Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 61.29 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 61.29 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 61.29

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Chapter 61
DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE; SUPPORT; TIME-SHARING
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 61.29
61.29 Child support guidelines; principles; applicability.
(1) The following principles establish the public policy of the State of Florida in the creation of the child support guidelines:
(a) Each parent has a fundamental obligation to support his or her minor or legally dependent child.
(b) The guidelines schedule is based on the parent’s combined net income estimated to have been allocated to the child as if the parents and children were living in an intact household.
(c) The guidelines encourage fair and efficient settlement of support issues between parents and minimizes the need for litigation.
(2) The guidelines in this section do not apply to support for a dependent adult child as defined in s. 61.1255(2)(a). The amount of support for a dependent adult child is determined by s. 61.31.
History.s. 4, ch. 2010-199; s. 3, ch. 2023-213.

F.S. 61.29 on Google Scholar

F.S. 61.29 on Casetext

Amendments to 61.29


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 61.29
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 61.29.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

JOHANSSON, v. JOHANSSON, n k a, 270 So. 3d 426 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . ." § 61.29(1), Fla. Stat. (2016). . . . accordance with the statute and the fundamental obligation of each parent to support their children. § 61.29 . . .

HEARD, v. PERALES,, 247 So. 3d 533 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . The legislature enacted section 61.29(1), Florida Statutes (2011), which declared that, "Each parent . . .

SOUTHERN- OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, v. EASDON RHODES ASSOCIATES LLC, D. W., 872 F.3d 1161 (11th Cir. 2017)

. . . Indeed, the Endorsement carries an annual premium of only $61.29 and provides a policy limit of $1,000,000.00 . . .

GROSS, v. ZIMMERMAN,, 197 So. 3d 1248 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . See § 61.29, Fla. Stat. (2014). . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, v. C. PRICE E., 182 So. 3d 782 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . .” § 61.29, Fla. Stat. . . .

D. M. T. v. T. M. H., 129 So. 3d 320 (Fla. 2013)

. . . See § 61.29, Fla. . . .

CONGINE, Jr. v. VILLAGE OF CRIVITZ, 947 F. Supp. 2d 963 (E.D. Wis. 2013)

. . . . §§ 61.28, 61.29, 61.31; cf. Chortek v. . . . clause to be prosecuted all violations of law of which the constable has knowledge or information,” § 61.29 . . .

EDWARDS, v. Jo BARNHART,, 214 F. Supp. 2d 700 (W.D. Tex. 2002)

. . . Plaintiff will be reimbursed $61.29 for expenses incurred, $177.60 for costs, and $4379.80 for attorney . . .

LAWRENCE AVIATION INDUSTRIES, INC. v. REICH,, 28 F. Supp. 2d 728 (E.D.N.Y. 1998)

. . . Vittone determined that the median length of employment for the 41 men who the company laid off was 61.29 . . .

PEREZ, v. PASADENA INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT,, 958 F. Supp. 1196 (S.D. Tex. 1997)

. . . 6,310 2,105 994 247 149 65 47 3,607 1,998 584 534 264 214 3,594 1,243 250 129 1,731 TOTAL 45.10% 100% 61.29% . . . Elam was elected, receiving 61.29 percent (3293/5373) of the total vote; 68.96 percent (651/944) of the . . .

WESCH, v. HUNT,, 785 F. Supp. 1491 (S.D. Ala. 1992)

. . . Block Group 4 35 33 2 100.00% 94.29% 5.71% 0 0 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total Tract 0058 912 559 349 100.00% 61.29% . . . Total Asian/PI Total Other Total ALABAMA NATIONAL BANK-RAMER * 912 100.00% 559 61.29% 349 38.27% 4 0.44% . . .