Cases from cite.case.law:

IN RE AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT APPROVED FAMILY LAW FORMS- NOMENCLATURE, 235 So. 3d 357 (Fla. 2018)

. . . interest of the particular minor child(ren) and the circumstances of that family, as listed in section 61.18 . . .

LOZA, v. MARIN,, 198 So. 3d 1017 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . In other words, he contended that Schedule A and section 61.18(l)(a)(2) allowed the trial court to extend . . .

E. MAGUIRE, v. J. WRIGHT,, 157 So. 3d 493 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . Section 61.18(8), Florida Statutes (2014), sets forth the numerous factors a trial court must consider . . .

C. HOLLAND, v. HOLLAND,, 140 So. 3d 1155 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . See § 61.18(3), Fla. Stat. (2013); Voorhies v. Voorhies, 705 So.2d 1064, 1065 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). . . .

COLE, v. COLE,, 95 So. 3d 369 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . needs have substantially changed, she may do so by seeking post-judgment modification under section 61.18 . . .

R. BAINBRIDGE, v. PRATT, Jr., 68 So. 3d 310 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . The parties are coequal in all factors of Section 61.18(3) Florida Statutes although the Court has come . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT APPROVED FAMILY LAW FORMS, 59 So. 3d 792 (Fla. 2010)

. . . For more information, you may consult section 61.18, Florida Statutes. . . . For more information, you may consult section 61.18, Florida Statutes. . . . interest of the particular minor child(ren) and the circumstances of that family, as listed in section 61.18 . . .

GELDZAHLER, v. NEW YORK MEDICAL COLLEGE,, 663 F. Supp. 2d 379 (S.D.N.Y. 2009)

. . . Office of the Professions’ “Regulations of the Commissioner” § 61.18 (stating that CODA is an “[acceptable . . .

ALOIS, v. T. ALOIS, Jr., 937 So. 2d 171 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . Section 61.18, Florida Statutes, states that “the court may at any time order either or both parents . . .

DIRECTV, INC. v. GOLLY,, 392 F. Supp. 2d 419 (N.D.N.Y. 2005)

. . . ._ Attorney Carrillo, $190 0.322 $ 61.18 $120 0.322 $ 38.64 Roberto_ Attorney Greco, $400 0.269 $107.60 . . .

STATE o b o K. CHEREN, n k a v. D. CHEREN,, 905 So. 2d 211 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . between the mother and father concerning his access to the children he was required to support, section 61.18 . . .

DUDLEY, v. J. DUDLEY,, 899 So. 2d 483 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . remand of the case to the trial court for it to address separately each of the criteria of section 61.18 . . .

H. JIFRY H. v. FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION,, 361 U.S. App. D.C. 450 (D.C. Cir. 2004)

. . . . § 61.18, 49 C.F.R. § 1540.117. . . . . § 61.18, provides for automatic suspension by the FAA of airman certificates upon written notification . . . See 14 C.F.R. § 61.18(b)(2). . . . See 14 C.F.R. § 61.18(c)(2). The pilot may appeal the certificate revocation to the NTSB. . . . of respondents TSA, FAA, and the NTSB, the pilots’ APA challenges to the FAA regulation, 49 C.F.R. § 61.18 . . .

COALITION OF AIRLINE PILOTS ASSOCIATIONS, v. FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, 361 U.S. App. D.C. 460 (D.C. Cir. 2004)

. . . . §§ 61.18, 63.14, 65.14). . . . security threat by the TSA automatically becomes ineligible to hold an airman certificate. 14 C.F.R. §§ 61.18 . . . See, e.g., 14 C.F.R. §§ 61.18(b)(2) (suspension), 61.18(c)(2) (revocation). . . .

H. JIFRY H. v. FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION,, 370 F.3d 1174 (D.C. Cir. 2004)

. . . . § 61.18, 49 C.F.R. § 1540.117. . . . . § 61.18, provides for automatic suspension by the FAA of airman certificates upon written notification . . . See 14 C.F.R. § 61.18(b)(2). . . . See 14 C.F.R. § 61.18(c)(2). The pilot may appeal the certificate revocation to the NTSB. . . . of respondents TSA, FAA, and the NTSB, the pilots’ APA challenges to the FAA regulation, 49 C.F.R. § 61.18 . . .

