Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 61.13001 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 61.13001 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 61.13001

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Chapter 61
DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE; SUPPORT; TIME-SHARING
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 61.13001
61.13001 Parental relocation with a child.
(1) DEFINITIONS.As used in this section, the term:
(a) “Child” means any person who is under the jurisdiction of a state court pursuant to the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act or is the subject of any order granting to a parent or other person any right to time-sharing, residential care, kinship, or custody, as provided under state law.
(b) “Court” means the circuit court in an original proceeding which has proper venue and jurisdiction in accordance with the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act, the circuit court in the county in which either parent and the child reside, or the circuit court in which the original action was adjudicated.
(c) “Other person” means an individual who is not the parent, but with whom the child resides pursuant to court order, or who has the right of access to, time-sharing with, or visitation with the child.
(d) “Parent” means any person so named by court order or express written agreement who is subject to court enforcement or a person reflected as a parent on a birth certificate and who is entitled to access to or time-sharing with the child.
(e) “Relocation” means a change in the location of the principal residence of a parent or other person from his or her principal place of residence at the time of the last order establishing or modifying time-sharing, or at the time of filing the pending action to establish or modify time-sharing. The change of location must be at least 50 miles from that residence, and for at least 60 consecutive days not including a temporary absence from the principal residence for purposes of vacation, education, or the provision of health care for the child.
(2) RELOCATION BY AGREEMENT.
(a) If the parents and every other person entitled to access to or time-sharing with the child agree to the relocation of the child, they may satisfy the requirements of this section by signing a written agreement that:
1. Reflects consent to the relocation;
2. Defines an access or time-sharing schedule for the nonrelocating parent and any other persons who are entitled to access or time-sharing; and
3. Describes, if necessary, any transportation arrangements related to access or time-sharing.
(b) If there is an existing cause of action, judgment, or decree of record pertaining to the child’s residence or a time-sharing schedule, the parties shall seek ratification of the agreement by court order without the necessity of an evidentiary hearing unless a hearing is requested, in writing, by one or more of the parties to the agreement within 10 days after the date the agreement is filed with the court. If a hearing is not timely requested, it shall be presumed that the relocation is in the best interest of the child and the court may ratify the agreement without an evidentiary hearing.
(3) PETITION TO RELOCATE.Unless an agreement has been entered as described in subsection (2), a parent or other person seeking relocation must file a petition to relocate and serve it upon the other parent, and every other person entitled to access to or time-sharing with the child. The pleadings must be in accordance with this section:
(a) The petition to relocate must be signed under oath or affirmation under penalty of perjury and include:
1. A description of the location of the intended new residence, including the state, city, and specific physical address, if known.
2. The mailing address of the intended new residence, if not the same as the physical address, if known.
3. The home telephone number of the intended new residence, if known.
4. The date of the intended move or proposed relocation.
5. A detailed statement of the specific reasons for the proposed relocation. If one of the reasons is based upon a job offer that has been reduced to writing, the written job offer must be attached to the petition.
6. A proposal for the revised postrelocation schedule for access and time-sharing together with a proposal for the postrelocation transportation arrangements necessary to effectuate time-sharing with the child. Absent the existence of a current, valid order abating, terminating, or restricting access or time-sharing or other good cause predating the petition, failure to comply with this provision renders the petition to relocate legally insufficient.
7. Substantially the following statement, in all capital letters and in the same size type, or larger, as the type in the remainder of the petition:

A RESPONSE TO THE PETITION OBJECTING TO RELOCATION MUST BE MADE IN WRITING, FILED WITH THE COURT, AND SERVED ON THE PARENT OR OTHER PERSON SEEKING TO RELOCATE WITHIN 20 DAYS AFTER SERVICE OF THIS PETITION TO RELOCATE. IF YOU FAIL TO TIMELY OBJECT TO THE RELOCATION, THE RELOCATION WILL BE ALLOWED, UNLESS IT IS NOT IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CHILD, WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE AND WITHOUT A HEARING.

