The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . . § 83.02; Rule 5, the Lookout rule, 33 C.F.R. § 83.05; and Rule 7, the Risk of Collision rule, 33 C.F.R . . . involved, which may make a departure from these Rules necessary to avoid immediate danger.' ■’ 33 C.F.R. § 83.02 . . .
. . . Explanatory Notes, Explanatory Note 83.02. . . . Explanatory Note 83.02 states: . . . . A review of the products listed in Explanatory Note 83.02 reinforces our conclusion that heading 8302 . . . Explanatory Note 83.02 states that items “such as” swivel devices for revolving chairs and frames for . . . According. to the government, the language of Explanatory Note 83.02 which excludes “goods forming an . . .
. . . . § 83.02(a) (“Nothing in these Rules shall exonerate any vessel, or the owner, master, or crew thereof . . . See Folkstone, 64 F.3d at 1046; see also 33 C.F.R. § 83.02(a) (“Nothing in these Rules shall exonerate . . .
. . . . § 83.02. . . .
. . . . §§ 83.02, 83.06. . . .
. . . .; see also 33 C.F.R. 83.02(b) (Rule 2) (“In construing and complying with these Rules due regard shall . . .
. . . R. 83.02). . . .
. . . . § 83.02; see also Varig Airlines, 467 U.S. at 816-17, 817 n. 13, 104 S.Ct. 2755 (internal citations . . .
. . . Civil Rule 83.1.D.1-WDNC; Local Civil Rule 83.1.D.1-EDVA; Local Civil Rule 6.D-WDVA; Local Civil Rule 83.02 . . .
. . . PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Pursuant to Local Rule of Prisoner Litigation 83.02 and Local Standing Order No . . .
. . . R. 83.02, 83.03. Transfers without a written application are the distinct minority. . . . R. 83.02. . . .
. . . P. 83.02. . . . P. 83.02. . . . P. 83.02. . . . Also, if the Missouri Court of Appeals has denied a party's Rule 83.02 motion for transfer to the Missouri . . .
. . . Missouri Supreme Court Rule 83.02 states that a ease may be transferred to the Supreme Court of Missouri . . .
. . . Woon Soon and Ai Ja Lee $ 170,000.00 $141,758.63 (83.39%) Patricia Veraldo $ 205,000.00 $170,197.10 (83.02% . . .
. . . The Swedish value is 8.5 times higher than the average import value of 83.02 Rs/Kg. See Pls.’ . . .
. . . P. 83.02 requires visiting attorneys to have a local attorney be responsible for their actions in accordance . . .
. . . House District 148 voted for Michael Thurmond in the 1998 Democratic Party primary runoff election, and 83.02% . . .
. . . Pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rules 83.02 and 83.04 (2001), a defendant may apply to transfer his . . . R. 83.02; a dissenting judge of the court of appeals may transfer a case, Mo. Sup.Ct. . . . R. 83.02. We disagree. . . . R. 83.02. . . . R. 83.02. . . .
. . . 7.0 Day of Test 70°C 80°C 70°C 80°C 0 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 1 98.53 95.22 99.76 96.63 4 93.03 83.02 . . .
. . . Lucas, supra, ¶ 83.02 at 83-5. . . .
. . . See J.A. 143, 198 (Blue Cross High Option premium $83.02 for airport employees but $174.77 for federal . . .
. . . See Mo.R.Civ.P. 83.02, 83.03. . . . Rule 83.02 provides that a case may be transferred by order of the court of appeals because of the general . . . an application for transfer, the supreme court may grant a transfer for the reasons stated in Rule 83.02 . . .
. . . Lucas, supra, II 83.02, at 83-5. . . . ÍI 83.02, at 83-6. . . .
. . . Brown then filed a Mo.R.Civ.P. 83.02 application to transfer to the Missouri Supreme Court, alleging . . . Rule 83.02 provides that an appellate court may transfer a case to the Missouri Supreme Court "because . . . 83.03 provides that the supreme court may transfer a case for any of the reasons set forth in Rule 83.02 . . .
. . . regard to the alleged lack of "general interest or importance” was an obvious reference to Missouri Rule 83.02 . . .
. . . . §§ 83.02; 83.03(3) (1987). . . .
. . . After the Missouri Court of Appeals denied him relief, Brown filed a Rule 83.02 motion in that court . . .
. . . (Id. at pp. 89-101; see Mo.R.Civ.P. 83.02). . . .
. . . transfer out of time”, Response at 3, and that petitioner’s failure to do so in this case after a Rule 83.02 . . . Missouri Court of Appeals to the Supreme Court of Missouri under either Missouri Supreme Court Rule 83.02 . . . petitioner had failed to file a motion for transfer under either [emphasis in original] Mo.R.Civ.P. 83.02 . . . reflect that in all ten of those cases, the Supreme Court of Missouri simultaneously denied the Rule 83.02 . . . R.Civ.P. 83.02. . . . .
. . . Conason, Damages in Tort Actions §§ 82.20, 83.02 (1982); Krause, The Benefits of Structured Settlements . . .
. . . Y, § 10 (emphasis added); see to the same effect Mo.R.Crim.P. 30.27 and Mo.R.Civ.P. 83.02. . . .
. . . Conason, Damages in Tort Actions §§ 82.20, 83.02 (1982); Krause, The Benefits of Structured Settlements . . .
. . . Kisco Road the following courses and distances, S. 62° 20' 30" W. 83.02 feet, S. 66° 15' 30" W. 20.01 . . .
. . . Mo.R.Civ.P. 83.02. . . .
