The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . is only required to have a sponsor if of Michigan LR (s)he was held in contempt (or subject to other 83.20 . . . LR 83.20(c)(2)) or is taking the oath of office by telephone of video conference. . . .
. . . LR 83.20(f)(1). . . .
. . . such as a suit for ejectment, or trespass to try title, or removal of tennant proceedings under Sec. 83.20 . . .
. . . . § 83.20 and show that it satisfies the criteria set forth in 25 C.F.R. § 83.11. B. . . .
. . . landlord shall recover possession of rented premises only: (a) In an action for possession under s. 83.20 . . . abrogate the landlord’s right to obtain possession—unless he files an action for possession under section 83.20 . . . in which the tenant remains on the premises after having been given the notice provided in section 83.20 . . .
. . . and all four occupations were rated “sedentary” by the Dictionary of Occupational Titles and paid $83.20 . . . App. at 00435-36,' 00438. $83.20 is greater than the reasonable wage for Plaintiff allowed under the . . .
. . . presented satisfied all the requirements for establishing a prima facie claim for eviction under section 83.20 . . . Section 83.20, Florida Statutes (2010), states, in pertinent part: Any tenant or lessee at will or sufferance . . . prima facie claim for eviction as follows: Eviction of a non-residential tenant is governed by section 83.20 . . . Under section 83.20(2), appellant was required to offer evidence of the following elements to establish . . . to satisfy each of the requirements necessary to prove a prima facie case for eviction under section 83.20 . . .
. . . Code § 83.20(e). . . .
. . . Section 83.20(3), Florida Statutes (2011), explicitly authorizes claims for possession for breach of . . .
. . . apply to members of the bar of this court and attorneys who practice in this court as permitted by LR 83.20 . . . LR 83.20.” The Michigan Rules of Professional Conduct (“MRPC”) therefore govern BOC’s conduct. . . .
. . . neither a party to this litigation, nor counsel, and her signing of the motion violates Local Rule 83.20 . . .
. . . See § 83.20 Fla. Stat. At this point, neither party asserted that the Lease was terminated. . . . terminated and eviction, satisfied the statutory three-day notice requirement in Florida Statute § 83.20 . . . the complaint in Fontaine was based on the default statutory notice requirement in Florida Statute § 83.20 . . .
. . . . § ¿83.20(b)(2)(H) 42 C.F.R. § 483.20(b)(2)(ii) requires that a facility conduct a significant-change . . .
. . . Eviction of a non-residential tenant is governed by section 83.20, Florida Statutes. . . . Under section 83.20(2), appellant was required to offer evidence of the following elements to establish . . . The notice requirement is set by section 83.20(2), Florida Statutes, and may be waived by the parties . . .
. . . . §§ 83.20 et seq. (“MSLSPA”). . . .
. . . Rule 4.2, made applicable to attorneys practicing in this Court by way of Local Rule 83.20(j), provides . . . LR 83.20(j); E.D. Mich. LR 83.22(b); Nat’l Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. . . .
. . . Stat. (2006); see also §§ 66.021 (ejectment), 82.04-05 (unlawful detainer), 83.20-.21(tenant removal . . .
. . . LR 83.20(j)) (adopting MRPC). . . . .
. . . Section 83.20(2), Florida Statutes (2002), provides guidance. . . . .” § 83.20(2). . . .
. . . This notice was sent pursuant to section 83.20(2), Florida Statutes (2000), the statutory three-day notice . . . three days of receipt of the notice, rendering it insufficient as a three-day notice under section 83.20 . . . notice to adhere to the requirements of Florida’s statutory three-day notice provision under section 83.20 . . . and unambiguously waived the three-day notice provision, resulting in a valid eviction under section 83.20 . . .
. . . . §§ 83.7(b), (e)-(g), 83.20. . . .
. . . Lr 83.20(j). . . .
. . . On April 21, 1999, Corrigan attempted to serve a three-day notice letter under section 83.20, Florida . . . Baldwin that “[i]n accordance with Paragraph 15 of the Lease, and to the extent, it applies, Section 83.20 . . . argued below that there is no right to a jury trial in a summary eviction proceeding under sections 83.20 . . .
. . . Michigan Rules of Professional Conduct (1999), which apply to counsel in both Hadix and Glover, see Rule 83.20 . . .
. . . previously held that a three-day notice under an earlier version of a landlord tenant statute, section 83.20 . . . Section 83.20(2), Florida Statutes (1995), is substantially the same as the 1969 version of the statute . . .
. . . Subtracting 2% of $4,190.92 ($83.20) for the prompt payment discount would result in a net billing amount . . .
. . . Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice § 83.20 (3d ed.1997), and the parties are charged with knowledge of the . . .
. . . Further, the trial court found that Talbert had given the proper three-day notice pursuant to section 83.20 . . .