(b) The petition to relocate must be served on the other parent and on every other person entitled to access to and time-sharing with the child. If there is a pending court action regarding the child, service of process may be according to court rule. Otherwise, service of process shall be according to chapters 48 and 49 or via certified mail, restricted delivery, return receipt requested.
(c) A parent or other person seeking to relocate has a continuing duty to provide current and updated information required by this section when that information becomes known.
(d) If the other parent and any other person entitled to access to or time-sharing with the child fails to timely file a response objecting to the petition to relocate, it is presumed that the relocation is in the best interest of the child and that the relocation should be allowed, and the court shall, absent good cause, enter an order specifying that the order is entered as a result of the failure to respond to the petition and adopting the access and time-sharing schedule and transportation arrangements contained in the petition. The order may be issued in an expedited manner without the necessity of an evidentiary hearing. If a response is timely filed, the parent or other person may not relocate, and must proceed to a temporary hearing or trial and obtain court permission to relocate.
(e) Relocating the child without complying with the requirements of this subsection subjects the party in violation to contempt and other proceedings to compel the return of the child and may be taken into account by the court in any initial or postjudgment action seeking a determination or modification of the parenting plan or the access or time-sharing schedule as:
1. A factor in making a determination regarding the relocation of a child.
2. A factor in determining whether the parenting plan or the access or time-sharing schedule should be modified.
3. A basis for ordering the temporary or permanent return of the child.
4. Sufficient cause to order the parent or other person seeking to relocate the child to pay reasonable expenses and attorney’s fees incurred by the party objecting to the relocation.
5. Sufficient cause for the award of reasonable attorney’s fees and costs, including interim travel expenses incident to access or time-sharing or securing the return of the child.
(4) APPLICABILITY OF PUBLIC RECORDS LAW.If the parent or other person seeking to relocate a child, or the child, is entitled to prevent disclosure of location information under a public records exemption, the court may enter any order necessary to modify the disclosure requirements of this section in compliance with the public records exemption.
(5) OBJECTION TO RELOCATION.An answer objecting to a proposed relocation must be verified and include the specific factual basis supporting the reasons for seeking a prohibition of the relocation, including a statement of the amount of participation or involvement the objecting party currently has or has had in the life of the child.
(6) TEMPORARY ORDER.
(a) The court may grant a temporary order restraining the relocation of a child, order the return of the child, if a relocation has previously taken place, or order other appropriate remedial relief, if the court finds:
1. That the petition to relocate does not comply with subsection (3);
2. That the child has been relocated without a written agreement of the parties or without court approval; or
3. From an examination of the evidence presented at the preliminary hearing that there is a likelihood that upon final hearing the court will not approve the relocation of the child.
(b) The court may grant a temporary order permitting the relocation of the child pending final hearing, if the court finds:
1. That the petition to relocate was properly filed and is otherwise in compliance with subsection (3); and
2. From an examination of the evidence presented at the preliminary hearing, that there is a likelihood that on final hearing the court will approve the relocation of the child, which findings must be supported by the same factual basis as would be necessary to support approving the relocation in a final judgment.
(c) If the court has issued a temporary order authorizing a party seeking to relocate or move a child before a final judgment is rendered, the court may not give any weight to the temporary relocation as a factor in reaching its final decision.
(d) If temporary relocation of a child is approved, the court may require the person relocating the child to provide reasonable security, financial or otherwise, and guarantee that the court-ordered contact with the child will not be interrupted or interfered with by the relocating party.
(7) NO PRESUMPTION; FACTORS TO DETERMINE CONTESTED RELOCATION.A presumption in favor of or against a request to relocate with the child does not arise if a parent or other person seeks to relocate and the move will materially affect the current schedule of contact, access, and time-sharing with the nonrelocating parent or other person. In reaching its decision regarding a proposed temporary or permanent relocation, the court shall evaluate all of the following:
(a) The nature, quality, extent of involvement, and duration of the child’s relationship with the parent or other person proposing to relocate with the child and with the nonrelocating parent, other persons, siblings, half-siblings, and other significant persons in the child’s life.
(b) The age and developmental stage of the child, the needs of the child, and the likely impact the relocation will have on the child’s physical, educational, and emotional development, taking into consideration any special needs of the child.
(c) The feasibility of preserving the relationship between the nonrelocating parent or other person and the child through substitute arrangements that take into consideration the logistics of contact, access, and time-sharing, as well as the financial circumstances of the parties; whether those factors are sufficient to foster a continuing meaningful relationship between the child and the nonrelocating parent or other person; and the likelihood of compliance with the substitute arrangements by the relocating parent or other person once he or she is out of the jurisdiction of the court.
(d) The child’s preference, taking into consideration the age and maturity of the child.
(e) Whether the relocation will enhance the general quality of life for both the parent or other person seeking the relocation and the child, including, but not limited to, financial or emotional benefits or educational opportunities.
(f) The reasons each parent or other person is seeking or opposing the relocation.
(g) The current employment and economic circumstances of each parent or other person and whether the proposed relocation is necessary to improve the economic circumstances of the parent or other person seeking relocation of the child.
(h) That the relocation is sought in good faith and the extent to which the objecting parent has fulfilled his or her financial obligations to the parent or other person seeking relocation, including child support, spousal support, and marital property and marital debt obligations.
(i) The career and other opportunities available to the objecting parent or other person if the relocation occurs.
(j) A history of substance abuse or domestic violence as defined in s. 741.28 or which meets the criteria of s. 39.806(1)(d) by either parent, including a consideration of the severity of such conduct and the failure or success of any attempts at rehabilitation.
(k) Any other factor affecting the best interest of the child or as set forth in s. 61.13.
(8) BURDEN OF PROOF.The parent or other person wishing to relocate has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that relocation is in the best interest of the child. If that burden of proof is met, the burden shifts to the nonrelocating parent or other person to show by a preponderance of the evidence that the proposed relocation is not in the best interest of the child.
(9) ORDER REGARDING RELOCATION.If relocation is approved:
(a) The court may, in its discretion, order contact with the nonrelocating parent or other person, including access, time-sharing, telephone, Internet, webcam, and other arrangements sufficient to ensure that the child has frequent, continuing, and meaningful contact with the nonrelocating parent or other person, if contact is financially affordable and in the best interest of the child.
(b) If applicable, the court shall specify how the transportation costs are to be allocated between the parents and other persons entitled to contact, access, and time-sharing and may adjust the child support award, as appropriate, considering the costs of transportation and the respective net incomes of the parents in accordance with the state child support guidelines schedule.
(10) PRIORITY FOR HEARING OR TRIAL.An evidentiary hearing or nonjury trial on a pleading seeking temporary or permanent relief filed under this section shall be accorded priority on the court’s calendar. If a motion seeking a temporary relocation is filed, absent good cause, the hearing must occur no later than 30 days after the motion for a temporary relocation is filed. If a notice to set the matter for a nonjury trial is filed, absent good cause, the nonjury trial must occur no later than 90 days after the notice is filed.
(11) APPLICABILITY.
(a) This section applies:
1. To orders entered before October 1, 2009, if the existing order defining custody, primary residence, the parenting plan, time-sharing, or access to or with the child does not expressly govern the relocation of the child.
2. To an order, whether temporary or permanent, regarding the parenting plan, custody, primary residence, time-sharing, or access to the child entered on or after October 1, 2009.
3. To any relocation or proposed relocation, whether permanent or temporary, of a child during any proceeding pending on October 1, 2009, wherein the parenting plan, custody, primary residence, time-sharing, or access to the child is an issue.
(b) To the extent that a provision of this section conflicts with an order existing on October 1, 2009, this section does not apply to the terms of that order which expressly govern relocation of the child or a change in the principal residence address of a parent or other person.
History.s. 2, ch. 2006-245; s. 9, ch. 2008-61; s. 5, ch. 2009-21; s. 4, ch. 2009-180.

