJANI,, 911 So. 2d 1154 (Fla. 2005)

. . . See § 61.011, Fla. Stat. (1995) (“Proceedings under this chapter are in chancery.”). . . .

R. WADE, f k a R. v. D. HIRSCHMAN,, 903 So. 2d 928 (Fla. 2005)

. . . See § 61.011, Fla. Stat. (2004) ("Proceedings under this chapter are in chancery.”). . . . .

FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY, v. ROTEC INDUSTRIES, INC., 392 F.3d 944 (7th Cir. 2004)

. . . Labor Code § 61.011, of protecting wage earners. . . .

FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY, v. ROTEC INDUSTRIES, INC., 392 F.3d 944 (7th Cir. 2004)

. . . Labor Code § 61.011, of protecting wage earners. . . .

MIKESKA, v. THE CITY OF GALVESTON,, 328 F. Supp. 2d 671 (S.D. Tex. 2004)

. . . . § 61.011, codifies the easement and provides for unrestricted public access to the state-owned wet . . . solely to make the house habitable; (B) complies with rules adopted by the commissioner under Section 61.011 . . .

KALMANSON, v. T. LOCKETT,, 848 So. 2d 374 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . Section 61.011 specifically provides that these proceedings are “in chancery,” and accordingly authorizes . . .

L. SUMLAR, v. K. SUMLAR,, 827 So. 2d 1079 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . Rosen, 696 So.2d at 700; § 61.011, Fla. Stat. (2000). . . .

GAUTHIER, v. A. GAUTHIER,, 768 So. 2d 1119 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . governed by basic rules of fairness as opposed to the strict rule of law.” 696 So.2d at 700 (citing § 61.011 . . .

ROSEN, v. ROSEN,, 696 So. 2d 697 (Fla. 1997)

. . . See § 61.011, Fla.Stat. (1995) (“Proceedings under this chapter are in chancery.”). . . .

ATKINSON, v. DENTON PUBLISHING COMPANY,, 84 F.3d 144 (5th Cir. 1996)

. . . The Texas Payday Law has been repealed and codified at TexLabor Code § 61.011 et seq. . . .

M. EMMEL, v. T. EMMEL,, 671 So. 2d 282 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . .2d 620, 621 (Fla.1988): [T]he equitable considerations underlying our dissolution law, see section 61.011 . . .

HALKIAS, v. GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION,, 899 F. Supp. 295 (N.D. Tex. 1995)

. . . . § 61.011 (Vernon pam. 1995). . . .

DENNIS, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES,, 566 So. 2d 1374 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . HRS responded that section 61.011 provides that proceedings for child support under that chapter are . . .

DeLOACH, v. DeLOACH,, 552 So. 2d 324 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . . § 61.011, Fla.Stat. . . .

G. NICHOLS, v. NICHOLS,, 519 So. 2d 620 (Fla. 1988)

. . . Moreover, the equitable considerations underlying our dissolution law, see § 61.011, Fla.Stat. (1985) . . .

J. v. W. McCLELLAND,, 318 So. 2d 160 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

. . . Secs. 61.011, 61.052(2)(a), F.S.1973. . . .

R. RYAN, v. E. RYAN,, 277 So. 2d 266 (Fla. 1973)

. . . Section 61.011, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., entitled, “Dissolution in Chancery”, provides that proceedings . . .