COALITION OF AIRLINE PILOTS ASSOCIATIONS, v. FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, 370 F.3d 1184 (D.C. Cir. 2004)

. . . . §§ 61.18, 63.14, 65.14). . . . security threat by the TSA automatically becomes ineligible to hold an airman certificate. 14 C.F.R. §§ 61.18 . . . See, e.g., 14 C.F.R. §§ 61.18(b)(2) (suspension), 61.18(c)(2) (revocation). . . .

C. KUTTAS, v. R. RITTER f k a R., 879 So. 2d 3 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . Substantial Change in Circumstances Section 61.18(l)(a), Florida Statutes (2001), provides that a court . . .

MILLER, v. E. MILLER,, 842 So. 2d 168 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . the trial judge provided a thorough, written evaluation of each of the factors contained in section 61.18 . . .

DAVIS H. v. K. WEINBAUM,, 843 So. 2d 290 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . court stated: Under our prior holdings, including Von Eiff and Beagle, it is apparent that section 61.18 . . .

GEORGIA, v. ASHCROFT,, 195 F. Supp. 2d 25 (D.D.C. 2002)

. . . within the proposed district also supported Michael Thurmond in the 1998 primary runoff at a rate of 61.18% . . .

E. DUNSON, v. TRI- MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS, INC. St. s B. L. F., 171 F. Supp. 2d 103 (E.D.N.Y. 2001)

. . . J, Caprio Tr. at 61.18-61.24.) . . .

In INTEREST N. Z. B. M. T. B. K. N. B. v. M. C., 779 So. 2d 508 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . residential care of the children and shared parental responsibility with the parents, pursuant to section 61.18 . . .

FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION RSKCO, v. VAN LOAN,, 764 So. 2d 708 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . from that total 80 percent of the average weekly wage, or $608.84, resulting in a weekly set-off of $61.18 . . .

ROCHETTE, v. ROCHETTE,, 722 So. 2d 236 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . without further notice, issue execution against the husband for $60,000 in accordance with section 61.18 . . . Section 61.18 covers situations where there was a breach of a condition of a bond posted to ensure the . . . Therefore, the trial court was not authorized, pursuant to section 61.18(3), to order that execution . . .

S. YOUNG, v. G. HECTOR,, 740 So. 2d 1153 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . . § 61.18(3)(d), Fla. Stat. (1995). See Mize v. . . .

J. MAHNKE f k a J. v. A. RICE,, 703 So. 2d 1235 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . In other words, the Hill factors assume that the custodial parent has prevailed under a section 61.18 . . .

SMITH, v. M. BEASLEY, C. ABLE, v. H. WILKINS, H. Jr., 946 F. Supp. 1174 (D.S.C. 1996)

. . . Under the final plan, District 121 remains a majority-minority district, with a BPOP of 61.18% and a . . .

S. GERARD, v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,, 455 So. 2d 500 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . The court there stated, quoting 16 Couch, Cyclopedia of Insurance Law, § 61.18 (2nd ed. 1964): [A] wrongdoer . . .

UNITED STATES v. REEDER,, 614 F.2d 1179 (8th Cir. 1980)

. . . Blackmar, Federal Jury Practice and Instructions § 61.18 (1977) (“a ‘wire communication facility’ would . . .

WEAVER, v. M. MASANOTTI, 376 So. 2d 484 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . Section 61.18(3) Florida Statutes (1971). . . .

TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES, 543 F.2d 71 (9th Cir. 1976)

. . . for the loss on the person who in equity and good conscience ought to pay it. 16 Couch on Insurance § 61.18 . . .

NARULA, v. ORANGE MOTORS OF MIAMI, INCORPORATED,, 337 So. 2d 1001 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

. . . Chicago, Illinois, Fla.App.1966, 193 So.2d 224, 227, quoting 16 Couch, Cyclopedia of Insurance Law, § 61.18 . . .

UNITED STATES v. OREGON, 295 U.S. 701 (U.S. 1935)

. . . (North of Malheur Lake) S. 89° E. 61.18 chs.; thence, in T. 26 S., R. 31 E. . . .

THE ASTORIA AND COLUMBIA RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES, 41 Ct. Cl. 284 (Ct. Cl. 1906)

. . . 1896, it has owned a line of railroad from Astoria to Goble, in the State of Oregon, a distance of 61.18 . . .