F.S. 61.13001 on Google Scholar

F.S. 61.13001 on Casetext

Amendments to 61.13001


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 61.13001
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 61.13001.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

HULL, v. HULL,, 273 So. 3d 1135 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . 2017, Former Husband was residing in Volusia County when he filed the instant petition under section 61.13001 . . . See § 61.13001(5), Fla. Stat. (2017). . . . See § 61.13001(7), Fla. Stat. (2017). . . . In its detailed supplemental final judgment, the trial court addressed each factor under section 61.13001 . . . Former Husband never challenged the constitutionality of section 61.13001 below, see Fla. Fam. . . .

PEARCE, v. BOUDREAUX f k a, 265 So. 3d 712 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . . § 61.13001(3)(d), Fla. Stat. (emphasis added). The highlighted portions establish two points. . . . participation or involvement the objecting party currently has or has had in the life of the child." § 61.13001 . . .

P. SANABRIA, v. SANABRIA n k a, 271 So. 3d 1101 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . OF ISSUE ON APPEAL The issue on appeal concerns the interaction between two subsections of section 61.13001 . . . Section 61.13001(3)(d), Florida Statutes (2017), provides that if a petition to relocate with a minor . . . Section 61.13001(8), Florida Statutes (2017), provides that if there is an evidentiary hearing to determine . . . At the start of the hearing, the mother argued that pursuant to section 61.13001(3)(d), the father's . . . This case concerns a parent's petition to relocate with a child filed under section 61.13001, Florida . . .

ALLENDE, v. VELOZ,, 273 So. 3d 142 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . This oral agreement, however, did not comply with section 61.13001, Florida Statutes (2015), which requires . . . Section 61.13001(3)(e) sets forth the consequences for relocating a child without complying with the . . . (6)(a) 2., and was not granting a temporary relocation under section 61.13001(6)(b). . . . See § 61.13001(6)(b) 1. . . . parent when the other parent relocates without following the requirements of section 61.13001. . . .

PARRIS, v. BUTLER,, 264 So. 3d 1089 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . relocation of the children predated the petition for dissolution such that the relocation statute, section 61.13001 . . . the trial court reversibly erred in failing to consider the relocation factors set forth in section 61.13001 . . . See § 61.13001(7)(a), (b). . . .

A. CHALMERS, v. A. CHALMERS,, 259 So. 3d 878 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . "[T]he question of whether the trial court properly applied the relocation statute [ section 61.13001 . . . current schedule of contact, access, and time-sharing with the nonrelocating parent or other person." § 61.13001 . . . under section 61.13(3), Florida Statutes (2017), and to determine a contested relocation under section 61.13001 . . . Competent substantial evidence also supports the circuit court's ultimate decisions, under section 61.13001 . . .

SAPONARA, v. SAPONARA,, 261 So. 3d 570 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . Under section 61.13001(9), Florida Statutes (2017), if a trial court approves a parent's petition for . . . between modification based on changed circumstances under section 61.13(3) and relocation under section 61.13001 . . . See § 61.13001(3)(a) 6., (7)(c), Fla. Stat. (2017). . . .

RYAN, v. RYAN,, 252 So. 3d 272 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . On May 4, 2017, the father filed a supplemental petition for relocation pursuant to section 61.13001, . . . she was required to file a response "within 20 days after service of [the] petition to relocate." § 61.13001 . . . Section 61.13001(3)(d) provides that where a parent fails to timely file a response objecting to a petition . . . as a non-final order granting temporary relocation, and remand for a hearing consistent with section 61.13001 . . .

A. BUSCHOR n k a A. v. BUSCHOR,, 252 So. 3d 833 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . See § 61.13001(7), Fla. Stat. . . . Id. § 61.13001(7)(a)-(k). . . . Id. § 61.13001(8). . . . Id. § 61.13001(7)(b), (e). . . . Id. § 61.13001(7)(a), (b), (c), (e), (f), (g), (h), (k). . . .

LANE, v. LANE,, 254 So. 3d 570 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . The Court reasoned that such a "prospective-based" analysis is unsound because section 61.13001(7), Florida . . .

RIVERA, v. PURTELL,, 252 So. 3d 283 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . Any one of the various factors outlined in section 61.13001(7) that the trial court is required to consider . . .

NESS f k a v. MARTINEZ,, 249 So. 3d 754 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . court considers whether competent, substantial evidence supports the court's findings under section 61.13001 . . . See § 61.13001(7) - (8), Fla. Stat. . . . moving more than fifty miles from their present residence without following the provisions of section 61.13001 . . . before the relocation, she did not secure his written consent or file a formal petition, as required. § 61.13001 . . .

CASTLEMAN, v. BICALDO,, 248 So. 3d 1181 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . In making its ruling, the trial court did not comply with the dictates of section 61.13001, Florida Statutes . . . Parental Relocation with a Child The trial court committed fundamental error when it found that section 61.13001 . . . There is no language in either section 61.13001 or section 61.13 granting a presumption in favor of a . . . , this does not lead to the conclusion that she is entitled, without an inquiry pursuant to section 61.13001 . . . Any one of the various factors outlined in section 61.13001(7) that the trial court is required to consider . . .