. . . .: 83.20 Milberg Weiss Bershad Specthrie & Lerach: 1,972.25 (includes $361.50 for courier service) Murray . . .
. . . . § 83.20 to the Debtor notifying the Debtor that it was in default under the lease in the amount of . . .
. . . refused the tender and, on the same day (May 1, 1986), filed a tenant eviction proceeding under section 83.20 . . .
. . . Cf Section 61.12(h), and 83.20, Larson’s Workmen’s Compensation Law. Affirmed. . . .
. . . such as a suit for ejectment, or trespass to try title, or removal of tenant proceedings under Sec. 83.20 . . .
. . . . § 83.20(2). . . . in this action, the record below shows that such service was proper and in conformity with F.S.A. § 83.20 . . . record in this case, the Lessor complied with the legal requirements of service as set forth in F.S.A. § 83.20 . . .
. . . Section 83.20(2) Fla. . . .
. . . landlord shall recover possession of rented premises only: (a) In an action for possession under s. 83.20 . . . premises for a period of 30 consecutive days; (b) The rent is not current; and (c) A notice pursuant to s. 83.20 . . . Section 83.20(2), Florida Statutes (1983) provides: Where such person holds over without permission as . . .
. . . . § 83.20 et seq. (West 1986); Haw.Rev.Stat. § 484-1 et seq. (1985). . . .
. . . Rate Pay 1/20/80 $3.10 1359 416 0.20 $83.20 the inquiry here is what number of cards/hour would this . . . wage X cards processed gross pay Inserting the known sample data, cards/hour = $3.10 x 1359 = 51. $83.20 . . . This solution demonstrates that this employee would have had to process 51 cards/hour in order for $83.20 . . . 50 = 27.18 X $3.10 - $83.20 = $84.26 - $83.20 = $1.06 Therefore, the hypothetical employee should have . . . Since the actual pay was only $83.20, a minimum wage violation of $1.06 occurred. . . .
. . . . § 83.20(2) (1987) which allows tenant three days to pay rent or vacate. . . .
. . . Plaintiff served Defendant with a three day notice to pay rent or vacate the premises pursuant to section 83.20 . . . Where a lease provides for a longer grace period than that called for by section 83.20, the landlord . . .
. . . the instant action, Kaplan presented McCabe with a “NOTICE TO PAY RENT OR QUIT” pursuant to section 83.20 . . .
. . . FS § 83.20(2). 4. . . .
. . . Only after the lessor sent a three-day notice pursuant to Section 83.20(2), Florida Statutes (1985) did . . .
. . . ineffective because the lessor failed to comply with the three-day notice provisions of Florida Statute § 83.20 . . . The Bankruptcy Court based its decision on Florida Statute § 83.20 which provides as follows: 83.20. . . . requiring the payment of the rent or the possession of the premises as required by Florida Statute § 83.20 . . . The three day notice to pay rent or vacate requirement set forth in Florida Statute § 83.20(2) deals . . .
. . . served the three-day notice to pay or to vacate the premises as provided for under Florida Statutes § 83.20 . . .
. . . fee percentage, and its marketing fee percentage) was 78.95 percent for the bacon board dispenser, 83.20 . . .
. . . Clarks because the Hietts had not served on the Clarks the three-day written notice required by section 83.20 . . . Section 83.20(2) authorizes the removal: (2) Where such person holds over without permission as aforesaid . . . excepting the failure to pay rent constituted a waiver of the requirement to give notice under section 83.20 . . . There is authority for the proposition that the three-day notice provided in section 83.20(2) can be . . . The three-day notice under section 83.20(2) was a condition precedent to relief. . . .
. . . under the following conditions: (1) if the landlord has instituted action for possession under Section 83.20 . . . the landlord’s right to obtain possession — unless he files an action for possession under section 83.20 . . . in which the tenant remains on the premises after having been given the notice provided in section 83.20 . . .
. . . This notice, sent purportedly pursuant to § 83.20(2) of Fla.Stat., is a statutory prerequisite for filing . . . demanded a payment within three days or possession of the premises and was given pursuant to Fla.Stat. 83.20 . . . As noted earlier, the three day notice was given pursuant to § 83.20(2) Fla.Stat. which-provides as follows . . . : 83.20 Causes for removal of tenants Any tenant or lessee at will or sufferance, or for part of the . . .
. . . Default for Non-Payment of Rent in accordance with Section 11.1 of the Lease and Florida Statutes § 83.20 . . .
. . . premature and ineffective because the Landlord did not strictly comply with Florida Statutes §§ 83.05 and 83.20 . . .
. . . . § 83.20. . . .
. . . Section 83.20(1) and F.S. Section 83.20(2), respectively. . . .
. . . careful examination of the record reveals that the Landlord fully complied with Florida Statute Section 83.20 . . .
