Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 61.19 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 61.19 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 61.19

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Chapter 61
DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE; SUPPORT; TIME-SHARING
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 61.19
61.19 Entry of judgment of dissolution of marriage, delay period.No final judgment of dissolution of marriage may be entered until at least 20 days have elapsed from the date of filing the original petition for dissolution of marriage; but the court, on a showing that injustice would result from this delay, may enter a final judgment of dissolution of marriage at an earlier date.
History.s. 1, ch. 57-258; s. 1, ch. 59-64; s. 1, ch. 61-123; s. 16, ch. 67-254; s. 20, ch. 71-241.
Note.Former s. 65.20.

F.S. 61.19 on Google Scholar

F.S. 61.19 on Casetext

Amendments to 61.19


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 61.19
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 61.19.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

ROBINSON- DOUGLAS, v. COASTAL INTERNATIONAL SECURITY, INC., 287 F. Supp. 3d 14 (D.D.C. 2018)

. . . s Dep. 61.19-22. . . .

In BLACKWELL, II, s J. v. II,, 432 B.R. 856 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2010)

. . . STAT. ch. 61.19 (2009) (emphasis added). . . .

UNITED STATES N v. CITY OF NEW YORK,, 683 F. Supp. 2d 225 (E.D.N.Y. 2010)

. . . that setting the cutoff score at 84.705 would result in an 89.84% pass rate for whites, but only a 61.19% . . . setting the cutoff score at 84.705 would result in an 89.84% pass rate for white applicants, but only a 61.19% . . .

AT T CORP. v. DATAWAY INC., 577 F. Supp. 2d 1099 (N.D. Cal. 2008)

. . . . § 61.19(b). . . .

EURO- AMERICAN COAL TRADING, INC. v. JAMES TAYLOR MINING, INC., 431 F. Supp. 2d 705 (E.D. Ky. 2006)

. . . state court judgment entered against Taylor Mining is for $256,218.15, plus interest in the amount of $61.19 . . .

WHOLESALE TELECOM CORPORATION, v. ITC DELTACOM COMMUNICATIONS, INC., 176 F. App'x 76 (11th Cir. 2006)

. . . . § 61.19. . . .

LAMB, f k a v. LEITER,, 603 So. 2d 632 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

. . . the final judgment was entered barely three days after the period of limitation set forth in section 61.19 . . .

In AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 604 So. 2d 1110 (Fla. 1992)

. . . JUDGE Circuit Judge (NOTE: This final judgment is subject to the provisions of FlaJBtatr-(-1983) -§ 61.19 . . .

UNITED STATES v. B. GAUNCE,, 779 F.2d 1434 (9th Cir. 1986)

. . . Federal Aviation Regulations § 61.19(f) directs that “[t]he holder of any certificate issued under this . . . suspended or revoked shall, upon the Administrator’s request, return it to the Administrator.” 14 C.F.R. § 61.19 . . .

UNITED STATES v. INTERCON LEASING, INC. a L. DC- s, 617 F. Supp. 323 (S.D. Fla. 1985)

. . . . § 61.19(f).) . . .

THE FLORIDA BAR RE AMENDMENT TO FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE, 450 So. 2d 817 (Fla. 1984)

. . . of_, 19_ CIRCUIT JUDGE (NOTE: This final judgment is subject to the provisions of Fla.Stat. (1983) § 61.19 . . .

MAGAZINER, v. MAGAZINER,, 434 So. 2d 10 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . judgment of dissolution was void and should be set aside because it was entered in violation of section 61.19 . . . The court’s failure to follow this provision of section 61.19 does not, however, render the judgment . . . We conclude that the failure of the court to follow the twenty day waiting provision of section 61.19 . . .

R. JENSEN, v. ADMINISTRATOR OF FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, 641 F.2d 797 (9th Cir. 1981)

. . . . § 61.19 (1980). . . .

T. HALL, v. AIR FORCE FINANCE CENTER, DEPARTMENT OF AIR FORCE OF UNITED STATES, 344 So. 2d 1340 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

. . . similar changes compare § 65.08 to § 61.08; § 65.11 with § 61.11; § 65.15 with § 61.14 and § 65.20 with § 61.19 . . .

v., 36 T.C. 255 (T.C. 1961)

. . . fees and the like) totaling $1,224.50, incurred in connection with the new financing, at the rate of $61.19 . . . Kespondent disallowed tbe petitioner’s amortization deduction of $1,967.04 ($1,905.85 plus $61.19) in . . .

A. R. DENNIS, HART L. WEAVER, EBENEZER WELLS, 2 B.T.A. 977 (B.T.A. 1925)

. . . Ebenezer Wells-'_ 61.19 for the year 1919. . . .