OVERSTREET, v. OVERSTREET,, 244 So. 3d 1182 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . not apply to permanent change of station moves by military personnel, which shall be governed by s. 61.13001 . . . In turn, section 61.13001, although entitled "Parental relocation with a child " (emphasis added), defines . . . "at least 50 miles from" the previous principal residence and "for at least 60 consecutive days." § 61.13001 . . . not apply to permanent change of station moves by military personnel, which shall be governed by s. 61.13001 . . . We therefore reverse this provision of the order and remand for further proceedings under section 61.13001 . . .

GIMONGE, v. GIMONGE,, 239 So. 3d 1275 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . Section 61.13001, Florida Statutes (2017), governs "[p]arental relocation with a child." . . . The parties' agreement complied with the mandates of section 61.13001(2). . . . See § 61.13001(2)(A) 1., Fla. Stat. . . . See id. § 61.13001(2)(A) 2. . . . See id. § 61.13001(2) - (3). . . .

IN RE AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT APPROVED FAMILY LAW FORMS- NOMENCLATURE, 235 So. 3d 357 (Fla. 2018)

. . . change in the location of the principal residence of a parent or other person in accordance with section 61.13001 . . . filing for dissolution of marriage, there are dependent or minor children, and pursuant to Section 61.13001 . . . If the case involves relocation, pursuant to Section 61.13001, Florida Statutes, then a Relocation/Long . . . If the case involves relocation, pursuant to Section 61.13001, Florida Statutes, then Relocation/Long . . .

D. SICKELS, v. M. SICKELS,, 221 So. 3d 778 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . He petitioned the trial court to relocate the minor children to Virginia pursuant to section 61.13001 . . .

SOLOMON, v. SOLOMON n k a, 221 So. 3d 652 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . relocation, the trial court evaluated the evidence based on the statutory factors provided in section 61.13001 . . . Section 61.13001(8), Florida Statutes (2016), governs the burden of proof for rulings on relocation and . . . preponderance of the evidence that the proposed relocation is not in the best interest of the child. § 61.13001 . . . burden of proof by actually producing evidence sufficient to meet the standard set forth in section 61.13001 . . . Any one of the various factors outlined in section 61.13001(7) that, the trial court is required to consider . . .

RIDDLE, v. RIDDLE, 214 So. 3d 694 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . The wife's argument that the trial court misapplied the parental relocation statute, section 61.13001 . . .

HORN, v. HORN,, 225 So. 3d 292 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . final judgment would allow the former husband to relocate without meeting the requirements of Section 61.13001 . . .

GARCIA, v. L. RIVERA,, 208 So. 3d 1183 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . Granting Mother’s Petition for Relocation with Minor Child,” granting relocation pursuant to section 61.13001 . . .

NAIME, v. T. CORZO, III,, 208 So. 3d 296 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . trial court properly considered and applied the requisite and applicable factors set forth in section 61.13001 . . . See § 61.13001(l)(e), Fla. . . . While it dutifully treated each of the factors in the relocation statute, section 61.13001(7) of the . . . to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that relocation is in the best interests of the child. § 61.13001 . . . whether there is substantial, competent evidence to support the trial court’s findings under section 61.13001 . . . that “the court must consider” in reaching a relocation decision, and placed them in a new section, 61.13001 . . . (k) Any other factor affecting the best interest of the child or as set forth in s. 61.13. § 61.13001 . . .

HENDERSON- BULLARD, v. LOCKARD,, 204 So.3d 568 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . When no objection was filed as required by section 61.13001(7)(d), Florida Statutes (2016), the mother . . . Section 61.13001, Florida Statutes, provides that if a party does not respond by objecting to a relocation . . . The order may be issued in an expedited manner without the necessity for an evidentiary hearing.” § 61.13001 . . .

H. GOLSON, v. GOLSON,, 207 So.3d 321 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Second, he asked that Former Wife be required to comply with the relocation provisions of section 61.13001 . . .

MORELL, v. RUIZ,, 207 So.3d 293 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Morell appeals an Order requiring her to file a petition for relocation under Florida Statute Section 61.13001 . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA SUPREME COURT APPROVED FAMILY LAW FORMS, 205 So. 3d 1 (Fla. 2015)

. . . is filing for dissolution of marriage, there are dependent or minor children and pursuant to Section 61.13001 . . . ñnal .judgment or to request the return of a children) who has been relocated in violation of Section 61.13001 . . . If the judge finds the other party to be in willful contempt or in violation of Section 61.13001, Florida . . . If the case involves relocation, pursuant to Section 61.13001, Florida Statutes, then a Relocation/Long . . . If the case involves relocation, ■ pursuant to Section 61.13001, Florida Statutes, then Relocation/Long . . .

T. B. v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,, 189 So. 3d 150 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . The attorney contended that the court should apply section 61.13001, Florida Statutes (2014),,regarding . . . Contrary to the court’s conclusion, compliance' with the ' provisions of section 61.13001, Florida Statutes . . . Section 61.13001(l)(a), Florida Statutes, defines “.child,” for the purposes of the Parental Relocation . . . defines “relocation” as meaning the “change in location of the ... parent or other person• ■ ■ ■” § 61.13001 . . . See §§ 61.13001(l)(a), .13001(l)(e), .503(4), Fla. Stat. (2014). . . .

NICOLAS, v. BLANC,, 178 So. 3d 430 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . trial court properly considered and applied the requisite and applicable factors set forth in section 61.13001 . . .

VAELIZADEH, v. HOSSAINI,, 174 So. 3d 579 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . Analysis The mother filed her petition for relocation pursuant to section 61.13001(3), Florida Statutes . . . relocate, and must proceed to a temporary hearing or trial and obtain court permission to relocate. § 61.13001 . . .

E. DICKSON n k a E. v. M. DICKSON,, 169 So. 3d 287 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . Further, section 61.13001(e) defines “Relocation” as “a change in the location of the principal residence . . . Hence, the mother was not required to file a petition to relocate pursuant to section 61.13001 before . . .