. . . not only in accordance with the terms of the lease but also in compliance with the requirements of § 83.20 . . .
. . . that the debtor filed its Petition for Bankruptcy, a Three Day Notice, pursuant to Florida Statutes 83.20 . . .
. . . . § 83.20(2) (Supp.1981); that they made a tender to purchase by offering to exercise the offer prior . . . The three day notice requirement mentioned earlier, is set forth in Fla.Stat. § 83.20(2) (Supp.1981) . . .
. . . Section 83.20, Florida Statutes, then provides that any “tenant at sufferance” may be removed from the . . . As noted in § 83.20, the lessor’s right to evict a tenant who has become a tenant at sufferance after . . . This proviso in § 83.20 is an anti-forfeiture provision whereby the tenant who has been rendered one . . . In the instant case, the plaintiff lessor complied with the prescribed procedure mandated by § 83.20, . . .
. . . .” § 83.20, Florida Statutes. . . . It is clear that the landlord did not comply with the requirements of § 83.20. . . .
. . . grounds for regaining leased property over which the county court is given jurisdiction under Sections 83.20 . . .
. . . . § 83.20, et seq.; and common law fraud and breach of contract. . . .
. . . lease agreement between the parties allegedly waived the three day notice requirement under Section 83.20 . . .
. . . such as a suit for ejectment, or trespass to try title, or removal of tenant proceedings under Sec. 83.20 . . .
. . . City Council, and that the Ordinance conflicted with state law, specifically Sections 83.03, 83.04 and 83.20 . . . that this rent control ordinance does conflict with Florida Statutes Sections 83.03, 83.04, 83.06 and 83.20 . . . F.S. 83.20, F.S.A. provides that a tenant at will or sufferance may be removed from the premises, evicted . . .
. . . had annual income from weekly premium, Industrial Life policies on members of the Scyphers family of $83.20 . . .
. . . Sections 83.20 et seq., F.S.A.) whereas the facts appear to more appropriately support a statutory proceeding . . .
. . . The tenant’s plaint that he did not receive the three days notice provided in Section 83.20(2), F.S.1969 . . .
. . . S. 83.20(2) demanded the amount of $665 or possession of the premises within three days of service; and . . .
. . . The suit was filed under the provisions of Section 83.20, F.S.1969, F.S.A. . . . counterclaim within the jurisdiction of the court is authorized in a statutory proceeding under Section 83.20 . . .
. . . third issue, portions of the ordinance conflict with state law, particularly §§83.03, 83.04, 83.06 and 83.20 . . .
. . . F.S.A. in determining the average weekly wage and held that the average weekly wage was the sum of $83.20 . . .
. . . Plaintiff Hollestelle alleged that after criminal proceedings under Florida Statutes, section 83.20 ( . . .
. . . such as a suit for ejectment, or trespass to try title, or removal of tennant proceedings under Sec. 83.20 . . .
. . . The latter is outlined and provided for in Chapter 83, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., §§ 83.20-83.27. . . .
. . . This reflected the accused’s basic pay as $83.20 per month. . . . Since the evidence showed' the accused's basic pay was $83.20, the court-martial could, by simple arithmetical . . .
. . . 70.29 New York to London, England and return 858.20 London, England to Hamburg, Germany and return 83.20 . . .
. . . an action against the appellees-defendants-lessees seeking removal of the defendants, under section 83.20 . . . Section 83.20, F.S.A. authorizes proceedings for the removal of a tenant who (1) holds over after the . . .
. . . respondents in the sum of $2,080.97, together with interest from September 10, 1957 in the amount of $83.20 . . .
. . . General Laws of 1927 have now been incorporated into our present Florida Statutes as Sections 83.05, 83.20 . . .
. . . Section 83.20, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. . . .
. . . Total compensation (I+J+K)-$83.20 M. Total compensation paid_$75.00 N. . . .
. . . shipment to the United States, was for each depth-sounding device $2,027.65 less nondutiable charges of $83.20 . . . the value of the merchandise in issue, and that said value is $2,027.65, less nondutiable charges of $83.20 . . .
. . . undersigned within three days from the date whereupon this notice is given, in accordance with Section 83.20 . . .
. . . the period he was paid $50.40 on Nov. 13, 1953, $67.20 on Nov. 20, 1953, $113.93 on Nov. 27, 1953, $83.20 . . .
. . . The eviction proceedings were brought under Chapter 83 F.S.A., and particularly, Section 83.20(2), which . . .
. . . contends that this is a statutory proceeding to evict, authorized by Florida Statutes of 1941, Sec. 83.20 . . .
. . . It baa a gross tonnage, 87.55; net tonnage, 83.20; net length, 91.9; breadth, 27.7; depth, 6.8 feet,- . . .