. . . 1982, the Missouri Court of Appeals denied petitioner’s motion pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 83.02 . . . Petitioner’s 83.02 motion for rehearing or transfer to the Missouri Supreme Court has been denied. . . . requires that such an application be made within fifteen days after the court of appeals denies the 83.02 . . . 8th Cir. 1982), in which petitioner had failed to file a motion for transfer under either Mo.R.Civ.P. 83.02 . . . court, the Missouri Court of Appeals rendered its decision on the merits and then denied petitioner’s 83.02 . . .
. . . appeal or the rule 27.26 appeal, seek transfer to the Missouri Supreme Court under either Mo.R.Civ.P. 83.02 . . . Civ.P. 83.02 or 83.03 and had not sought to file an out-of-time motion under 84.08. . . . He reasoned that since, in either case, Adail had not filed a motion to transfer under Mo.R.Civ.P. 83.02 . . .
. . . Powell then requested, pursuant to Mo.R.Civ.P. 83.02, that the court of appeals transfer the ease to . . . 83.03 which requires such application be made within 15 days after the court of appeals denies the 83.02 . . .
. . . Additionally, appellee suggests that in the event Rodgers is unsuccessful under Rule 83.02, he should . . . Rule 83.02 specifies that either of two grounds warrant transfer by the Missouri Court of Appeals: (1 . . . Rule 83.02 specifies a procedure whereby a defined legal controversy properly before the Missouri Court . . . Under the facts of this case, therefore, a successful transfer under 83.02 would only enable review of . . . In this sense, Rule 83.02 simply could not secure Missouri Supreme Court review of those issues relevant . . .
. . . Petitioner then filed motions under Missouri Rules 83.02 and 83.03, without success, but he did not file . . . Motions under Rules 83.02 and 83.03 were denied. State v. McReynolds, 574 S.W.2d 450 (Mo.App.1978). . . .
. . . For this same period 83.02 percent (3,781 of 4,554) of Black elementary students attended schools 90- . . .
. . . claim, in this instance by means of a motion to transfer to the Missouri Supreme Court under Rules 83.02 . . .
. . . His request, pursuant to Mo.Sup.Ct.R. 83.02, that the court of appeals transfer the case to the Missouri . . .
. . . , 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 77.01, 78.01, 79, 80, 82.01, 82.02, 83.01, 83.02 . . .
. . . petitioner does, in fact, still have an available state court remedy under the transfer provisions of Rule 83.02 . . . Admittedly, Rule 83.02 requires that a motion for transfer from the Court of Appeals to the Missouri . . . Louis District, pursuant to Rule 83.02. . . . procedure in this case is for the appellant to file a motion for rehearing or transfer pursuant to Rule 83.02 . . .
. . . a timely application to transfer in the Missouri Court of Appeals, Kansas City District, under Rule 83.02 . . . as petitioner alleges, abandon the petitioner and failed to advise him of his rights to have a Rule 83.02 . . . that the Missouri Court of Appeals would exercise its power to modify the time requirement of Rule 83.02 . . . It has now been established in this case that the petitioner did not file a Missouri Rule 83.02 motion . . . has been established that petitioner likely was unaware of the necessity of filing a Missouri Rule 83.02 . . .
. . . will or from month to month of a mobile home lot was also subject to termination under Sections 83.01, 83.02 . . .
. . . Although Rule 83.02, V.A.M.R., and Rule 83.03, V. . . . Rule 83.02, V.A.M.R. provides: Transfer on Order of Court of Appeals A ease in which an opinion has been . . . Court of Appeals In any case in which a motion for rehearing and an application for transfer under Rule 83.02 . . . transferred by order of this Court on application of a party for any of the reasons specified in Rule 83.02 . . . ascertained that it was probable that a substantial number of transfers would be granted, under either Rule 83.02 . . .
. . . See Florida Statutes §§ 83.01 and 83.02, F.S.A., and 20 Fla.Jur., Landlord and Tenant §§ 18-20. . . .
. . . covered by the superior heading, but that the heading appeared to have been derived in part from item 83.02 . . . of the Brussels Nomenclature, which provides: 83.02 — Base Metal Fittings AND Mountings op a Kind Suitable . . .
. . . Town of Groveland, Fla. 1955, 79 So.2d 765, §§ 83.02, 83.04, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. . . .
. . . . §§83.01 and 83.02. . . .
. . . That superior heading appears to have been derived, at least in part, from item 83.02 of the Nomenclature . . . Classification of Goods in Customs Tariffs, generally known as the Brussels Nomenclature, which provides: 83.02 . . .
. . . That superior heading appears to have been derived, at least in part, from item 83.02 of the Nomenclature . . . Classification of Goods in Customs Tariffs, generally known as the Brussels Nomenclature, which provides: 83.02 . . .
. . . covered by the superior heading, but that the heading appeared to have been derived in part from item 83.02 . . . The explanatory notes state that said item 83.02 does include: (G) Curtain, blind and portiere fittings . . .
. . . encompassed within the term “vehicle coachwork” referred to in TSTJS item 647.01, or to “coachwork” in item 83.02 . . .
. . . The superior heading appears to have been derived in part from item 83.02 of the Nomenclature for the . . . Classification of Goods in Customs Tariffs, generally known as the Brussels Nomenclature, which provides: 83.02 . . .
. . . The superior heading appears to have been derived in part from item 83.02 of the Nomenclature for the . . . Classification of Goods in Customs Tariffs, generally known as the Brussels Nomenclature, which provides: 83.02 . . .
. . . Procedure — Forms (1952 Ed.), § 83.02, p.563. . . . .
. . . fourth counts are similar to the first and second, except that in each 81 bales of hay of the value of $83.02 . . .