A. FOSSHAGE n k a A. v. S. FOSSHAGE,, 167 So. 3d 525 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . between modification based on changed circumstances under section 61.13(3) and relocation under section 61.13001 . . . A petition for relocation under section 61.13001, Florida Statutes (2013), on the other hand, requires . . . couched in the language of section 61.13(3), was in essence a petition for relocation under section 61.13001 . . . Accordingly, we reverse the order entered below and remand for proceedings under section 61.13001. . . .

SULEIMAN, v. YUNIS,, 168 So. 3d 319 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . Furthermore, section 61.13001(3), Florida Statutes (2014), which requires a parent to either obtain consent . . . See § 61.13001(l)(e), Fla. Stat. (2014). . . .

EDGAR, v. FIRUTA,, 165 So. 3d 758 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . mother to pay child support to the father without a determination of need and ability to pay: Section 61.13001 . . . the trial court’s assessment of the “best interests of the child” for purposes of sections 61.13 and 61.13001 . . . Any parenting plan entered by the court below shall address not only section 61.13001 of the Florida . . . Section 61.13001 of the Florida Statutes addresses parental relocation with a child. . . . .

BROOKS, v. BROOKS,, 164 So. 3d 162 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . The emphasis shifted from such terminology to “time-sharing parent”; for example, section 61.13001(3) . . . Further, “relocation” is defined by section 61.13001(l)(e) as “a change in the location of the principal . . . Even though the title of section 61.13001 should be considered along with the statutory text, see State . . . residence of a parent ... from his or her principal place of residence”); see also § 61.13001(3) (“[ . . . Wright, 60 So.3d 487, 489 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (evaluating the legislative intent of section 61.13001 . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA SUPREME COURT APPROVED FAMILY LAW FORMS, 173 So. 3d 19 (Fla. 2015)

. . . is filing for dissolution of marriage, there are dependent or minor children and pursuant to Section 61.13001 . . . final judgment or to request the return of a children) who has been relocated in violation of Section 61.13001 . . . If the judge finds the other party to be in willful contempt or in violation of Section 61.13001, Florida . . . If the case involves relocation, pursuant to Section 61.13001, Florida Statutes, then a Relocation/Long . . . If the case involves relocation, pursuant to Section 61.13001, Florida Statutes, then Relocation/Long . . .

VAZQUEZ, v. VAZQUEZ- ROBELLEDO,, 150 So. 3d 855 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . The order finds that the Husband has the ability to pay this “security deposit” and cites section 61.13001 . . . The Husband argues the provision is not authorized by section 61.13001(6)(d) because the court orally . . . Section 61.13001(6)(d) authorizes a court that approves a temporary relocation to “require the person . . . And while the court’s order refers to a “security deposit” and cites to section 61.13001(6)(d), it specifies . . .

KRIFT, v. OBENOUR,, 152 So. 3d 645 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . Section 61.13001(e), Florida Statutes (2012) defines “Relocation” as “a change in the location of the . . . The parenting plan in the amended final judgment does not involve “relocation,” as defined in section 61.13001 . . .

JOHNSON, v. McCULLOUGH,, 143 So. 3d 1129 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . After considering the evidence as applied to the statutory factors set forth in section 61.13001(7), . . .

D. ROLISON, v. L. ROLISON,, 144 So. 3d 610 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . We affirm the trial court’s order, which correctly found that section 61.13001, Florida Statutes (2013 . . . The trial court denied the Father’s emergency motion, finding' that section 61.13001 was inapplicable . . . The relevant language in section 61.13001 is located within the definition of the word “relocation,” . . . We note that this court’s plain reading of section 61.13001 is in accordance with the interpretation . . . Based upon the definition of relocation under section 61.13001(l)(e), and citing the Second District’ . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA FAMILY LAW RULES OF PROCEDURE NEW RULES FOR QUALIFIED AND COURT- APPOINTED PARENTING COORDINATORS, 142 So. 3d 831 (Fla. 2014)

. . . jurisdiction of the court without prior court approval or compliance with the requirements of section 61.13001 . . .

KERSHAW, v. KERSHAW,, 141 So. 3d 642 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . either party wished to relocate, the party must do so subject to the procedures set forth in section 61.13001 . . .

ALBANESE, v. ALBANESE,, 135 So. 3d 532 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . Section 61.13001(6)(b), Florida Statutes (2013), authorizes a trial court to grant a temporary order . . . current schedule of contact, access, and time-sharing with the nonrelocating parent or other person.” § 61.13001 . . . proving by a preponderance of the evidence that relocation is in the best interest of the child. § 61.13001 . . .

W. WING, v. D WING,, 129 So. 3d 1116 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . court’s ruling was an error of law insofar as it failed to apply the explicit directives in section 61.13001 . . . cannot endorse the undeniable effect of his conclusion, which grafts onto the provisions of section 61.13001 . . . The mandate in section 61.13001(3) is clear: The parent seeking to relocate “must file a petition to . . . the other parent and on every other person entitled to access to and time-sharing with the child.” § 61.13001 . . . Section 61.13001(3) says what it says, and we are impelled by its clarity to give effect to its terms . . . time, raised the issue of Former Wife’s failure to file a petition that strictly complied with section 61.13001 . . .

P. BLAKELY, v. BLAKELY,, 123 So. 3d 662 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . We reject Appellant’s assertion that the order is one for relocation under section 61.13001, Florida . . .

