Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 83.40 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 83.40 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 83.40

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Chapter 83
LANDLORD AND TENANT
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 83.40
83.40 Short title.This part shall be known as the “Florida Residential Landlord and Tenant Act.”
History.s. 2, ch. 73-330.

F.S. 83.40 on Google Scholar

F.S. 83.40 on Casetext

Amendments to 83.40


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 83.40
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 83.40.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

MUSI, v. CREDO, LLC,, 273 So. 3d 93 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)

. . . See § 83.40, Fla. Stat. (2018). . . .

SOUTHFIELD EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF SOUTHFIELD PUBLIC SCHOOLS,, 319 F. Supp. 3d 898 (E.D. Mich. 2018)

. . . obtain a second opinion from the Michigan Supreme Court under Eastern District of Michigan Local Rule 83.40 . . . Mich LR 83.40(a). . . .

HILL, v. SNYDER,, 308 F. Supp. 3d 893 (E.D. Mich. 2018)

. . . L.R. 83.40(a)(3). This Court cannot make such a finding. . . .

ICE, v. COSMOPOLITAN RESIDENCES ON SOUTH BEACH, A CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., 237 So. 3d 408 (Fla. App. Ct. 2017)

. . . . §§ 83.40, 83.41, Fla. Stat. (2012). . . .

MDEWAKANTON SIOUX INDIANS OF MINNESOTA, v. ZINKE,, 264 F. Supp. 3d 116 (D.D.C. 2017)

. . . . § 83.38, and subsequently by the Assistant Secretary, id, § 83.40. . . .

LE SCAMPI CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. v. HALL, 200 So. 3d 187 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . and when so exercised shall be done so in accordance with those provisions as set forth in Section 83.40 . . .

WILSON, v. TERWILLINGER,, 140 So. 3d 1122 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . . §§ 83.40-682, Fla. Stat. (2012). . See also City of Miami Beach v. . . .

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. KINNUCAN, 9 F. Supp. 3d 370 (S.D.N.Y. 2014)

. . . The following day, F5’s share price increased from $73.11 to $83.40, a gain of 14%. Id. . . .

GRANT, v. METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE, 727 F. Supp. 2d 677 (M.D. Tenn. 2010)

. . . for FLSA non-exempt positions, 87.62% to 94.80% for blacks held such position compared to 78.00% to 83.40% . . .

LANGBEHN, v. PUBLIC HEALTH TRUST OF MIAMI- DADE COUNTY, d b a Dr. Dr., 661 F. Supp. 2d 1326 (S.D. Fla. 2009)

. . . . § 83.40 et seq., was not the sort of legislative enactment that would support a negligence per se claim . . .

OLEN PROPERTIES CORPORATION, a a v. S. MOSS,, 984 So. 2d 558 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . . §§ 83.40-83.682, Fla. Stat. (2007). . . .

L. SMITH, v. GROVE APARTMENTS, LLC,, 976 So. 2d 582 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . But in 1973, the Florida legislature enacted the Florida Residential Landlord and Tenant Act (section 83.40 . . .

MINALLA, v. EQUINAMICS CORPORATION,, 954 So. 2d 645 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . . §§ 83.40-83.682, Fla. Stat. (2005). . . .

ATHENACO, LTD d b a s L. L. C. d b a s v. COX, L. P. H. O K. J. L. M. D. L. L. J. A. R. B. M. J. A. S. J. J. III, W. C. J. C. J. A. C. Jr. L. W. J. L. J. M. E. W. S. T. D. G. L. O. L. J. J. D. V. R. St. St. L. M., 335 F. Supp. 2d 773 (E.D. Mich. 2004)

. . . L.R. 83.40; M.C.R. 7.305(B). . . .

In JUNCO, INC. In PRESS, JONES WAECHTER, P. C. In SPRINGFIELD CONTRACTING CORPORATION,, 185 B.R. 215 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 1995)

. . . Prepare for and attend hearing on Application BIS o BLW cn TOTAL 12.17 $604.62 SUMMARY Total Hours: 83.40 . . .

W. WOLFF v. UNITED STATES, 967 F.2d 222 (6th Cir. 1992)

. . . that by paying for the 73.30 and 98.75 acres in those tracts they would get, respectively, 54.75 and 83.40 . . .

LINKER v. ROSSE ZAGER, 49 Fla. Supp. 2d 22 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1991)

. . . Florida’s Residential Landlord and Tenant Act (Florida Statute 83.40, et. seq.) is clearly intended to . . .

DELAND HOUSING AUTHORITY v. GOOSBY, 38 Fla. Supp. 2d 184 (Volusia Cty. Ct. 1989)

. . . This is an action to evict Defendant from public housing for nonpayment of rent pursuant to § 83.40, . . .

W. J. GROSS, a k a J. v. H. J. BARTLETT, a k a, 547 So. 2d 661 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . unit is clearly a dwelling unit governed by the Florida Residential Landlord and Tenant Act, section 83.40 . . .

RUSSO v. MANFREDO, 35 Fla. Supp. 2d 23 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1989)

. . . . §§ 83.40-83.67 (1987) governing residential tenancies. . . .

In CHURCHFIELD MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT CORPORATION,, 98 B.R. 838 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1989)

. . . KM & Z requests $42,-146.00 in compensation (380.60 attorney hours, 83.40 paralegal hours). Ms. . . .

