Cases from cite.case.law:

LONDON, v. LONDON,, 32 So. 3d 107 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . modification, “the provisions of section 61.519 should be considered in pari materia with those of section 61.530 . . . Section 61.530 provides that, given simultaneous proceedings, “the enforcing court shall immediately . . . “[Section 61.530] clearly confers greater discretion on the enforcing court to proceed with enforcement . . . The order on appeal is silent on the matter. .Both sections 61.519 and 61.530 are titled “Simultaneous . . .

B. STAATS, v. E. McKINNON, f k a E., 924 So. 2d 82 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . The Florida court ostensibly relied on the enforcement provisions of the act, sections 61.519 and 61.530 . . . judgment, the provisions of section 61.519 should be considered in pari materia with those of section 61.530 . . . Section 61.530 (section 36-6-231 of the Tennessee Code) specifically provides: “The proceeding for enforcement . . . See § 61.530, Fla. Stat.; Tenn.Code Ann. § 36-6-236. . . . .

GIVENTER, v. GIVENTER,, 863 So. 2d 438 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . The clear requirement of section 61.530 is that the enforcing court (Florida) “shall immediately communicate . . . Section 61.530, providing for simultaneous proceedings, states that an enforcement proceeding in this . . . Based on section 61.530, the Broward circuit court should have communicated with the Colorado court as . . . enforcing court, after consultation with the modifying court, stays or dismisses the proceeding. § 61.530 . . .

AMERICAN AIRLINES, v. AIR LINE PILOTS ASS N, INTERNATIONAL, 91 F. Supp. 629 (E.D.N.Y. 1950)

. . . what the Board meant by saying that the company failed to comply fully with the “intent” of Regulation 61.530 . . .