FETZER, v. T. EVANS,, 123 So. 3d 124 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . The next day, Former Wife filed a petition to relocate the child pursuant to section 61.13001, Florida . . . Applying the factors enumerated in section 61.13001(7), Florida Statutes, the trial court found that . . . For example, she argues that the trial court erred in applying section 61.13001, Florida Statutes — the . . . In fact, she specifically sought relief pursuant to section 61.13001 in her petition to relocate. . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA SUPREME COURT APPROVED FAMILY LAW FORMS, 122 So. 3d 320 (Fla. 2013)

. . . change in the location of the principal residence of a parent or other person in accordance with section 61.13001 . . .

SHIBA, v. GABAY,, 120 So. 3d 80 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . he had considered the factors contained in section 61.13, as well as the relocation statute, section 61.13001 . . .

SLOWINSKI v. M. SWEENEY,, 117 So. 3d 73 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . John Slowinski, the child’s parent as defined in sections 39.01(49), 61.13001(1)(d) and 63.062(1)(b)1 . . .

MILTON, v. MILTON,, 113 So. 3d 1040 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . Milton relies on section 61.13001, Florida Statutes, and Raulerson, to assert that because Mrs. . . . Milton did not comply with section 61.13001, the trial court erred in permitting the child’s relocation . . . Section 61.13001(3)(a) unambiguously requires that, absent agreement of both parents, a parent wishing . . . to relocate file a petition and the petition be served on the other parent. § 61.13001(3), Fla. . . . the court may grant other relief, including restraining relocation or ordering the child’s return. § 61.13001 . . .

RIVERO, v. RIVERO,, 111 So. 3d 233 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . evidentiary hearing before allowing the temporary relocation, contrary to the requirements of section 61.13001 . . . an evidentiary hearing from which the court can determine the necessary findings required by section 61.13001 . . .

ECKERT, v. ECKERT,, 107 So. 3d 1235 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . See § 61.13001(7), Fla. Stat. (2012). . . . . § 61.13001(7), Fla. Stat. (2012) (emphasis added). . . .

EDGAR, v. FIRUTA,, 100 So. 3d 255 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . The notice included specifics regarding the proposed relocation, pursuant to section 61.13001, Florida . . . Section 61.13001(8)(e), Florida Statutes, expressly provides that a parent’s relocation of a minor child . . . the trial court’s assessment of the “best interests of the child” for purposes of sections 61.13 and 61.13001 . . . Section 61.13001(3)(e)l provides that the Mother’s relocation of the youngest child in violation of the . . .

ESSEX, v. B. DAVIS, a k a Al-, 116 So. 3d 445 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . parties’ minor daughter to Palm Beach County pending a relocation hearing in conformity with section 61.13001 . . . Section 61.13001 was amended effective October 1, 2009. . . . (7); the father asserted that section 61.13001 did not apply, as he already lived in Pennsylvania. . . . The Second District noted that prior to October 1, 2009, relocation under section 61.13001 was defined . . . See § 61.13001(2), Fla. Stat. Reversed and remanded. WARNER and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur. . . . .

In GUIZZARDI, v. GUIZZARDI,, 89 So. 3d 967 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . The father claims here, as he did below, that because section 61.13001 is inapplicable to the instant . . . See § 61.13001(l)(b), Fla. . . . Stat. (2009) (defining the term “Court” as used in section 61.13001 as “the circuit court in the county . . . in which either parent and the child reside”); § 61.13001(7), Fla. . . . Thus, while we agree that the trial court erred in applying section 61.13001 to the instant relocation . . .

ALINAT, v. CURTIS,, 86 So. 3d 552 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . We agree with the Former Husband that section 61.13001, Florida Statutes (2011), does not contemplate . . . Section 61.13001(6)(b) allows a trial court to grant a temporary relocation order “pending final hearing . . . See § 61.13001(6)(b), (10). . . . Arthur, 54 So.3d 454, 455 (Fla.2010), the Florida Supreme Court addressed section 61.13001 in a situation . . . See § 61.13001(9)(b). . . .

M. McGRATH v. J. PUCKETT,, 75 So. 3d 366 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . determining the best interest of the minor child pursuant to an analysis of the factors set forth in section 61.13001 . . .

A. MATA, v. A. MATA,, 75 So. 3d 341 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . failed to comply with requirements relevant to the temporary relocation of minor children under section 61.13001 . . . Section 61.13001(6)(b), Florida Statutes (2011), establishes the procedures that must be followed in . . . Section 61.13001(6)(b) states: (b) The court may grant a temporary order permitting the relocation of . . . Here, it is apparent that the court did not consider the factors listed in section 61.13001(6)(b)(2) . . . court’s error as a matter of law when it misapplied the correct legal standard set forth in section 61.13001 . . . relocation order on review must be reversed because the court below failed to follow the dictates of section 61.13001 . . . when evidence presented provides a factual basis likely to support permanent relocation under section 61.13001 . . . Stat. (2010) (emphasis added); see also § 61.13001(8), Fla. . . . In short, because the court below failed to comply with the mandates of section 61.13001, it erred as . . . (k) Any other factor affecting the best interest of the child or as set forth in s. 61.13. § 61.13001 . . .

A. F. v. R. P. B., 100 So. 3d 71 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . We affirm, but write to explain our holding that the version of section 61.13001, Florida Statutes, effective . . . She cites subsection 61.13001(11)(a)(2), which provides that the relocation statute applies where there . . . In 2009, section 61.13001 existed in two slightly different versions at the times relevant here. . . . See ch. 2009-180, § 4, Laws of Fla.; § 61.13001(1)(e), Fla. Stat. (2009). . . . See ch. 2009-180, § 4, Laws of Fla.; § 61.13001(3). . . .