PALM BEACH COUNTY LEASED HOUSING CORPORATION, INC. v. MURRELL, 29 Fla. Supp. 2d 11 (Volusia Cty. Ct. 1988)

. . . The waiver rule was codified in the Florida Residential Landlord and Tenant Act, § 83.40, et. seq., Fla . . .

C. HERRELL, Jr. C. Jr. P. A. v. SEYFARTH, SHAW, FAIRWEATHER GERALDSON, A, 491 So. 2d 1173 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . the Florida Residential Landlord and Tenant Act (Chapter 73-330, Laws of Florida, creating Section 83.40 . . .

CARAVAN APARTMENTS, v. HOLMES, 18 Fla. Supp. 2d 15 (Duval Cty. Ct. 1986)

. . . The waiver rule was codified in the Florida Residential Landlord and Tenant Act, §§ 83.40 to 83.66, Florida . . .

BENNETT M. LIFTER, INC. d b a d b a v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, a, 482 So. 2d 479 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . . § 83.40, et seq., Fla.Stat. . . .

LOCKAMY v. BYRNE, 474 So. 2d 372 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . Additionally, after the passage of the Florida Residential Landlord and Tenant Act, Sections 83.40-66 . . .

PATERSON, v. C. DEEB, Co. W. Co., 472 So. 2d 1210 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . knowledge, has considered the legal impact of the Florida Residential Landlord and Tenant Act, sections 83.40 . . .

BENNETT M. LIFTER, INC. v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, 15 Fla. Supp. 2d 60 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1985)

. . . Section 83.40, et seq., Fla. Stat. . . .

SHARICK, v. SAGER, 8 Fla. Supp. 2d 122 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1984)

. . . provided for a special section of landlord/tenant law to govern cases of residential tenancies, F.S. 83.40 . . .

CUNNING v. GRIFFIN, 3 Fla. Supp. 2d 127 (Lake Cty. Ct. 1983)

. . . precluding summary eviction of Defendants pursuant to Chapter 83, Florida Statutes, Part II (Section 83.40 . . .

THOMPSON, v. ROCK SPRINGS MOBILE HOME PARK,, 413 So. 2d 1213 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . COWART, Judge, dissenting: Sections 83.40 et seq., Florida Statutes (1981), relate only to contractual . . .

COLON, v. n LARA, 389 So. 2d 1070 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . . § 83.40, Fla.Stat. (1975). . . .

RODEWAY INNS OF AMERICA, a a v. E. ALPAUGH P. W. Sr. E. L. ABS,, 390 So. 2d 370 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . Although the Florida Residential Landlord & Tenant Act (§§ 83.40 et seq., Fla. . . .

BEATY v. KIMERLING CORPORATION,, 47 Fla. Supp. 103 (Dade Cty. Cir. Ct. 1978)

. . . Enforcement of Florida Statute §83.40 et seq. as it pertains to any public lodging establishment required . . . any public lodging establishment that has operated or is operating in violation of Florida Statute §83.40 . . .

JONES v. STYLES, 46 Fla. Supp. 175 (Palm Beach Cty. Ct. 1977)

. . . The action was brought pursuant to Florida Statute §83.40, et seq., the “Florida Residential Landlord . . .

ROBINSON v. ROUNDTREE, 43 Fla. Supp. 141 (Palm Beach Cty. Ct. 1976)

. . . stricken from the original draft of the Florida Residential Landlord and Tenant Act, Florida Statute 83.40 . . .

WOLGIN v. ATLAS UNITED FINANCIAL CORPORATION S. BLUMENFELD v. ATLAS UNITED FINANCIAL CORPORATION, 397 F. Supp. 1003 (E.D. Pa. 1975)

. . . 109.40 2/15/74 2.083 104.20 2/28/74 2.083 99.00 3/15/74 2.083 93.80 3/31/74 2.083 88.60 4/15/74 2.083 83.40 . . .

UNITED STATES v. A. BOYD, 458 F.2d 1252 (6th Cir. 1972)

. . . that by paying for the 73.30 and 98.75 acres in those tracts they would get, respectively, 54.75 and 83.40 . . .

D. HODGSON, v. ROBERT HALL CLOTHES, INC. a a, 326 F. Supp. 1264 (D. Del. 1971)

. . . The same exhibits show that for the same period Robbins was responsible for $83.40 per hour of sales . . .

H. FERGUSON, v. J. CELEBREZZE,, 232 F. Supp. 952 (W.D.S.C. 1964)

. . . He made $9.24 at Lawnsdale and $83.40 at Victor-Monaghan. . . .

THE H. FRAZIER COMPANY, INC. v. THE UNITED STATES, 157 Ct. Cl. 536 (Ct. Cl. 1962)

. . . by all the analyses of samples mentioned in the evidence were as follows: 70.24, approximately- 75, 83.40 . . .

v., 36 T.C. 818 (T.C. 1961)

. . . Prudential policy, the record bears the inference that the stipulated amount paid on this contract includes $83.40 . . .

WILLIAM WALTER BLANTON, v. ONEIDA LANGLEY BLANTON, 154 Fla. 750 (Fla. 1944)

. . . the support of the child from November 28, 1942, and interest thereon at 6 per cent, and the sum of $83.40 . . .

SCOTT v. LATTIG, 227 U.S. 229 (U.S. 1913)

. . . Lattig, contains 54.75 acres, and the southern part, which is -opposite the lands of Green, contains 83.40 . . . that by paying for the 73.80 and 98.75 acres in those tracts they would get, respectively, 54.75 and 83.40 . . .