In IMPLEMENTATION OF COMMITTEE ON PRIVACY AND COURT RECORDS RECOMMENDATIONS- AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FLORIDA RULES OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE FLORIDA PROBATE RULES FLORIDA SMALL CLAIMS RULES FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE FLORIDA FAMILY LAW RULES OF PROCEDURE, 78 So. 3d 1045 (Fla. 2011)

. . . If the case involves relocation, pursuant to Section 61.13001, Florida Statutes, then a Relocation/Long . . . If the case involves relocation, pursuant to Section 61.13001, Florida Statutes, then Relocation/Long . . .

WRAIGHT, v. WRAIGHT,, 71 So. 3d 139 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . Section 61.13001, Florida Statutes (2006), titled “Parental relocation with a child,” establishes the . . . Instead, section 61.13001(8), states: The parent or other person wishing to relocate has the burden of . . . Here, the trial court considered the factors under sections 61.13(8) and 61.13001(7) and made written . . . Section 61.13001(6)(c), Florida Statutes (2007), provides: If the court has issued a temporary order . . . Oddly, section 61.13001(6)(c) expressly requires the court, in making a temporary relocation decision . . .

VALQUI, v. RODRIGUEZ,, 75 So. 3d 751 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . discretion which would be required for reversal of an order like this one entered pursuant to Section 61.13001 . . .

ROSSMAN, f k a v. J. PROFERA,, 67 So. 3d 363 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . . § 61.13001(7)(e), Fla. Stat. (2008) (emphasis added). . . .

ORTA, v. SUAREZ,, 66 So. 3d 988 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . (k) Any other factor affecting the best interest of the child or as set forth in s. 61.13. § 61.13001 . . . See § 61.13001(7)(d), Fla. Stat. (2010). . . . See § 61.13001(7)(e), Fla. . . . Section 61.13001(7)(c) deals with (1) whether substitute visitation arrangements may be made taking “ . . . See § 61.13001(8), Fla. . . .

RAULERSON, v. WRIGHT,, 60 So. 3d 487 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . Our decision in the instant case turns on whether the trial court properly applied section 61.13001, . . . See § 61.13001(3). . . . . § 61.13001(3). . . . See also § 61.13001(6)(a)2 (further providing that if the trial court finds “[t]hat the child has been . . . See § 61.13001(6)(b)l. . . . The essence of the error is the trial court’s failure to apply section 61.13001, Florida Statutes, to . . . When a shared-parenting order is in place, section 61.13001, Florida Statutes requires a parent seeking . . . to relocate with a child subject to that order to file a petition in accordance with section 61.13001 . . . Temporary permission to relocate may be granted only if a sufficient petition has been filed. § 61.13001 . . .

GERGEN, v. R. GERGEN,, 48 So. 3d 148 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . Arthur, — So.3d —, —, 2010 WL 114532 (Fla.2010) (applying § 61.13001, Fla. . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA FAMILY LAW RULES, 55 So. 3d 381 (Fla. 2010)

. . . In the interim, in both the 2008 and 2009 legislative sessions, the Legislature amended section 61.13001 . . . (amending section 61.13001 primarily to remove the terms “visitation,” “primary residential parent,” . . . (significantly amending the relocation process set out in section 61.13001). . . . As noted, the Committee now recommends that no rule of procedure is necessary, in that section 61.13001 . . . 12.950(b) (Motion for Order Permitting Relocation by Agreement), are designed to implement section 61.13001 . . .

TILLOTSON, n k a v. TILLOTSON,, 32 So. 3d 191 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . and March 2009 both parties filed a “notice of intent to relocate with children” pursuant to section 61.13001 . . . Section 61.13001(l)(b) defines “child” as “any person who is under the jurisdiction of a state court . . . he no longer qualified as a child under the UCCJEA and was not subject to relocation under section 61.13001 . . .

ZEPEDA, v. ZEPEDA,, 32 So. 3d 679 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . .” § 61.13001(6)(b)(2), Fla. Stat. (2008). . . . The factors to be considered when deciding relocation issues are enumerated in section 61.13001(7). . . . provides for relocation when the parties sign a written agreement that is ratified by the court. § 61.13001 . . . Without dispute, the schedule did not suffice as a relocation agreement under section 61.13001(2), which . . . relocation and remand for consideration of the issue in light of the factors prescribed in section 61.13001 . . .

L. PORRAS, v. PORRAS,, 29 So. 3d 1189 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . Accordingly, as required by section 61.13001(3)(d), Florida Statutes (2009), the trial court entered . . . notice of intent to relocate with the children, Porras offered no objection as required by section 61.13001 . . .

CONNERS, v. MULLINS,, 27 So. 3d 199 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . In evaluating the child’s best interests pursuant to section 61.13001(7), Florida Statutes, the trial . . . the actual relocation was in the child’s best interests pursuant to the factors set forth in section 61.13001 . . .

M. ARTHUR, v. A. ARTHUR,, 54 So. 3d 454 (Fla. 2010)

. . . ANALYSIS Section 61.13001, Florida Statutes (2006), titled “Parental relocation with a child,” establishes . . . Instead, section 61.13001(8) states: The parent or other person wishing to relocate has the burden of . . . Section 61.13001(7) provides that the court shall evaluate: (a) The nature, quality, extent of involvement . . . Any one of the various factors outlined in section 61.13001(7) that the trial court is required to consider . . . In its consideration of subsection (b) of section 61.13001(7), the court found that “[r]equiring the . . .

ARRABAL, v. B. HAGE,, 19 So. 3d 1137 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . The notice of relocation statute, section 61.13001(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2008), applies to the residential . . .

T. COYLE, v. D. COYLE,, 8 So. 3d 1271 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . former wife’s request to relocate without properly evaluating all the factors set forth in section 61.13001 . . . Section 61.13001(7) sets forth a lengthy list of factors a trial court must evaluate in reaching a decision . . . Pertinent to this case, section 61.13001(7)(c) states that the court must consider: The feasibility of . . . Under section 61.13001(7), there is no presumption in favor of or against relocation. . . . . § 61.13001(8). . . .

SCARITI, v. SABILLON,, 16 So. 3d 144 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . because no pleading sought that relief and because the trial court mistakenly concluded that section 61.13001 . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT APPROVED FAMILY LAW FORMS, 20 So. 3d 173 (Fla. 2009)

. . . If this case involves a request for relocation of a minor child, pursuant to section 61.13001, Florida . . . If this involves relocation of minor child(ren) pursuant to section 61.13001, Florida Statutes, a Parenting . . .

LOMBARD, v. LOMBARD,, 997 So. 2d 1188 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . when a custodial parent refuses to honor a noncustodial parent’s visitation rights”); (4)(c) (same); § 61.13001 . . .

In B. T. G. B. S. G. A. V. v. M. G., 993 So. 2d 1140 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . .” § 61.13001(7)(c), Fla. Stat. (2006); see Fredman v. . . . Nevertheless, the trial court must consider the relocation factors enumerated in section 61.13001(7) . . . Therefore, section 61.13001, the current version of the parental relocation statute, applies to the determination . . . See § 61.13001(10(a)(2). . . .

MILLER, v. MILLER,, 992 So. 2d 346 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . regional director of a biotechnology company located in Atlanta, Georgia and in accordance with section 61.13001 . . . See § 61.13001, Fla. Stat. (2007). . . . There are two reasons for this reminder and our emphasis on this portion of section 61.13001. . . . to the trial court’s conclusion, the Mother met her initial burden of proof regarding relocation. § 61.13001 . . . See § 61.13001(8), Fla. Stat. (2007). . . .

M. ARTHUR, v. A. ARTHUR,, 987 So. 2d 212 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . Under section 61.13001(7), Florida Statutes (2006), the court must consider the following factors prior . . . burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that relocation is in the child’s best interests. § 61.13001 . . . Section 61.13001 does not give the trial court the authority to deny a request for relocation if relocation . . . She submits that in analyzing the factors under section 61.13001, Florida Statutes (2006), which governs . . .

E. NORRIS, v. C. HECKERMAN, f k a C., 972 So. 2d 1098 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . Although the trial court did not believe section 61.13001 applied, it ruled in the alternative that relocation . . . In Florida, there is no presumption in favor of, or against, relocation. § 61.13001(7), Fla. . . . to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that relocation is in the best interest of the child. § 61.13001 . . . Here, it is apparent that the trial court mentioned almost all of the listed factors of section 61.13001 . . . See 61.13001(7)(g), Fla. Stat. (2006). . . . which we affirm, approving the former wife’s relocation pursuant to the factors enumerated in section 61.13001 . . . prove by a preponderance of the evidence that relocation is in the best interests of the children. § 61.13001 . . .

HOWLE, II, v. HOWLE,, 967 So. 2d 435 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . of section 61.13(2)(d) were later substituted with different requirements by the newly added section 61.13001 . . . See § 61.13001(11), Fla. Stat. (2006). . . .

PATMAN, v. PATMAN,, 971 So. 2d 835 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . certiorari to the lower court quashing an order granting temporary relocation to the wife under paragraph 61.13001 . . .

VIVIAN f k a v. SCHEMBARI,, 966 So. 2d 492 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . to move there with the children, but the trial court denied relief, citing to the factors in section 61.13001 . . . evidence supports the trial court’s findings concerning the statutory factors contained in section 61.13001 . . . The court’s questions pertained to considerations required by section 61.13001(7). . . .

E. PASKIEWICZ, Sr. v. PASKIEWICZ, n k a, 967 So. 2d 277 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . See § 61.13001(7), Fla. . . .

VELAZQUEZ a. k. a. v. MILLAN,, 963 So. 2d 852 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . See § 61.13001(7), Fla. . . . request to relocate with the child when a primary residential parent seeks to move the child''); § 61.13001 . . .

MULLER, v. R. MULLER,, 964 So. 2d 732 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . determine if there is substantial competent evidence to support the trial court’s findings under section 61.13001 . . . See § 61.13001(7), Fla. Stat. (2006). . . . making a determination as to whether the primary residential parent may relocate with a child, section 61.13001 . . . was no substantial competent evidence to support relocation under the factors set forth in section 61.13001 . . . See § 61.13001(1 l)(a)(l), Fla. Stat. (2006). . . . . See § 61.13001(7)(e), Fla. . . .

FREDMAN, n k a v. FREDMAN,, 960 So. 2d 52 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . this opinion does not address the significantly amended version of the relocation statute in section 61.13001 . . . The legislature significantly amended the parental relocation statute and moved it to section 61.13001 . . . Thus, this opinion does not address section 61.13001. . . .

SANCHEZ, v. P. SANCHEZ,, 958 So. 2d 1054 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . The trial court’s order fails to address the statutory factors set out in section 61.13001(7), Florida . . .

MONASMITH, v. MONASMITH,, 954 So. 2d 1271 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . We find that Appellant’s argument regarding section 61.13001, Florida Statutes (2006), was not preserved . . . Appellant made no mention of section 61.13001, Florida Statutes (2006), or its procedural requirements . . .

CECEMSKI, v. CECEMSKI,, 954 So. 2d 1227 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . section 61.13(2)(d) were deleted and different requirements were implemented in the newly added section 61.13001 . . . See § 61.13001(ll)(b), Fla. Stat. (2006). . . . .

MATIAS, v. MATIAS,, 948 So. 2d 1021 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . Both parties have acknowledged that the judgment will now be controlled by the provisions of section 61.13001 . . .

D. ECHEZARRETA, v. ECHEZARRETA,, 944 So. 2d 1169 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . Under the now-applicable statute, § 61.13001, Fla. . . .